Emerging Technologies and Applications in Clinical Practice

Comparison on the effect and complications of different timing of CRPP in the treatment of children with humeral supracondylar fractures

  • Shaosong SUN ,
  • Shaoyu ZHU ,
  • Xingchen ZHANG ,
  • Bin DENG
Expand
  • Department of Orthopedics,the Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University,Xuzhou 221000,Jiangsu,China

Received date: 2025-11-05

  Online published: 2026-02-25

Abstract

Objective To explore the clinical curative effect of different timings of closed reduction and percutaneous pinning (CRPP) and its influences on complications in children with humeral supracondylar fractures. Methods In this retrospective study, a total of 100 children with humeral supracondylar fractures who underwent CRPP at the Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University between February 2022 and February 2025 were enrolled. Based on the interval from injury to surgery, the children were divided into an early-treatment group (interval ≤ 12 hours, n = 58) and a delayed-treatment group (interval > 12 hours, n = 42). The perioperative indexes and fracture healing time were compared between the two groups. Three months after surgery, the elbow range of motion on the affected side, Baumann angle, and carrying angle were evaluated. The clinical curative effect was assessed using the Flynn elbow scoring standard, and the incidence of complications was recorded. Results The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and intraoperative fluoroscopy frequency in the early group were all significantly shorter or less than those in the delayed group (P < 0.05). However, there was no significant difference in the length of hospital stay or fracture healing time between the two groups (P > 0.05). Three months after surgery, there was no significant difference in the elbow range of motion, Baumann angle, or carrying angle between the two groups (P > 0.05). The good-outcome rate of the early group was significantly higher than that of the delayed group (94.83% vs. 80.95%, P < 0.05). The incidence of cubitus varus and the total incidence of complications in the early group were significantly lower than those in the delayed group (P < 0.05). The results of univariate logistic regression analysis indicated that surgical timing, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and intraoperative fluoroscopy frequency were all associated with the curative effect in children with humeral supracondylar fractures following CRPP (P < 0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that early surgery was an independent protective factor for a good curative effect in children with humeral supracondylar fractures after CRPP (P < 0.05). Conclusion Compared with delayed surgery, early CRPP (interval from injury to surgery ≤ 12 h) can significantly shorten the operation time, reduce the intraoperative blood loss, increase the good rate of elbow function, and reduce the risk of complications in children with humeral supracondylar fractures.

Cite this article

Shaosong SUN , Shaoyu ZHU , Xingchen ZHANG , Bin DENG . Comparison on the effect and complications of different timing of CRPP in the treatment of children with humeral supracondylar fractures[J]. The Journal of Practical Medicine, 2026 , 42(4) : 655 -662 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2026.04.016

References

[1] DUFFY S, FLANNERY O, GELFER Y, et al. Overview of the contemporary management of supracondylar humeral fractures in children[J]. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol, 2021, 31(5): 871-881. doi: 10.1007/s00590-021-02932-2 .
[2] ALAYED Y, ALRASHEDAN B S, ALMISFER S K, et al. Impact of Preoperative Neuropraxia on Surgical Duration Following Pediatric Supracondylar Fracture of the Humerus: A Retrospective Cohort Study[J]. J Brachial Plex Peripher Nerve Inj, 2023, 18(1): e27-e31. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1771012 .
[3] MUSLU O, CENGIZ T, AYDIN ?IM?EK ?, et al. Radiological and Clinical Outcomes of Pediatric Patients With a Supracondylar Humerus Fracture Surgically Treated With Closed Reduction and Percutaneous Pinning[J]. Cureus, 2023, 15(11): e49358. doi: 10.7759/cureus.49358 .
[4] COUPAL S, LUKAS K, PLINT A, et al. Management of Gartland Type 1 Supracondylar Fractures: A Systematic Review[J]. Front Pediatr, 2022, 10: 863985. doi: 10.3389/fped. 2022. 863985 .
[5] REHM A, SEAH M, KABWAMA S, et al. Conservative versus surgical treatment of Gartland type II supracondylar humeral fractures in children[J]. J Pediatr Orthop B, 2024, 33(6): 607-608. doi: 10.1097/BPB.0000000000001194 .
[6] ALI S, KUMAR S, NATH R, et al. Prospective Study of Functional and Radiological Outcome after Operative Management of Supracondylar Fracture Humerus in Children[J]. J Orthop Case Rep, 2025, 15(3): 257-264. doi: 10.13107/jocr.2025.v15.i03. 5406 .
[7] ABOUSALEH M A, ZEIDAN A A, MUKHTAR I, et al. Comparative Effectiveness of Closed Reduction With Percutaneous Pinning and Open Reduction With Internal Fixation in the Operative Management of Pediatric Type III Supracondylar Fractures[J]. Cureus, 2022, 14(2): e22707. doi: 10.7759/cureus.22707 .
[8] BARIK S, GARG V, SINHA S K, et al. A Meta-Analysis on Comparison of Open vs Closed Reduction of Gartland Type 3 Supracondylar Humerus Fractures in Children[J]. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech, 2023,90(3):198-205. PMID:. doi:10.55095/achot2023/023
[9] ULUS S A, AKAR M S. Comparison of complications and results of early vs. delayed surgery for pediatric supracondylar humeral fractures[J]. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci, 2023, 27(24): 11764-11770. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_202312_34774 .
[10] PRABHAKAR P, HO C A. Delaying Surgery in Type III Supracondylar Humerus Fractures Does Not Lead to Longer Surgical Times or More Difficult Reduction[J]. J Orthop Trauma, 2019, 33(8): e285-e290. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001491 .
[11] HAN Q L, WANG Y H, LIU F. Comparison of complications and results of early versus delayed surgery for Gartland type III supracondylar humeral fractures in pediatric patients[J]. Orthop Surg, 2011, 3(4): 242-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1757-7861.2011.00153.x .
[12] 孙振球, 徐勇勇. 医学统计学[M]. 北京:人民卫生出版社, 2014.
[13] ZENG T, WANG L G, LIU W Q. Our experience with a modified prying-up technique for closed reduction of irreducible supracondylar humeral fractures[J]. Sci Rep, 2024, 14(1): 23048. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-74467-5 .
[14] YüZüGüLDü U, YE?IL M, ?ZCAN ?, et al. Reliability of radiographic union score and correlation of clinical outcomes in children operated for supracondylar humerus fracture: A prospective study[J]. J Child Orthop, 2025, 19(3): 221-228. doi: 10.1177/18632521251331773 .
[15] JOSHI P, DAWADI P, RANA K, et al. Epidemiological and Clinical Pattern of Pediatric Supracondylar Fracture of Humerus in A Provincial Hospital: A Descriptive Cross-sectional Study[J]. JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc, 2021, 59(233): 12-14. doi: 10.31729/jnma.6047 .
[16] FAMILIARI F, ZAPPIA A, GASPARINI G, et al. Pediatric Supracondylar Humerus Fracture: When Should We Surgically Treat A Case-Series[J]. J Clin Med, 2025, 14(1): 237. doi: 10.3390/jcm14010237 .
[17] ALSHAYNAWI S O, ALSHOMRANY A A, ALSHEBROMI A, et al. A Systemic Review of Adolescent Supracondylar Fractures: What Is the Surgical Treatment, Open Reduction With Internal Fixation (ORIF) or Closed Reduction With Percutaneous Pinning (CRPP) [J].Cureus, 2024,16(4): e58123. doi: 10.7759/cureus.58123 .
[18] OKKAOGLU M C, OZDEMIR F E, OZDEMIR E, et al. Is there an optimal timing for surgical treatment of pediatric supracondylar humerus fractures in the first 24 hours [J]. J Orthop Surg Res, 2021, 16(1): 484. doi: 10.1186/s13018-021-02638-5 .
[19] 俞皋, 单斌斌, 邹承达, 等. 早期闭合复位经皮克氏针固定治疗小儿肱骨髁上骨折[J]. 中国微创外科杂志, 2025, 25(6): 348-353. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1009-6604.2025.06.005 .
[20] 潘天龙 侯相华, 张敬东. 手术时机对闭合复位经皮克氏针内固定术治疗儿童肱骨髁上骨折疗效影响的研究[J]. 中国修复重建外科杂志, 2025, 39(5): 569-573. doi:10.7507/1002-1892.202503106 .
[21] WANG Q, WANG Y, HE M, et al. Research: Construction and validation of elbow function prediction model after supracondylar humerus fracture in children[J]. Medicine (Baltimore), 2023, 102(52): e36775. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000036775 .
[22] 沈濬, 徐大鹏, 王晓东, 等. 儿童移位肱骨髁上骨折手术时间的多中心分析[J]. 中国矫形外科杂志, 2024, 32(4): 308-313.doi:10.3977/j.issn.1005-8478.2024.04.04 .
[23] 詹翼, 贝朝涌. 儿童肱骨髁上骨折相关的神经损伤研究进展[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2021, 39(1): 115-117. doi:10. 13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2021.01.023 .
[24] CHAUDHRY S. Value-Driven Pediatric Supracondylar Humerus Fracture Care: Implementing Evidence-Based Practices[J]. J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev, 2024, 8(4): e24.00058. doi: 10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-24-00058 .
[25] ERDO?AN F, ?ZTüRK ?, CENGIZ T,et al. The Impact of Surgical Timing on Complications and Clinical Outcomes in Surgery for Displaced Pediatric Supracondylar Humerus Fracture[J]. Ortop Traumatol Rehabil, 2024, 26(6): 257-263. doi: 10.5604/01.3001.0055.0633 .
[26] GUPTA S K, ESPOSITO E R, PHILLIPS R, et al. Effect of Antibiotic Prophylaxis on Infection Rates in Pediatric Supracondylar Humerus Fractures Treated with Closed Reduction and Percutaneous Pinning: A Prospective Double-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial[J]. J Am Acad Orthop Surg, 2024, 32(9): 410-416. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-23-00795 .
[27] SUGANUMA S, TADA K, YASUTAKE H, et al. Timing of Surgery for Pediatric Supracondylar Humerus Fractures and Early Postoperative Results[J]. J Hand Surg Asian Pac Vol, 2020, 25(2): 226-231. doi: 10.1142/S2424835520500277 .
Outlines

/