The Journal of Practical Medicine ›› 2026, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (9): 1491-1500.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2026.09.002
• Feature Reports:Breast carcinoma • Previous Articles
Jiaqian ZHONG,Xiaoyan XIE,Yanling ZHENG(
)
Received:2025-12-01
Online:2026-05-10
Published:2026-04-29
Contact:
Yanling ZHENG
E-mail:zhyanl@mail.sysu.edu.cn
CLC Number:
Jiaqian ZHONG,Xiaoyan XIE,Yanling ZHENG. Advances in the application of multimodal ultrasound and artificial intelligence in the early diagnosis and prognostic prediction of breast cancer[J]. The Journal of Practical Medicine, 2026, 42(9): 1491-1500.
| [1] |
KUBOTA K, NAKASHIMA K, NAKASHIMA K, et al. The Japanese breast cancer society clinical practice guidelines for breast cancer screening and diagnosis, 2022 edition[J]. Breast Cancer, 2024, 31(2): 157-164. doi:10.1007/s12282-023-01521-x .
doi: 10.1007/s12282-023-01521-x |
| [2] |
GUNDRY K R. Breast ultrasound: Indications and findings[J]. Clin Obstet Gynecol, 2016, 59(2): 380-393. doi:10.1097/GRF.0000000000000194 .
doi: 10.1097/GRF.0000000000000194 |
| [3] |
KRATKIEWICZ K, PATTYN A, ALIJABBARI N, et al. Ultrasound and photoacoustic imaging of breast cancer: Clinical systems, challenges, and future outlook[J]. J Clin Med, 2022, 11(5): 1165. doi:10.3390/jcm11051165 .
doi: 10.3390/jcm11051165 |
| [4] |
GUO W, LI F, JIA C, et al. The clinical value of conventional ultrasound combined with contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the evaluation of BI-RADS 4 lesions detected by magnetic resonance imaging[J]. Br J Radiol, 2022, 95(1136): 20220025. doi:10.1259/bjr.20220025 .
doi: 10.1259/bjr.20220025 |
| [5] |
SUN J, SHEN X, ZHANG N, et al. Combination of conventional ultrasound with quantitative and qualitative analyses of CEUS for the differentiation of benign and malignant breast solid lesions: A modified breast cancer model[J]. Asian J Surg, 2024: S1015-S9584(24)01844-X. doi:10.1016/j.asjsur.2024.08.104 .
doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2024.08.104 |
| [6] |
SUN J, ZHANG W, ZHAO Q, et al. Associated factors leading to misdiagnosis of a combined diagnostic model of different types of strain imaging and conventional ultrasound in evaluation of breast lesions: Selection strategy for using different types of strain imaging in evaluation of breast lesions[J]. Eur J Radiol, 2024, 176: 111512. doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111512 .
doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111512 |
| [7] |
GOMES A F, JUSTINO D, TOMÁS C, et al. Comparing the diagnostic performance of ultrasound elastography and magnetic resonance imaging to differentiate benign and malignant breast lesions: A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Acad Radiol, 2025, 32(8): 4421-4434. doi:10.1016/j.acra.2024.12.061 .
doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2024.12.061 |
| [8] |
ZHOU J, ZHANG Y, SHI S. Ultrasound elastography: Advances and challenges in early detection of breast cancer[J]. Front Oncol, 2025, 15: 1589142. doi:10.3389/fonc.2025.1589142 .
doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1589142 |
| [9] |
ZHANG Y, SUN X, LI J, et al. The diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound and superb microvascular imaging in differentiating benign from malignant solid breast lesions: A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc, 2022, 81(2): 109-121. doi:10.3233/CH-211367 .
doi: 10.3233/CH-211367 |
| [10] |
COMBI C, AMICO B, BELLAZZI R, et al. A manifesto on explainability for artificial intelligence in medicine[J]. Artif Intell Med, 2022, 133: 102423. doi:10.1016/j.artmed.2022.102423 .
doi: 10.1016/j.artmed.2022.102423 |
| [11] |
SĂFTOIU A, GILJA O H, SIDHU P S, et al. The EFSUMB Guidelines and Recommendations for the Clinical Practice of Elastography in Non-Hepatic Applications: Update 2018[J]. Ultraschall Med, 2019, 40(4):425-453. doi: 10.1055/a-0838-9937 .
doi: 10.1055/a-0838-9937 |
| [12] |
KUMAR V, DENIS M, GREGORY A, et al. Viscoelastic parameters as discriminators of breast masses: Initial human study results[J]. PLoS One, 2018, 13(10): e0205717. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0205717 .
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0205717 |
| [13] |
POUL S S, ORMACHEA J, GE G R, et al. Comprehensive experimental assessments of rheological models' performance in elastography of soft tissues[J]. Acta Biomater, 2022, 146: 259-273. doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2022.04.047 .
doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2022.04.047 |
| [14] |
JIA W, XIA S, JIA X, et al. Ultrasound viscosity imaging in breast lesions: A multicenter prospective study[J]. Acad Radiol, 2024, 31(9): 3499-3510. doi:10.1016/j.acra.2024.03.017 .
doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2024.03.017 |
| [15] |
刘钊,李慧,王敏敏,等.黏弹性成像联合剪切波弹性成像在乳腺癌诊断中的价值评估[J].实用医学杂志,2025,41(18):2806-2811.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2025.18.004 .
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2025.18.004 |
| [16] |
朱彩霞.超声黏弹性成像技术对乳腺肿块良恶性鉴别的应用研究[D].南昌:南昌大学,2025.doi:10.27232/d.cnki.gnchu.2025.000539 .
doi: 10.27232/d.cnki.gnchu.2025.000539 |
| [17] |
周锋盛, 袁琳, 浦浙宁, 等. 超声黏弹性成像瘤周参数对BI-RADS 4类乳腺结节良恶性的预测价值[J]. 南京医科大学学报(自然科学版), 2025, 45(11): 1563-1571. doi:10.7655/NYDXBNSN250876 .
doi: 10.7655/NYDXBNSN250876 |
| [18] |
SU G H, XIAO Y, YOU C, et al. Radiogenomic-based multiomic analysis reveals imaging intratumor heterogeneity phenotypes and therapeutic targets[J]. Sci Adv, 2023, 9(40): eadf0837. doi:10.1126/sciadv.adf0837 .
doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adf0837 |
| [19] |
XU Y J, GONG H L, HU B, et al. Role of “Stiff Rim” sign obtained by shear wave elastography in diagnosis and guiding therapy of breast cancer[J]. Int J Med Sci, 2021, 18(15): 3615-3623. doi:10.7150/ijms.64243 .
doi: 10.7150/ijms.64243 |
| [20] |
BENE I, DONCI D D, GHERMAN D, et al. Vi-PLUS: Pioneering plane-wave ultrasound to assess breast glandular tissue in healthy women-a pilot study[J]. Cancers, 2025, 17(2): 237. doi:10.3390/cancers17020237 .
doi: 10.3390/cancers17020237 |
| [21] |
OPACIC T, DENCKS S, THEEK B, et al. Motion model ultrasound localization microscopy for preclinical and clinical multiparametric tumor characterization[J]. Nat Commun, 2018, 9(1): 1527. doi:10.1038/s41467-018-03973-8 .
doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-03973-8 |
| [22] |
SONG P, RUBIN J M, LOWERISON M R. Super-resolution ultrasound microvascular imaging: Is it ready for clinical use?[J]. Z Med Phys, 2023, 33(3): 309-323. doi:10.1016/j.zemedi.2023.04.001 .
doi: 10.1016/j.zemedi.2023.04.001 |
| [23] |
DENCKS S, SCHMITZ G. Ultrasound localization microscopy[J]. Z Für Med Phys, 2023, 33(3): 292-308. doi:10.1016/j.zemedi.2023.02.004 .
doi: 10.1016/j.zemedi.2023.02.004 |
| [24] |
PARK A Y, KWON M, WOO O H, et al. A prospective study on the value of ultrasound microflow assessment to distinguish malignant from benign solid breast masses: Association between ultrasound parameters and histologic microvessel densities[J]. Korean J Radiol, 2019, 20(5): 759-772. doi:10.3348/kjr.2018.0515 .
doi: 10.3348/kjr.2018.0515 |
| [25] |
HUANG C, ZHANG W, GONG P, et al. Super-resolution ultrasound localization microscopy based on a high frame-rate clinical ultrasound scanner: An in-human feasibility study[J]. Phys Med Biol, 2021, 66(8): 08NT01. doi:10.1088/1361-6560/abef45 .
doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/abef45 |
| [26] |
ZHANG G, LEI Y M, LI N, et al. Ultrasound super-resolution imaging for differential diagnosis of breast masses[J]. Front Oncol, 2022, 12: 1049991. doi:10.3389/fonc.2022.1049991 .
doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1049991 |
| [27] |
XIA S, HUA Q, SONG Y, et al. Super-resolution ultrasound imaging of intranodal lymphatic sinuses for predicting sentinel lymph node metastasis in breast cancer: A preliminary study[J]. Eur Radiol, 2025, 35(10): 6079-6088. doi:10.1007/s00330-025-11520-5 .
doi: 10.1007/s00330-025-11520-5 |
| [28] |
FANG K, WANG L, HUANG H, et al. Construction of nucleolin-targeted lipid nanobubbles and contrast-enhanced ultrasound molecular imaging in triple-negative breast cancer[J]. Pharm Res, 2020, 37(7): 145. doi:10.1007/s11095-020-02873-1 .
doi: 10.1007/s11095-020-02873-1 |
| [29] |
DE KOEKKOEK-DOLL P K, ROBERTI S, VAN DEN BREKEL M W, et al. Value of assessing peripheral vascularization with micro-flow imaging, resistive index and absent hilum sign as predictor for malignancy in lymph nodes in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma[J]. Cancers, 2021, 13(20): 5071. doi:10.3390/cancers13205071 .
doi: 10.3390/cancers13205071 |
| [30] |
KANG T W, JEONG W K, KIM Y Y, et al. Comparison of super-resolution US and contrast material-enhanced US in detection of the spoke wheel sign in patients with focal nodular hyperplasia[J]. Radiology, 2021, 298(1): 82-90. doi:10.1148/radiol.2020200885 .
doi: 10.1148/radiol.2020200885 |
| [31] |
FORSBERG F, RO R J, FOX T B, et al. Contrast enhanced maximum intensity projection ultrasound imaging for assessing angiogenesis in murine glioma and breast tumor models: A comparative study[J]. Ultrasonics, 2011, 51(3): 382-389. doi:10.1016/j.ultras.2010.11.004 .
doi: 10.1016/j.ultras.2010.11.004 |
| [32] |
DU J, LI F H, FANG H, et al. Microvascular architecture of breast lesions: Evaluation with contrast-enhanced ultrasonographic micro flow imaging[J]. J Ultrasound Med, 2008, 27(6): 833-842;quiz844. doi:10.7863/jum.2008.27.6.833 .
doi: 10.7863/jum.2008.27.6.833 |
| [33] |
EUN N L, LEE E, PARK A Y, et al. Artificial intelligence for ultrasound microflow imaging in breast cancer diagnosis[J]. Ultraschall Med, 2024, 45(4): 412-417. doi:10.1055/a-2230-2455 .
doi: 10.1055/a-2230-2455 |
| [34] |
STEINBERG I, HULAND D M, VERMESH O, et al. Photoacoustic clinical imaging[J]. Photoacoustics, 2019, 14: 77-98. doi:10.1016/j.pacs.2019.05.001 .
doi: 10.1016/j.pacs.2019.05.001 |
| [35] |
NEUSCHLER E I, BUTLER R, YOUNG C A, et al. A pivotal study of optoacoustic imaging to diagnose benign and malignant breast masses: A new evaluation tool for radiologists[J]. Radiology, 2018, 287(2): 398-412. doi:10.1148/radiol.2017172228 .
doi: 10.1148/radiol.2017172228 |
| [36] |
HUANG Z, TIAN H, LUO H, et al. Assessment of oxygen saturation in breast lesions using photoacoustic imaging: Correlation with benign and malignant disease[J]. Clin Breast Cancer, 2024, 24(4): e210-e218.e1. doi:10.1016/j.clbc.2024.01.006 .
doi: 10.1016/j.clbc.2024.01.006 |
| [37] |
FANG J S, GILLIES R D, GATENBY R A. Adaptation to hypoxia and acidosis in carcinogenesis and tumor progression[J]. Semin Cancer Biol, 2008, 18(5): 330-337. doi:10.1016/j.semcancer.2008.03.011 .
doi: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2008.03.011 |
| [38] |
HUANG Z, MO S, LI G, et al. Prognosticating axillary lymph node metastasis in breast cancer through integrated photoacoustic imaging, ultrasound, and clinical parameters[J]. Breast Cancer Res, 2025, 27(1): 123. doi:10.1186/s13058-025-02073-y .
doi: 10.1186/s13058-025-02073-y |
| [39] |
CHEN J, YIN Y, LI G, et al. Integrated nomogram to predict HER2 expression in breast tumor: Clinical, Ultrasound, and Photoacoustic imaging approaches[J]. Eur J Cancer, 2024, 209: 114259. doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2024.114259 .
doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2024.114259 |
| [40] |
LI G, HUANG Z, TIAN H, et al. Deep learning combined with attention mechanisms to assist radiologists in enhancing breast cancer diagnosis: A study on photoacoustic imaging[J]. Biomed Opt Express, 2024, 15(8): 4689-4704. doi:10.1364/BOE.530249 .
doi: 10.1364/BOE.530249 |
| [41] |
FU Q, DONG H. Spiking neural network based on multi-scale saliency fusion for breast cancer detection[J]. Entropy, 2022, 24(11): 1543. doi:10.3390/e24111543 .
doi: 10.3390/e24111543 |
| [42] |
VALLEZ N, MATEOS-APARICIO-RUIZ I, RIENDA M A, et al. Comparative analysis of deep learning methods for breast ultrasound lesion detection and classification[J]. Phys Med, 2025, 134: 104993. doi:10.1016/j.ejmp.2025.104993 .
doi: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2025.104993 |
| [43] |
LIU W, ANGUELOV D, ERHAN D, et al. SSD: Single shot MultiBox detector[C]//Computer Vision – ECCV 2016. Cham: Springer, 2016: 21-37. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-46448-0_2 .
doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-46448-0_2 |
| [44] |
PUNN N S, AGARWAL S. RCA-IUnet: A residual cross-spatial attention-guided inception U-Net model for tumor segmentation in breast ultrasound imaging[J]. Mach Vis Appl, 2022, 33(2): 27. doi:10.1007/s00138-022-01280-3 .
doi: 10.1007/s00138-022-01280-3 |
| [45] |
ZHAI D, HU B, GONG X, et al. ASS-GAN: Asymmetric semi-supervised GAN for breast ultrasound image segmentation[J]. Neurocomputing, 2022, 493: 204-216. doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2022.04.021 .
doi: 10.1016/j.neucom.2022.04.021 |
| [46] |
ILESANMI A E, CHAUMRATTANAKUL U, MAKHANOV S S. A method for segmentation of tumors in breast ultrasound images using the variant enhanced deep learning[J]. Biocybern Biomed Eng, 2021, 41(2): 802-818. doi:10.1016/j.bbe.2021.05.007 .
doi: 10.1016/j.bbe.2021.05.007 |
| [47] |
RADHI E A, KAMIL M Y. Anisotropic diffusion method for speckle noise reduction in breast ultrasound images[J]. Inte J Intellig Engineer Syst, 2024, 17(2). doi: 10.22266/ijies2024.0430.50 .
doi: 10.22266/ijies2024.0430.50 |
| [48] |
BADAWY S M, MOHAMED A E A, HEFNAWY A A, et al. Automatic semantic segmentation of breast tumors in ultrasound images based on combining fuzzy logic and deep learning-a feasibility study[J]. PLoS One, 2021, 16(5): e0251899. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0251899 .
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251899 |
| [49] |
XUE C, ZHU L, FU H, et al. Global guidance network for breast lesion segmentation in ultrasound images[J]. Med Image Anal, 2021, 70: 101989. doi:10.1016/j.media.2021.101989 .
doi: 10.1016/j.media.2021.101989 |
| [50] |
PRAMANIK P, PRAMANIK R, SCHWENKER F, et al. DBU-Net: Dual branch U-Net for tumor segmentation in breast ultrasound images[J]. PLoS One, 2023, 18(11): e0293615. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0293615 .
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0293615 |
| [51] |
HUANG J, MAO Y, DENG J, et al. EMGANet: Edge-aware multi-scale group-mix attention network for breast cancer ultrasound image segmentation[J]. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform, 2025, 29(8): 5631-5641. doi:10.1109/JBHI.2025.3546345 .
doi: 10.1109/JBHI.2025.3546345 |
| [52] |
SUN D, DONG C, YAN Y, et al. Challenge-aware U-Net for breast lesion segmentation in ultrasound images[J]. Pattern Recognit, 2025, 168: 111851. doi:10.1016/j.patcog.2025.111851 .
doi: 10.1016/j.patcog.2025.111851 |
| [53] |
HUANG J, HUANG J, ZHANG M, et al. UltraMamba: Mamba-based multimodal ultrasound image adaptive fusion for breast lesion segmentation[J]. IEEE Trans Med Imaging, 2026, PP: 1. doi:10.1109/TMI.2026.3653779 .
doi: 10.1109/TMI.2026.3653779 |
| [54] |
KRIZHEVSKY A, SUTSKEVER I, HINTON G E. ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks[J]. Commun ACM, 2017, 60(6):84-90. doi: 10.1145/3065386 .
doi: 10.1145/3065386 |
| [55] |
TAGNAMAS J, RAMADAN H, YAHYAOUY A, et al. Correction: Multi-task approach based on combined CNN-transformer for efficient segmentation and classification of breast tumors in ultrasound images[J]. Vis Comput Ind Biomed Art, 2024, 7(1): 5. doi:10.1186/s42492-024-00156-9 .
doi: 10.1186/s42492-024-00156-9 |
| [56] |
TAHERI F, RAHBAR K. Improving breast cancer classification in fine-grain ultrasound images through feature discrimination and a transfer learning approach[J]. Biomed Signal Process Control, 2025, 106: 107690. doi:10.1016/j.bspc.2025.107690 .
doi: 10.1016/j.bspc.2025.107690 |
| [57] |
CHEN S H, WU Y L, PAN C Y, et al. Breast ultrasound image classification and physiological assessment based on GoogLeNet[J]. J Radiat Res Appl Sci, 2023, 16(3): 100628. doi:10.1016/j.jrras.2023.100628 .
doi: 10.1016/j.jrras.2023.100628 |
| [58] |
ZHAO M, YE N. High-dimensional ensemble learning classification: An ensemble learning classification algorithm based on high-dimensional feature space reconstruction[J]. Appl Sci, 2024, 14(5):1956. doi:10.3390/app14051956 .
doi: 10.3390/app14051956 |
| [59] |
LIU Y, LI J, ZHAO C, et al. FAMF-net: Feature alignment mutual attention fusion with region awareness for breast cancer diagnosis via imbalanced data[J]. IEEE Trans Med Imaging, 2025, 44(3): 1153-1167. doi:10.1109/TMI.2024.3485612 .
doi: 10.1109/TMI.2024.3485612 |
| [60] |
HOSSAIN S, AZAM S, MONTAHA S, et al. Automated breast tumor ultrasound image segmentation with hybrid UNet and classification using fine-tuned CNN model[J]. Heliyon, 2023, 9(11): e21369. doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e21369 .
doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e21369 |
| [61] |
HE Q, YANG Q, SU H, et al. Multi-task learning for segmentation and classification of breast tumors from ultrasound images[J]. Comput Biol Med, 2024, 173: 108319. doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2024.108319 .
doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2024.108319 |
| [62] |
AUMENTE-MAESTRO C, DÍEZ J, REMESEIRO B. A multi-task framework for breast cancer segmentation and classification in ultrasound imaging[J]. Comput Methods Programs Biomed, 2025, 260: 108540. doi:10.1016/j.cmpb.2024.108540 .
doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2024.108540 |
| [63] |
SU A, WANG X, XU H, et al. Multi-task learning for multi-scale breast cancer ultrasound image segmentation and classification based on visual perception[J]. Biomed Signal Process Control, 2025, 110: 108212. doi:10.1016/j.bspc.2025.108212 .
doi: 10.1016/j.bspc.2025.108212 |
| [64] |
ARUNKUMAR K E, WILSON M E, BLAKE N E, et al. Deep learning for tumor segmentation and multiclass classification in breast ultrasound images using pretrained models[J]. Sensors, 2025, 25(24): 7557. doi:10.3390/s25247557 .
doi: 10.3390/s25247557 |
| [65] |
NAKACH F Z, IDRI A, GOCERI E. A comprehensive investigation of multimodal deep learning fusion strategies for breast cancer classification[J]. Artif Intell Rev, 2024, 57(12): 327. doi:10.1007/s10462-024-10984-z .
doi: 10.1007/s10462-024-10984-z |
| [66] |
RANI S, AHMAD T, MASOOD S, et al. Diagnosis of breast cancer molecular subtypes using machine learning models on unimodal and multimodal datasets[J]. Neural Comput Appl, 2023, 35(34): 24109-24121. doi:10.1007/s00521-023-09005-x .
doi: 10.1007/s00521-023-09005-x |
| [67] |
ASIF S, OU D, HADI F, et al. BreastUS-Net: An Attention-Guided Dual-Branch Network with Feature Fusion for Fine-Grained Breast Tumor Classification in Ultrasound Imaging[J]. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform, 2025. doi: 10.1109/JBHI.2025.3620256 .
doi: 10.1109/JBHI.2025.3620256 |
| [68] |
ASIF S, YAN Y, FENG B, et al. Improving Breast Cancer Diagnosis in Ultrasound Images Using Deep Learning with Feature Fusion and Attention Mechanism[J]. Acad Radiol, 2025, 32(9):4997-5009. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2025.05.007 .
doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2025.05.007 |
| [69] |
刘丽, 谢月, 黄剑荣, 等. 人工智能乳腺超声诊断系统在乳腺癌筛查中的应用价值[J]. 影像研究与医学应用, 2025, 9(22): 111-113. doi:10.20267/j.issn.2096-3807.2025.22.035 .
doi: 10.20267/j.issn.2096-3807.2025.22.035 |
| [70] |
XIANG H, WANG X, XU M, et al. Deep Learning-assisted Diagnosis of Breast Lesions on US Images: A Multivendor, Multicenter Study[J]. Radiol Artif Intell, 2023, 5(5):e220185. doi: 10.1148/ryai.220185 .
doi: 10.1148/ryai.220185 |
| [71] |
AZHAR K, LEE B D, BYON S S, et al. AI-powered synthesis of structured multimodal breast ultrasound reports integrating radiologist annotations and deep learning analysis[J]. Bioengineering, 2024, 11(9): 890. doi:10.3390/bioengineering11090890 .
doi: 10.3390/bioengineering11090890 |
| [72] |
LIAO J, GUI Y, LI Z, et al. Artificial intelligence-assisted ultrasound image analysis to discriminate early breast cancer in Chinese population: A retrospective, multicentre, cohort study[J]. EClinicalMedicine, 2023, 60: 102001. doi:10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.102001 .
doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.102001 |
| [73] |
QIAN L, LIU X, ZHOU S, et al. A cutting-edge deep learning-and-radiomics-based ultrasound nomogram for precise prediction of axillary lymph node metastasis in breast cancer patients ≥ 75 years[J]. Front Endocrinol, 2024, 15: 1323452. doi:10.3389/fendo.2024.1323452 .
doi: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1323452 |
| [74] |
ZHENG X, YAO Z, HUANG Y, et al. Deep learning radiomics can predict axillary lymph node status in early-stage breast cancer[J]. Nat Commun, 2020, 11(1):1236. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-15027-z .
doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-15027-z |
| [75] |
GONG C, WU Y, ZHANG G, et al. Computer-assisted diagnosis for axillary lymph node metastasis of early breast cancer based on transformer with dual-modal adaptive mid-term fusion using ultrasound elastography[J]. Comput Med Imaging Graph, 2025, 119:102472. doi: 10.1016/j.compmedimag.2024.102472 .
doi: 10.1016/j.compmedimag.2024.102472 |
| [76] |
AGYEKUM E A, KONG W, AGYEKUM D N, et al. Ultrasound derived deep learning features for predicting axillary lymph node metastasis in breast cancer using graph convolutional networks in a multicenter study[J]. Sci Rep, 2025, 15(1):27796. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-13086-0 .
doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-13086-0 |
| [77] |
GAO Y, GU D, LI J, et al. Preoperative assessment of axillary lymph node tumor burden in cT1-2N0 breast cancer patients with a modality-adaptive network based on sentinel lymph node ultrasound images[J]. Sci Rep, 2026, 16: 4228. doi:10.1038/s41598-025-34371-y .
doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-34371-y |
| [78] |
FENG X, SHI Y, WU M, et al. Predicting the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients based on ultrasound longitudinal temporal depth network fusion model[J]. Breast Cancer Res, 2025, 27(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s13058-025-01971-5 .
doi: 10.1186/s13058-025-01971-5 |
| [79] |
GUO J, CHEN B, CAO H, et al. Cross-modal deep learning model for predicting pathologic complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer[J]. NPJ Precis Oncol, 2024, 8(1):189. doi: 10.1038/s41698-024-00678-8 .
doi: 10.1038/s41698-024-00678-8 |
| [80] |
FU Y, LEI Y T, HUANG Y H, et al. Longitudinal ultrasound-based AI model predicts axillary lymph node response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: A multicenter study[J]. Eur Radiol, 2024, 34(11):7080-7089. doi: 10.1007/s00330-024-10786-5 .
doi: 10.1007/s00330-024-10786-5 |
| [81] |
LIU Y, WANG Y, HUANG J, et al. Deep learning-based prediction of axillary pathological complete response in patients with breast cancer using longitudinal multiregional ultrasound[J]. EBioMedicine, 2025, 119:105896. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2025.105896 .
doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2025.105896 |
| [82] |
LI M, XU P, HU J, et al. From challenges and pitfalls to recommendations and opportunities: Implementing federated learning in healthcare[J]. Med Image Anal, 2025, 101: 103497. doi:10.1016/j.media.2025.103497 .
doi: 10.1016/j.media.2025.103497 |
| [1] | Huan LIN,Hongsheng LI,Mei HUANG,Guochun ZHANG,Neng WANG,Guanqun HUANG,Juan XU,Qingfeng ZOU,Xingyuan SHI,Wenguang HE,Feng LI,Yanqing CAI,xiaoping HUANG,Qiongdiao HUANG,Zejuan YANG,Runmei LUO,Jiewen ZHANG,Yi TANG,Chaoliang XU,Hongfei GAO,Weicai CHEN,Hao HU,Yongsheng YAO,Chu HUANG,Jiewen HUANG,Yichao HUANG,Yeyan LEI,Ming LUO,Zhe WU,Nangui YUAN,Yongting LIN. Consensus on integrative medicine cooling therapy management during the peri-chemotherapy period for breast cancer [J]. The Journal of Practical Medicine, 2026, 42(5): 723-733. |
| [2] | Zhengxia SUN,Lin ZHANG,Jiaqi CHANG,Hui XIE,Hui LIU,Qingming BIAN. Efficacy and safety of transversus thoracic muscle plane-pectoral nerve block combined with oxycodone-propofol opioid-sparing general anesthesia in breast-conserving surgery [J]. The Journal of Practical Medicine, 2026, 42(5): 734-741. |
| [3] | Sheng NONG,Zhanxiong LI,Qi ZHANG,Zhendong LU,Minping HONG,Wubiao CHEN,Zilin LIU. Predictive performance of an interpretable BPNN model for axillary lymph node burden in breast cancer patients with 1 ~ 2 sentinel lymph node positive [J]. The Journal of Practical Medicine, 2026, 42(1): 45-55. |
| [4] | Likun WANG,Qi HAO,Weihan JIN,Shizheng DONG,Xueliang WU,Xiaofeng HU,Liang WU,Jing XUN,Hongqing MA. Application of multi⁃omics and artificial intelligence in the prediction and diagnosis of liver metastases in colorectal cancer [J]. The Journal of Practical Medicine, 2025, 41(7): 1070-1078. |
| [5] | Ying ZOU,Jihua LIU,Jingyi LI,Hai BI,Yan SHI,Xiudi LU,Qibo. ZHANG. Efficacy of transfer learning artificial intelligence model based on ultrasound in evaluating the probability of malignancy of partially cystic thyroid nodule [J]. The Journal of Practical Medicine, 2025, 41(6): 889-895. |
| [6] | Wei LU,Pan ZHANG,Yushu. QIN. Clinical significance of CT perfusion imaging combined with artificial intelligence in evaluating reperfusion injury after cerebral infarction [J]. The Journal of Practical Medicine, 2025, 41(2): 264-270. |
| [7] | Chun WANG,Xiaodi WANG,Haitao ZHANG,Dan. LIU. Predictive value of ai quantitative parameters combined with 256⁃slice spiral CT scans for the invasiveness of lung ground⁃glass nodules [J]. The Journal of Practical Medicine, 2025, 41(19): 3106-3111. |
| [8] | Yingchao WU,Liushan CHEN,Yuqi LIANG,Jieting CHEN,Junfeng HUANG,Qian ZUO,Qianjun CHEN. Development of an organoid⁃based pan⁃TKI precision screening platform to enhance therapeutic efficacy of ET+CDK4/6 inhibitors in HR+/HER2⁃low breast cancer [J]. The Journal of Practical Medicine, 2025, 41(18): 2786-2795. |
| [9] | Xinran ZHANG,Yan SHEN,Jiaojiao HU,Qingqing CHEN,Yangjie XIAO,Feng LU,Shasha YUAN,Xiaohong FU. Study on the applied value of combined clinical and ultrasound multiparameter constructed nomogram for predicting HER⁃2⁃positive breast cancer [J]. The Journal of Practical Medicine, 2025, 41(18): 2812-2819. |
| [10] | Jingshuo LI,Shoushi LIU,Hongwei. GUO. Advances in the mechanism and therapeutic potential of Erianin⁃induced apoptosis in breast cancer cells [J]. The Journal of Practical Medicine, 2025, 41(14): 2132-2137. |
| [11] | Hai QIU,Yifei GUI,Yuan. LIU. Predictors of sentinel lymph node metastasis in clinical T1⁃2 N0 breast cancer patients with preoperatively normal axillary ultrasound [J]. The Journal of Practical Medicine, 2025, 41(14): 2143-2151. |
| [12] | Yuling DUAN,Xuezhi ZHOU,Yongyi LI,Lixia MA,Desheng YANG,Jiao CHENG,Yan WU,Tao LIU,Guoyuan JIANG,Mei. WANG. Clinical value analysis of different MRI measurement methods in evaluating the efficacy of neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer [J]. The Journal of Practical Medicine, 2025, 41(14): 2152-2159. |
| [13] | Lu JIANG,Weipeng LYU,Sijing CHEN,Yanhua FANG,Shanshan LIANG. Inhibitory effect of disitamab vedotin on breast cancer cells with different HER⁃2 expression levels in tumor organoid culture system [J]. The Journal of Practical Medicine, 2025, 41(12): 1808-1815. |
| [14] | Siyi FENG,Yanjiao LI,Rui ZHONG,Junbiao. GUO. Efficacy, lumbar muscle morphology and mechanical property in the elderly with degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis treated with four⁃dimensional traction [J]. The Journal of Practical Medicine, 2025, 41(10): 1525-1532. |
| [15] | Yaqian DENG,Wenxiao LI,Zelin XU,Jinmei MA,Tingting DU,Wen LIU,Jun LI. Predictive value of growth orientation quantification combined with S⁃Detect technique for axillary lymph node metastasis in breast cancer [J]. The Journal of Practical Medicine, 2025, 41(1): 100-107. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||

