实用医学杂志 ›› 2022, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (19): 2451-2456.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006⁃5725.2022.19.014

• 临床研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

2 ~ 5 cm 胃间质瘤内镜与外科治疗疗效对比 

张婧文 曹新广 符洋 焦文云 刘靓 郭长青    

  1. 郑州大学第一附属医院消化内科(郑州450052

  • 出版日期:2022-10-10 发布日期:2022-10-10

Comparison of therapeutic effects between endoscopic and surgical treatment of 2 ~ 5 cm gastric stromal tumor

 ZHANG JingwenCAO XinguangFU YangJIAO WenyunLIU LiangGUO Changqing.   

  1. Department of Gastrologythe First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou UniversityZhengzhou 450052China

  • Online:2022-10-10 Published:2022-10-10

摘要:

目的 评价内镜与外科治疗直径 2 ~ 5 cm 胃间质瘤的疗效,探讨内镜下切除 2 ~ 5 cm 胃间 质瘤的临床价值。方法 收集2012年7月至2021年1月在郑州大学第一附属医院接受内镜或外科治疗直 径 2 ~ 5 cm 且经术后病理证实为胃间质瘤的病例共 225 例。按照手术方式分为内镜组和外科组,其中内 镜组共收集 104 例,外科组共收集 121 例。对比分析两组病例的一般资料,手术时间,术后住院时间,术 后禁食时间,并发症及长期随访肿瘤复发情况。结果 两组在年龄、性别、肿瘤发生部位、手术时间、完 整切除率上差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。两组在肿瘤直径、肿瘤生长方式、临床表现、危险度分级、核分 裂像数上差异具有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。内镜组术后住院时间、术后禁食时间小于外科组,差异具有统 计学意义;内镜组并发症发生率(6.7%)低于外科组(20.7%),差异有统计学意义。中位随访 40 月,内镜组 复发 1 例(复发率 1.0%);外科组复发 2 例(复发率 1.7%),两组复发率相比差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。 结论 内镜下治疗直径 2 ~ 5 cm 无转移胃间质瘤是一种安全且有效的方法,患者预后同外科相当,可作为 治疗胃间质瘤的主要方法之一。

关键词:

胃间质瘤, 内镜治疗, 外科手术, 疗效, 安全性

Abstract:

Objective To evaluate the efficacy of endoscopic and surgical treatment of gastric stromal tumors with a diameter of 2 ~ 5 cmand to explore the clinical value of endoscopic resection of gastric stromal tumors of 2 ~ 5 cm in diameter. Methods A total of 225 cases of gastric stromal tumor with a diameter of 2 ~ 5 cm and confirmed by postoperative pathology in the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University from July 2012 to January 2021 were collected. They were divided into endoscopic groupn = 104and surgical groupn = 121. The general dataoperation timepostoperative hospital staypostoperative fasting timeintraoperative and postop⁃ erative complications and long ⁃ term follow ⁃ up tumor recurrence were compared and analyzed between the two groups. Results There was no significant difference between the two groups in agesextumor siteoperation timeand complete resection rateP > 0.05. There were statistically significant differences in tumor diametertumor growth patternclinical manifestationsrisk gradingand mitotic figures between the two groupsP < 0.05. The postoperative hospital stay and postoperative fasting time in the endoscopic group were shorter than those in the surgical groupand the differences were statistically significant. The incidence of complications in the endoscopic group6.7%was lower than that in the surgical group20.7%),showing statistical difference. With a median follow⁃up of 40 months1 case of recurrence in the endoscopic groupthe recurrence rate was 1.0%and 2 in the surgical groupthe recurrence rate was 1.7%were foundand there was no significant difference in the recur⁃ rence rate between the two groupsP > 0.05. Conclusion Endoscopic treatment of non⁃metastatic gastric stromal tumors with a diameter of 2⁃5cm is a safe and effective method. The prognosis of patients with endoscopic treatment is comparable to that with surgical treatment. It can be used as one of the main methods for the treatment of gastric stromal tumors.

Key words: gastric stromal tumor,  , endoscopic treatment,  , surgery,  , curative effect,  , safety