The Journal of Practical Medicine ›› 2025, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (21): 3455-3461.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2025.21.023
• Modernization of Traditional Chinese Medicine • Previous Articles
Xin ZHOU1,Bin YUE2,Yuedong. LIU3(
)
Received:2025-05-08
Online:2025-11-10
Published:2025-11-13
Contact:
Yuedong. LIU
E-mail:13998359001@126.com
CLC Number:
Xin ZHOU,Bin YUE,Yuedong. LIU. Analyzing the effects of the combination of ginseng⁃lingbaijusan plus reduction and acupuncture on patients with ulcerative colitis by the theory of “lung⁃intestinal axis”[J]. The Journal of Practical Medicine, 2025, 41(21): 3455-3461.
Tab.2
Comparison of two groups of TCM syndrome points before and after treatment"
| 组别 | 例数 | 食欲不振/分 | 黏液脓血便/分 | 腹泻便溏/分 | 食少乏力/分 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 治疗前 | 治疗后 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | ||
| 对照组 | 75 | 2.22 ± 0.52 | 1.37 ± 0.51? | 3.47 ± 0.71 | 2.60 ± 0.72? | 4.47 ± 1.01 | 2.44 ± 0.42? | 2.17 ± 0.60 | 1.70 ± 0.80? |
| 联合组 | 75 | 2.21 ± 0.52 | 1.11 ± 0.20? | 3.30 ± 0.62 | 1.82 ± 0.53? | 4.44 ± 1.07 | 2.30 ± 0.35? | 2.14 ± 0.52 | 1.13 ± 0.71? |
| t值 | 0.118 | 3.153 | 1.562 | 7.556 | 0.177 | 2.218 | 0.327 | 4.615 | |
| P值 | 0.906 | 0.002 | 0.120 | < 0.001 | 0.860 | 0.028 | 0.744 | < 0.001 | |
Tab.3
Comparison of intestinal mucosal barrier index between the two groups before and after treatment"
| 组别 | 例数 | PCT/(μg/L) | ET/(EU/mL) | DAO/(U/mL) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 治疗前 | 治疗后 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | ||
| 对照组 | 75 | 5.20 ± 0.70 | 3.66 ± 0.61* | 0.30 ± 0.11 | 0.20 ± 0.05* | 7.32 ± 1.01 | 6.40 ± 0.71* |
| 联合组 | 75 | 5.17 ± 0.66 | 2.25 ± 0.55* | 0.28 ± 0.09 | 0.15 ± 0.04* | 7.36 ± 0.95 | 5.22 ± 0.60* |
| t值 | 0.270 | 14.867 | 1.219 | 6.763 | 0.250 | 10.993 | |
| P值 | 0.788 | < 0.001 | 0.225 | < 0.001 | 0.803 | < 0.001 | |
Tab.4
Comparison of two groups of inflammatory factors before and after treatment"
| 组别 | 例数 | IL-23/(ng/L) | IL-1β/(ng/L) | TGF-β1/(ng/mL) | IL-6/(pg/mL) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 治疗前 | 治疗后 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | ||
| 对照组 | 75 | 22.28 ± 4.70 | 18.30 ± 4.07* | 63.33 ± 7.05 | 36.42 ± 6.10* | 12.20 ± 2.34 | 5.10 ± 0.68 | 27.80 ± 4.22 | 12.39 ± 2.20 |
| 联合组 | 75 | 22.20 ± 4.56 | 14.11 ± 4.33* | 63.21 ± 6.95 | 34.37 ± 5.28* | 12.50 ± 2.10 | 6.70 ± 1.12 | 27.46 ± 4.13 | 15.70 ± 2.82 |
| t值 | 0.106 | 6.106 | 0.101 | 2.201 | 0.675 | 8.635 | 0.407 | 6.544 | |
| P值 | 0.916 | < 0.001 | 0.920 | 0.029 | 0.502 | < 0.001 | 0.685 | < 0.001 | |
Tab.5
Comparison of two groups of nutritional indexes before and after treatment"
| 组别 | 例数 | ALB/(g/L) | Hb(g/L) | PAB(mg/L) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 治疗前 | 治疗后 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | ||
| 对照组 | 75 | 38.10 ± 5.23 | 37.60 ± 6.01* | 97.21 ± 22.10 | 100.30 ± 23.82* | 175.90 ± 11.77 | 181.33 ± 16.42* |
| 联合组 | 75 | 38.03 ± 5.20 | 39.70 ± 4.80* | 97.58 ± 22.05 | 111.04 ± 28.50* | 176.13 ± 11.70 | 186.75 ± 9.80* |
| t值 | 0.082 | 2.365 | 0.103 | 2.504 | 0.120 | 2.456 | |
| P值 | 0.935 | 0.019 | 0.918 | 0.013 | 0.905 | 0.015 | |
Tab.6
Comparison of changes in IBDQ, DAI, and Baron scores before and after treatment in two groups"
| 组别 | 例数 | IBDQ评分/分 | DAI评分/分 | Baron评分/分 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 治疗前 | 治疗后 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | ||
| 对照组 | 75 | 130.28 ± 10.50 | 44.56 ± 14.90* | 3.25 ± 0.69 | 1.06 ± 0.27* | 6.39 ± 1.05 | 4.40 ± 0.82* |
| 联合组 | 75 | 129.96 ± 10.41 | 30.23 ± 13.53* | 3.36 ± 0.71 | 0.70 ± 0.22* | 6.45 ± 1.03 | 3.16 ± 0.70* |
| t值 | 0.187 | 6.166 | 0.962 | 8.952 | 0.353 | 9.960 | |
| P值 | 0.852 | < 0.001 | 0.338 | < 0.001 | 0.724 | < 0.001 | |
Tab.7
Comparison of changes before and after two groups of immune microenvironment therapy"
| 组别 | 例数 | CD8+/% | CD4+/% | CD4+/CD8+/% | Th17/Treg/% | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 治疗前 | 治疗后 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | ||
| 对照组 | 75 | 33.88 ± 6.10 | 25.70 ± 5.05* | 34.96 ± 6.03 | 39.11 ± 7.05* | 1.03 ± 0.98 | 1.20 ± 0.96* | 0.74 ± 0.20 | 0.49 ± 0.18* |
| 联合组 | 75 | 34.03 ± 6.04 | 21.63 ± 4.75* | 34.80 ± 5.88 | 42.22 ± 7.08* | 1.02 ± 0.97 | 1.52 ± 0.97* | 0.70 ± 0.22 | 0.29 ± 0.15* |
| t值 | 0.151 | 5.084 | 0.165 | 2.696 | 0.063 | 2.031 | 1.165 | 7.392 | |
| P值 | 0.880 | < 0.001 | 0.870 | 0.008 | 0.950 | 0.044 | 0.246 | < 0.001 | |
Tab.8
Comparison of changes of intestinal flora before and after treatment in two groups (x ± s)/(IgCFU/g)"
| 组别 | 例数 | 肠杆菌 | 大肠杆菌 | 双歧杆菌 | 肠球菌 | 乳酸杆菌 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 治疗前 | 治疗后 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | ||
| 对照组 | 75 | 10.55 ± 1.50 | 9.22 ± 1.02? | 7.75 ± 0.41 | 7.21 ± 0.36? | 2.20 ± 0.42 | 3.90 ± 0.47? | 7.21 ± 0.53 | 5.75 ± 0.44? | 3.09 ± 0.52 | 3.82 ± 0.50? |
| 联合组 | 75 | 10.37 ± 1.43 | 8.11 ± 0.51? | 7.77 ± 0.43 | 7.09 ± 0.35? | 2.17 ± 0.45 | 4.10 ± 0.46? | 7.25 ± 0.51 | 5.17 ± 0.42? | 3.05 ± 0.50 | 4.45 ± 0.47? |
| t值 | 0.752 | 8.429 | 0.292 | 2.070 | 0.422 | 2.634 | 0.471 | 8.258 | 0.471 | 7.951 | |
| P值 | 0.453 | < 0.001 | 0.771 | 0.040 | 0.674 | 0.009 | 0.638 | < 0.001 | 0.638 | < 0.001 | |
| [1] |
DANESE S, DIGNASS A, MATSUOKA K, et al. Early and Sustained Symptom Control with Mirikizumab in Patients with Ulcerative Colitis in the Phase 3 LUCENT Programme[J]. J Crohns Colitis, 2024, 18(11): 1845-1856. doi:10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjae088
doi: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjae088 |
| [2] |
WAN J, SHEN J, ZHONG J, et al. Natural course of ulcerative colitis in China: Differences from the West?[J]. United European Gastroenterol J, 2024, 12(9): 1167-1178. doi:10.1002/ueg2.12634
doi: 10.1002/ueg2.12634 |
| [3] | 叶道冰, 杨会举, 高宗跃. 提插泻法针刺外治联合痛泻汤内服治疗湿热内蕴证溃疡性结肠炎患者的效果分析[J]. 中医药临床杂志, 2025, 37(1): 176-180. |
| [4] |
EL-HAGGAR S M, HEGAZY S K, MAHER M M, et al. Repurposing metformin as adjuvant therapy in patients with ulcerative colitis treated with mesalamine: A randomized controlled double-blinded study[J]. Int Immunopharmacol, 2024, 138(1): 112541. doi:10.1016/j.intimp.2024.112541
doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2024.112541 |
| [5] |
CHEN H, FANG J, LIU S, et al. Efficacy and safety of two-step acupuncture therapy for symptom relief in adults with mild to moderate ulcerative colitis: Rationale and design of the TSA-UC randomised controlled trial[J]. BMJ Open, 2025, 15(2): 94301. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2024-094301
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-094301 |
| [6] | 中华中医药学会脾胃病分会, 李军祥, 唐旭东, 等. 溃疡性结肠炎中医诊疗专家共识(2023)[J]. 中华中医药杂志, 2024, 39(1): 288-296. |
| [7] | 梁笑楠, 尹凤荣, 张晓岚. 炎症性肠病诊断与治疗的共识意见(2018年, 北京)溃疡性结肠炎部分解读[J]. 临床荟萃, 2018, 33(11): 987-990. |
| [8] | 郑筱萸. 中药新药临床研究指导原则: 试行[M]. 北京:中国医药科技出版社, 2002. |
| [9] | MOHAMMED VASHIST N, SAMAAN M, MOSLI M H, et al. Endoscopic scoring indices for evaluation of disease activity in ulcerative colitis[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2018, 1(1): 11450. |
| [10] | 许涵, 唐文. 中文版炎症性肠病残疾指数的信效度研究[J]. 中华炎性肠病杂志, 2020, 4(4): 304-310. |
| [11] | 谢艳, 魏兵, 欧阳钦. 疾病活动指数在炎症性肠病诊治中的应用[J]. 中华消化杂志, 2001, 21(9): 559-560. |
| [12] | 孔欣, 袁媛, 韩捷. 韩捷教授从“太阴、少阴、厥阴”辨证治疗溃疡性结肠炎的经验[J]. 世界中西医结合杂志, 2023, 18(6): 1137-1140. |
| [13] | 徐春霞, 李荣军, 杨小丽, 等. 从肺论治以荆芥连翘方结合针刺鬼眼穴治疗溃疡性结肠炎的临床观察[J]. 湖南中医药大学学报, 2023, 43(2): 338-342. |
| [14] | 贾庆成, 孙潇洒, 申炜. 芪术利湿汤对轻中度活动期溃疡性结肠炎患者氧化应激水平的影响[J]. 四川中医, 2024, 42(6): 133-136. |
| [15] | 王怡菲, 王志颖, 陈航, 等. 从虚、热、湿、瘀、郁论治溃疡性结肠炎[J]. 中国中医急症, 2024, 33(9): 1577-1581. |
| [16] | 盛静, 张锦萍, 王洁, 等. 基于“肺-肠轴”理论探讨从肺论治腹泻型肠易激综合征[J]. 现代消化及介入诊疗, 2023, 28(6): 770-772. |
| [17] | 王辉, 蒋庆雨. 基于“肺-肠轴”理论运用宣肺通腑法保护肠屏障防治老年脓毒症急性胃肠损伤的临床研究[J]. 中国中西医结合消化杂志, 2024, 32(9): 796-800. |
| [18] | 韩云鹏, 王翼轩, 闫亚男, 等. 参苓白术散调控“肠-肺轴”微生态干预慢性阻塞性肺疾病机理探讨[J]. 河北中医药学报, 2022, 37(5): 7-12. |
| [19] | 苏丽, 周敦荣, 谭茜茜, 等. 基于“肺-肠轴”理论分析微生物调节剂对新型冠状病毒肺炎患者肺部菌群、肠道菌群及免疫功能的影响[J]. 广西医学, 2022, 44(20): 2407-2412. |
| [20] |
CHANDWASKAR R, DALAL R, GUPTA S, et.al. Dysregulation of T cell response in the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease[J]. Scand J Immunol, 2024, 100(6): 13412. doi:10.1111/sji.13412
doi: 10.1111/sji.13412 |
| [21] | 陈天, 王泽惠, 彭云花, 等. 加味葛根芩连汤联合针刺对大肠湿热型溃疡性结肠炎患者的临床疗效[J]. 中成药, 2025, 47(2): 453-457. |
| [22] | 邓永文, 张全辉, 陈教华, 等. 基于炎症反应研究参苓白术散加减方治疗溃疡性结肠炎的药效及作用机制[J]. 中国老年学杂志, 2024, 44(4): 902-906. |
| [23] | 叶佳, 刘畅, 朱梅萍. 痛泻汤结合针刺治疗溃疡性结肠炎临床效果及对血清炎症因子、肠道菌群的影响[J]. 辽宁中医杂志, 2024, 51(6): 159-162. |
| [24] | 李春梦, 李微, 廖瑶玎, 等. 参苓白术散治疗溃疡性结肠炎的作用机制研究进展[J]. 山西医科大学学报, 2023, 54(10): 1423-1427. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||

