实用医学杂志 ›› 2022, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (20): 2602-2607.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006⁃5725.2022.20.017

• 新技术新方法 • 上一篇    下一篇

直接前侧入路全髋与半髋关节置换术治疗高龄股骨颈骨折的疗效 

李骏然1翟婧秀罗程王磊徐颖韩硕梁俊生1李力更2   

  1. 唐山市第二医院 1 老年骨科,2 创伤骨科,3 创伤外科研究所(河北唐山 063000

  • 出版日期:2022-10-25 发布日期:2022-10-25
  • 通讯作者: 梁俊生 E⁃mail:452455738@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    河北省医学科学研究课题计划(编号:20221741)

Clinical efficacy of total hip arthroplasty vs hemiarthroplasty through the direct anterior approach for elderly patients with femoral neck fractures

LI Junran*ZHAI JingxiuLUO ChengWANG LeiXU YingHAN ShuoLIANG JunshengLI Ligeng.   

  1. Department of Geriatric Orthopedicsthe Second Hospital of TangshanTangshan 063000China*Institute of Trauma Surgerythe Second Hospital of TangshanTangshan 063000China

  • Online:2022-10-25 Published:2022-10-25
  • Contact: LIANG Junsheng E⁃mail:452455738@qq.com

摘要:

目的 对比直接前侧入路全髋关节置换术与半髋关节置换术治疗高龄股骨颈骨折的临床 疗效。方法 选取我院 2019 6 月至 2020 10 月收治的 86 例高龄股骨颈骨折患者为研究对象。将采用 人工全髋关节置换术的 41 例患者作为全髋组,采用人工股骨头置换术的 45 例患者为半髋组。比较两组 患者手术时间、术中出血量、术后初次下床行走时间、术后住院时间、股骨假体中心性固定、双侧肢体长度 差值、术后 3612 个月 Harris 髋关节功能评分以及并发症发生情况。结果 与全髋组相比,半髋组手术 时间更短、术中出血量更少、双侧肢体长度差值< 5 mm比率更高,差异均有统计学意义(P < 0.05);术后12个 月的 Harris 评分,全髋组明显优于半髋组,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。两组术后初次下床行走时间、术 后住院时间、双侧肢体长度差值< 10 mm 比率、术后 36 个月 Harris 评分和并发症发生率比较差异无统计 学意义(P > 0.05)。结论 直接前侧入路全髋关节置换术与半髋关节置换术治疗高龄股骨颈骨折均能获 得良好的短期疗效,但全髋关节置换术的长期疗效更优。半髋关节置换术在手术时间、术中出血量和精 准重建肢体长度方面更有优势。

关键词:

直接前入路, 股骨颈骨折, 高龄, 关节成形术,

Abstract:

Objective To investigate the clinical effect of total hip arthroplasty(THA)versus hemiarthro⁃ plasty(HA)through the direct anterior approach(DAA)for femoral neck fractures in elderly patients. Methods A total of 86 elderly patients with femoral neck fractures in our hospital from June 2019 to October 2020 were enrolled and assigned to total hip arthroplasty group(n = 41,THA group)and hemiarthroplasty group(n = 45, HA group). The operation duration,intraoperative blood loss,time of first postoperative walking,duration of post⁃ operative hospitalization,central fixation of femoral prosthesis,limb length discrepancy,Harris hip score in 3 months,6 months and 12 months after the operation,and complications were compared between the two groups. Results Compared with the THA group,HA group had shorter operation duration,less intraoperative blood loss and higher ratio of limb length discrepancy shortened than 5mm,and the differences were statistically significant between the two groups(P < 0.05). The Harris score in 12 months after the operation in the THA group were signif⁃ icantly higher than that of the HA group,and the difference was statistically significant(P < 0.05). No significant difference was noted in time of first postoperative walking,duration of postoperative hospitalization,central fixation of femoral prosthesis,the ratio of limb length discrepancy shortened than 10mm,the Harris score in 3 months and 6 months after the operation,and the incidence of complications between the two groups(P > 0.05). Conclusion Both THA and HA via DAA could achieve excellent short⁃term efficacy in the treatment of femoral neck fractures in elderly patients. But the long⁃term outcomes of THA were better than HA,the latter was featured by shorter opera⁃ tion time,less intraoperative blood loss and accurate limb length reconstruction.

Key words:

direct anterior approach, femoral neck fractures, elderly, arthroplasty, hip