The Journal of Practical Medicine ›› 2026, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (10): 1805-1810.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2026.10.015
• Modernization of Traditional Chinese Medicine • Previous Articles
Jing ZHANG1,Yan LI2,Ni DING1,Man GUO1(
)
Received:2026-01-28
Online:2026-05-25
Published:2026-05-27
Contact:
Man GUO
E-mail:qd18766249232@163.com
CLC Number:
Jing ZHANG,Yan LI,Ni DING,Man GUO. Efficacy of Niantong powder plaster moxibustion combined with three-step analgesic ladder in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer with cancer pain and influence on cancer-related fatigue[J]. The Journal of Practical Medicine, 2026, 42(10): 1805-1810.
Tab.1
Comparison of baseline data between the two groups"
| 项目 | 对照组(n = 76) | 联合组(n = 76) | t/χ2 值 | P值 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 年龄( | 56.38 ± 4.38 | 55.78 ± 5.12 | 0.776 | 0.439 |
| 性别 | ||||
| 男 | 40(52.63) | 43(56.58) | 0.239 | 0.625 |
| 女 | 36(47.37) | 33(43.42) | ||
| 体质量指数( | 20.15 ± 0.63 | 20.21 ± 0.67 | 0.569 | 0.570 |
| 病程( | 38.78 ± 7.38 | 39.21 ± 7.15 | 0.365 | 0.716 |
| 入院时卡氏功能状态评分( | 60.24 ± 3.15 | 60.47 ± 3.23 | 0.444 | 0.657 |
| 病理分型 | ||||
| 腺癌 | 70(92.11) | 72(94.74) | 0.428 | 0.513 |
| 其他 | 6(7.89) | 4(5.26) | ||
| 临床分期 | ||||
| Ⅲ期 | 26(34.21) | 30(39.47) | 0.452 | 0.501 |
| Ⅳ期 | 50(65.79) | 46(60.53) |
Tab.3
Comparison of cancer pain degree between the two groups"
| 项目 | 对照组(n = 76) | 联合组(n = 76) | t值 | P值 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NRS评分 | 治疗前 | 6.61 ± 1.34 | 6.55 ± 1.42 | 0.268 | 0.789 |
| 治疗后 | 3.37 ± 0.69* | 2.85 ± 0.57* | 5.065 | 0.000 | |
| BPI-疼痛程度 | 治疗前 | 6.68 ± 1.26 | 6.62 ± 1.35 | 0.283 | 0.777 |
| 治疗后 | 3.26 ± 0.72* | 2.81 ± 0.62* | 4.129 | < 0.001 | |
| BPI-疼痛干扰 | 治疗前 | 6.34 ± 1.23 | 6.39 ± 1.31 | 0.243 | 0.809 |
| 治疗后 | 3.15 ± 0.66* | 2.66 ± 0.47* | 5.272 | < 0.001 | |
Tab.4
Comparison of PFS-R scores between the two groups"
| 项目 | 对照组(n = 76) | 联合组(n = 76) | t值 | P值 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 行为 | 治疗前 | 5.76 ± 0.88 | 5.71 ± 0.86 | 0.354 | 0.724 |
| 治疗后 | 4.14 ± 0.85* | 3.36 ± 0.78* | 5.894 | < 0.001 | |
| 情感 | 治疗前 | 6.57 ± 1.01 | 6.54 ± 1.07 | 0.178 | 0.859 |
| 治疗后 | 4.34 ± 1.11* | 3.27 ± 1.02* | 6.188 | < 0.001 | |
| 感觉 | 治疗前 | 4.66 ± 0.89 | 4.73 ± 0.92 | 0.477 | 0.634 |
| 治疗后 | 3.14 ± 0.82* | 2.71 ± 0.73* | 3.415 | 0.001 | |
| 认知 | 治疗前 | 4.55 ± 0.82 | 4.62 ± 0.86 | 0.514 | 0.608 |
| 治疗后 | 3.22 ± 0.74* | 2.93 ± 0.64* | 2.584 | 0.011 | |
| 总分 | 治疗前 | 5.38 ± 0.90 | 5.40 ± 0.93 | 0.135 | 0.893 |
| 治疗后 | 3.71 ± 0.88* | 3.07 ± 0.79* | 4.718 | < 0.001 | |
Tab.5
Comparison of pain mediators levels between the two groups"
| 组别 | 对照组(n = 76) | 联合组(n = 76) | t值 | P值 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5-HT/(ng/mL) | 治疗前 | 94.54 ± 14.65 | 95.23 ± 12.57 | 0.312 | 0.756 |
| 治疗后 | 84.24 ± 8.11* | 76.44 ± 7.26* | 6.247 | < 0.001 | |
| SP/(pg/mL) | 治疗前 | 139.60 ± 19.27 | 138.86 ± 20.14 | 0.231 | 0.817 |
| 治疗后 | 120.24 ± 12.19* | 110.65 ± 14.08* | 4.489 | 0.000 | |
| PGE2/(pg/mL) | 治疗前 | 663.73 ± 96.84 | 661.89 ± 90.57 | 0.121 | 0.904 |
| 治疗后 | 528.64 ± 58.22* | 480.24 ± 60.25* | 5.036 | < 0.001 | |
| NP-Y/(pg/mL) | 治疗前 | 299.77 ± 29.28 | 297.58 ± 30.14 | 0.454 | 0.650 |
| 治疗后 | 249.66 ± 19.58* | 233.47 ± 20.05* | 5.036 | < 0.001 | |
| [1] |
LØHRE E T, THRONÆS M, KLEPSTAD P. Breakthrough cancer pain in 2020[J]. Curr Opin Support Palliat Care, 2020, 14(2): 94-99. doi: 10.1097/SPC.0000000000000494 .
doi: 10.1097/SPC.0000000000000494 |
| [2] |
ATA F, YOUSAF Z, KALAJI B N AL, et al. Back pain as an initial feature of advanced gastric cancer mimicking multiple myeloma: A case report and literature review[J]. Qatar Med J, 2022, 2022(4): 53. doi: 10.5339/qmj.2022.53 .
doi: 10.5339/qmj.2022.53 |
| [3] |
WANG D, JIANG T, ZHENG L, et al. Analgesic treatment for refractory cancer pain caused by gastric cancer bone metastasis: A case report and literature review[J]. Medicine (Baltimore), 2024, 103(28): e38851. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000038851 .
doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000038851 |
| [4] |
TAKEI D, TAGAMI K. Management of cancer pain due to bone metastasis[J]. J Bone Miner Metab, 2023, 41(3): 327-336. doi: 10.1007/s00774-022-01382-y .
doi: 10.1007/s00774-022-01382-y |
| [5] |
BROZOVIĆ G, LESAR N, JANEV D, et al. CANCER PAIN AND THERAPY[J]. Acta Clin Croat, 2022, 61(): 103-108. doi: 10.20471/acc.2022.61.s2.13 .
doi: 10.20471/acc.2022.61.s2.13 |
| [6] |
《慢性癌性疼痛中医诊疗规范专家共识》制订专家组. 慢性癌性疼痛中医诊疗规范专家共识[J]. 江苏中医药, 2025, 57(7): 69-72. doi: 10.19844/j.cnki.1672-397X.2025.07.018 .
doi: 10.19844/j.cnki.1672-397X.2025.07.018 |
| [7] |
李壮苗,燕文娟,刘芳,等. 姜黄天灸膏穴位贴敷治疗脑卒中偏瘫肩痛临床疗效观察[J]. 中国针灸, 2023, 43(12): 1373-1378. doi: 10.13703/j.0255-2930.20230130-0001 .
doi: 10.13703/j.0255-2930.20230130-0001 |
| [8] |
TAN C, WONG J F, YEE C M, et al. Methadone rotation for cancer pain: An observational study[J]. BMJ Support Palliat Care, 2022, 12(e6): e736-e739. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2019-002175 .
doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2019-002175 |
| [9] |
MAO J J, LIOU K T, BASER R E, et al. Effectiveness of Electroacupuncture or Auricular Acupuncture vs Usual Care for Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain Among Cancer Survivors: The PEACE Randomized Clinical Trial[J]. JAMA Oncol, 2021, 7(5): 720-727. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2021.0310 .
doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2021.0310 |
| [10] |
中国抗癌协会癌症康复与姑息治疗专业委员会,中国临床肿瘤学会肿瘤支持与康复治疗专家委员会. 癌症相关性疲乏诊断与治疗中国专家共识[J]. 中华医学杂志, 2022, 102(3): 180-189. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20210811-01789 .
doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20210811-01789 |
| [11] |
李鑫,解晓芳,张光,等. 玄乌止痛膏穴位贴敷联合加味芍药甘草汤对癌性疼痛患者的疗效[J]. 辽宁中医杂志, 2024, 51(5): 164-167. doi: 10.13192/j.issn.1000-1719.2024.05.044 .
doi: 10.13192/j.issn.1000-1719.2024.05.044 |
| [12] |
MESTDAGH F, STEYAERT A, LAVAND'HOMME P. Cancer Pain Management: A Narrative Review of Current Concepts, Strategies, and Techniques[J]. Curr Oncol, 2023, 30(7): 6838-6858. doi: 10.3390/curroncol30070500 .
doi: 10.3390/curroncol30070500 |
| [13] |
张馨予. 中药外敷抗癌止痛贴联合针刺三阶梯药物止痛法治疗癌症疼痛的临床研究[J]. 辽宁中医杂志, 2022, 49(2): 165-169. doi: 10.13192/j.issn.1000-1719.2022.02.046 .
doi: 10.13192/j.issn.1000-1719.2022.02.046 |
| [14] |
魏世民,董宝强,富昱,等. 经筋刺法联合艾灸治疗阳虚型肺癌患者癌性疼痛的临床研究[J]. 辽宁中医杂志, 2020, 47(2): 169-171. doi: 10.13192/j.issn.1000-1719.2020.02.052 .
doi: 10.13192/j.issn.1000-1719.2020.02.052 |
| [15] |
THONG M S Y, VAN NOORDEN C J F, STEINDORF K, et al. Cancer-Related Fatigue: Causes and Current Treatment Options[J]. Curr Treat Options Oncol, 2020, 21(2): 17. doi: 10.1007/s11864-020-0707-5 .
doi: 10.1007/s11864-020-0707-5 |
| [16] |
TANAKA K, KONDO T, NARITA M, et al. Cancer aggravation due to persistent pain signals with the increased expression of pain-related mediators in sensory neurons of tumor-bearing mice[J]. Mol Brain, 2023, 16(1): 19. doi: 10.1186/s13041-023-01001-5 .
doi: 10.1186/s13041-023-01001-5 |
| [17] |
SÁNCHEZ M L, RODRÍGUEZ F D, COVEÑAS R. Neuropeptide Y Peptide Family and Cancer: Antitumor Therapeutic Strategies[J]. Int J Mol Sci, 2023, 24(12): 9962. doi: 10.3390/ijms24129962 .
doi: 10.3390/ijms24129962 |
| [18] |
石明宏,刘占伟,朱洋,等. 氨酚羟考酮联合局部放疗对老年恶性肿瘤骨转移癌痛患者血清细胞因子的影响[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2025, 41(11): 1718-1723. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2025.11.016 .
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2025.11.016 |
| [19] |
莫威,曾繁睿,易炜,等. "围放疗期"动态调整盐酸羟考酮缓释片剂量对肺癌骨转移患者镇痛效果的影响[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2022, 38(24): 3150-3154. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2022.24.023 .
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2022.24.023 |
| [20] |
LI C, CAI Q, WU X, et al. Anti-inflammatory Study on the Constituents of Angelica sinensis (Oliv.) Diels, Angelica dahurica (Hoffm.) Benth. & Hook.f. ex Franch. & Sav., Angelica pubescence Maxim and Foeniculum vulgare Mill. Essential Oils[J]. J Oleo Sci, 2022, 71(8): 1207-1219. doi: 10.5650/jos.ess22031 .
doi: 10.5650/jos.ess22031 |
| [21] |
HUSSAIN H, RASHAN L, HASSAN U, et al. Frankincense diterpenes as a bio-source for drug discovery[J]. Expert Opin Drug Discov, 2022, 17(5): 513-529. doi: 10.1080/17460441.2022.2044782 .
doi: 10.1080/17460441.2022.2044782 |
| [22] |
PENG J, SONG X, YU W, et al. The role and mechanism of cinnamaldehyde in cancer[J]. J Food Drug Anal, 2024, 32(2): 140-154. doi: 10.38212/2224-6614.3502 .
doi: 10.38212/2224-6614.3502 |
| [23] |
DENG J, HAN J, CHEN J, et al. Comparison of analgesic activities of aconitine in different mice pain models[J]. PLoS One, 2021, 16(4): e0249276. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249276 .
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249276 |
| [24] |
张珂洋, 张永清, 杨春淼, 等. 全蝎的炮制历史沿革、化学成分及药理作用研究进展[J]. 中国中药杂志, 2024, 49(4): 868-883. doi: 10.19540/j.cnki.cjcmm.20230814.202 .
doi: 10.19540/j.cnki.cjcmm.20230814.202 |
| [25] |
刘丽丽, 尧章洪, 李童, 等. 吴茱萸现代药理作用、剂型设计与临床外用研究进展[J]. 中华中医药学刊, 2025, 43(6): 52-60. doi: 10.13193/j.issn.1673-7717.2025.06.009 .
doi: 10.13193/j.issn.1673-7717.2025.06.009 |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||

