The Journal of Practical Medicine ›› 2025, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (10): 1525-1532.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2025.10.014
• Clinical Research • Previous Articles
Siyi FENG1,Yanjiao LI1,Rui ZHONG1,Junbiao. GUO2()
Received:
2025-01-17
Online:
2025-05-25
Published:
2025-05-21
Contact:
Junbiao. GUO
E-mail:yrtb0731@163.com
CLC Number:
Siyi FENG,Yanjiao LI,Rui ZHONG,Junbiao. GUO. Efficacy, lumbar muscle morphology and mechanical property in the elderly with degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis treated with four⁃dimensional traction[J]. The Journal of Practical Medicine, 2025, 41(10): 1525-1532.
Tab. 1
Comparison of general information between the two groups"
项目 | 观察组 (n = 40) | 对照组 (n = 40) | χ2 /t值 | P值 |
---|---|---|---|---|
年龄/岁 | 74.33 ± 3.56 | 75.54 ± 4.09 | 1.411 | 0.162 |
性别/例 | ||||
男 | 23 | 22 | 0.051 | 0.822 |
女 | 17 | 18 | ||
病程/月 | 21.65 ± 6.98 | 20.18 ± 6.35 | 0.985 | 0.328 |
身高/m | 1.64 ± 0.58 | 1.65 ± 0.55 | 0.670 | 0.505 |
体质量/kg | 54.52 ± 4.84 | 56.29 ± 5.01 | 1.607 | 0.112 |
病变累及节段/例 | ||||
L3 — L4 | 14 | 16 | 0.457 | 0.796 |
L4 — L5 | 19 | 16 | ||
L5 — S1 | 7 | 8 | ||
类型/例 | ||||
中央型 | 15 | 15 | 0.321 | 0.852 |
侧隐窝型 | 14 | 12 | ||
椎间孔型 | 11 | 13 | ||
并发症/例 | ||||
高血压 | 18 | 15 | 0.464 | 0.496 |
糖尿病 | 12 | 10 | 0.251 | 0.617 |
慢性心血管疾病 | 8 | 6 | 0.346 | 0.556 |
骨质疏松 | 10 | 9 | 0.069 | 0.793 |
慢性呼吸系统疾病 | 5 | 4 | - | 1.000 |
慢性肾病 | 4 | 3 | - | 1.000 |
Tab. 2
Comparison of morphological indices of lumbar muscle group between the two groups"
项目 | 观察组(n = 40) | 对照组(n = 40) | t值 | P值 |
---|---|---|---|---|
多裂肌厚度/cm | ||||
治疗前 | 2.90 ± 0.57 | 2.84 ± 0.61 | 0.455 | 0.651 |
治疗后 | 3.50 ± 0.74? | 3.16 ± 0.68? | 2.140 | 0.036 |
多裂肌周长/cm | ||||
治疗前 | 3.00 ± 0.48 | 2.96 ± 0.51 | 0.361 | 0.719 |
治疗后 | 3.31 ± 0.56 | 3.08 ± 0.42 | 2.078 | 0.041 |
多裂肌横截面积/cm2 | ||||
治疗前 | 2.87 ± 0.63 | 2.91 ± 0.70 | 0.269 | 0.789 |
治疗后 | 3.74 ± 0.51 | 3.45 ± 0.48 | 2.619 | 0.011 |
多裂肌SWV/(m/s) | ||||
治疗前 | 2.23 ± 0.27 | 2.21 ± 0.38 | 0.271 | 0.787 |
治疗后 | 1.65 ± 0.36 | 1.83 ± 0.41 | 2.086 | 0.040 |
多裂肌杨氏模量/kPa | ||||
治疗前 | 15.80 ± 3.43 | 15.65 ± 3.51 | 0.193 | 0.847 |
治疗后 | 9.25 ± 2.68? | 10.73 ± 2.46? | 2.121 | 0.037 |
Tab. 3
Comparison of mechanical property of lumbar muscle between the two groups"
项目 | 观察组 (n = 40) | 对照组 (n = 40) | t值 | P值 |
---|---|---|---|---|
肌张力/N | ||||
治疗前 | 83.20 ± 12.51 | 84.59 ± 13.47 | 0.478 | 0.634 |
治疗后 | 53.61 ± 10.25 | 58.32 ± 9.09 | 2.174 | 0.033 |
压痛阈/% | ||||
治疗前 | 80.36 ± 13.59 | 79.84 ± 12.62 | 0.177 | 0.860 |
治疗后 | 89.31 ± 7.42 | 84.54 ± 8.67 | 2.644 | 0.010 |
屈曲伸直比 | ||||
治疗前 | 0.95 ± 0.23 | 0.93 ± 0.24 | 0.381 | 0.705 |
治疗后 | 0.56 ± 0.16 | 0.63 ± 0.14 | 2.082 | 0.041 |
Tab. 4
Comparison of lumbar range of motion between the two groups"
项目 | 观察组 (n = 40) | 对照组(n = 40) | t值 | P值 |
---|---|---|---|---|
前屈活动度 | ||||
治疗前 | 35.34 ± 5.45 | 36.10 ± 5.28 | 0.633 | 0.528 |
治疗后 | 43.58 ± 5.61? | 39.13 ± 5.57? | 3.560 | 0.001 |
后伸活动度 | ||||
治疗前 | 25.66 ± 3.17 | 24.72 ± 3.34 | 1.291 | 0.200 |
治疗后 | 28.69 ± 3.47? | 26.54 ± 3.82? | 2.635 | 0.010 |
左侧屈活动度 | ||||
治疗前 | 28.36 ± 2.47 | 27.69 ± 2.15 | 1.294 | 0.199 |
治疗后 | 35.44 ± 4.42? | 31.33 ± 4.38? | 4.177 | < 0.001 |
右侧屈活动度 | ||||
治疗前 | 29.25 ± 2.01 | 29.33 ± 2.94 | 0.142 | 0.887 |
治疗后 | 35.96 ± 2.98? | 32.85 ± 2.59? | 4.982 | < 0.001 |
左旋转活动度 | ||||
治疗前 | 44.58 ± 3.69 | 43.24 ± 3.56 | 1.653 | 0.102 |
治疗后 | 55.49 ± 3.42? | 50.72 ± 4.03? | 5.708 | < 0.001 |
右旋转活动度 | ||||
治疗前 | 45.64 ± 3.23 | 46.74 ± 3.37 | 1.490 | 0.140 |
治疗后 | 58.38 ± 4.12? | 52.15 ± 3.87? | 6.971 | <0.001 |
Tab. 5
Comparison of VAS and ODI scores between the two groups"
项目 | 观察组 (n = 40) | 对照组 (n = 40) | t值 | P值 |
---|---|---|---|---|
VAS评分 | ||||
治疗前 | 5.03 ± 1.12 | 4.85 ± 1.08 | 0.732 | 0.467 |
治疗1周 | 4.06 ± 0.64? | 4.24 ± 0.56? | 1.339 | 0.185 |
治疗2周 | 3.09 ± 0.41?# | 3.43 ± 0.45?# | 3.532 | 0.001 |
治疗4周 | 1.89 ± 0.25?#△ | 2.23 ± 0.51?#△ | 3.786 | < 0.001 |
ODI指数 | ||||
治疗前 | 36.11 ± 6.83 | 35.25 ± 6.57 | 0.574 | 0.568 |
治疗1周 | 30.50 ± 6.24? | 33.73 ± 6.41 | 2.284 | 0.025 |
治疗2周 | 22.38 ± 6.54?# | 31.42 ± 5.62? | 6.630 | < 0.001 |
治疗4周 | 18.25 ± 5.47?#△ | 26.49 ± 5.21?#△ | 12.867 | < 0.001 |
Tab. 6
Comparison of long-term efficacy indicators"
项目 | 观察组 (n = 33) | 对照组 (n = 35) | t值 | P值 |
---|---|---|---|---|
VAS评分 | ||||
治疗3个月 | 2.97 ± 0.68 | 3.32 ± 0.73 | 2.043 | 0.045 |
治疗6个月 | 3.24 ± 0.63 | 3.65 ± 0.61 | 2.726 | 0.008 |
治疗12个月 | 3.57 ± 0.85 | 4.02 ± 0.72 | 2.360 | 0.021 |
ODI指数 | ||||
治疗3个月 | 17.39 ± 2.94 | 25.63 ± 3.46 | 10.552 | < 0.001 |
治疗6个月 | 16.86 ± 2.41 | 22.28 ± 3.02 | 8.149 | < 0.001 |
治疗12个月 | 14.62 ± 2.65 | 20.47 ± 2.59 | 9.205 | < 0.001 |
1 | BAO X, LU H, GAO Z, et al. Clinical Study of Percutaneous Endoscopic Large-channel Fusion and Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in the Treatment of Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis[J]. Altern Ther Health Med, 2023,29(8):552-557. |
2 |
SILVA P S, JARDIM A, PEREIRA J, et al. Minimally invasive fusion surgery for patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis and severe lumbar spinal stenosis: A comparative study between MIDLIF and TLIF[J]. Eur Spine J, 2023,2(9):3210-3217. doi:10.1007/s00586-023-07847-6
doi: 10.1007/s00586-023-07847-6 |
3 |
DING Y, ZHANG H, JIANG Q, et al. Finite element analysis of endoscopic cross-overtop decompression for single-segment lumbar spinal stenosis based on real clinical cases[J]. Front Bioeng Biotechnol, 2024,12:1393005. doi:10.3389/fbioe.2024.1393005
doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1393005 |
4 | 杨磊,陈锋,闫乾,等. 腰椎管狭窄症中西医治疗方法选择[J]. 辽宁中医药大学学报,2021,23(10):130-134. |
5 | 曾浩彬,王慧敏,郭俊彪,等. 四维牵引干预治疗腰椎管狭窄症患者腰大肌肌容积改变的临床研究[J]. 中华中医药杂志,2015,30(11):4189-4191. |
6 | 史进军,高启,王颖彦,等. 通过超声显像测量腰多裂肌厚度变化率评估腰多裂肌训练动作的效果[J]. 中华物理医学与康复杂志,2015,37(2):131-135. |
7 | 王学志,于勇华,肖人洪. TPELD和LLE治疗腰椎管狭窄的疗效观察[J]. 中南医学科学杂志,2024,52(4):642-644,648. |
8 |
GAO Y, LIU F, GU Z, et al. Clinical efficacy and imaging analysis of oblique lateral lumbar interbody fusion in the treatment of different types of lumbar intervertebral foramen stenosis[J]. J Orthop Surg Res, 2024,19(1):216. doi:10.1186/s13018-024-04636-9
doi: 10.1186/s13018-024-04636-9 |
9 | NAVARROZA E S, SENOLOS G C, LEOCHICO C F D. The Correlation between Unilateral Hip Bridge Endurance and Lumbar Multifidi Sonologic Characteristics in Physically Active Allied Healthcare Professionals at St. Luke's Medical Center - Quezon City: A Cross-sectional Study[J]. Acta Med Philipp, 2024,58(15):46-54. |
10 |
GOFELD M, BHARATHA A. Qualitative and quantitative characteristics of the lumbar multifidi muscles: Comparison of the magnetic resonance imaging and musculoskeletal ultrasound[J]. Interv Pain Med, 2025,4(1):100547. doi:10.1016/j.inpm.2025.100547
doi: 10.1016/j.inpm.2025.100547 |
11 | 中华中医药学会. 腰椎管狭窄症ZYYXH/T410-2012[J]. 风湿病与关节炎,2013,2(2):75-77. |
12 | 万丽,赵晴,陈军,等.疼痛评估量表应用的中国专家共识(2020版)[J].中华疼痛学杂志,2020,16(3):177-187. |
13 |
ZHAO K, BAO T, YANG W, et al. Spinal-pelvic sagittal imbalance and paraspinal muscle degeneration in patients with degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: A monocentric, prospective and observational study[J]. Exp Ther Med, 2023,26(4):479. doi:10.3892/etm.2023.12178
doi: 10.3892/etm.2023.12178 |
14 | 柳博文,王宝剑,杨克新,等. 高景华运用引火汤加减治疗退行性腰椎疾病临床经验[J]. 中国中医基础医学杂志,2022,28(3):478-481. |
15 | 燕文海,马楠山,张坤,等. 从矢状位平衡谈脊柱疾病治疗的整体观[J]. 中华中医药杂志,2022,37(5):2672-2676. |
16 |
DENG G H, TAN Z, CHEN R, et al. Chiropractic rehabilitation in accelerated rehabilitation after total hip arthroplasty for Crowe type IV hip dysplasia[J]. Medicine (Baltimore), 2024,103(30):e39117. doi:10.1097/md.0000000000039117
doi: 10.1097/md.0000000000039117 |
17 |
LI W, CHANG Y, FENG Q, et al. Balance chiropractic therapy for cervical spondylotic radiculopathy: A randomized controlled trial[J]. Contemp Clin Trials Commun, 2024,41:101323. doi:10.1016/j.conctc.2024.101323
doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2024.101323 |
18 |
FEDORCHUK C A, FEDORCHUK C G, LIGHTSTONE D F. Improvement in Pain, Quality of Life, and Urinary Dysfunction following Correction of Lumbar Lordosis and Reduction in Lumbar Spondylolistheses Using Chiropractic BioPhysics® Structural Spinal Rehabilitation: A Case Series with > 1-Year Long-Term Follow-Up Exams[J]. J Clin Med, 2024,13(7):2024. doi:10.3390/jcm13072024
doi: 10.3390/jcm13072024 |
19 | HAAS J W, FEDORCHUK C, LIGHTSTONE D F, et al. Improvement in Spine Pain, Functional Performance, and Quality of Life in a 26-Year-Old Male With a Failed Spine Fusion Surgery After Chiropractic BioPhysics® Structural Spinal Rehabilitation: A Case Report With a Six-Month Follow-Up[J]. Cureus, 2024,16(10):e71544. |
20 |
SCHWAB F, MEKHAIL N, PATEL K V, et al. Restorative Neurostimulation Therapy Compared to Optimal Medical Management: A Randomized Evaluation (RESTORE) for the Treatment of Chronic Mechanical Low Back Pain due to Multifidus Dysfunction[J]. Pain Ther, 2025,14(1):401-423. doi:10.1007/s40122-024-00689-0
doi: 10.1007/s40122-024-00689-0 |
21 |
XIA G, LI X, SHANG Y, et al. Correlation between severity of spinal stenosis and multifidus atrophy in degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis[J]. BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 2021,22(1):536. doi:10.1186/s12891-021-04411-5
doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04411-5 |
22 |
SARAFADEEN R, GANIYU S O, IBRAHIM A A, et al. Effectiveness of lumbar stabilization exercise with real-time ultrasound imaging biofeedback on lumbar multifidus muscle cross-sectional area in individuals with non-specific chronic low back pain: A study protocol for a randomized controlled trial[J]. Trials, 2022,23(1):20. doi:10.1186/s13063-021-05952-9
doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05952-9 |
23 |
NAGHDI N, MOHSENI-BANDPEI M A, TAGHIPOUR M, et al. Lumbar Multifidus Muscle Morphology Changes in Patient with Different Degrees of Lumbar Disc Herniation: An Ultrasonographic Study[J]. Medicina (Kaunas), 2021,57(7):699. doi:10.3390/medicina57070699
doi: 10.3390/medicina57070699 |
24 | 钟燕彪,徐海珊,吕江红,等. 超声在评估健康人和慢性腰椎间盘突出症患者多裂肌形态中的应用[J]. 中华物理医学与康复杂志,2014,36(8):625-629. |
25 | 朱璐,徐道明,吴文忠,等. 雷火灸联合振动训练治疗原发性骨质疏松症腰背痛疗效观察[J]. 中国针灸,2020,40(1):17-20. |
26 | 郝振民,郭振宁,邓宇光,等. 肌骨超声、SMI联合SWE技术在观察NLBP患者相关肌肉特征变化中的应用[J]. 影像科学与光化学,2023,41(1):79-83. |
27 | 梁允标,沈梅,韩为. 针灸联合康复训练对脑卒中后偏瘫并腰椎间盘突出症患者患肢运动功能及生存质量的影响[J]. 临床误诊误治,2024,37(15):62-67. |
28 | 姜玉国,陈林森. 推拿牵引联合冲击波治疗腰椎间盘突出症[J]. 辽宁中医杂志,2021,48(7):204-207. |
29 |
ÖTEN E, CIVAN O, UĞUR L. Traction therapy in lumbar disc hernias: A finite element analysis study[J]. Jt Dis Relat Surg, 2022,33(1):86-92. doi:10.52312/jdrs.2022.516
doi: 10.52312/jdrs.2022.516 |
30 | 郭俊彪,饶思远,肖镇泓,等. 基于腰骶-骨盆矢状位参数改变探讨不同整脊牵引疗法治疗退变性腰椎滑脱症临床疗效的对比[J]. 实用医学杂志,2024,40(24):3482-3488. |
31 | 陈志伟,张钰敏,占超,等. 脊柱微调手法结合四维牵引调曲治疗腰椎间盘突出症100例[J]. 时珍国医国药,2021,32(2):358-359. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||