传统后路椎管减压融合术与电子显微镜下微创术治疗退变性腰椎管狭窄症的疗效比较

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006⁃5725.2020.22.012

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目的对退变性腰椎管狭窄症患者在电子显微镜下行微创后路椎管减压融合术治疗，并与传统后路椎管减压融合术的临床治疗效果进行比较。方法选择2017 年3 月至2019 年3 月在本院行融合手术治疗的110例退变性腰椎管狭窄症患者作为研究对象，将采用电子显微镜导航行微创后路椎管减压融合术患者58例作为微创组，采用传统后路椎管减压融合术患者52例为传统组。对两组患者的手术指标、术后住院时间、术后并发症、视觉模拟评分（VAS）和Oswestry功能障碍指数（ODI）评分等进行比较分析，并采用MacNab标准于术后末次随访对两组临床效果进行评价。结果较之于传统手术组，微创组的手术时间、术中出血量、手术切口长度、术后住院时间、术后并发症均明显更短或更少，组间差异有统计学意义（P < 0.05）。较之于治疗前，两组治疗后VAS 评分与ODI 评分明显改善（P＜0.05），但治疗后两组间VAS评分与ODI评分比较差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）。两组患者末次随访优良率相比差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）。结论相较于传统减压融合术，电子显微镜导航下微创后入路椎管减压融合术治疗退变性腰椎管狭窄症在保证疗效的同时，还具有创伤小、出血量少、手术时间及住院时间短、术后并发症低等诸多优势，值得临床优先选择。

关键词: 退变性腰椎管狭窄症, 电子显微镜, 微创, 椎管减压融合术

Abstract:

Objective The treatment of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis by minimally invasive posteriorspinal decompression and fusion under electron microscope was compared with that of traditional posterior spinaldecompression and fusion. Methods A total of 110 patients with degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis who underwentfusion surgery in our hospital from March 2017 to March 2019 were selected. There were 58 patients who underwentminimally invasive posterior spinal decompression and fusion guided by electron microscope and selected as theminimally invasive group，Other 52 patients who underwent traditional posterior spinal decompression and fusionwere selected as the traditional group. The surgical indicators，postoperative hospital stay，postoperative complica⁃tions，visual analog score（VAS）and Oswestry dysfunction index（ODI）scores of the two groups were comparedand analyzed. The MacNab standard was used at the last postoperative period of follow⁃up to evaluate the clinicaleffects. Results Compared with traditional operation group，the operation time，intraoperative blood loss，surgi⁃cal incision length，postoperative hospital stay，and postoperative complications of the minimally invasive groupwere significantly shorter or less（P < 0.05）. The VAS score and ODI score of the two groups were all significantlyimproved after treatment（P < 0.05）but there was no significant difference in VAS score and ODI score betweentwo groups（P > 0.05）. Conclusion Compared with traditional decompression and fusion，electron microscope⁃guided minimally invasive posterior approach decompression and fusion not only guarantees the curative effect butalso has many advantages for the treatment of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. The advantages includes lesstrauma，less bleeding，shorter operative time and hospital stay，and lower postoperative complications. It is worthyof clinical preference.

Key words: degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis, electron microscope, minimally invasive, spinal decompression and fusion

李雪鹏, 宋成, 桑平, 王子予, 郭梓恒. 传统后路椎管减压融合术与电子显微镜下微创术治疗退变性腰椎管狭窄症的疗效比较[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2020, 36(22): 3088-3093.

LI Xuepeng, SONG Cheng, SANG Ping, WANG Ziyu, GUO Ziheng. Comparison of the efficacy of traditional posterior spinal decompression fusion and electron microscopy in minimally invasive surgery for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis[J]. The Journal of Practical Medicine, 2020, 36(22): 3088-3093.

[1]	徐璐,张晶晶,闫奇奇,许雯婷,黎淮,王德光. IgM沉积强度对原发性IgA肾病患者肾小球超微结构及临床病理的影响[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2024, 40(22): 3172-3178.
[2]	王益,徐彬,陈杨达豪,徐卫星,盛红枫. 微创内镜辅助下颈椎前路减压融合术治疗神经根型颈椎病的疗效[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2024, 40(20): 2880-2887.
[3]	孙文熙杨一帆林锐赵帅刘秉新王洪伸李永津陈博来 . 骨科手术机器人辅助技术在颈椎手术中的应用进展 [J]. 实用医学杂志, 2023, 39(9): 1179-1184.
[4]	罗城,郭胜杰,张志凌,周芳坚. 国产单孔手术机器人辅助腹腔镜下肾部分切除术的可行性及安全性分析[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2023, 39(24): 3275-3280.
[5]	王晓陆, 尹宗生刘艺明马力郁贤舜 . 多节段腰椎管狭窄症融合术后疗效与脊柱骨盆参数变化分析 [J]. 实用医学杂志, 2023, 39(2): 224-229.
[6]	王志强梁思敏杨万忠史安利刘威周月勇戈朝晖. 侧板固定与后路双侧椎弓根钉棒固定联合斜外侧椎间融合治疗单节段腰椎退变性疾病的疗效 [J]. 实用医学杂志, 2022, 38(21): 2702-2708.
[7]	刘俊祥王怡轩郭超 . 右胸前外侧小切口与胸骨上段小切口在主动脉瓣置换术中的短期疗效比较 [J]. 实用医学杂志, 2022, 38(20): 2597-2601.
[8]	李佳张欣王磊单中书刘伟李涛 . 多裂肌劈开入路微创行TLIF 治疗腰骶段退变性疾病的疗效 [J]. 实用医学杂志, 2022, 38(20): 2608-2613.
[9]	许宇霞史强李远红何友智罗为民 . 显微镜辅助下侧前方腰椎融合术与改良经椎间孔入路腰椎融合术治疗退变性腰椎管狭窄症的疗效 [J]. 实用医学杂志, 2022, 38(19): 2429-2439.
[10]	廖军宗少晖陈晓明程立维 . 经皮内镜后路腰椎间融合术与微创经椎间孔入路腰椎椎间融合术治疗腰椎管狭窄症的效果 [J]. 实用医学杂志, 2022, 38(17): 2209-2215.
[11]	柏小金韩小松向柄彦王知王昭杨灿刘福英. 后外侧微创入路行全髋关节置换术治疗老年股骨颈骨折的早期疗效 [J]. 实用医学杂志, 2022, 38(12): 1456-1460.
[12]	翟晓雷周大志刘冬红王少丹. 微创抽吸辅助无延迟开颅减压治疗原发性脑出血伴脑疝的随机对照研究 [J]. 实用医学杂志, 2022, 38(11): 1328-1332.
[13]	商宏伟, 李超, 孙盛斌 , 娄霞 . Wang手术治疗漏斗胸应用体会 [J]. 实用医学杂志, 2021, 37(9): 1230-1234.
[14]	刘佩雷, 张乐, 彭成, 陶奇昌, 代建昊, 常彬, 李强. 3D打印联合关节镜微创治疗胫骨平台骨折 [J]. 实用医学杂志, 2021, 37(3): 353-357.
[15]	王晓陆, 刘艺明 , 杜怡斌, 祁家龙 , 李春, 郑科, 郁贤舜. 微创经椎间孔入路椎体间融合术治疗双节段腰椎管狭窄症中远期疗效 [J]. 实用医学杂志, 2021, 37(2): 149-153.

传统后路椎管减压融合术与电子显微镜下微创术治疗退变性腰椎管狭窄症的疗效比较

Comparison of the efficacy of traditional posterior spinal decompression fusion and electron microscopy in minimally invasive surgery for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价