实用医学杂志 ›› 2022, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (20): 2608-2613.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006⁃5725.2022.20.018

• 新技术新方法 • 上一篇    下一篇

多裂肌劈开入路微创行TLIF 治疗腰骶段退变性疾病的疗效 

李佳 张欣 王磊 单中书 刘伟 李涛    

  1. 青海省人民医院骨科(西宁 810007

  • 出版日期:2022-10-25 发布日期:2022-10-25
  • 通讯作者: 张欣 E⁃mail:zx09011951@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    青海省卫健委指导性计划课题(编号:2019⁃wjzdx⁃10)

Clinical effect of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion via multifidus ⁃ splitting ap⁃ proach for lumbosacral degenerative diseases

LI Jia,ZHANG Xin,WANG Lei,SHAN Zhongshu,LIU Wei, LI Tao.   

  1. Department of OrthopaedicsQinghai Provincial People′s HospitalXining 810007China
  • Online:2022-10-25 Published:2022-10-25
  • Contact: ZHANG Xin E⁃mail:zx09011951@163.com ​

摘要:

目的 探讨多裂肌劈开入路微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术(transforaminal lumbar interbodyfu⁃ sionTLIF)治疗腰骶段退变性疾病的临床疗效。方法 选取 2017 2 月至 2021 2 月符合纳入标准的 127例腰骶椎单节段退变的患者作为研究对象。根据手术入路不同分为观察组(n = 62)和对照组(n = 65)。 观察组患者行正中切口后劈开多裂肌后行 TLIF 手术治疗,对照组行传统剥离椎旁肌行 TLIF 手术。比较 两组患者治疗前后及术后 1 年随访时腰椎 Oswestry 功能障碍指数(ODI)及 JOA 评分,疼痛视觉模拟量 表(VAS)评分,术中出血量、手术时间、术后引流量、住院时间、多裂肌脂肪浸润等级等相关指标评估。 结果 观察组患者术中出血量、手术时间、术后引流量及住院时间与对照组比较,均低于对照组,差异有 统计学意义(P < 0.05);两组患者术前的 ODIJOA 评分差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05),术后 3 d 1 年随访 时观察组患者 ODI 评分低于对照组,JOA 评分高于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P < 0.05);两组患者的术 前疼痛 VAS 评分差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05),观察组患者术后 3 d 1 年随访时 VAS 评分均低于对照 组,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05);术后 1 年,观察组多裂肌脂肪浸润等级级别较高的比例与对照组相比明 显较低,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。结论 相对于传统入路,多裂肌劈开入路行 TLIF 治疗单节段腰骶 段退变性疾病能明显改善患者腰椎功能,且出血少,术后疼痛小、手术时间短、住院时间短等优势,减轻多 裂肌脂肪化,保留其功能,具有微创优势,促进患者围手术期快速康复。

关键词:

多裂肌劈开, 微创, 经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术, 腰骶段, 单节段, 腰椎退变

Abstract:

Objective To investigate the clinical effect of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar inter⁃ body fusionTLIFby multifidus ⁃splitting approach in the treatment of lumbosacral degenerative diseases. Methods A total of 127 patients with lumbosacral single ⁃ level degeneration who met the inclusion criteria from February 2017 to February 2021 were selected as the study subjects. According to different surgical approachesthe patients were divided into treatment groupn = 62and control groupn = 65. Patients in the treatment group received TLIF surgery after median incision and splitting of multifidus musclewhile patients in the control group received TLIF surgery after traditional paravertebral muscle dissection. Lumbar Oswestry Disability IndexODIand JOA scoresvisual analogue scaleVASscoresintraoperative blood lossoperation timepostoperative drainagelength of hospital stayand multifidus fat infiltration grade were compared between the two groups before and after treatment and at 1⁃year follow⁃up. Results The amount of intraoperative blood lossoperation timepostoperative drainage volume and length of hospital stay in the treatment group were lower than those in the control groupwith statistical significanceP < 0.05. There were no statistically significant differences in preoperative ODI and JOA scores between 2 groupsP > 0.05),but ODI score in treatment group was lower than control group and JOA score was higher than control group at 3 days and 1 year follow⁃up after surgerywith statistically significant differences P < 0.05. There was no statistically significant difference in preoperative VAS scores between 2 groupsP > 0.05), and VAS scores of 3 days and 1 year after surgery in the treatment group were lower than those in the control group. The difference was statistically significantP < 0.05. One year after surgerythe proportion of higher fat infiltra⁃tion grade of multifidus muscle in the treatment group was significantly lower than that in the control groupand the difference was statistically significantP < 0.05. Conclusion Compared with traditional approachTLIF by splitting the multifidus approach for the treatment of lumbosacral single ⁃segment degenerative disease can signifi⁃ cantly improve the lumbar function of patientsand has the advantages of less bleedingless postoperative painshort operation timeand short hospital stay. It can reduce the adipose formation of multifidus muscle retain its functionand has the advantages of minimally invasive surgeryand promote the rapid perioperative recovery of patients. 

Key words:

multifidus splitting, mminimally invasive, transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion, lum? bosacral segment, single segment, lumbar degeneration