The Journal of Practical Medicine ›› 2026, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (1): 126-131.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2026.01.016
• Treatise: Mechanism and Practice • Previous Articles
Maijuan DONG1,Yufeng WANG2,Wei YUAN1,Jiale NIU1,Yaomin ZHU1(
)
Received:2025-09-23
Online:2026-01-10
Published:2026-01-14
Contact:
Yaomin ZHU
E-mail:yaomin_zhu@126.com
CLC Number:
Maijuan DONG,Yufeng WANG,Wei YUAN,Jiale NIU,Yaomin ZHU. Observation on the anesthetic effects of remimazolam combined with propofol in transvaginal ultrasound-guided oocyte retrieval[J]. The Journal of Practical Medicine, 2026, 42(1): 126-131.
Tab.2
Comparison of HR, MAP, and SpO2 at different time points among the three patient groups"
| 指标 | 组别 | 例数 | T0 | T1 | T2 | T3 | T4 | T5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR/(次/min) | P组 | 48 | 80.4 ± 9.6 | 73.3 ± 8.9 | 80.5 ± 7.7 | 78.5 ± 8.2 | 79.1 ± 7.8 | 80.1 ± 9.2 |
| PR1组 | 49 | 80.8 ± 9.5 | 77.2 ± 8.7a | 79.6 ± 8.3b | 75.1 ± 7.5a | 78.8 ± 8.2 | 80.5 ± 8.9 | |
| PR2组 | 48 | 81.2 ± 9.1 | 77.9 ± 8.5a | 75.3±8.6a | 74.2 ± 7.7a | 78.5 ± 8.1 | 80.4 ± 8.9 | |
| F值 | 0.778 | 6.926 | 7.813 | 5.812 | 1.186 | 0.980 | ||
| P值 | 0.541 | < 0.01 | < 0.01 | < 0.01 | 0.309 | 0.416 | ||
| MAP/mmHg | P组 | 48 | 91.2 ± 7.8 | 82.2 ± 8.6 | 89.1 ± 9.2 | 86.9 ± 6.9 | 83.5 ± 6.7 | 83.5 ± 7.1 |
| PR1组 | 49 | 90.3 ± 8.1 | 88.4 ± 8.5a | 88.9 ± 8.9b | 84.2 ± 7.1a | 83.4 ± 6.9 | 84.2 ± 6.9 | |
| PR2组 | 48 | 90.9 ± 7.9 | 88.9 ± 8.2a | 86.2 ± 8.5a | 83.9 ± 7.3a | 83.2 ± 7.1 | 83.6 ± 6.8 | |
| F值 | 1.047 | 6.234 | 6.898 | 5.278 | 1.286 | 1.155 | ||
| P值 | 0.354 | < 0.01 | < 0.01 | < 0.01 | 0.280 | 0.319 | ||
| SpO2/% | P组 | 48 | 99.8 ± 0.9 | 99.2 ± 0.9 | 99.4 ± 0.7 | 99.4 ± 0.8 | 99.8 ± 0.5 | 99.9 ± 0.4 |
| PR1组 | 49 | 99.9 ± 0.9 | 99.3 ± 0.8 | 99.2 ± 0.6 | 99.7 ± 0.5 | 99.9 ± 0.5 | 99.8 ± 0.5 | |
| PR2组 | 48 | 99.8 ± 1.0 | 99.5 ± 0.6 | 99.7 ± 0.8 | 99.2 ± 1.0 | 99.7 ± 0.6 | 99.8 ± 0.4 | |
| F值 | 1.144 | 0.769 | 0.239 | 0.715 | 0.457 | 1.186 | ||
| P值 | 0.322 | 0.466 | 0.788 | 0.491 | 0.637 | 0.309 |
Tab.3
Comparison of intraoperative propofol dosage, sedation success rate, MOAA/S score at 1 minute postoperatively, and duration of PADSS score ≥ 9 points"
| 指标 | 例数 | 丙泊酚用量/mg | 镇静成功率/[例(%)] | 术后1 min MOAA/S评分/分 | PADSS评分≥ 9分时间 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| P组 | 48 | 166.2 ± 10.3 | 8(16.7) | 2.8 ± 0.8 | 19.7 ± 5.5 |
| PR1组 | 49 | 135.6 ± 9.9ab | 25(51.0)ab | 3.6 ± 0.6 a | 13.1 ± 4.3a |
| PR2组 | 48 | 115.8 ± 9.5a | 37(77.1)a | 3.5 ± 0.6 a | 12.8 ± 3.9a |
| χ2/F值 | 15.965 | 35.307 | 6.748 | 11.488 | |
| P值 | < 0.01 | < 0.01 | < 0.01 | < 0.01 |
| [1] |
GBD 2013 Mortality and Causes of Death Collaborators. Global, regional, and national age-sex specific all-cause and cause-specific mortality for 240 causes of death, 1990-2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013 [J]. Lancet (London, England), 2015, 385(9963): 117-171. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61682-2 .
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61682-2 |
| [2] |
毕淑雯, 尹静涵, 张浩原, 等. 浅析辅助生殖技术的应用与管理 [J]. 中华生殖与避孕杂志, 2025, 45(3): 319-324. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn101441-20241003-00362 .
doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn101441-20241003-00362 |
| [3] |
WU Q, XU F, WANG J, et al. Comparison of Remimazolam-Flumazenil versus Propofol for Recovery from General Anesthesia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis [J]. J Clin Med, 2023, 12(23): 7316. doi: 10.3390/jcm12237316 .
doi: 10.3390/jcm12237316 |
| [4] |
REVES J G, CORSSEN G, HOLCOMB C. Comparison of two benzodiazepines for anaesthesia induction: midazolam and diazepam [J]. Can Anaesth Soc J, 1978, 25(3): 211-214. doi: 10.1007/BF03004881 .
doi: 10.1007/BF03004881 |
| [5] |
PRIOR F N. Anaesthetics [J]. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed), 1984, 288(6432): 1750-1753. doi: 10.1136/bmj.288.6432.1750 .
doi: 10.1136/bmj.288.6432.1750 |
| [6] |
LU L, CHEN B, ZHAO X, et al. Comparison of Remimazolam and Propofol in Recovery of Elderly Outpatients Undergoing Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: A Randomized, Non-Inferiority Trial [J]. Drug Design Develop Ther, 2024, 18: 4307-4318. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S474275 .
doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S474275 |
| [7] |
YAN L, WANG X, CHEN Z, et al. Safety and efficacy of remimazolam tosilate combined with low-dose fentanyl for procedural sedation in obese patients undergoing gastroscopy: study protocol for a single-centre, double-blind, randomised controlled trial [J]. BMJ Open, 2023, 13(12): e079095. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-079095 .
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-079095 |
| [8] |
MALDONADOROSAS I, ANAGNOSTOPOULOU C, SINGH N, et al. Optimizing embryological aspects of oocyte retrieval, oocyte denudation, and embryo loading for transfer [J]. Panminerva Med, 2022, 64(2): 156-170. doi: 10.23736/S0031-0808. 22. 04675-4 .
doi: 10.23736/S0031-0808. 22. 04675-4 |
| [9] |
FREDERIKSEN Y, MEHLSEN M Y, MATTHIESEN S M, et al. Predictors of pain during oocyte retrieval [J]. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol, 2017, 38(1): 21-29. doi: 10.1080/0167482X.2016.1235558
doi: 10.1080/0167482X.2016.1235558 |
| [10] |
ÖZALTIN S, KUMBASAR S, SAVAN K. Evaluation of complications developing during and after transvaginal ultrasound-guided oocyte retrieval [J]. Ginekol Pol, 2018, 89(1): 1-6. doi: 10.5603/GP.a2018.0001 .
doi: 10.5603/GP.a2018.0001 |
| [11] |
VELEZ I C, ARNOLD C, JACOBSON C C, et al. Effects of repeated transvaginal aspiration of immature follicles on mare health and ovarian status [J]. Equine Vet J Suppl, 2012, 43: 78-83. doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.2012.00606.x .
doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.2012.00606.x |
| [12] |
GILBOA D, SEIDMAN L, KIMIAGAROV P, et al. Why do women choose to undergo oocyte aspiration without sedation or analgesia? [J]. Reprod Fertil, 2021, 2(2): 89-94. doi: 10.1530/RAF-20-0064 .
doi: 10.1530/RAF-20-0064 |
| [13] |
D'ANGELO A, PANAYOTIDIS C, AMSO N, et al. Recommendations for good practice in ultrasound: oocyte pick up(†) [J]. Hum Reprod Open, 2019, 2019(4): hoz025. doi: 10.1093/hropen/hoz025 .
doi: 10.1093/hropen/hoz025 |
| [14] |
CASCELLA M, BIMONTE S, DI NAPOLI R. Delayed Emergence from Anesthesia: What We Know and How We Act [J]. Local Reg Anesth, 2020, 13:195-206. doi: 10.2147/LRA.S230728 .
doi: 10.2147/LRA.S230728 |
| [15] |
PETER J U, DIEUDONNÉ P, ZOLK O. Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Side Effects of Midazolam: A Review and Case Example [J]. Pharmaceuticals (Basel), 2024, 17(4): 195-206. doi: 10.2147/LRA.S230728 .
doi: 10.2147/LRA.S230728 |
| [16] |
TANG Y, YANG X, YU Y, et al. Remimazolam versus traditional sedatives for procedural sedation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of efficacy and safety outcomes [J]. Minerva Anestesiol, 2022, 88(11): 939-949. doi: 10.23736/S0375-9393. 22. 16631-9 .
doi: 10.23736/S0375-9393. 22. 16631-9 |
| [17] |
JHUANG B J, YEH B H, HUANG Y T, et al. Efficacy and Safety of Remimazolam for Procedural Sedation: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials With Trial Sequential Analysis [J]. Front Med, 2021, 8: 641866. doi: 10.3389/fmed. 2021. 641866 .
doi: 10.3389/fmed. 2021. 641866 |
| [18] |
ZHU X, WANG H, YUAN S, et al. Efficacy and Safety of Remimazolam in Endoscopic Sedation-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis [J]. Front Med, 2021, 8: 655042. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.655042 .
doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.655042 |
| [19] |
苯磺酸瑞马唑仑临床应用指导意见专家组. 苯磺酸瑞马唑仑临床应用指导意见 [J]. 中华麻醉学杂志, 2023, 43(8): 904-911. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn131073.20230206.00802 .
doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn131073.20230206.00802 |
| [20] |
王卉, 陈春. 瑞马唑仑复合丙泊酚用于无痛人工流产手术的镇静效果 [J]. 国际麻醉学与复苏杂志, 2024, 45(5): 514-517. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn321761-20230905-01036 .
doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn321761-20230905-01036 |
| [21] |
康佳敏, 元元, 于泳浩, 等. 瑞马唑仑临床研究进展 [J]. 中华麻醉学杂志, 2022, 42(8): 1020-1024. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn131073.20220321.00828 .
doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn131073.20220321.00828 |
| [22] |
彭蕊, 张建友, 王倩, 等. 瑞马唑仑复合不同阿片类药物在无痛胃镜检查中的应用效果 [J]. 国际麻醉学与复苏杂志, 2023, 44(8): 838-842. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn321761-20230329-00860 .
doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn321761-20230329-00860 |
| [23] |
汤黎黎, 孙月, 刘学胜, 等. 不同性别对日间关节镜手术患者瑞马唑仑使用剂量及术后恢复质量的影响 [J]. 实用医学杂志, 2024, 40(8): 1063-1068. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725. 2024.08.007 .
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725. 2024.08.007 |
| [24] |
ZHANG X, LI S, LIU J. Efficacy and safety of remimazolam besylate versus propofol during hysteroscopy: single-centre randomized controlled trial [J]. BMC Anesthesiol, 2021, 21(1): 156. doi: 10.1186/s12871-021-01373-y .
doi: 10.1186/s12871-021-01373-y |
| [25] |
WANG X, HU X, BAI N, et al. Safety and efficacy of remimazolam besylate in patients undergoing colonoscopy: A multicentre, single-blind, randomized, controlled, phase Ⅲ trial [J]. Front Pharmacol, 2022, 13: 900723. doi: 10.3389/fphar. 2022. 900723 .
doi: 10.3389/fphar. 2022. 900723 |
| [26] |
陈红芽, 王惠军, 王月, 等. 瑞马唑仑与丙泊酚对老年眼底日间手术患者全麻恢复质量的影响 [J]. 实用医学杂志, 2024, 40(8): 1052-1057. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725. 2024. 08.005 .
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725. 2024. 08.005 |
| [27] |
MATSUI Y, TAKAZAWA T. Comment on: "Treatment-resistant hiccups during general anesthesia possibly caused by remimazolam: a case report"-a reply [J]. JA Clin Rep, 2024, 10(1): 56. doi: 10.1186/s40981-024-00738-9 .
doi: 10.1186/s40981-024-00738-9 |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||

