The Journal of Practical Medicine ›› 2026, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (16): 2883-2890.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2026.16.003
• Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Diseases Column • Previous Articles
Wei Sheng1, Haiqin Yang2, Zhentong Zhao1, Hao Deng1, Kun Fan1, Zhiqiang Zheng1, Long Sun3(
)
Received:2026-05-26
Revised:2026-06-30
Accepted:2026-07-01
Online:2026-08-20
Published:2026-09-20
Contact:
Long Sun
About author:Sheng Wei and Sun Long carried out the project design,data analysis and article writing. Zhao Zhentong, Deng Hao, Fan Kun and Zheng Zhiqiang were involved in the collection and revision of the materials. Sheng Wei and Yang Haiqin participated in the revision and finalization of the paper. All authors read and approved the final manuscript as submitted.
CLC Number:
Wei Sheng, Haiqin Yang, Zhentong Zhao, Hao Deng, Kun Fan, Zhiqiang Zheng, Long Sun. Effects of Qili Qiangxin capsule combined with cardiac rehabilitation on cardiac function and ventricular remodeling in post‑CABG patients with heart failure[J]. The Journal of Practical Medicine, 2026, 42(16): 2883-2890.
Tab.1
Comparison of general information of the four groups of patients"
| 指标 | 对照组(n = 38) | 康复组(n = 39) | 中药组(n = 39) | 联合组(n = 38) | F/χ²值 | P值 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 年龄/岁 | 62.41 ± 7.31 | 63.12 ± 6.91 | 62.79 ± 7.52 | 63.48 ± 7.11 | 0.181 | 0.909 |
| 男性/[例(%)] | 28(73.68) | 29(74.36) | 30(76.92) | 28(73.68) | 0.148 | 0.986 |
| BMI/(kg/m2) | 24.61 ± 2.81 | 24.92 ± 3.12 | 24.38 ± 2.91 | 25.01 ± 3.02 | 0.332 | 0.802 |
| 高血压/[例(%)] | 26(68.42) | 27(69.23) | 26(66.67) | 27(71.05) | 0.176 | 0.981 |
| 糖尿病/[例(%)] | 18(47.37) | 19(48.72) | 18(46.15) | 19(50.00) | 0.119 | 0.989 |
| NYHA分级/[例(%)] | 0.278 | 0.964 | ||||
| Ⅱ级 | 22(57.89) | 23(58.97) | 24(61.54) | 22(57.89) | ||
| Ⅲ级 | 16(42.11) | 16(41.03) | 15(38.46) | 16(42.11) | ||
| LVEF/% | 35.03 ± 3.61 | 34.89 ± 3.79 | 35.41 ± 3.52 | 34.99 ± 3.71 | 0.135 | 0.939 |
| NT-proBNP/(pg/mL) | 1 735.42 ± 456.31 | 1 699.79 ± 481.07 | 1 759.58 ± 467.14 | 1 720.03 ± 475.06 | 0.112 | 0.953 |
| 中医证候积分/分 | 24.61 ± 5.21 | 25.12 ± 5.41 | 24.79 ± 5.32 | 25.29 ± 5.51 | 0.156 | 0.925 |
Tab.2
Comparison of cardiac function indexes at different time points among four groups of patients"
| 指标 | 对照组(n = 38) | 康复组(n = 39) | 中药组(n = 39) | 联合组(n = 38) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NT-proBNP/(pg/mL) | ||||
| 治疗前 | 1 735.43 ± 456.28 | 1 699.81 ± 481.13 | 1 759.57 ± 467.09 | 1 720.04 ± 475.12 |
| 治疗结束 | 1 000.02 ± 289.75* | 735.53 ± 245.38* | 709.12 ± 240.06* | 522.31 ± 186.57*△▲■ |
| 治疗后1个月 | 746.22 ± 255.86* | 559.82 ± 208.19* | 533.13 ± 202.68* | 426.42 ± 160.09*△▲■ |
| 治疗后3个月 | 693.13 ± 245.28* | 506.43 ± 191.87* | 479.92 ± 186.59* | 346.63 ± 133.28*△▲■ |
| 治疗后6个月 | 666.44 ± 234.57* | 479.72 ± 181.39* | 453.33 ± 175.94* | 319.82 ± 122.74*△▲■ |
| LVEF/% | ||||
| 治疗前 | 35.22 ± 3.63 | 34.91 ± 3.79 | 35.39 ± 3.52 | 35.00 ± 3.71 |
| 治疗结束 | 41.33 ± 4.22* | 43.82 ± 4.53* | 44.22 ± 4.33* | 47.62 ± 4.82*△▲■ |
| 治疗后1个月 | 42.52 ± 4.31* | 44.63 ± 4.62* | 45.13 ± 4.51* | 48.92 ± 5.02*△▲■ |
| 治疗后3个月 | 43.03 ± 4.42* | 45.52 ± 4.72* | 46.02 ± 4.63* | 50.53 ± 5.12*△▲■ |
| 治疗后6个月 | 43.22 ± 4.33* | 45.82 ± 4.62* | 46.52 ± 4.52* | 51.02 ± 5.03*△▲■ |
Tab.3
Comparison of ventricular remodeling indicators at different time points among four groups of patients"
| 指标 | 对照组(n = 38) | 康复组(n = 39) | 中药组(n = 39) | 联合组(n = 38) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LA /mm | ||||
| 治疗前 | 45.61 ± 4.22 | 46.12 ± 4.55 | 45.80 ± 4.31 | 45.93 ± 4.44 |
| 治疗结束 | 43.82 ± 3.91* | 42.51 ± 4.04* | 42.32 ± 4.13* | 41.23 ± 3.83*△ |
| 治疗后1个月 | 43.53 ± 3.85* | 42.14 ± 3.93* | 41.91 ± 4.06* | 40.82 ± 3.74*△ |
| 治疗后3个月 | 43.42 ± 3.77* | 41.93 ± 3.89* | 41.73 ± 3.97* | 40.53 ± 3.69*△ |
| 治疗后6个月 | 43.31 ± 3.88* | 41.83 ± 3.94* | 41.62 ± 3.91* | 40.44 ± 3.63*△ |
| E/e' | ||||
| 治疗前 | 14.82 ± 2.63 | 15.13 ± 2.83 | 14.91 ± 2.74 | 15.02 ± 2.82 |
| 治疗结束 | 13.22 ± 2.31* | 12.51 ± 2.44* | 12.42 ± 2.53* | 11.81 ± 2.23*△ |
| 治疗后1个月 | 13.01 ± 2.35* | 12.33 ± 2.42* | 12.21 ± 2.45* | 11.52 ± 2.24*△ |
| 治疗后3个月 | 12.98 ± 2.27* | 12.22 ± 2.39* | 12.12 ± 2.36* | 11.43 ± 2.16*△ |
| 治疗后6个月 | 12.92 ± 2.25* | 12.11 ± 2.33* | 12.03 ± 2.31* | 11.34 ± 2.13*△ |
Tab.4
Comparison of 6MWD at different time points amongfour groups of patients"
| 时间点 | 对照组(n = 38) | 康复组(n = 39) | 中药组(n = 39) | 联合组(n = 38) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 治疗前 | 325.82 ± 56.27 | 332.43 ± 58.73 | 328.62 ± 57.19 | 330.13 ± 59.36 |
| 治疗结束 | 382.63 ± 62.38* | 428.52 ± 65.29*△ | 412.73 ± 63.75*△ | 468.33 ± 68.15*△▲■ |
| 治疗后1个月 | 396.43 ± 63.46* | 445.23 ± 66.75*△ | 428.62 ± 64.48*△ | 482.53 ± 69.28*△▲■ |
| 治疗后3个月 | 398.53 ± 63.78* | 448.93 ± 66.48*△ | 432.33 ± 64.77*△ | 485.73 ± 69.49*△▲■ |
| 治疗后6个月 | 401.83 ± 64.15* | 452.62 ± 67.26*△ | 435.82 ± 65.19*△ | 489.63 ± 70.04*△▲■ |
Tab.5
Comparison of TCM syndrome scores at different time points among four groups"
| 时间点 | 对照组(n = 38) | 康复组(n = 39) | 中药组(n = 39) | 联合组(n = 38) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 治疗前 | 24.62 ± 5.23 | 25.19 ± 5.48 | 24.81 ± 5.33 | 25.35 ± 5.56 |
| 治疗结束 | 16.83 ± 4.30* | 14.25 ± 3.85*△ | 13.58 ± 3.69*△ | 10.68 ± 3.25*△▲■ |
| 治疗后1个月 | 15.67 ± 4.19* | 12.88 ± 3.66*△ | 12.29 ± 3.50*△ | 9.39 ± 2.98*△▲■ |
| 治疗后3个月 | 15.26 ± 4.04* | 12.37 ± 3.60*△ | 11.88 ± 3.41*△ | 8.90 ± 2.87*△▲■ |
| 治疗后6个月 | 14.95 ± 3.98* | 11.98 ± 3.52*△ | 11.47 ± 3.33*△ | 8.60 ± 2.82*△▲■ |
Tab.6
Comparison of SF-36 scale scores at different time points among four groups"
| 维度 | 对照组(n = 38) | 康复组(n = 39) | 中药组(n = 39) | 联合组(n = 38) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PF | ||||
| 治疗前 | 52.61 ± 8.46 | 53.18 ± 8.69 | 52.87 ± 8.44 | 52.92 ± 8.62 |
| 治疗结束 | 61.53 ± 9.16* | 68.46 ± 9.81*△ | 67.26 ± 9.56*△ | 74.68 ± 10.28*△▲■ |
| 治疗后1个月 | 63.32 ± 9.39* | 70.51 ± 10.15*△ | 69.28 ± 9.91*△ | 77.21 ± 10.58*△▲■ |
| 治疗后3个月 | 63.82 ± 9.36* | 71.18 ± 10.20*△ | 70.15 ± 9.81*△ | 78.03 ± 10.69*△▲■ |
| 治疗后6个月 | 64.16 ± 9.46* | 71.64 ± 10.20*△ | 70.36 ± 9.92*△ | 78.71 ± 10.76*△▲■ |
| VT | ||||
| 治疗前 | 48.47 ± 7.57 | 49.23 ± 7.95 | 48.85 ± 7.70 | 49.05 ± 7.82 |
| 治疗结束 | 56.79 ± 8.40* | 63.56 ± 8.90*△ | 62.97 ± 8.72*△ | 70.21 ± 9.46*△▲■ |
| 治疗后1个月 | 58.32 ± 8.62* | 65.41 ± 9.12*△ | 64.67 ± 8.94*△ | 72.53 ± 9.65*△▲■ |
| 治疗后3个月 | 58.82 ± 8.65* | 65.92 ± 9.12*△ | 65.26 ± 8.91*△ | 73.11 ± 9.74*△▲■ |
| 治疗后6个月 | 59.16 ± 8.65* | 66.38 ± 9.18*△ | 65.64 ± 9.07*△ | 73.45 ± 9.84*△▲■ |
| SF | ||||
| 治疗前 | 55.32 ± 8.87 | 56.10 ± 9.22 | 55.82 ± 8.99 | 56.37 ± 9.16 |
| 治疗结束 | 63.66 ± 9.43* | 69.82 ± 10.23*△ | 69.08 ± 10.00*△ | 75.84 ± 10.81*△▲■ |
| 治疗后1个月 | 65.26 ± 9.73* | 71.49 ± 10.49*△ | 70.69 ± 10.22*△ | 77.95 ± 11.02*△▲■ |
| 治疗后3个月 | 65.82 ± 9.75* | 72.15 ± 10.48*△ | 71.26 ± 10.21*△ | 78.37 ± 11.05*△▲■ |
| 治疗后6个月 | 66.18 ± 9.86* | 72.51 ± 10.54*△ | 71.62 ± 10.37*△ | 78.84 ± 11.25*△▲■ |
| MH | ||||
| 治疗前 | 51.29 ± 8.10 | 52.10 ± 8.43 | 51.62 ± 8.17 | 52.32 ± 8.29 |
| 治疗结束 | 60.37 ± 9.03* | 66.87 ± 9.55*△ | 65.97 ± 9.33*△ | 73.26 ± 10.15*△▲■ |
| 治疗后1个月 | 62.08 ± 9.23* | 68.51 ± 9.79*△ | 67.59 ± 9.47*△ | 75.42 ± 10.22*△▲■ |
| 治疗后3个月 | 62.74 ± 9.23* | 69.10 ± 9.77*△ | 68.28 ± 9.51*△ | 75.95 ± 10.36*△▲■ |
| 治疗后6个月 | 63.00 ± 9.30* | 69.49 ± 9.87*△ | 68.56 ± 9.59*△ | 76.37 ± 10.58*△▲■ |
| [1] |
骆骏骞, 邓志文, 黎土娣, 等. 心力衰竭的治疗进展[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2022, 38(10): 1181-1186. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2022.10.002 .
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
国鹏飞, 高政, 颜文龙, 等. 非体外循环下冠状动脉旁路移植术后低心排血量综合征危险因素分析[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2022, 38(11): 1359-1364. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2022.11.011 .
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
马介旭, 陈钊, 朱家德, 等. 2025年中国心脏移植文献盘点[J]. 器官移植, 2026, 17(4): 563-573. doi: 10.12464/j.issn. 1674-7445.2026131 .
|
| [7] |
pmid: 40834370 |
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
中国康复医学会心血管病专业委员会. 慢性稳定性心力衰竭运动康复中国专家共识[J]. 中华心血管病杂志, 2014, 42(9): 714-720. doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3758.2014.09.002 .
|
| [10] |
国家心血管病中心, 《冠状动脉旁路移植术后心脏康复专家共识》编写委员会. 冠状动脉旁路移植术后心脏康复专家共识[J]. 中国循环杂志, 2020, 35(1): 4-15. doi:10.3969/j.issn. 1000-3614.2020.01.002 .
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
郑筱萸. 中药新药临床研究指导原则——试行[M]. 北京: 中国医药科技出版社, 2002: 77-85.
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
国家中医药管理局. 中医病证诊断疗效标准[M]. 南京: 南京大学出版社, 1994.
|
| [22] |
|
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||

