The Journal of Practical Medicine ›› 2024, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (8): 1063-1068.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2024.08.007
• Feature Reports:day surgery anesthesia • Previous Articles Next Articles
Lili TANG1,Yue SUN1,Xuesheng LIU1,Yao. LU1,2()
Received:
2023-10-11
Online:
2024-04-25
Published:
2024-04-19
Contact:
Yao. LU
E-mail:luyao@ahmu.edu.cn
CLC Number:
Lili TANG,Yue SUN,Xuesheng LIU,Yao. LU. The gender⁃specific effects on doses of remimazolam and quality of postoperative recovery in patients undergoing ambulatory arthroscopic surgery[J]. The Journal of Practical Medicine, 2024, 40(8): 1063-1068.
Tab.1
Patient Characteristics parameters in two groups"
指标 | M组(n = 25) | F组(n = 25) | t/χ2值 | P 值 |
---|---|---|---|---|
43.3 ± 11.1 | 45.2 ± 11.3 | -0.631 | 0.87 | |
BMI(x ± s,kg/m2) | 24.7 ± 2.3 | 24.9 ± 2.6 | -0.228 | 0.473 |
ASA分级(例) | 2.083 | 0.490 | ||
Ⅰ级 | 0 | 2 | ||
Ⅱ级 | 25 | 23 | ||
手术时间(x ± s,min) | 47.6 ± 20.1 | 47.7 ± 16.0 | -0.031 | 0.168 |
麻醉时间(x ± s,min) | 79.0 ± 20.6 | 79.2 ± 17.3 | -0.037 | 0.352 |
舒芬太尼(x ± s | 36.5 ± 5.2 | 33.2 ± 3.7 | 2.559 | 0.104 |
瑞芬太尼(x ± s | 743.8 ± 244.2 | 724.1 ± 240.0 | 0.288 | 0.692 |
输注液体(x ± s | 424.0 ± 207.2 | 422.0 ± 167.8 | 0.038 | 0.180 |
Tab.2
Comparison of perioperative time and remimazolam dosages in two groups"
指标 | M组(n = 25) | F组(n = 25) | t/Z值 | P值 |
---|---|---|---|---|
失去意识时间(x ± s | 76.7 ± 19.5 | 73.1 ± 15.6 | 0.726 | 0.262 |
失去意识BIS[M(P25,P75)] | 81(79, 85) | 83(81, 84) | -0.428 | 0.668 |
BIS60的时间(x ± s | 132.1 ± 37.4 | 148.8 ± 49.8 | -1.340 | 0.138 |
睁眼时间[M(P25,P75),min] | 12(8,18) | 10(8,14) | -1.119 | 0.263 |
拔管时间[M(P25,P75),min] | 16(13,27) | 17(12,20) | -0.565 | 0.572 |
定向力恢复时间[M(P25,P75),min] | 15(12, 27) | 17(10, 20) | -0.895 | 0.371 |
失去意识剂量[M(P25,P75),mg/kg] | 0.14(0.13,0.15) | 0.14(0.12,0.16) | -0.223 | 0.823 |
维持剂量[M(P25,P75),mg/(kg·h)] | 0.80(0.60,0.96) | 0.90(0.79,1.12) | -1.796 | 0.073 |
Tab.3
Comparison of Quality of Recovery?15 scores, AIS scores, and domains on POD 1 in two groups"
指标 | M组(n = 25) | F组(n = 25) | Z/t值 | P值 |
---|---|---|---|---|
QoR-15总分(x ± s) | 126.1 | 122.6 | 2.330 | 0.024 |
QoR-15维度 | ||||
疼痛 | 18(17,19) | 18(17,18) | -0.354 | 0.723 |
生理舒适度 | 47(45,48) | 45(45,47) | -2.094 | 0.036 |
生理独立性 | 9(8,10) | 8(7,9) | -1.355 | 0.176 |
心理支持 | 17(13,17) | 16(12,17) | -1.061 | 0.289 |
情感 | 36(36,38) | 36(35,38) | -0.529 | 0.597 |
AIS 基线评分 | 3(1,5) | 4(2,6) | -0.313 | 0.755 |
术后第1天AIS评分 | 4(3,6) | 6(4,7) | -1.122 | 0.262 |
AIS术后第1天各维度评分 | ||||
入睡时间 | 0(0,1) | 0(0,1) | -0.513 | 0.608 |
夜间觉醒 | 1(1,2) | 1(0,1) | -0.759 | 0.448 |
比期望时间早醒 | 0(0,1) | 1(0,1) | -2.231 | 0.026 |
总睡眠时间 | 1(0,1) | 1(0,1) | -0.590 | 0.555 |
总睡眠质量 | 1(1,1) | 1(0,1) | -0.115 | 0.909 |
白天情绪 | 0(0,1) | 0(0,1) | -0.583 | 0.560 |
白天身体功能 | 1(0,1) | 1(0,1) | -0.437 | 0.662 |
白天思睡 | 1(0,1) | 1(0,1) | -0.868 | 0.386 |
Tab.4
Comparison of mean arterial pressure(MAP) and heart rate(HR) at different time points between the two groups"
指标 | 组别 | 例数 | T0 | T1 | T2 | T3 | T4 | T5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MAP(mmHg) | M组 | 25 | 91.68 ± 12.91 | 74.52 ± 6.73* | 91.40 ± 13.37 | 81.44 ± 9.98△ | 91.48 ± 11.67▲ | 87.12 ± 23.56 |
F组 | 25 | 94.64 ± 15.55 | 73.60 ± 13.83* | 92.96 ± 15.09 | 78.88 ± 12.76△ | 90.64 ± 12.93▲ | 92.32 ± 15.20 | |
HR(次/min) | M组 | 25 | 71.36 ± 10.93 | 70.92 ± 10.20 | 71.84 ± 11.43 | 77.00 ± 10.26 | 71.00 ± 11.46▲ | 80.20 ± 9.81# |
F组 | 25 | 75.12 ± 8.98 | 70.60 ± 11.61* | 76.04 ± 10.90 | 79.56 ± 10.99 | 76.92 ± 13.65▲ | 83.76 ± 12.72# |
1 |
GEBHARDT V, ZAWIERUCHA V, SCHOFFSKI O, et al. Spinal anaesthesia with chloroprocaine 1% versus total intravenous anaesthesia for outpatient knee arthroscopy: A randomised controlled trial [J]. Eur J Anaesthesiol, 2018, 35(10): 774-781. doi:10.1097/eja.0000000000000794
doi: 10.1097/eja.0000000000000794 |
2 | 肖文峰,高曙光. 关节镜日间手术临床实践专家共识 [J]. 中国内镜杂志, 2020, 26(6):1-7. |
3 |
覃兆军,马广胜,向春艳,等. 基于加速康复外科膝关节镜日间手术模式与传统住院模式的对比研究[J]. 安徽医药, 2023,27(4):711-715. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1009-6469.2023.04.017
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6469.2023.04.017 |
4 |
CHOI J Y, LEE H S, KIM J Y, et al. Comparison of remimazolam-based and propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia on postoperative quality of recovery: A randomized non-inferiority trial [J]. J Clin Anesth, 2022, 82:110955. doi:10.1016/j.jclinane.2022.110955
doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2022.110955 |
5 |
STÖHR T, COLIN P J, OSSIG J, et al. Pharmacokinetic properties of remimazolam in subjects with hepatic or renal impairment [J]. Br J Anaesth, 2021, 127(3): 415-423. doi:10.1016/j.bja.2021.05.027
doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2021.05.027 |
6 |
YOSHIDA A, KURATA S, KIDA K, et al. Anesthetic management for the sleep-awake-sleep technique of awake craniotomy using a novel benzodiazepine remimazolam and its antagonist flumazenil [J]. JA Clin Rep, 2021, 7(1): 14. doi:10.1186/s40981-021-00417-z
doi: 10.1186/s40981-021-00417-z |
7 |
DONG S A, GUO Y, LIU S S, et al. A randomized, controlled clinical trial comparing remimazolam to propofol when combined with alfentanil for sedation during ERCP procedures [J]. J Clin Anesth, 2023, 86:111077. doi:10.1016/j.jclinane.2023.111077
doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2023.111077 |
8 |
顾学鹏,周娜,张乃夫,等. 瑞马唑仑复合阿芬太尼在日间手术麻醉中安全性和有效性的研究 [J]. 河北医科大学学报, 2022, 43(3): 331-334. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1007-3205.2022.03.017
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-3205.2022.03.017 |
9 |
陈海波,张毓洁, 蒋柯. 瑞马唑仑复合舒芬太尼在无痛超声胃镜检查中的安全性 [J]. 临床麻醉学杂志, 2023, 39(8): 838-841. doi:10.12089/jca.2023.08.010
doi: 10.12089/jca.2023.08.010 |
10 |
旷光华,徐伟,夏瑞. 瑞马唑仑的应用现状及其研究进展[J].实用医学杂志, 2022,38(13):1695-1700. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2022.13.025
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2022.13.025 |
11 |
杜海伟,李丽伟. 甲苯磺酸瑞马唑仑对妇科日间手术患者术后苏醒质量及谵妄影响研究 [J]. 河南外科学杂志, 2022, 28(4): 63-65. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1007-8991.2022.4.hnwkxzz202204019
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-8991.2022.4.hnwkxzz202204019 |
12 |
蔡璐,陈公锦, 王昌盛. 甲苯磺酸瑞马唑仑联合瑞芬太尼对无痛胃镜置入反应的药效学研究及其性别差异 [J]. 现代实用医学, 2022, 34(6): 752-754. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-0800.2022.06.020
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-0800.2022.06.020 |
13 |
DOI M, MORITA K, TAKEDA J, et al. Efficacy and safety of remimazolam versus propofol for general anesthesia: a multicenter, single-blind, randomized, parallel-group, phase IIb/III trial [J]. J Anesth, 2020, 34(4): 543-553. doi:10.1007/s00540-020-02788-6
doi: 10.1007/s00540-020-02788-6 |
14 |
MYLES P S, MYLES D B. An Updated Minimal Clinically Important Difference for the QoR-15 Scale [J]. Anesthesiology, 2021, 135(5): 934-935. doi:10.1097/aln.0000000000003977
doi: 10.1097/aln.0000000000003977 |
15 | 天天,嵇武, 刘玉秀,等. 膝关节镜日间手术的实践分析 [J]. 医学研究生学报, 2018, 31(3): 309-312. |
16 |
杨婉,孔令锁,陈兰仁. 甲苯磺酸瑞马唑仑在老年患者无痛胃肠镜检查的应用[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2021,37(20):2665-2669. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2021.20.019
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2021.20.019 |
17 | 李璐,周俊飞, 袁畅,等. 年龄及性别因素对瑞马唑仑用于无痛胃镜检查有效剂量的影响 [J]. 世界临床药物, 2023, 44(7):751-756. |
18 |
BRAITHWAITE H E, PAYNE T, DUCE N, et al. Impact of female sex on anaesthetic awareness, depth, and emergence: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. Br J Anaesth, 2023, 131(3): 510-522. doi:10.1016/j.bja.2023.06.042
doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2023.06.042 |
19 |
STARK P A, MYLES P S, BURKE J A. Development and psychometric evaluation of a postoperative quality of recovery score the QoR-15 [J]. Anesthesiology, 2013, 118(6): 1332-1340. doi:10.1097/aln.0b013e318289b84b
doi: 10.1097/aln.0b013e318289b84b |
20 | 欧阳文,李天佐, 周星光. 日间手术麻醉专家共识 [J]. 临床麻醉学杂志, 2016, 32(10): 1017-1022. |
21 |
HARI Y, SATOMI S, MURAKAMI C, et al. Remimazolam decreased the incidence of early postoperative nausea and vomiting compared to desflurane after laparoscopic gynecological surgery [J]. J Anesth, 2022, 36(2): 265-269. doi:10.1007/s00540-022-03041-y
doi: 10.1007/s00540-022-03041-y |
22 |
MAO Y, GUO J, YUAN J, et al. Quality of Recovery After General Anesthesia with Remimazolam in Patients' Undergoing Urologic Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Remimazolam with Propofol [J]. Drug Des Devel Ther, 2022, 16:1199-1209. doi:10.2147/dddt.s359496
doi: 10.2147/dddt.s359496 |
23 |
NING M, SUN Y, ZHANG H, et al. Effects of different anesthetic depth during propofol anesthesia on postoperative recovery 24 h after arthroscopic day surgery: A randomized clinical trial [J]. Front Pharmacol, 2022, 13:972793. doi:10.3389/fphar.2022.972793
doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.972793 |
24 |
SOLDATOS C R, DIKEOS D G, PAPARRIGOPOULOS T J. The diagnostic validity of the Athens Insomnia Scale [J]. J Psychosom Res, 2003, 55(3): 263-267. doi:10.1016/s0022-3999(02)00604-9
doi: 10.1016/s0022-3999(02)00604-9 |
25 |
DE MENDONÇA F M R, DE MENDONÇA G P R R, SOUZA L C, et al. Benzodiazepines and Sleep Architecture: A Systematic Review [J]. CNS Neurol Disord Drug Targets, 2023, 22(2): 172-179. doi:10.2174/1871527320666210618103344
doi: 10.2174/1871527320666210618103344 |
26 |
张颖,孔源,朱冰青,等. 超声引导下前锯肌平面阻滞联合音乐疗法对日间乳腺手术患者镇痛效果及焦虑情绪的影响[J]. 重庆医学, 2023,52(10):1520-1524. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-8348.2023.10.016
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-8348.2023.10.016 |
[1] | Junjie ZHANG,Xiaochun YANG,Zhuoyi LIU,Ruoqiu WU,Ping LI,Qulian GUO,E. WANG. A randomized controlled study of remimazolam tosilate under bispectral index and bypass EtCO2 monitoring in daytime hysteroscopic surgery [J]. The Journal of Practical Medicine, 2024, 40(8): 1047-1051. |
[2] | Hongya CHEN,Huijun WANG,Yue WANG,Shaofei SU,Guyan. WANG. Remimazolam versus propofol on quality of recovery after general anesthesia in elders undergoing ocular fundus daytime surgery [J]. The Journal of Practical Medicine, 2024, 40(8): 1052-1057. |
[3] | Chunhua HU,Guyan WANG,Huijun WANG,Chunhua XI,Congya ZHANG,Lili. WU. Effect of remimazolam combined with desflurane and flumazenil antagonism for anesthesia during ophthalmic day surgery [J]. The Journal of Practical Medicine, 2024, 40(4): 537-542. |
[4] | Jiaman LIN,Yongxin YE,Shanghang LI,Yunfei. CHAI. Effect of remifentanil fast⁃track anesthesia on enhancing postoperative recovery quality in patients undergoing cardiac valve surgery: a prospective randomized controlled trial [J]. The Journal of Practical Medicine, 2024, 40(14): 1988-1994. |
[5] |
WANG Jing , GAO Yuru, CAI Qianwei, ZHUA Weiwei, HUANG Xiao, SUN Dakang, WANG Xiaozhi, WANG Tao..
Remimazolam alleviates LPS ⁃ induced acute lung injury by regulating macrophage polarization [J]. The Journal of Practical Medicine, 2023, 39(9): 1092-1097. |
[6] |
JIN Bei, CHENG Cheng, ZHUANG Hongjie, OUYANG Xiaojun, LI Jie, CHEN Lizhi, JIANG Xiaoyun..
The clinicopathological features and long ⁃ term prognosis inlupus nephritis children of different gender [J]. The Journal of Practical Medicine, 2023, 39(8): 997-1001. |
[7] |
ZHANG Rui, WANG Zhitao, LIU Dejun, MA Heng.
Effect of different doses of dexmedetomidine on the loss of consciousness ED95 and stress response in patients caused by remimazolam [J]. The Journal of Practical Medicine, 2023, 39(4): 476-480. |
[8] | Xue BAI,Hao LUO,Yayin HUANG,Junxiang HUANG,Yonghong TAN,Xingrong SONG,Bilian. LI. Remimazolam versus Propofol for children undergoing painless gastroscopy [J]. The Journal of Practical Medicine, 2023, 39(19): 2529-2533. |
[9] |
CHEN Nanjin, LIANG Wenhua, YING Tingting, CHEN Lingyang, JIANG Yongpo..
Determination of the median effective dose of alfentanil combined with propofol to inhibit the reaction of double⁃lumen bronchial intubation by sequential method [J]. The Journal of Practical Medicine, 2022, 38(7): 889-892. |
[10] |
YIN Guojiang, LI Yue, RUAN Jianhui, LI Kun, GAN Cuosheng, LI Bixi, SONG Xiaoyang..
Application of ultrasound⁃guided paravertebral block inrobot⁃assisted nephrectomy [J]. The Journal of Practical Medicine, 2022, 38(2): 196-200. |
[11] | KUANG Guanghua, XU Wei, XIA Rui.. Clinical application status and research progress of remazolam [J]. The Journal of Practical Medicine, 2022, 38(13): 1695-1700. |
[12] |
YANG Huasheng, DENG Gang, XU Lishu. .
R574.4 Application of 3D high⁃resolution anorectal manometry in functional constipation caused by defecation dis⁃ orders [J]. The Journal of Practical Medicine, 2021, 37(11): 1456-1460. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||