实用医学杂志 ›› 2020, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (22): 3094-3099.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006⁃5725.2020.22.013

• 临床研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

三种不同手术入路髓内钉治疗胫骨骨折的疗效比较

田仁元,郭松,徐林,袁野,黄文良,阮世强,邓江   

  1. 遵义医科大学第三附属医院(遵义市第一人民医院)骨科(贵州遵义563000)
  • 出版日期:2020-11-25 发布日期:2020-12-14
  • 通讯作者: 邓江E⁃mail:dJ30666@126.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(编号:81660367)

Comparison of three different surgical approaches forintramedullarynailing in the treatment of tibial frac⁃ture

TIAN Renyuan,GUO Song,XU Lin,YUAN Ye,HUANG Wenliang,RUAN Shiqiang,DENG Jiang   

  1. Depart⁃ment of Orthopedics,the Third Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University,the First People′s Hospital of Zunyi,Zunyi 563000,China
  • Online:2020-11-25 Published:2020-12-14
  • Contact: DENG Jiang E⁃mail:dJ30666@126.com

摘要:

目的 探讨不同手术入路胫骨髓内钉治疗胫骨骨折的疗效。方法 收集我院2018年1月至2019 年1 月住院行髓内钉内固定治疗的99 例胫骨骨折患者,其中男69 例,女30 例,年龄为18~65岁,平均47 岁,根据手术入路分为髌上入路组33 例、髌下入路组30 例、髌骨旁外侧入路组36 例;比较三组患者手术时间、术中出血量、X 线照射次数、住院时间、骨折愈合时间、Lysholm 评分、膝前疼痛的发生率、内固定物取除时间、并发症发生率、临床疗效优良率,使用SPSS 22.0 统计学软件进行统计学分析。结果 手术时间、术中出血量、X线照射次数、住院时间及膝前疼痛发生率比较,均为髌旁外侧入路组最少,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);Lysholm 评分比较,髌旁外侧入路组最高,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);临床疗效优良率、并发症发生率、骨折愈合时间及内固定物取除时间比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 不同手术入路是影响胫骨骨折疗效的重要因素,髌旁外侧入路不损伤髌韧带及髌股关节面,手术时间短,术中透视次数少,膝前疼痛发生率低,并发症少,可优先选择。

关键词: 胫骨骨折, 髓内钉, 髌上人路, 髌下入路, 髌旁入路

Abstract:

Objective To compare the effect of three different surgical approaches for intramedullarynailing for tibia fractures. Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted of the 99 patients with tibial fracturewho had been treated from January 2018 to 2019 and completed follow⁃ups,there were 69 males and 30 females,with an average age of 47 years(range from 18 to 65 years),33 were treated through suprapatellar approach,30 weretreated through infrapatellar approach and 36 were treated through parapatellar approach,The operative time,bloodloss,times of X⁃ray exposure,length of hospital stay,fracture healing time,lysholm scoring,anterior knee pain,removal time of internal fixation,complication rate and postoperative excellence rate were recorded and comparedamong the three groups. The data were analyzed by SPSS22.0. Results In the parapatellar approach group,theoperative time,blood loss,times of X⁃ray exposure,length of hospital stay and anterior knee pain were shorter,thelysholm scoring was highest. The difference was statistically significant(P<0.05). There were no significantlydifference in the postoperative excellence rate,complication rate,blood loss and removal time of internal fixation(P>0.05). Conclusion Different surgical approach are factors related to treatment of tibial fracture. The parapatellarapproach for tibial fractures doesn′t injury of ligamentumpatellae and patellofemoral,it also has the advantages ofshorter operative time,less times of X⁃ray exposure,less pain and fewer complications,may be choosed firstly

Key words: intramedullary nail , tibial shaft fracture , suprapatellar approach , transpatellar approach, parapatellar approach