Medical Examination and Clinical Diagnosis

Correlation of fetal rectal ampulla abdominal diameter with gestational age and establishment of reference values in low⁃risk fetuses at 18 ~ 40 weeks of pregnancy

  • Yuqi ZHANG ,
  • Kesong ZHOU ,
  • Shiquan ZHANG ,
  • Lei TANG ,
  • Enxiu XIE ,
  • Hongquan LIAO ,
  • Tao. YANG
Expand
  • *.The Ultrasound Department,Second People′s Hospital of Yibin,Yibin 644000,Sichuan,China

Received date: 2024-09-12

  Online published: 2025-03-31

Abstract

Objective To examine the correlation between fetal rectal ampulla diameter and gestational age, and to establish reference value ranges for low-risk fetuses between 18 and 40 weeks of gestation in Yibin region. Methods A total of 1,103 low-risk singleton pregnant women between 18 and 40 weeks of gestation were recruited from five hospitals in Yibin City (the Second People′s Hospital, the First People′s Hospital, the Fifth People′s Hospital, the Maternal and Child Health Hospital of Yibin City, and the Maternal and Child Health Hospital of Cuiping District) for routine level Ⅰ, Ⅱ, and Ⅲ prenatal ultrasound screening from October 2022 to March 2024. Fetal rectal ampulla diameters, including anteroposterior diameter, transverse diameter, and area, were measured using prenatal ultrasound. The normality of these measurements was assessed using the Shapiro-Wilk test. Scatter plots depicting the relationship between fetal rectal ampulla diameter parameters and gestational age were generated using the "Overlap Scatter Plot" function in SPSS. Percentiles were calculated using the "Explore" function in SPSS, with reference value ranges described by P5, P10, P50, P90, and P95. Results The visualization rate of the fetal rectal ampulla diameter was 55% at 18 ~ 20 weeks of gestation, 100% at 21 ~ 37 weeks, and 96% at greater than 37 weeks. The fetal rectal ampulla diameter exhibited a significant positive correlation with gestational age (r = 0.925 ~ 0.949, P < 0.01). Conclusions Prenatal ultrasound measurement of fetal rectal ampulla diameter demonstrates a robust correlation with gestational age. The reference intervals for the rectal ampulla diameter of low-risk fetuses between 18 and 40 weeks of gestation, established in this study, may offer valuable theoretical guidance for prenatal diagnosis of fetal rectal and anal abnormalities in Yibin region.

Cite this article

Yuqi ZHANG , Kesong ZHOU , Shiquan ZHANG , Lei TANG , Enxiu XIE , Hongquan LIAO , Tao. YANG . Correlation of fetal rectal ampulla abdominal diameter with gestational age and establishment of reference values in low⁃risk fetuses at 18 ~ 40 weeks of pregnancy[J]. The Journal of Practical Medicine, 2025 , 41(6) : 882 -888 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2025.06.017

References

1 ISHIMARU T, HOSOKAWA T, KAWASHIMA H,et al. Rectal Prolapse After Laparosc opically Assisted Anorect oplasty for Anorectal Malformations[J].J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A,2020,30(12): 1277-1281. doi:10.1089/lap.2020.0609
2 KAWAMURA T, KAMO A, NISHIGUCHI T. Diagnosis of Persistent Cloaca by Ultrasonography and MRI: A Case Report[J]. Am J Case Rep, 2020,21:e921576. doi:10.12659/ajcr.921576
3 KING S K, LEVITT M A. Advances in the Management of the Neonate Born with an Anorectal Malformation[J]. Clin Perinatol, 2022,49(4):965-979. doi:10.1016/j.clp.2022.08.002
4 BURKE Y, GILBOA Y, BRONSHTEIN M. Intra uterine sludge does not rule out anal ATRESIA[J]. Prenat Diagn, 2018,38(3):222-223. doi:10.1002/pd.5203
5 ERCULIANI M, TROVALUSCI E, ZANATTA C, et al. First trimester lower abdominal cysts as early predictor of anorectal malformations[J]. J Ultrasound, 2023,26(2):543-548. doi:10.1007/s40477-022-00744-6
6 中华医学会超声医学分会妇产超声学组,国家卫生健康委妇幼司全国产前诊断专家组医学影像组. 超声产前筛查指南[J]. 中华超声影像学杂志,2022,31(1):1-12.
7 SALOMON L J, ALFIREVIC Z, SILVA COSTA F DA, et al. ISUOG Practice Guidelines: Ultrasound assessment of fetal biometry and growth[J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2019,53(6):715-723. doi:10.1002/uog.20272
8 STIRNEMANN J, VILLAR J, SALOMON L J, et al. International estimated fetal weight standards of the INTERGROWTH-21st Project[J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2017,49(4):478-486. doi:10.1002/uog.17347
9 BRONSHTEIN M, GOVER A, BELOOSESKY R, et al. Transient Distention of Right Posterior Located Sigma, a New Sonographic Sign for the Prenatal Diagnosis of Anal Atresia[J]. J Clin Ultrasound, 2017,45(3):160-162. doi:10.1002/jcu.22426
10 ELKAN MILLER T, WEISSBACH T, ELKAN M, et al. Infracoccygeal/transperineal window: New method to prenatally diagnose and classify level of anal atresia[J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2024,64(4):521-527. doi:10.1002/uog.29094
11 KING S K, LEVITT M A. Advances in the Management of the Neonate Born with an Anorectal Malformation[J]. Clin Perinatol, 2022,49(4):965-979. doi:10.1016/j.clp.2022.08.002
12 裴元元, 胡亮, 冉健, 等. 无创产前检测技术在不同血清学筛查风险值及不同年龄孕妇中检测染色体异常的价值[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2022, 38(2): 217-221.
13 周燕. 先天性肛门直肠畸形预后风险预测模型的建立及新生儿一期腹腔镜手术疗效评估[D]. 北京:北京协和医学院,2022.
14 杜明珊,韦娜,甄志铭,等. 3D MR结肠成像评价孕中晚期胎儿结直肠发育[J]. 中国医学影像技术,2023,39(2):241-245.
15 袁鹰,李胜利,田晓先,等. “靶环征”在产前诊断肛门闭锁中的意义[J]. 中华超声影像学杂志, 2014, 23(5):4.
16 ZHANG Q, BAO Z K, DENG M X, et al. Fetal growth, fetal development, and placental features in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: Analysis based on fetal and placental magnetic resonance imaging[J]. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B,2020, 21(12): 977-989. doi:10.1631/jzus.b2000350
17 刘利娜, 吴和明, 郑志远, 等. 超声评估颈项透明层厚度增厚和鼻骨钙化不良结合染色体微阵列分析在胎儿产前诊断中的应用 [J]. 实用医学杂志, 2024, 40(19): 2755-2759.
18 NAYAK S S, HARKNESS R, SHUKLA A, et al. Clinically diverse and perinatally lethal syndromes with urorectal septum malformation sequence[J]. Am J Med Genet A, 2023,191(3):730-741. doi:10.1002/ajmg.a.63067
19 RUBESOVA E, MOEREMANS M. MR Imaging of the Fetal Gastrointestinal Anomalies[J]. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am, 2024,32(3):489-496. doi:10.1016/j.mric.2024.03.005
20 CHAO A S, CHANG Y L, HSIEH P C. Prenatal diagnosis of congenital megalourethra with imperforate anus[J]. BMC Pediatr, 2019,19(1):123. doi:10.1186/s12887-019-1510-y
21 陈王挺. 胎粪性腹膜炎超声及MRI表现1例 [J]. 中国现代医生, 2023, 61(21): 130-132.
Outlines

/