The Journal of Practical Medicine >
Predictors of sentinel lymph node metastasis in clinical T1⁃2 N0 breast cancer patients with preoperatively normal axillary ultrasound
Received date: 2025-04-09
Online published: 2025-07-29
Objective To develop a multivariate predictive nomogram to identify high-risk cohorts for sentinel lymph node (SLN) metastasis among cT1-2N0 breast cancer patients with preoperatively normal axillary ultrasound (AUS), thereby providing a reference for personalized axillary management. Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinicopathological and ultrasonographic data of 427 patients diagnosed with invasive breast cancer who received treatment at Ward 4 (Breast Unit), Department of General Surgery, Liuzhou Workers' Hospital, between January 2018 and December 2023. Univariate correlation analysis and multivariate logistic regression analysis were employed to identify independent risk factors associated with SLN metastasis. The accuracy and predictive performance of the nomogram were assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Results Our study enrolled 427 women diagnosed with clinical T1-2N0 breast cancer who underwent preoperative AUS with normal findings. Among these patients, 47 cases (11.0%) exhibited sonographically normal axillary lymph nodes, whereas 380 cases (89.0%) showed non-visualized lymph nodes. SLN metastasis, confirmed by postoperative pathological examination, was identified in 78 patients (18.3%). Univariate analysis revealed that estrogen receptor (ER) status, maximal tumor diameter, tumor location, lymphovascular invasion (LVI), and perineural invasion (PNI) were significantly associated with the presence of SLN metastasis (P < 0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis further identified the following independent high-risk factors for SLN metastasis: tumor location in the upper outer quadrant (OR = 4.118, 95% CI = 1.349 ~ 12.571), tumor size greater than 2 cm (OR = 2.246, 95% CI = 1.252 ~ 4.029), presence of LVI (OR = 4.477, 95% CI = 2.207 ~ 9.081), and presence of PNI (OR = 3.013, 95% CI = 1.573 ~ 5.771) (all P < 0.05). Ultrasonographic features of axillary lymph nodes—including their positivity status, short-axis diameter, and numerical count—did not show a statistically significant association with the SLN metastatic burden (P ≥ 0.05). However, these features demonstrated a statistically significant correlation with the pathological nodal stage (pN-stage) classification (P < 0.05). In patients with 1 ~ 2 positive sentinel lymph nodes, sonographic characteristics of axillary lymph nodes (including status, maximum diameter, minimum diameter, and numerical count) did not exhibit a significant association with either axillary lymph node metastatic burden or pN-stage classification (all P ≥ 0.05). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for the predictive nomogram was 0.702 (95% CI: 0.651 ~ 0.749, P < 0.0001), with a sensitivity of 78.21% and specificity of 59.12%. Conclusions Tumor location in the upper outer quadrant, tumor size greater than 2 cm, LVI, and PNI were identified as significant independent risk factors for SLN metastasis among patients with clinical T1-2N0 breast cancer who underwent preoperative AUS with normal findings. Furthermore, from the perspective of pN-stage stratification, omission of axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) appears to be clinically feasible for the majority of cT1-2N0 patients with 1 ~ 2 metastatic SLNs. However, preoperative ultrasonographic characteristics of lymph nodes demonstrate limited predictive value for axillary lymph node (ALN) metastatic burden or pN-stage progression.
Hai QIU , Yifei GUI , Yuan. LIU . Predictors of sentinel lymph node metastasis in clinical T1⁃2 N0 breast cancer patients with preoperatively normal axillary ultrasound[J]. The Journal of Practical Medicine, 2025 , 41(14) : 2143 -2151 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2025.14.004
| [1] | MATTAR A, ANTONINI M, CAVALCANTE F P, et al. CADONOT: Comparing axillary dissection or not in breast cancer surgery [J]. Breast, 2025, 81: 104453. doi:10.1016/j.breast.2025.104453 |
| [2] | HASSAN A M, HAJJ J P, LEWIS J P, et al. Long-Term Outcomes of Lymphedema After Immediate Lymphatic Reconstruction Following Axillary Lymph Node Dissection [J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2025.doi: 10.1245/s10434-025-17301-0 . Online ahead of print. |
| [3] | LI Q, XU H, BAO B, et al. Predicting sentinel lymph node metastasis in breast cancer: A study based on the SEER database [J]. Clin Exp Med, 2025, 25(1): 82. doi:10.1007/s10238-025-01591-5 |
| [4] | 李文肖, 刘燕, 曹春莉, 等. 常规超声联合超声造影预测乳腺癌腋窝淋巴结转移的价值 [J]. 实用医学杂志, 2022, 38(18): 2272-2278. |
| [5] | COMBI F, ANDREOTTI A, GAMBINI A, et al. Application of OSNA Nomogram in Patients With Macrometastatic Sentinel Lymph Node: A Retrospective Assessment of Accuracy [J]. Breast Cancer (Auckl), 2021, 15: 11782234211014796. doi:10.1177/11782234211014796 |
| [6] | GALIMBERTI V, COLE B F, VIALE G, et al. Axillary dissection versus no axillary dissection in patients with breast cancer and sentinel-node micrometastases (IBCSG 23-01): 10-year follow-up of a randomised, controlled phase 3 trial [J].Lancet Oncol, 2018, 19(10): 1385-1393. |
| [7] | GIULIANO A E, BALLMAN K V, MCCALL L, et al. Effect of Axillary Dissection vs No Axillary Dissection on 10-Year Overall Survival Among Women With Invasive Breast Cancer and Sentinel Node Metastasis: The ACOSOG Z0011 (Alliance) Randomized Clinical Trial [J]. JAMA, 2017, 318(10): 918-926. doi:10.1001/jama.2017.11470 |
| [8] | FU F, ZHANG Y, SUN J, et al. Predictors of sentinel lymph node metastasis in Chinese women with clinical T1-T2 N0 breast cancer and a normal axillary ultrasound [J]. Acta Radiol, 2022, 63(11): 1463-1468. doi:10.1177/02841851211054191 |
| [9] | 暴珞宁, 王瑛, 陈东, 等. 超声影像组学标签预测乳腺癌前哨淋巴结转移的价值 [J]. 实用医学杂志, 2021, 37(15): 2007-2011. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2021.15.020 |
| [10] | GENTILINI O D, BOTTERI E, SANGALLI C, et al. Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy vs No Axillary Surgery in Patients With Small Breast Cancer and Negative Results on Ultrasonography of Axillary Lymph Nodes: The SOUND Randomized Clinical Trial [J]. JAMA Oncol, 2023, 9(11): 1557-1564. |
| [11] | WINTRAECKEN V M, BOERSMA L J, VAN ROOZENDAAL L M, et al. Quality assurance of radiation therapy after breast-conserving surgery among patients in the BOOG 2013-08 trial [J]. Radiother Oncol, 2024, 191: 110069. doi:10.1016/j.radonc.2023.110069 |
| [12] | 丛斌斌, 曹晓珊, 王春建, 等. 临床查体阴性但超声检查及穿刺确诊腋窝淋巴结转移的乳腺癌前哨淋巴结活检的可行性分析 [J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2023, 33(6): 574-580. |
| [13] | DING W, CHEN Y, LIN Y, et al. The impact of axillary lymph node dissection on the prognosis of breast cancer patients undergoing up-front mastectomy with Sentinel lymph node micrometastases [J]. Sci Rep, 2025, 15(1): 10525. doi:10.1038/s41598-025-91405-1 |
| [14] | 罗海愉, 朱丽璋, 张屿森, 等. 术前超声与临床T1-2期乳腺癌腋窝淋巴结负荷的相关性分析 [J]. 中国超声医学杂志, 2021, 37(8): 859-861. |
| [15] | MINAMI S, SAKIMURA C, IRIE J, et al. Predictive Factors Among Clinicopathological Characteristics for Sentinel Lymph Node Metastasis in T1-T2 Breast Cancer [J]. Cancer Manag Res, 2021, 13: 215-223. doi:10.2147/cmar.s284922 |
| [16] | HERMANSYAH D, INDRA W, PARAMITA D A, et al. Role of Hormonal Receptor in Predicting Sentinel Lymph Node Metastasis in Early Breast Cancer [J]. Med Arch, 2022, 76(1): 34-38. doi:10.5455/medarh.2022.76.34-38 |
| [17] | 甘丽. 不同象限早期浸润性乳腺癌前哨淋巴结转移与其临床病理特征的关系研究 [D]. 郑州:郑州大学, 2024. |
| [18] | 王文彦, 孟祥志, 李霓, 等. 基于SEER数据库回顾性分析T1期乳腺癌腋窝淋巴结转移和预后影响因素 [J]. 中华医学杂志, 2021, 101(27): 2152-2158. |
| [19] | FU W D, WANG X H, LU K K, et al. Real-world outcomes for Chinese breast cancer patients with tumor location of central and nipple portion [J]. Front Surg, 2022, 9: 993263. doi:10.3389/fsurg.2022.993263 |
| [20] | YANG J, YANG Q, MUKHERJEE A, et al. Distance Between the Tumour and Nipple as a Predictor of Axillary Lymph Node Involvement in Breast Cancer [J]. Cancer Manag Res, 2021, 13: 193-199. doi:10.2147/cmar.s262413 |
| [21] | YIMING A, WUBULIKASIMU M, YUSUYING N. Analysis on factors behind sentinel lymph node metastasis in breast cancer by color ultrasonography, molybdenum target, and pathological detection [J]. World J Surg Oncol, 2022, 20(1): 72. doi:10.1186/s12957-022-02531-3 |
| [22] | LYU W, GUO Y, PENG H, et al. Analysis of the Influencing Factors of Sentinel Lymph Node Metastasis in Breast Cancer [J]. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med, 2022, 2022: 5775971. doi:10.1155/2022/5775971 |
| [23] | ZHAO Y, YANG N, WANG X, et al. Potential roles of lymphovascular space invasion based on tumor characteristics provide important prognostic information in T1 tumors with ER and HER2 positive breast cancer [J]. Clin Transl Oncol, 2020, 22(12): 2275-2285. doi:10.1007/s12094-020-02369-9 |
| [24] | WEI C, DENG Y, WEI S, et al. Lymphovascular invasion is a significant risk factor for non-sentinel nodal metastasis in breast cancer patients with sentinel lymph node (SLN)-positive breast cancer: a cross-sectional study [J]. World J Surg Oncol, 2023, 21(1): 386. doi:10.1186/s12957-023-03273-6 |
| [25] | 李卓璇, 童一苇, 陈小松, 等. 腋窝临床淋巴结阳性超声特征与乳腺癌淋巴结转移负荷及预后的相关性研究 [J]. 中国癌症防治杂志, 2022, 14(4): 393-399. |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |