实用医学杂志 ›› 2022, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (2): 168-172.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006⁃5725.2022.02.008

• 临床研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

血清降钙素原、肝素结合蛋白、白细胞介素⁃6联合序贯器官衰竭评分对重症肺炎患者预后评估的意义

张春玲 杨远见 刘畅 张伟华   

  1. 商丘市第一人民医院呼吸重症科(河南商丘 476300)

  • 出版日期:2022-01-25 发布日期:2022-01-25
  • 通讯作者: 张伟华 E⁃mail:zhangclzzu@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    河南省医学科技攻关计划联合项目资助(编号:LHGJ20191500)

Clinical significance of serum PCT,BBP,IL⁃6 combined SOFA score in prognosis assessment of patients with severe pneumonia

ZHANG Chunling,YANG Yuanjian,LIU Chang,ZHANG Weihua.   

  1. Department of Respi⁃ ratory and Critical Care,Shangqiu First People′s Hospital,Shangqiu 476300,China

  • Online:2022-01-25 Published:2022-01-25
  • Contact: ZHANG Weihua E⁃mail:zhangclzzu@163.com

摘要:

目的 探讨血清降钙素原(PCT)、肝素结合蛋白(HBP)、白细胞介素⁃6(IL⁃6)联合序贯器官 衰竭(SOFA)评分对重症肺炎患者预后评估的临床意义。方法 选取 2018 1 月至 2021 5 月在本院治 疗的 173 例肺炎患者为研究对象,将患者分为普通肺炎组 95 例,重症肺炎组 78 例,同期选取本院健康体检 100 例为对照组。入院 24 h 内对肺炎患者进行 SOFA 评分;酶联免疫吸附法检测所有受试对象血清 PCT、IL⁃6 水平,免疫荧光法检测血清 HBP 水平;根据患者入住重症监护室(ICU)28 d 内病情转归情况将重症肺炎患者分为预后良好组 57 例,预后不良组 21 例;比较对照组、普通肺炎组、重症肺炎组血清 PCT HBP、IL⁃6 水平及 SOFA 评分;比较预后良好组和预后不良组血清 PCT、HBP、IL⁃6 水平及 SOFA 评分;logistic 多因素回归分析与重症肺炎预后不良发生有关的因素;受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析 PCT、HBP、IL⁃6 联合 SOFA 评分对重症肺炎患者预后的评估价值。结果 与对照组比较,普通肺炎组、重症肺炎组血清 PCT、HBP、IL⁃6 水平显著升高(P < 0.05);与普通肺炎组比较,重症肺炎组血清 PCT、HBP、IL⁃6 水平及 SOFA 评分显著升高(P < 0.05);与预后良好组比较,预后不良组重症肺炎患者血清 PCT、HBP、IL⁃6 水平及 SOFA 评分显著升高(P < 0.05);logistic 多因素回归分析表明血清PCT、HBP、IL⁃6与重症肺炎患者预后不良 的发生有关(P < 0.05);ROC 曲线分析表明血清 PCT、HBP、IL⁃6 SOFA 评分评估重症肺炎患者预后不良 的曲线下面积(AUC)分别为 0.723(95%CI:0.617 ~ 0.908)、0.749(95%CI:0.604 ~ 0.856)、0.632(95%CI 0.514 ~ 0.780)、0.774(95%CI:0.625 ~ 0.893),血清 PCT、HBP、IL⁃6 联合 SOFA 评分评估重症肺炎患者预后 不良的AUC 为0.915(95%CI:0.793 ~ 0.977),血清PCT、HBP、IL⁃6联合SOFA 评分对重症肺炎患者预后的评 估价值高于各项指标单独检测(Z = 2.276、2.091、3.197、1.990,P < 0.05)。结论 血清 PCT、HBP、IL⁃6 联合 SOFA 评分对重症肺炎患者预后评估有较高的临床应用价值,可能为临床上重症肺炎患者的治疗提供参 考依据,降低患者不良预后的发生率。

关键词:

重症肺炎, 降钙素原, 肝素结合蛋白, 白介素-6, 序贯器官衰竭评分, 预后

Abstract:

Objective To explore the clinical value of serum procalcitonin(PCT),heparin binding pro⁃ tein(HBP),interleukin⁃6(IL⁃6)combined with sequential organ failure assessment(SOFA)score in theprogno⁃ sis evaluation of patients with severe pneumonia. Methods A total of 173 patients with pneumonia admitted to our hospital from January 2018 to May 2021 were selected as the study subjects,and the patients were divided into the the common pneumonia group(95 cases)and the severe pneumonia group(78 cases). During the same period 100 healthy people in our hospital were selected as the control group. Within 24 h after admission,SOFA scores was performed for patients with pneumonia;and the level of serum PCT and IL⁃6 were detected by enzyme⁃linked immunosorbent assay,and the level of serum HBP were detected by immunofluorescence;patients withsevere pneumonia were divided into good prognosis group(n = 57)and bad prognosis group(n = 21)according to the outcome within 28 days after admission to intensive care unit(ICU),the levels of serum PCT,HBP,IL⁃6 and SOFA score in control group,common pneumonia group and severe pneumonia group were compared,and the levels of serum PCT,HBP,IL⁃6 and SOFA score were compared between good prognosis group and poor prognosis group Logistic multivariate regression analysis was used to analyze the factors related to the poor prognosis of severe pneu⁃ monia;the receiver operating characteristic(ROC)curve was used to analyze the prognostic value of PCT,HBP IL ⁃ 6 combined SOFA score in patients with severe pneumonia. Results Compared with control group,serum PCT,HBP and IL⁃6 levels were significantly increased in common pneumonia group and severe pneumonia group (P < 0.05);compared with common pneumonia group,the serum PCT,HBP,IL⁃6 and SOFA scores were signifi⁃ cantly increased in severe pneumonia group(P < 0.05);compared with the good prognosis group,the serum PCT HBP,IL⁃6 levels and SOFA score in the poor prognosis group were significantly increased(P < 0.05);Logistic mul⁃ tivariate regression analysis showed that serum PCT,HBP and IL⁃6 were related to the occurrence of poor prognosis in patients with severe pneumonia(P < 0.05);ROC curve analysis showed that the area under curve(ROC)of serum PCT,HBP,IL⁃6 and SPFA score in evaluating poor prognosis of severe pneumonia patients were 0.723(95% CI:0.617 ~ 0.908),0.749(95%CI:0.604 ~ 0.856),0.632(95%CI:0.514 ~ 0.780),0.774(95%CI:0.625 ~ 0.893 respectively,and the AUC of PCT,HBP,IL⁃6 combined SOFA score for poor prognosis of severe pneumonia patients were 0.915(95%CI:0.793 ~ 0.977);combined SOFA score of serum PCT,HBP and IL⁃6 had a higher value in evaluating the prognosis of patients with severe pneumonia than the independent test of each indicator(Z = 2.276 2.091,3.197,1.990,P < 0.05). Conclusion The combination of serum PCT,HBP,IL⁃6 and SOFA score has a high clinical application value for the prognosis evalution of severe pneumonia patients,which may provide a refer⁃ ence for the treatment of severe pneumonia patients in clinic and reduce the incidence of poor prognosis. 

Key words:

severe pneumonia, procalcitonin, heparin binding protein, interleukin?6, sequential organ failure assessment, prognosis