The Journal of Practical Medicine ›› 2025, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (21): 3378-3384.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2025.21.012

• Clinical Research • Previous Articles    

Construction and clinical validation of a machine learning⁃based nomogram model for predicting lymphatic leakage following radical prostatectomy

Xiudong YANG1,Xing LIU1,Xin LIU2,Yan JIANG1,Wei WANG1,Zongbin HE1,Sha HUANG1,Meihong WEN3,Yazhen. LIU1()   

  1. *.Department of Urology,Zhujiang Hospital,Southern Medical University,Guangzhou 510282,Guangdong,China
  • Received:2025-06-03 Online:2025-11-10 Published:2025-11-13
  • Contact: Yazhen. LIU E-mail:263649576@qq.com

Abstract:

Objective To identify risk factors associated with lymphatic leakage after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) and to develop a machine learning?based nomogram for predicting such outcomes to support clinical prevention strategies. Methods We retrospectively analyzed perioperative data from 248 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer between January 2020 and January 2024. Independent risk factors were identified through univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. A predictive model was developed, and its diagnostic performance was assessed by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Five?fold cross?validation was performed to evaluate the model′s generalizability. A nomogram was subsequently constructed to facilitate individualized risk quantification. Results Among the 248 patients, 89 (35.9%) developed lymphatic leakage, while 159 (64.1%) did not. Independent risk factors for lymphatic leakage included intraoperative lymph node dissection (OR = 5.415, 95%CI: 2.167 ~ 13.532, P < 0.001), intraoperative plasma transfusion (OR = 2.952, 95%CI: 1.524 ~ 5.718, P = 0.001), and postoperative fasting duration of ≥ 2 days (OR = 1.412, 95%CI: 1.089 ~ 1.829, P = 0.009). The predictive model showed good discrimination and calibration (AUC = 0.711, 95%CI: 0.647 ~ 0.776, P < 0.001; sensitivity: 0.764; specificity: 0.597). Model robustness was confirmed through five?fold cross?validation (training set AUC = 0.822; test set AUC = 0.829). The nomogram provided a clinically useful tool for quantifying individual risk of lymphatic leakage. Conclusions Intraoperative lymph node dissection, plasma transfusion, and postoperative fasting lasting ≥ 2 days are independent risk factors for lymphatic leakage following radical prostatectomy. The validated predictive model demonstrates favorable clinical utility.

Key words: machine learning, radical prostatectomy, lymphatic leakage, predictive model, risk factors

CLC Number: