实用医学杂志 ›› 2020, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (23): 3269-3278.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006⁃5725.2020.23.021

• 医学检查与临床诊断 • 上一篇    下一篇

T1 mapping技术定量分析肥厚型心肌病纤维化

刘新峰,韩燕, 蒲伟, 刘昌杰, 王荣品, 田野, 翟茂雄   

  1. 贵州省人民医院1放射科,3 心内科(贵阳550002);2 贵阳市第六医院超声科(贵阳550002)
  • 出版日期:2020-12-10 发布日期:2020-12-23
  • 通讯作者: 王荣品E⁃mail:wangrongpin@126.com
  • 基金资助:

    贵州省科技成果应用及产业化计划项目(编号:黔科合成果[2019]4445 号);贵州省人民医院青年基金(编号:GZSYQN[2017]15 号);贵州省科技支撑计划(编号:黔科合支[2018]2794号)

Quantitative analysis of fibrosis in hypertrophic cardiomyopathyby T1 mapping technique

LIU Xinfeng, HAN Yan,PU Wei,LIU Changjie,WANG Rongpin,TIAN Ye,ZHAI Maoxiong.   

  1. Department of Radiology,Gui⁃zhou Provincial People′ s Hospital,Guiyang 550002,China
  • Online:2020-12-10 Published:2020-12-23
  • Contact: WANG Rongpin E⁃mail:wangrongpin@126.com

摘要:

目的 利用T1 mapping技术定量分析肥厚型心肌病(hypertrophic cardiomyopathy,HCM)纤维化特征,并对HCM患者的基本资料做统计学分析。方法 对28例HCM患者及正常组16例行T1 mapping序列、延迟强化(late gadoliniumenhancement,LGE)扫描及实验室检查,就病例组、正常组及病例组的肥厚区域、非肥厚区域心肌初始T1 值做统计学分析,比较LGE 阴性、LGE 阳性及正常组心肌T1 值及基本资料的差异。构建ROC 曲线,计算T1 值的诊断效能。结果 HCM 组左室心肌初始T1 值大于正常组,病例组肥厚区域T1 值大于非肥厚区域,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.001),LGE 阴性、LGE 阳性组及正常组组间T1 值差异有统计学意义(P < 0.001),LGE 阴性、LGE 阳性组间的射血分数、NT⁃proBNP 差异无统计学意义,但LGE 阴性组标准四腔心层面心肌最大短径低于LGE 阳性组,最大长径大于LGE 阳性组,左室心肌初始T1 值鉴别LGE 阴性组与正常组的敏感度、准确率均在85%以上,鉴别LGE 阳性组与正常组准确率为93.1%。结论 T1 mapping 技术能够定量心肌纤维化程度,T1 值的大小与心肌的肥厚程度有关。

关键词: 纵向弛豫成像, 磁共振, 肥厚型心肌病, 诊断

Abstract:

Objective To quantitatively analyze the fibrosis characteristics of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy(HCM)by T1 mapping technique,and analyze the basic data of HCM patients. Methods Twenty⁃eightcases withHCM patients and 16 cases(normal group)were examined with T1 mapping sequence,delayed enhanced scan andlaboratory examination. The initial T1 values of hypertrophic and non⁃hypertrophic myocardium in case group,normal group and case group were statistically analyzed.According to delayed enhanced scan,patients were dividedinto negative group and positive group. The differences of myocardial T1 and basic data between LGE negative,LGE positive and normal groups were compared. The ROC curve was constructed to analyze the diagnostic value ofT1 value in distinguishing LGE negative from normal group,LGE positive from normal group. Results The nativeT1 value in the HCM group were larger than those in the normal group. The initial T1 values of hypertrophic aerawere larger than those in non⁃hypertrophic myocardium. The difference was statistically significant(P < 0.001).There were significant differences among LGE negative,LGE positive and normal groups(P < 0.001). There wasno significant difference in ejection fraction and NT⁃proBNPamong the two groups,but the maximum short diameterof LGE negative group was lower than that of LGE positive group,and the maximum long diameter was opposite.The sensitivity and accuracy of T1 value in distinguishing LGE negative from normal group were more than 85%,respectively,and the accuracy were 93.1% between LGE positive and normal groups. Conclusion T1 mappingtechnique can quantify the degree of myocardial fibrosis. The value of T1 is related to the degree of myocardial hyper⁃trophy.

Key words: T1 mapping, magnetic resonance, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, diagnosis