The Journal of Practical Medicine ›› 2025, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (4): 607-614.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2025.04.022
• Clinical Nursing • Previous Articles
Huaping HAN1,Langtao WU1,Tian TIAN1,Zhongqin LI1,Yunyan. DENG2()
Received:
2024-10-09
Online:
2025-02-25
Published:
2025-02-28
Contact:
Yunyan. DENG
E-mail:2332625731@qq.com
CLC Number:
Huaping HAN,Langtao WU,Tian TIAN,Zhongqin LI,Yunyan. DENG. The effect of noninvasive matrix RF technology on pelvic floor function recovery in primiparous women undergoing spontaneous delivery[J]. The Journal of Practical Medicine, 2025, 41(4): 607-614.
Tab.1
Comparison of general information between two groups"
指标 | 观察组(n = 40) | 对照组(n = 40) | t/χ2值 | P值 |
---|---|---|---|---|
年龄(x ± s)/岁 | 30.65 ± 1.93 | 31.10 ± 1.75 | 1.092 | 0.278 |
产前体质量指数(x ± s)/(kg/m2) | 26.94 ± 2.37 | 27.10 ± 2.51 | 0.293 | 0.770 |
分娩孕周 | 0.607 | 0.738 | ||
< 37周 | 6(15.00) | 5(12.50) | ||
37 ~ 40周 | 31(77.50) | 30(75.00) | ||
> 40周 | 3(7.50) | 5(12.50) | ||
妊娠合并症 | ||||
妊娠期高血压 | 4(10.00) | 6(15.00) | 0.457 | 0.499 |
妊娠期糖尿病 | 2(5.00) | 4(10.00) | 0.180 | 0.671 |
胎儿性别 | 0.202 | 0.653 | ||
男 | 23(57.50) | 21(52.50) | ||
女 | 17(42.50) | 19(47.50) | ||
胎儿出生体质量(x ± s)/kg | 3.11 ± 0.47 | 3.05 ± 0.42 | 0.602 | 0.549 |
胎儿双顶径(x ± s)/cm | 8.71 ± 0.31 | 8.55 ± 0.24 | 2.581 | 0.012 |
会阴侧切 | 6(15.00) | 9(22.50) | 0.328 | 0.567 |
产钳助产 | 5(12.50) | 3(7.50) | 0.139 | 0.709 |
Tab.2
Comparison of pelvic floor muscle strength between two groups before treatment, after one treatment session, and at the end of treatment"
时间 | 组别 | 例数 | Ⅰ类肌 | Ⅱ类肌 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1级 | 2级 | 3级 | ≥ 4级 | 1级 | 2级 | 3级 | ≥ 4级 | |||
治疗前 | 观察组 | 40 | 3(7.50) | 27(67.50) | 10(25.00) | 0 | 2(5.00) | 25(62.50) | 13(32.50) | 0 |
对照组 | 40 | 5(12.50) | 23(57.50) | 12(30.00) | 0 | 4(10.00) | 24(60.00) | 12(30.00) | 0 | |
χ 2 值 | 0.068 | 0.445 | ||||||||
P值 | 0.946 | 0.656 | ||||||||
治疗1次 | 观察组 | 40 | 1(2.50) | 14(35.00) | 12(30.00) | 13(32.50) | 0 | 13(32.50) | 15(37.50) | 12(30.00) |
对照组 | 40 | 3(7.50) | 21(52.50) | 13(32.50) | 3(7.50) | 3(7.50) | 21(52.50) | 13(32.50) | 3(7.50) | |
χ 2 值 | 2.488 | 2.856 | ||||||||
P值 | 0.013 | 0.004 | ||||||||
治疗结束 | 观察组 | 40 | 0 | 0 | 2(5.00) | 38(95.00) | 0 | 0 | 3(7.50) | 37(92.50) |
对照组 | 40 | 0 | 7(17.50) | 13(32.50) | 20(50.00) | 0 | 5(12.50) | 13(32.50) | 22(55.00) | |
χ 2 值 | 3.554 | 2.977 | ||||||||
P值 | < 0.001 | 0.003 |
Tab.3
Comparison of levator hiatus area and levator muscle thickness between two groups before treatment, after one treatment session, and at the end of treatment"
组别 | 例数 | 肛提肌裂孔面积/cm2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
静息状态 | 缩肛状态 | ||||||
治疗前 | 治疗1次 | 治疗结束 | 治疗前 | 治疗1次 | 治疗结束 | ||
观察组 | 40 | 29.38 ± 1.51 | 28.71 ± 1.48?& | 27.01 ± 1.35?#& | 19.08 ± 3.05 | 17.42 ± 2.64?& | 13.38 ± 2.35?#& |
对照组 | 40 | 29.69 ± 1.70 | 29.55 ± 1.62 | 27.75 ± 1.33?# | 19.87 ± 2.86 | 19.01 ± 2.97 | 14.67 ± 2.19?# |
F值/P时间效应值 | 86.785/< 0.001 | 82.754/< 0.001 | |||||
F值/P组间效应值 | 38.354/< 0.001 | 46.968/< 0.001 | |||||
F值/P交互效应值 | 8.731/0.016 | 7.563/0.020 | |||||
组别 | 例数 | 肛提肌厚度/cm | |||||
静息状态 | 缩肛状态 | ||||||
治疗前 | 治疗1次 | 治疗结束 | 治疗前 | 治疗1次 | 治疗结束 | ||
观察组 | 40 | 0.55 ± 0.09 | 0.62 ± 0.08?& | 0.79 ± 0.09?#& | 0.48 ± 0.07 | 0.54 ± 0.05?& | 0.72 ± 0.08?#& |
对照组 | 40 | 0.57 ± 0.08 | 0.58 ± 0.07 | 0.72 ± 0.10?# | 0.50 ± 0.06 | 0.51 ± 0.06 | 0.66 ± 0.09?# |
F值/P时间效应值 | 79.864/< 0.001 | 77.635/< 0.001 | |||||
F值/P组间效应值 | 45.641/< 0.001 | 53.759/< 0.001 | |||||
F值/P交互效应值 | 6.548/0.038 | 6.947/0.034 |
Tab.4
Comparison of levator ani muscle elasticity between two groups before and after treatment"
组别 | 例数 | 左侧 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
耻骨下支 | 肌腹 | 后下方 | ||||||||
治疗前 | 治疗1次 | 治疗结束 | 治疗前 | 治疗1次 | 治疗结束 | 治疗前 | 治疗1次 | 治疗结束 | ||
观察组 | 40 | 15.28 ± 2.54 | 18.94 ± 2.16?& | 30.75 ± 3.37?#& | 14.78 ± 3.13 | 18.01 ± 2.84?& | 29.57 ± 3.15?#& | 13.65 ± 3.22 | 17.14 ± 2.61?& | 28.44 ± 3.19?#& |
对照组 | 40 | 15.87 ± 2.41 | 16.57 ± 2.54 | 26.41 ± 2.94?# | 15.02 ± 3.25 | 16.08 ± 3.13 | 25.87 ± 2.73?# | 13.58 ± 2.97 | 14.15 ± 3.02 | 24.39 ± 2.78?# |
F值/P时间效应值 | 50.348/ < 0.001 | 49.638/ < 0.001 | 48.674/ < 0.001 | |||||||
F值/P组间效应值 | 30.781/ < 0.001 | 28.741/ < 0.001 | 27.480/ < 0.001 | |||||||
F值/P交互效应值 | 5.348/0.043 | 6.297/0.039 | 5.239/0.044 | |||||||
组别 | 例数 | 右侧 | ||||||||
耻骨下支 | 肌腹 | 后下方 | ||||||||
治疗前 | 治疗1次 | 治疗结束 | 治疗前 | 治疗1次 | 治疗结束 | 治疗前 | 治疗1次 | 治疗结束 | ||
观察组 | 40 | 14.94 ± 3.01 | 18.34 ± 2.09?& | 29.81 ± 2.49?# | 13.58 ± 3.09 | 16.38 ± 2.75?& | 28.79 ± 2.84?#& | 12.97 ± 2.85 | 16.58 ± 2.34?& | 28.15 ± 2.88?#& |
对照组 | 40 | 14.87 ± 2.78 | 15.51 ± 2.43 | 25.49 ± 2.05?# | 14.02 ± 2.18 | 15.03 ± 3.04 | 24.71 ± 2.37?# | 13.06 ± 2.71 | 13.94 ± 2.17 | 23.54 ± 2.43?# |
F值/P时间效应值 | 48.674/ < 0.001 | 48.754/ < 0.001 | 46.297/ < 0.001 | |||||||
F值/P组间效应值 | 29.863/ < 0.001 | 27.533/ < 0.001 | 26.371/ < 0.001 | |||||||
F值/P交互效应值 | 6.089/0.039 | 5.987/0.039 | 5.684/0.040 |
Tab.5
Comparison of vaginal lubrication and vaginal sensitivity between two groups at the end of treatment"
组别 | 例数 | 阴道润滑度 | t值 | P值 | 阴道敏感度 | t值 | P值 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
治疗前 | 治疗结束 | 治疗前 | 治疗结束 | ||||||
观察组 | 40 | 3.83 ± 0.38 | 5.15 ± 0.36 | 15.679 | < 0.001 | 3.88 ± 0.40 | 5.03 ± 0.36 | 13.207 | < 0.001 |
对照组 | 40 | 3.85 ± 0.36 | 4.90 ± 0.35 | 12.987 | < 0.001 | 3.90 ± 0.38 | 4.80 ± 0.38 | 10.286 | < 0.001 |
t值 | 0.242 | 3.149 | 0.229 | 2.779 | |||||
P值 | 0.810 | 0.002 | 0.819 | 0.007 |
Tab.6
Comparison of total incidence of adverse events between two groups before and after treatment"
时间 | 组别 | 例数 | 尿失禁 | 腰骶痛 | 子宫脱垂 | 阴道壁膨出 | 总发生率 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
治疗前 | 观察组 | 40 | 15(37.50) | 13(32.50) | 8(20.00) | 10(25.00) | 25(62.50) |
对照组 | 40 | 13(32.50) | 10(25.00) | 7(17.50) | 12(30.00) | 27(67.50) | |
χ 2 值 | 0.220 | 0.549 | 0.082 | 0.251 | 0.220 | ||
P值 | 0.639 | 0.459 | 0.775 | 0.617 | 0.639 | ||
治疗结束 | 观察组 | 40 | 1(2.50) | 2(5.00) | 0(0.00) | 0(0.00) | 3(7.50) |
对照组 | 40 | 6(15.00) | 4(10.00) | 2(5.00) | 2(5.00) | 14(35.00) | |
χ 2 值 | 2.505 | 0.180 | - | - | 9.038 | ||
P值 | 0.114 | 0.671 | 0.494 | 0.494 | 0.003 |
1 | LIU J, YAN W, TANG Y, et al. Therapeutic effect of proprioception training combined with pelvic floor electrical stimulation biofeedback on postpartum pelvic floor dysfunction[J]. J Central South Univ (Med Ed), 2022,47(9):1253-1259. |
2 |
YANG S, SANG W, FENG J,et al. The effect of rehabilitation exercises combined with direct vagina low voltage low frequency electric stimulation on pelvic nerve electrophysiology and tissue function in primiparous women: A randomised controlled trial[J]. J Clin Nurs, 2017,26(23-24):4537-4547. doi:10.1111/jocn.13790
doi: 10.1111/jocn.13790 |
3 |
JIN X, WU S, HUANG J, et al. Effect of prolonged second stage of labor on pelvic floor function: A prospective cohort study[J]. Int Urogynecol J, 2022,33(6):1633-1638. doi:10.1007/s00192-022-05136-2
doi: 10.1007/s00192-022-05136-2 |
4 | ZHANG X, ZHONG W, YAN W, et al. Long-term efficacy of the pelvic floor muscle rehabilitation for women with stress urinary incontinence[J]. J Central South Univ (Med Ed), 2023,48(3):414-421. |
5 | 朱慧敏,杨罗旗,王淼.产妇盆底功能状况调查及盆底肌锻炼效果分析[J].中国妇幼保健,2022,37(3):495-498. |
6 |
KAZEMINIA M, RAJATI F, RAJATI M. The effect of pelvic floor muscle-strengthening exercises on low back pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis on randomized clinical trials[J]. Neurol Sci, 2023, 44(3):859-872. doi:10.1007/s10072-022-06430-z
doi: 10.1007/s10072-022-06430-z |
7 | 刘姜伶,周嘉禾,许秋仪,等. 瑜伽用于产后女性整体盆底功能康复的临床观察[J]. 实用医学杂志,2023,39(11):1433-1439. |
8 |
SARMENTO A L C, SÁ B S, VASCONCELOS A G, et al. Perspectives on the Therapeutic Effects of Pelvic Floor Electrical Stimulation: A Systematic Review[J]. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2022,19(21):14035. doi:10.3390/ijerph192114035
doi: 10.3390/ijerph192114035 |
9 |
ROMEIKIENĖ K E, BARTKEVIČIENĖ D. Pelvic-Floor Dysfunction Prevention in Prepartum and Postpartum Periods[J]. Medicina (Kaunas), 2021,57(4):387. doi:10.3390/medicina57040387
doi: 10.3390/medicina57040387 |
10 | ZHONG F, MIAO W, YU Z, et al. Clinical effect of electrical stimulation biofeedback therapy combined with pelvic floor functional exercise on postpartum pelvic organ prolapse[J]. Am J Transl Res, 2021, 13(6):6629-6637. |
11 | 杨素勉,赵海峰,桑文淑. 会阴体按摩联合生物反馈电刺激对产妇盆底功能及性功能的影响[J]. 实用医学杂志,2022,38(24):3118-3124. |
12 |
HONG J Y, KWON T R, KIM J H, et al. Prospective, preclinical comparison of the performance between radiofrequency microneedling and microneedling alone in reversing photoaged skin[J]. J Cosmet Dermatol, 2020,19(5):1105-1109. doi:10.1111/jocd.13116
doi: 10.1111/jocd.13116 |
13 |
BONJORNO A R, GOMES T B, PEREIRA M C, et al. Radiofrequency therapy in esthetic dermatology: A review of clinical evidences[J]. J Cosmet Dermatol, 2020, 19(2):278-281. doi:10.1111/jocd.13206
doi: 10.1111/jocd.13206 |
14 |
VANAMAN WILSON M J, BOLTON J, JONES I T, et al. Histologic and Clinical Changes in Vulvovaginal Tissue After Treatment With a Transcutaneous Temperature-Controlled Radiofrequency Device[J]. Dermatol Surg, 2018,44(5):705-713. doi:10.1097/dss.0000000000001453
doi: 10.1097/dss.0000000000001453 |
15 | 高竹薇,陈星慧,何军晶,等. 妇科射频联合生物反馈电刺激治疗子宫脱垂疗效分析[J]. 昆明医科大学学报,2022,43(6):127-131. |
16 |
WATTANAKRAI P, LIMPJAROENVIRIYAKUL N, THONGTAN D, et al. The efficacy and safety of a combined multipolar radiofrequency with pulsed electromagnetic field technology for the treatment of vaginal laxity: A double-blinded, randomized, sham-controlled trial[J]. Lasers Med Sci, 2022,37(3):1829-1842. doi:10.1007/s10103-021-03438-3
doi: 10.1007/s10103-021-03438-3 |
17 |
FU L, LONG S, LI Q, et al. The efficacy and safety of temperature controlled dual-mode radiofrequency in women with vaginal laxity[J]. BMC Womens Health, 2023,23(1):121. doi:10.1186/s12905-023-02261-y
doi: 10.1186/s12905-023-02261-y |
18 |
HIDALGO-LOPEZOSA P, PÉREZ-MARÍN S, JIMÉNEZ-RUZ A, et al. Factors Associated with Postpartum Sexual Dysfunction in Spanish Women: A Cross-Sectional Study[J]. J Pers Med, 2022, 12(6):926. doi:10.3390/jpm12060926
doi: 10.3390/jpm12060926 |
19 | 林丽,李喜梅,毛郁蕾,等. 产后性功能障碍的流行病学特征及临床干预措施分析[J]. 中国妇幼保健,2023,38(22):4416-4419. |
20 |
GONZÁLEZ-GUTIÉRREZ M D, LÓPEZ-GARRIDO Á, CORTÉS-PÉREZ I, et al. Effects of Non-Invasive Radiofrequency Diathermy in Pelvic Floor Disorders: A Systematic Review[J]. Medicina (Kaunas), 2022,58(3):437. doi:10.3390/medicina58030437
doi: 10.3390/medicina58030437 |
21 | 陈星慧,高竹薇,张广斌,等. 射频治疗阴道前壁脱垂伴压力性尿失禁的疗效分析[J]. 昆明医科大学学报,2022,43(10):127-130. |
22 |
COSTANTINI E, AIELLI L, SERRA F, et al. Evaluation of Cell Migration and Cytokines Expression Changes under the Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Field on Wound Healing In Vitro Model[J]. Int J Mol Sci, 2022, 23(4):2205. doi:10.3390/ijms23042205
doi: 10.3390/ijms23042205 |
[1] | Wenjing ZHENG,Xiangling CHU,Yuqiong WU,Min ZHANG,Xiaohong CHU,Nan ZHANG,Honglin HU. Changes in serum NOV/CCN3 levels in mid⁃ to late⁃term pregnant women and their association with gestational diabetes mellitus and pregnancy outcome [J]. The Journal of Practical Medicine, 2025, 41(1): 71-77. |
[2] | Wenqing XU,Yishan LI,Qiuyu HAN,Fangjing SONG,Lin. MENG. Expression levels of HIF⁃3α methylation and DDIT4 in gestational diabetes mellitus and its relationship with pregnancy outcomes [J]. The Journal of Practical Medicine, 2024, 40(24): 3497-3502. |
[3] | Chao SHENG,Zhijian. WANG. Early identification, standardized diagnosis and treatment of placenta accreta spectrum disorders [J]. The Journal of Practical Medicine, 2024, 40(21): 2965-2970. |
[4] | Shijun LUO,Lizi ZHANG,Dunjin. CHEN. Diagnosis, prevention and treatment of placenta accreta spectrum with non⁃traumatic factors [J]. The Journal of Practical Medicine, 2024, 40(21): 2971-2975. |
[5] | Cheng CHEN,Xinyang YU,Hua. ZHANG. Advances in imaging diagnosis of placenta accreta spectrum [J]. The Journal of Practical Medicine, 2024, 40(21): 2976-2981. |
[6] | Jingyu WANG,Yi HE,Cuifang FAN,Guoping XIONG,Guoqiang SUN,Shaoshuai WANG,Suhua CHEN,Jianli WU,Dongrui DENG,Ling FENG,Haiyi LIU,Xiaohe DANG,Wanjiang. ZENG. Analysis of factors influencing premature birth in cases with placenta previa complicated by placenta accreta spectrum disorders [J]. The Journal of Practical Medicine, 2024, 40(21): 2982-2988. |
[7] | Fan HONG,Xiaoyi WANG,Xinyue LIANG,Jingjin GONG,Yuqin LEI,Zhijian. WANG. Prenatal diagnosis and perinatal outcomes of non⁃anterior placenta accreta: A comparative study with anterior placenta accreta [J]. The Journal of Practical Medicine, 2024, 40(21): 2989-2995. |
[8] | Zhaohua YAN,Jianbin ZHENG,Na ZHANG,Chunyan CAO,Luchun. YAN. MiR⁃365a⁃3p affects vascular endothelial cell function through TGF⁃β signaling pathway and participates in the pathogenesis of preeclampsia [J]. The Journal of Practical Medicine, 2024, 40(16): 2263-2269. |
[9] | Yaling LI,Gang NIU,Wei. WANG. Impact of high⁃risk HPV infections on pregnancy outcomes and vaginal microenvironment [J]. The Journal of Practical Medicine, 2024, 40(15): 2138-2141. |
[10] | Sumei YU,Yuyue ZHANG,Liwen MA,Yuanjun KUANG,Qingning CHANG,Min KONG,ZHANG Huiping ZHANGx. Effect of miR⁃15a⁃5p on autophagy of placental trophoblasts in preeclampsia [J]. The Journal of Practical Medicine, 2024, 40(12): 1631-1636. |
[11] | Xiaoying DAI,Ya SHEN,Xiaofang. TAN. Influencing factors of early miscarriage after recurrent spontaneous abortion based on ultrasound endometrial receptivity parameters and lymphocyte immunophenotype [J]. The Journal of Practical Medicine, 2024, 40(10): 1402-1406. |
[12] | Yuying HU,Jinming ZHU,Jie LIU,Yawen PAN,Qian ZHANG,Jinqiu FENG. Expression and significance of miR⁃223⁃3p in serum of pregnant women with preterm premature rupture of membranes [J]. The Journal of Practical Medicine, 2024, 40(9): 1275-1279. |
[13] | Bo YANG,Zhaoquan. JIN. The clinical efficacy of sivelestat sodium combined with ulinastatin for sepsis⁃induced acute respiratory distress syndrome [J]. The Journal of Practical Medicine, 2024, 40(5): 621-626. |
[14] | Li′na GAO,Xiaohui LIU,Yufang ZHANG,Xiaoling LIU,Xiaochun HE,Jing GAO,Li ZHANG,Jun SUN,Xiujuan WANG,Yan. DONG. Expression of lncRNA SNHG8 in placenta accreta and its effect on trophoblast invasion and migration [J]. The Journal of Practical Medicine, 2024, 40(5): 646-652. |
[15] | Shiming WANG,Lin QI,Yaping LIU,Yingchun. SU. Effect of endometrial thickness on in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer pregnancy outcome: a review of research progress [J]. The Journal of Practical Medicine, 2023, 39(21): 2698-2703. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||