实用医学杂志 ›› 2022, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (19): 2434-2439.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006⁃5725.2022.19.011

• 临床研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

慢加急性肝衰竭前期患者是人工肝治疗的生存优势人群:一项多中心回顾性研究

朱龙川曾敬科袁桂才邹波甘达凯熊墨龙1   

  1. 1 南昌市第九医院重症肝病科(南昌330002);2 赣州市第五人民医院肝病科(江西赣州341000); 3 宜春学院第二附属医院感染科(江西宜春336000

  • 出版日期:2022-10-10 发布日期:2022-10-10
  • 基金资助:
    江西省卫生健康委科技计划(编号:202140134)

Survival advantage of patients with acute⁃on⁃chronic pre⁃liver failure treated with artificial livera multi⁃ center study 

ZHU Longchuan*ZENG JingkeYUAN GuicaiZOU BoGAN DakaiXIONG Molong.   

  1. Depart⁃ ment of Severe Liver Diseasethe Ninth Hospital of NanchangNanchang 330002China

  • Online:2022-10-10 Published:2022-10-10

摘要:

目的 探讨在人工肝治疗中慢加急性肝衰竭前期(pre⁃ACLF)患者是否较慢加急性肝衰竭 (ACLF)患者更具生存优势。方法 本研究为一项回顾性、多中心、观察性队列研究。连续性收集 2019 1月至202012月南昌市第九医院、赣州市第五人民医院及宜春学院第二附属医院具有血清乙肝表面抗原 阳性至少持续6个月以上、血清总胆红素≥ 171 μmol/L和至少行1次人工肝治疗特征的患者,分为pre⁃ACLF 52 例与 ACLF 233 例,随访 12 周,分析其生存情况及预后影响因素。生存资料采用 Kaplan⁃Meier 法 和 Cox 回归进行分析。结果 pre⁃ACLF 组的 12 周死亡率(5.8%3/52)不仅低于 ACLF 组(34.8%81/233), 也同时低于 ACLF 早期组(19.9%30/151)、中期组(57.9%33/57)和晚期组(72.0%18/25),差异有统计学 意义(P < 0.05)。12 周生存分析中,pre⁃ACLF 组不仅优于 ACLF 组,也同时优于ACLF早期组、中期组和晚 期组,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。Cox 回归分析显示,pre⁃ACLF、血甲胎蛋白、血钠、年龄、血白细胞及血 总胆红素是患者死亡的独立预测因素,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05),其中 pre⁃ACLF 组患者的死亡风险仅 为 ACLF 组患者的 0.238 倍。结论ACLF 组患者相比,pre⁃ACLF 组患者是人工肝治疗的生存优势人群, pre⁃ACLF 可能是人工肝治疗的黄金窗口期。

关键词:

慢加急性肝衰竭, 肝衰竭前期, 人工肝, 生存优势, 预后

Abstract:

Objective To investigate whether patients with acute⁃on⁃chronic pre⁃liver failurepre⁃ACLFhave survival advantage compared to patients with acute ⁃on ⁃chronic liver failureACLFin artificial liver treat⁃ ment. Methods A retrospectivemulticenter and observational cohort study was conducted. Patients with serum hepatitis B surface antigen⁃positive for at least 6 monthsserum total bilirubin ≥ 171 μmol/L and receiving at least one session of artificial liver treatmentwere enrolled from January 2019 to December 2020 consecutively. Fifty⁃two patients were included in the pre⁃ACLF groupand 233 patients in the ACLF group. All patients were followed up for 12 weeksand the survival and prognostic factors were analyzed. Kaplan Meier method and Cox regression were used to analyse the survival data. Results The 12⁃week mortality of the pre⁃ACLF group5.8%3/52was lower than that of the ACLF group34.8%81/233),and also lower than that of early stage of ACLF group19.9%30/151), middle stage of ACLF group57.9%33/57and late stage of ACLF group72.0%18/25),respectivelyall P < 0.05. Survival analysis at 12 weeks showed that the survival for pre⁃ACLF group was better than ACLF groupand also better than that for earlymiddle and late stage of ACLF grouprespectivelyall P < 0.05. Cox regression anal⁃ ysis showed that pre ACLFserum alpha fetoproteinserum sodiumageblood leukocytes and total bilirubin were independent predictors of deathall P < 0.05),and the death risk of pre⁃ACLF patients was only 0.238 times that of ACLF patients. Conclusion Compared with ACLF patientspre⁃ACLF patients are the survival advantage group of artificial liver treatment. Thereforepre⁃ACLF may be the golden window of artificial liver treatment.

Key words:

acute ? on ? chronic liver failure, pre ?liver failure, artificial liver, survival advantage, prognosis