Clinical Research

Efficacy and complications of microwave ablation and sublobectomy for treating ⅠA⁃stage NSCLC: A comparative analysis based on propensity score matching

  • Yingding ZHAO ,
  • Bangsheng LI ,
  • Tiantian XUE ,
  • Qihan ZI ,
  • Xin YANG ,
  • Xi WANG
Expand
  • Department of Thoracic Surgery,Kunming 650118,Yunnan,China

Received date: 2025-01-18

  Online published: 2025-04-23

Abstract

Objective This study aims to compare the clinical efficacy and complications associated with microwave ablation (MWA) and sublobectomyfor treating stage ⅠA non?small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods Data from stage ⅠA1?ⅠA3 NSCLC patients treated at Yunnan Cancer Hospital between January 2021 and December 2022 were retrospectively collected. A total of 82 patients who underwent MWA and 82 patients who received sublobectomy were selected through propensity score matching. Periprocedural conditions, short?term efficacy, and complications were compared between the two groups. Progression?free survival (PFS) and Disease?free survival (DFS) were monitored and evaluated. The Kaplan?Meier method was employed to construct survival curves, and logistic regression was utilized to analyze the factors influencing complications. Results The MWA group exhibited shorter procedure times, less intraprocedural blood loss, less postprocedure pain, shorter hospitalization durations, and lower hospitalization costs compared to the sublobectomy group (P < 0.001). All patients successfully underwent the procedures, with a complete ablation rate of 97.6% and a local control rate of 87.8%in the MWA group. The median follow?up duration was 26.5 months. Survival curve analysis indicated no statistically significant differences in PFS and DFS between the two groups. The primary complications observed were pneumothorax (24.4%, 20/82) and moderate to severe pain (11.0%, 9/82) in the MWA group, while the sublobectomy group experienced moderate to severe pain (41.5%, 34/82) and pulmonary infection (12.2%, 10/82). Single?factor analysis demonstrated six variables influenced the occurrence of MWA pneumothorax. Multi?factor logistic regression revealed that the shortest distance from the tumor to the pleura (P = 0.021,OR = 15.341,95%CI: 1.699 ~ 24.367) and the number of punctures through the pleura (P = 0.024,OR = 0.068, 95%CI: 0.001 ~ 0.612) were identified as independent risk factors for pneumothorax. Conclusion MWA demonstrates good efficacy for treating stage ⅠA NSCLC due to minimal trauma, low cost, rapid recovery, few and mild complications. Additionally, MWA and sublobectomy exhibit comparable PFS and DFS, making MWA a safe and effective treatment method. Therefore, MWA is worthy of promotion in clinical practice.

Cite this article

Yingding ZHAO , Bangsheng LI , Tiantian XUE , Qihan ZI , Xin YANG , Xi WANG . Efficacy and complications of microwave ablation and sublobectomy for treating ⅠA⁃stage NSCLC: A comparative analysis based on propensity score matching[J]. The Journal of Practical Medicine, 2025 , 41(7) : 976 -984 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2025.07.007

References

1 ZHENG R S, CHEN R, HAN B F, et al. Cancer incidence and mortality in China, 2022[J]. J Natl Cancer Cent, 2024, 46 (3): 221-231.
2 BRAY F, LAVERSANNE M, SUNG H, et al. Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries[J]. CA Cancer J Clin,2024, 74(3): 229-263. doi:10.3322/caac.21834
3 MA G, DOU Y, DANG S, et al. Improving Image Quality and Nodule Characterization in Ultra-low-dose Lung CT with Deep Learning Image Reconstruction[J]. Acad Radiol, 2024, 31(7): 2944-2952. doi:10.1016/j.acra.2024.01.010
4 冷雪春, 尤振兵, 徐克平, 等. 同侧多发性亚厘米肺结节影像学特征同临床病理相关研究[J]. 中国CT和MRI杂志, 2023, 21 (4): 41-43.
5 徐朋亮, 彭秀华, 李文辉, 等. 印戒征型囊性肺癌的影像及临床病理特征[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2020, 36(21): 3028-3032.
6 RIELY G J, WOOD D E, ETTINGER D S, et al. Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer, Version 4.2024, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology[J]. J Natl Compr Canc Netw, 2024, 22(4): 249-274.
7 LI M, XU X, QIN Y, et al. Radiofrequency ablation vs. stereotactic body radiotherapy for stage IA non-small cell lung cancer in nonsurgical patients[J]. J Cancer,2021, 12 (10): 3057-3066. doi:10.7150/jca.51413
8 钱涵, 汪红艳, 王凡. 呼吸触发前瞻门控在早期非小细胞肺癌立体定向放射治疗中剂量学优势 [J]. 实用医学杂志, 2023, 39 (1): 86-91.
9 HE J Y, YANG L, WANG D D. Efficacy and Safety of Thermal Ablation for Patients With Stage I Non-small Cell Lung Cancer[J]. Acad Radiol, 2024, 31(12): 5269-5279. doi:10.1016/j.acra.2024.05.038
10 YE X, FAN W, WANG Z, et al. Clinical practice guidelines on image-guided thermal ablation of primary and metastatic lung tumors (2022 edition)[J]. J Cancer Res Ther, 2022, 18(5): 1213-1230. doi:10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_880_22
11 吴凯怡, 吕学东, 何海艳, 等. 冷冻消融联合免疫治疗在非小细胞肺癌治疗中的应用进展[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2023, 39 (8): 1058-1062.
12 CHEN D, ZHAO M, XIANG X, et al.Percutaneous local tumor ablation vs. stereotactic body radiotherapy for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis[J].Chin Med J (Engl), 2022, 135 (13): 1517-1524. doi:10.1097/cm9.0000000000002131
13 ALTORKI N, WANG X, KOZONO D, et al. Lobar or Sublobar Resection for Peripheral Stage IA Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer[J]. N Engl J Med, 2023, 388(6): 489-498. doi:10.1056/nejmoa2212083
14 BUCHBERGER D S, KHURANA R, BOLEN M, et al. The Treatment of Patients with Early-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Who Are Not Candidates or Decline Surgical Resection: The Role of Radiation and Image-Guided Thermal Ablation[J]. J Clin Med, 2024, 13(24). doi:10.3390/jcm13247777
15 CARDELLA J F, KUNDU S, MILLER D L, et al. Society of Interventional Radiology clinical practice guidelines[J]. J Vasc Interv Radiol, 2009, 20(7 ): S189-191. doi:10.1016/j.jvir.2009.04.035
16 DONG H, TIAN Y, XIN S, et al. Diagnosis and management of multiple primary lung cancer[J]. Front Oncol, 2024, 14: 1392969. doi:10.3389/fonc.2024.1392969
17 HAReARDOTTIR H, JONSSON S, GUNNARSSON O, et al. Advances in lung cancer diagnosis and treatment - a review[J].Laeknabladid, 2022, 108(1): 17-29.
18 SULTAN S, ULLMAN K, ESTER E, et al. VA Evidence-based Synthesis Program Reports, Non-surgical Therapies for Early-stage Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review[C]. Washington (DC): Department of Veterans Affairs (US), 2023.
19 PARK H S, DETTERBECK F C, MADOFF D C, et al. A guide for managing patients with stage I NSCLC: deciding between lobectomy, segmentectomy, wedge, SBRT and ablation-part 4: Systematic review of evidence involving SBRT and ablation[J]. J Thorac Dis, 2022, 14(6): 2412-2436. doi:10.21037/jtd-21-1826
20 SHANG Y, LI G, ZHANG B, et al. Image-guided percutaneous ablation for lung malignancies[J]. Front Oncol, 2022, 12: 1020296. doi:10.3389/fonc.2022.1020296
21 MURPHY M C, WROBEL M M, FISHER D A, et al. Update on Image-Guided Thermal Lung Ablation: Society Guidelines, Therapeutic Alternatives, and Postablation Imaging Findings[J].AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2022, 219(3): 471-485. doi:10.2214/ajr.21.27099
22 CHAN M V, HUO Y R, CAO C, et al. Survival outcomes for surgical resection versus CT-guided percutaneous ablation for stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Eur Radiol, 2021, 31(7): 5421-5433. doi:10.1007/s00330-020-07634-7
23 YIM S, LIN W C, LIU J S, et al. Survival after thermal ablation versus wedge resection for stage I non-small cell lung cancer?<?1 cm and 1 to 2 cm: Evidence from the US SEER database[J]. Cancer Imaging, 2024, 24(1): 91. doi:10.1186/s40644-024-00733-4
24 赵恒,范坤,王泓懿,等. 消融术和亚肺叶切除术治疗Ⅰa期非小细胞肺癌患者疗效的对比[J]. 中国肿瘤癌杂志, 2021, 24(9): 613-622.
25 NI Y, HUANG G, YANG X, et al. Microwave ablation treatment for medically inoperable stage I non-small cell lung cancers: long-term results[J]. Eur Radiol, 2022, 32(8): 5616-5622. doi:10.1007/s00330-022-08615-8
26 FISH A G, MADOFF D C. An Interventional Radiologist's Guide to Lung Cancer[J]. Semin Intervent Radiol, 2024, 41(2): 121-128. doi:10.1055/s-0044-1786725
Outlines

/