The Journal of Practical Medicine ›› 2022, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (19): 2451-2456.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006⁃5725.2022.19.014

• Clinical Research • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Comparison of therapeutic effects between endoscopic and surgical treatment of 2 ~ 5 cm gastric stromal tumor

 ZHANG JingwenCAO XinguangFU YangJIAO WenyunLIU LiangGUO Changqing.   

  1. Department of Gastrologythe First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou UniversityZhengzhou 450052China

  • Online:2022-10-10 Published:2022-10-10

Abstract:

Objective To evaluate the efficacy of endoscopic and surgical treatment of gastric stromal tumors with a diameter of 2 ~ 5 cmand to explore the clinical value of endoscopic resection of gastric stromal tumors of 2 ~ 5 cm in diameter. Methods A total of 225 cases of gastric stromal tumor with a diameter of 2 ~ 5 cm and confirmed by postoperative pathology in the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University from July 2012 to January 2021 were collected. They were divided into endoscopic groupn = 104and surgical groupn = 121. The general dataoperation timepostoperative hospital staypostoperative fasting timeintraoperative and postop⁃ erative complications and long ⁃ term follow ⁃ up tumor recurrence were compared and analyzed between the two groups. Results There was no significant difference between the two groups in agesextumor siteoperation timeand complete resection rateP > 0.05. There were statistically significant differences in tumor diametertumor growth patternclinical manifestationsrisk gradingand mitotic figures between the two groupsP < 0.05. The postoperative hospital stay and postoperative fasting time in the endoscopic group were shorter than those in the surgical groupand the differences were statistically significant. The incidence of complications in the endoscopic group6.7%was lower than that in the surgical group20.7%),showing statistical difference. With a median follow⁃up of 40 months1 case of recurrence in the endoscopic groupthe recurrence rate was 1.0%and 2 in the surgical groupthe recurrence rate was 1.7%were foundand there was no significant difference in the recur⁃ rence rate between the two groupsP > 0.05. Conclusion Endoscopic treatment of non⁃metastatic gastric stromal tumors with a diameter of 2⁃5cm is a safe and effective method. The prognosis of patients with endoscopic treatment is comparable to that with surgical treatment. It can be used as one of the main methods for the treatment of gastric stromal tumors.

Key words: gastric stromal tumor,  , endoscopic treatment,  , surgery,  , curative effect,  , safety