The Journal of Practical Medicine >
Study of modified anteromedial approach and preserves the superior extensor retinaculum for clinical effect of Pilon fracture
Received date: 2024-06-09
Online published: 2025-02-19
Objective To explore the clinical efficacy of modified anteromedia approach with superior extensor retinaculars and traditional anteromedia combined with posterolateral approach in the treatment of Rüedi-Allg?wer type Ⅲ Pilon fractures. Methods In this study selected 56 patients with Rüedi-Allg?wer type Ⅲ Pilon fractures treated in our hospital from January 2020 to January 2022, all of whom met the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 27 in the experimental group and 29 in the control group. Both groups underwent open reduction and internal fixation of Pilon fractures. The experimental group used a modified anteromedial approach to preserve the supraspinatus, while the control group used a traditional anteromedial combined with posterolateral approach to cut off the supraspinatus. The general clinical data, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage volume, fracture reduction quality, early pain VAS score, complications and ankle function evaluation of the experimental group and the control group were compared in detail, and the early clinical efficacy of the two surgical methods was analyzed and compared. Results There were no significant differences in age, gender, body mass index (BMI), complications, injury mechanism and the time from admission to operation between the experimental group and the control group (P > 0.05). Experimental group: operation time (115.92 ± 12.23)min, intraoperative blood loss(129.25 ± 16.15)mL, postoperative drainage volume (82.44 ± 25.57)mL, fracture healing time (17.89 ± 2.39)w;Control group: operation time (172.75 ± 15.09)min, intraoperative blood loss (177.24 ± 14.36)mL, postoperative drainage volume(115.06 ± 21.95)mL, fracture healing time(19.93 ± 3.75)w. The operative time and fracture healing time of the experimental group were less than those of the control group(P < 0.05), and the intraoperative blood loss and postoperative drainage volume of the experimental group were less than those of the control group, the difference was statistically significant(P < 0.05). The Buewell-Charnley fracture reduction radiological evaluation criteria were used to evaluate the fracture reduction, and the rate of good reduction was 96.29% in the experimental group and 93.10% in the control group. There was no statistical significance in the anatomical reduction between the two groups (P > 0.05). Visual analog scale (VAS) was used to evaluate postoperative pain, and pain VAS scores of the experimental group were lower than those of the control group at 3 days, 1 week and 4 weeks after surgery (P <0.05). Both groups were followed up for at least 12 months after surgery, and the incidence of postoperative complications in the experimental group was lower than that in the control group(P < 0.05). The AOFAS score of the experimental group was higher than that of the control group at 3 months, 6 months and 12 months after surgery (P < 0.05). Conclusion Improvement on the medial approach retains the superior extensor retinaculum, relative to the combined surgical approach to cut off the superior extensor retinaculum treatment Rüedi-Allg?wer Ⅲ Pilon fractures, with shorter operation time, less intraoperative blood loss, less postoperative complications and other advantages. The functional recovery of the ankle joint in the modified anteromedial approach preserving the superior extensor retinaculum was better than that in the combined approach cutting the superior extensor retinaculum.
Youqiang ZHANG , Ling YAN , Wei LIAO , Guang WANG , Xiaoheng CHEN , Rui FAN , Zuwei. LIU . Study of modified anteromedial approach and preserves the superior extensor retinaculum for clinical effect of Pilon fracture[J]. The Journal of Practical Medicine, 2025 , 41(3) : 358 -364 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2025.03.008
| 1 | VAN RYSSELBERGHE N L, CAMPBELL S T, GOODNOUGH L H, et al.Metaphyseal callus formation in pilon fractures is associated with loss of alignment: Is stiffer better?[J].Injury,2021,52(4): 977-981. doi:10.1016/j.injury.2020.10.080 |
| 2 | HU H, ZhANG J, XIE X G,et al.Identification of risk factors for surgical site infection after type II and type III tibial pilon fracture surgery[J]. World J Clin Cases, 2022,10(19): 6399-6405. doi:10.12998/wjcc.v10.i19.6399 |
| 3 | PINA-RIVA A, MUT-PONS R, LlOPIS E. Presurgical Perspective and Postsurgical Evaluation of Tibial Pilon Fractures[J]. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol, 2022,26(6): 623-634. doi:10.1055/s-0042-1760122 |
| 4 | 张宪高, 张一, 王志强. 胫骨远端pilon骨折手术入路研究进展[J]. 中华骨与关节外科杂志, 2021,14(4): 303-309. |
| 5 | WILLIAMS C E, JOO P, OH I, et al. Arthroscopically Assisted Internal Fixation of Foot and Ankle Fractures: A Systematic Review[J]. Foot Ankle Orthop, 2021,6(1): 683315514. doi:10.1177/2473011420950214 |
| 6 | SUNG Y T, WU J S.The Visual Analogue Scale for Rating, Ranking and Paired-Comparison (VAS-RRP): A new technique for psychological measurement[J]. Behav Res Methods, 2018,50(4): 1694-1715. doi:10.3758/s13428-018-1041-8 |
| 7 | HUANG M, WANG Q, GUAN J, et al.Tips and Tricks in surgical reduction of the posterior column of AO/OTA C3 pilon fractures[J]. BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 2022,23(1): 2. doi:10.1186/s12891-021-04890-6 |
| 8 | VELASCO B T, CHIEN B, KWON J Y,et al.Online Ratings and Reviews of American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Surgeons[J]. Foot Ankle Spec, 2020,13(1): 43-49. doi:10.1177/1938640019832363 |
| 9 | GULBRANDSEN T R, HULICK R M, P0LK A J,et al. Does surgical approach affect sagittal plane alignment and pilon fracture outcomes?[J]. Injury, 2020,51(3): 750-758. doi:10.1016/j.injury.2020.01.020 |
| 10 | 唐润,杨杰,李毅,等. 改良内侧入路治疗内侧柱压缩性Pilon骨折[J]. 中国骨伤, 2022,35(3): 248-252. |
| 11 | ASSAL M,RAY A, STERN R. The extensile approach for the operative treatment of high-energy pilon fractures: Surgical technique and soft-tissue healing[J]. J Orthop Trauma, 2007,21(3): 198-206. doi:10.1097/bot.0b013e3180316780 |
| 12 | 刘斌, 邱贵兴, 裴福兴, 等. 骨科加速康复围手术期疼痛管理专家共识[J]. 中华骨与关节外科杂志, 2022,15(10): 739-745. |
| 13 | YAO Y, LI G, LI J,et al. Short-Term Outcomes of Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) for Ankle Fracture Patients: A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study[J]. Orthop Surg, 2023,15(3):766-776. doi:10.1111/os.13621 |
| 14 | KORRAPATI A, TA C N, MITCHELL B C, et al. Fracture blisters: Predictors for time to definitive fixation in pilon fractures[J]. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol, 2024,34(1):161-166. doi:10.1007/s00590-023-03623-w |
| 15 | 余进伟,陈豪杰,张雁儒,等. 新型Pilon钢板治疗C型Pilon骨折的疗效研究[J]. 中国修复重建外科杂志, 2023,37(1):31-36. |
| 16 | MURAWSKI C D, MITTWEDE P N, WAWROSE R A,et al. Management of High-Energy Tibial Pilon Fractures[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2023,105(14):1123-1137. doi:10.2106/jbjs.21.01377 |
| 17 | MA Z, ZHAN J, ZHU N, et al. A comparative study of the clinical efficacy of supination-adduction type II ankle fracture surgery based on the medial pilon fracture concept versus the ankle fracture concept[J]. BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 2021,22(1): 936. doi:10.1186/s12891-021-04818-0 |
| 18 | 李庆虎, 傅佰圣, 赵闯, 等. Pilon骨折术后感染的危险因素分析[J]. 实用骨科杂志, 2021,27(7): 598-600. |
| 19 | KORRAPATI A, TA C N, MITCHELL B C, et al. Fracture blisters: predictors for time to definitive fixation in pilon fractures[J]. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol, 2024,34(1):161-166. doi:10.1007/s00590-023-03623-w |
| 20 | 姜刚强, 焦福德, 应霁翀, 等. 分期手术治疗复杂闭合Pilon骨折[J]. 中国骨伤, 2022,35(9):878-882. |
| 21 | 胡远军, 成瑞萍, 史会明, 等. 改良前内侧入路治疗Ruedi-Allgower Ⅲ型Pilon骨折的疗效[J]. 实用骨科杂志, 2020,26(2): 124-127. |
| 22 | 周骅, 薛剑锋, 周朝, 等. 改良前内侧手术入路对Ruedi-Allgower Ⅲ型Pilon骨折的临床效果分析[J]. 浙江创伤外科, 2022,27(1): 139-140. |
| 23 | 黄绍飞,杨云平,黄海. 改良前内侧入路治疗复杂闭合性Pilon骨折的疗效[J]. 中华实验外科杂志, 2020,37(11):2121. |
| 24 | 付鲲鹏, 张晓敏, 赵艳霞, 等. 改良前内侧入路与前外侧入路对C3型Pilon骨折复位及疗效的影响[J]. 西南国防医药, 2020,30(8): 739-742. |
| 25 | 王伟, 刘增瑞, 李艳卫, 等. 两种手术入路治疗Pilon骨折43例疗效观察[J]. 实用骨科杂志, 2014,20(12): 1141-1142. |
| 26 | 陈伟练, 黎俊豪, 郑伟坤. 改良双切口锁定加压钢板固定治疗高能量闭合性Pilon骨折疗效分析[J]. 创伤外科杂志, 2018,20(11): 855-858. |
| 27 | LEE W, TRAN S, COODPER M T, et al. Clinical Outcomes of Osteochondral Lesions of the Tibial Plafond Following Arthroscopic Microfracture[J]. Foot Ankle Int, 2019,40(9): 1018-1024. doi:10.1177/1071100719850145 |
| 28 | MALIGE A, YEAZELL S, NWACHUKU C.Surgical fixation of pilon injuries: A comparison of the anterolateral and posterolateral approach[J].Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 2019,139(9): 1179-1185. doi:10.1007/s00402-019-03145-3 |
| 29 | 俞光荣, 洪浩. 踝关节损伤的治疗进展与思考[J]. 中国骨伤, 2016,29(12): 1071-1073. |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |