The Journal of Practical Medicine ›› 2024, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (12): 1683-1689.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2024.12.012
• Clinical Research • Previous Articles Next Articles
Na LI,Zhenhua WANG(),Qianqian NIU,Guiqin CHEN,Suiyu LUO,Li DONG
Received:
2024-01-12
Online:
2024-06-25
Published:
2024-06-14
Contact:
Zhenhua WANG
E-mail:wzh0371@163.com
CLC Number:
Na LI,Zhenhua WANG,Qianqian NIU,Guiqin CHEN,Suiyu LUO,Li DONG. The clinical effect of Tension⁃free laparoscopic lateral suspension with mesh for pelvic organ prolapse[J]. The Journal of Practical Medicine, 2024, 40(12): 1683-1689.
Tab.1
Comparison of general information among two groups"
项目 | 观察组(n = 85) | 对照组(n = 40) | P值 |
---|---|---|---|
年龄(岁) | 54.16 ± 11.14 | 60.77 ± 9.70 | 0.184 |
BMI | 25.30 ± 2.97 | 25.50 ± 3.29 | 0.852 |
孕次(次) | 3.37 ± 1.75 | 3.55 ± 1.97 | 0.745 |
产次(次) | 2.46 ± 0.95 | 2.38 ± 0.98 | 0.558 |
合并后盆腔脱垂[例(%)] | 53(62.35) | 24(60.00) | 0.84 |
合并排尿困扰[例(%)] | 43(50.59) | 19(47.50) | 0.922 |
合并排粪困扰[例(%)] | 4(4.71) | 3(7.50) | 0.805 |
切除子宫[例(%)] | 62(72.94) | 34(85.00) | 0.154 |
合并压力性尿失禁并同时行经尿道中段悬吊术[例(%)] | 5(5.88) | 4(10.00) | 0.62 |
合并会阴体陈旧性裂伤并同时行修补术[例(%)] | 14(16.47) | 12(30.00) | 0.07 |
Ⅱ°脱垂[例(%)] | 38(44.71) | 16(40.00) | 0.697 |
Ⅲ°脱垂[例(%)] | 47(55.29) | 22(55.00) | 0.918 |
Ⅳ°脱垂[例(%)] | 2(2.35) | 2(5.00) | 0.793 |
中位随访时间(月) | 13.13 | 13.76 | 0.892 |
Tab.2
Surgical conditions and postoperative complications"
项目 | 观察组(切除子宫) (n = 62) | 对照组(切除子宫) (n = 34) | t/χ2值 | P值 | 观察组(保留子宫) (n = 23) | 对照组(保留子宫) (n = 6) | t/χ2值 | P值 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
手术时间(min) | 60.25 ± 15.16 | 71.25 ± 20.14 | -2.464 | 0.016 | 30.45 ± 10.64 | 65.24 ± 9.15 | -2.383 | 0.020 |
术中出血量(mL) | 72.75 ± 20.25 | 95.30 ± 10.35 | -3.697 | 0.001 | 30.75 ± 11.25 | 92.46 ± 8.14 | -4.273 | 0.000 |
术后留置尿管(d) | 2.71 ± 1.84 | 2.85 ± 0.88 | -1.461 | 0.147 | 1.70 ± 0.64 | 1.81 ± 0.36 | -1.363 | 0.179 |
术后排气时间(d) | 2.21 ± 0.72 | 2.40 ± 0.67 | -1.121 | 0.265 | 1.88 ± 0.92 | 2.94 ± 0.33 | -2.921 | 0.007 |
住院天数(d) | 5.11 ± 0.91 | 6.23 ± 0.75 | -2.811 | 0.006 | 4.24 ± 0.91 | 6.11 ± 0.77 | -2.863 | 0.005 |
网片暴露率[例(%)] | 1(1.61) | 3(8.82) | 1.339 | 0.047 | 0 | 0 | ||
近期并发症[例(%)] | 4(6.45) | 5(14.71) | 0.923 | 0.337 | 1(4.35) | 2(33.33) | - | 0.04 |
Tab.4
Comparison of POP-Q points in POP patients between preoperation and postoperations"
观察组(n = 60) | POP?Q | Z值 | P值 | 对照组(n = 28) | POP?Q | Z值 | P值 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Aa | 术前 | 0(0,1) | -6.757 | 0.000 | Aa | 术前 | 0.5(0,1) | -4.162 | 0.000 |
术后12个月 | -3(-3,-3) | 术后12个月 | -3(-3,-3) | ||||||
Ba | 术前 | 1(0.5,2) | -6.716 | 0.000 | Ba | 术前 | 1(1,3) | -4.640 | 0.000 |
术后12个月 | -3(-3,-3) | 术后12个月 | -3(-3,-3) | ||||||
C | 术前 | 1(0,1) | -6.782 | 0.000 | C | 术前 | 0(-1,0.5) | -4.649 | 0.000 |
术后12个月 | -5(-5,-5) | 术后12个月 | -5(-5,-4) | ||||||
Ap | 术前 | 0(-3,0) | -5.036 | 0.000 | Ap | 术前 | 0(-3,-0.5) | -3.758 | 0.000 |
术后12个月 | -3(-3,-3) | 术后12个月 | -3(-3,-3) | ||||||
Bp | 术前 | 0(-2,1) | -5.879 | 0.000 | Bp | 术前 | 0(-3,1) | -4.135 | 0.000 |
术后12个月 | -3(-3,-3) | 术后12个月 | -3(-3,-3) |
Tab.5
Comparison of life quality in POP patients between preoperation and postoperations"
观察组 | 生活质量评分 | Z值 | P值 | 对照组 | 生活质量评分 | Z值 | P值 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PDFI?20 | 术前 | 70.5(67.25,73) | -6.745 | < 0.01 | PDFI?20 | 术前 | 70(67.25,73) | -4.628 | < 0.01 |
术后12个月 | 18(16,19) | 术后12个月 | 18(16,19) | ||||||
POPDI?6 | 术前 | 19(18,19) | -6.760 | < 0.01 | POPDI?6 | 术前 | 19(18,22) | -4.644 | < 0.01 |
术后12个月 | 6(6,7) | 术后12个月 | 6.5(6,7) | ||||||
CARDI?6 | 术前 | 30(29,31) | -6.779 | < 0.01 | CARDI?6 | 术前 | 29(28.25,30) | -4.651 | < 0.01 |
术后12个月 | 7(6,8) | 术后12个月 | 7(6,8) | ||||||
UDI?6 | 术前 | 21(20,23) | -6.767 | < 0.01 | UDI?6 | 术前 | 21(20,22.75) | -4.648 | < 0.01 |
术后12个月 | 4(4,5.75) | 术后12个月 | 4.5(3.25,5.75) | ||||||
PFIQ?7 | 术前 | 33(32,34) | -6.761 | < 0.01 | PFIQ?7 | 术前 | 33.5(32,34) | -4.637 | < 0.01 |
术后12个月 | 7(6,8) | 术后12个月 | 7.5(7,8) | ||||||
PISQ?12 | 术前 | 46(45,47) | -6.776 | < 0.01 | PISQ?12 | 术前 | 46(45,47) | -4.639 | < 0.01 |
术后12个月 | 6(5,7) | 术后12个月 | 6.5(6,8) |
Tab.6
Comparison of the subjective indexes between the study group with the control group"
研究组与对照组主观指标比较 | Z值 | P值 | |
---|---|---|---|
PDFI?20 | 术前 | -0.265 | 0.791 |
术后12个月 | -0.322 | 0.748 | |
POPDI?6 | 术前 | -0.104 | 0.917 |
术后12个月 | -0.459 | 0.646 | |
CARDI?6 | 术前 | -1.032 | 0.302 |
术后12个月 | -0.109 | 0.913 | |
UDI?6 | 术前 | -0.738 | 0.227 |
术后12个月 | -2.410 | 0.821 | |
PFIQ?7 | 术前 | -0.037 | 0.971 |
术后12个月 | -1.073 | 0.283 | |
PISQ?7 | 术前 | -0.635 | 0.526 |
术后12个月 | -1.548 | 0.122 |
1 | 中华医学会妇产科学分会妇科盆地学组. 盆腔器官脱垂的中国诊治指南(2020年版)[J]. 中华妇科杂志, 2020,55(5):300-306. |
2 |
BATALLER E, ROS C, ANGLÈS S, et al. Anatomical outcomes 1 year after pelvic organ prolapse surgery in patients with and without a uterus at a high risk of recurrence: a randomised controlled trial comparing laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy/cervicopexy and anterior vaginal mesh[J]. Int Urogynecol J, 2019,30(4):545-555. doi:10.1007/s00192-018-3702-7
doi: 10.1007/s00192-018-3702-7 |
3 |
VEIT-RUBIN N, DUBUISSON J B, GAYET-AGERON A, et al. Patient satisfaction after laparoscopic lateral suspension with mesh for pelvic organ prolapse: outcome report of a continuous series of 417 patients[J]. Int Urogynecol J, 2017,28(11):1685-1693. doi:10.1007/s00192-017-3327-2
doi: 10.1007/s00192-017-3327-2 |
4 |
ARCIERI M, MORLACCO A, MONTEBELLI F, et al. Sacrocolpopexy after sub-total hysterectomy vs. sacral hysteropexy for advanced urogenital prolapse: A propensity-matched study[J]. Int J Gynaecol Obstet,2023,163(3):847-853. doi:10.1002/ijgo.14959
doi: 10.1002/ijgo.14959 |
5 |
李华梅,张兰玲,杨林青,等. 腹腔镜下Dubuisson术式治疗盆腔脏器脱垂临床分析[J]. 现代妇产科进展, 2021, 30(11):843-845,850. doi:10.13283/j.cnki.xdfckjz.2021.11.008
doi: 10.13283/j.cnki.xdfckjz.2021.11.008 |
6 |
DÄLLENBACH P. Laparoscopic Lateral Suspension (LLS) for the Treatment of Apical Prolapse: A New Gold Standard?[J]. Front Surg, 2022, 9:898392. doi:10.3389/fsurg.2022.898392
doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.898392 |
7 | 孙秀丽. 盆底支持结构Ⅲ水平修复的重要性[J]. 中国妇产科临床杂志, 2019,20(2):97-98. |
8 |
CHATZIIOANNIDOU K, VEIT-RUBIN N, DÄLLENBACH P. Laparoscopic lateral suspension for anterior and apical prolapse: a prospective cohort with standardized technique[J]. Int Urogynecol J, 2022,33(2):319-325. doi:10.1007/s00192-021-04784-0
doi: 10.1007/s00192-021-04784-0 |
9 |
DEFFIEUX X, PERROUIN-VERBE M A, CAMPAGNE-LOISEAU S, et al. Diagnosis and management of complications following pelvic organ prolapse surgery using a synthet ic mesh: French national guidelines for clinical practice[J]. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 2024,294:170-179. doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2024.01.015
doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2024.01.015 |
10 | KAPANDJI M. Cure des prolapsus uro-génitaux par la colpo-isthmo-cystopexie par bandelette transversale et la Douglassorraphie ligamento-péritonéale étagée et croisée [Treatment of urogenital prolapse by colpo-isthmo-cystopexy with transverse strip and crossed, multiple layer, ligamento-peritoneal douglasorrhaphy][J]. Ann Chir, 1967,21(5):321-328. |
11 |
DUBUISSON J, CHAPRON C. Laparoscopic Iliac Colpo-Uterine Suspension For the Treatment of Genital Prolapse Using Two Meshes: A New Operative Laparoscopic Approach[J]. Gynecol Surg, 1998,14(4): 153-159. doi:10.1089/gyn.1998.14.153
doi: 10.1089/gyn.1998.14.153 |
12 |
DUBUISSON J, VEIT-RUBIN N, BOUQUET DE JOLINIÈRE J, et al. Laparoscopic Lateral Suspension: Benefits of a Cross-shaped Mesh to Treat Difficult Vaginal Vault Prolapse[J]. J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 2016,23(5):672. doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2016.01.028
doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2016.01.028 |
13 |
MULAYIM B, SENDAG F. Modified Laparoscopic Lateral Suspension: The Mulayim Technique[J]. J Minim Invasive Gynecol,2019,26(3):407-408. doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2018.07.014
doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2018.07.014 |
14 |
YASSA M, DOGAN O, TUG N. Regarding "Modified Laparoscopic Lateral Suspension: The Mulayim Technique"[J]. J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 2019,26(3):571-572. doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2018.09.788
doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2018.09.788 |
15 |
SCHUG-PASS C, TAMME C, TANNAPFEL A, et al. A lightweight polypropylene mesh (TiMesh) for laparoscopic intraperitoneal repair of abdominal wall hernias: comparison of biocompatibility with the DualMesh in an experimental study using the porcine model[J]. Surg Endosc, 2006,20(3):402-409. doi:10.1007/s00464-004-8277-3
doi: 10.1007/s00464-004-8277-3 |
16 |
SAAD S, MURDOCH C, WORKMAN V, et al. In-vitro evaluation of macrophage response to polypropylene mesh before and after application of mechano-oxidative stress[J]. Eur Urol, 2023,83:S1190. doi:10.1016/s0302-2838(23)00882-5
doi: 10.1016/s0302-2838(23)00882-5 |
17 |
PROTSEPKO O, VOISARD P, KUHN C, et al. Induction of a different immune response in non-titanized compared to titanized polypropylene meshes[J]. Acta Biomater, 2023,169:363-371. doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2023.08.018
doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2023.08.018 |
18 |
FARR N T H, KLOSTERHALFEN B, NOÉ G K. Characterization in respect to degradation of titanium-coated polypropylene surgical mesh explanted from humans[J]. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater, 2023,111(5):1142-1152. doi:10.1002/jbm.b.35221
doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.35221 |
19 |
ABDULAGATOV I M, RAGIMOV R M, KHAMIDOV М А, et al. ALD coated polypropylene hernia meshes for prevention of mesh-related post-surgery complications: an experimental study in animals[J]. Biomed Mater, 2021,17(1).doi: 10.1088/1748-605X/ac361e .
doi: 10.1088/1748-605X/ac361e |
20 |
ISENLIK B S, AKSOY O, EROL O, et al. Comparison of laparoscopic lateral suspension and laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with concurrent total laparoscopic hysterectomy for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse: a randomized controlled clinical trial[J]. Int Urogynecol J, 2023,34(1):231-238. doi:10.1007/s00192-022-05267-6
doi: 10.1007/s00192-022-05267-6 |
21 |
RUSSO E, GIANNINI A, GUEVARA M M, et al. Medium-term outcomes after robotic-assisted lateral suspension with mesh for advanced multi-compartmental prolapse[J]. Int Urogynecol J, 2020,31(8):1647-1653. doi:10.1007/s00192-019-04069-7
doi: 10.1007/s00192-019-04069-7 |
22 |
CHATZIIOANNIDOU K, VEIT-RUBIN N, DÄLLENBACH P. Laparoscopic lateral suspension for anterior and apical prolapse: a prospective cohort with standardized technique[J]. Int Urogynecol J, 2022,33(2):319-325. doi:10.1007/s00192-021-04784-0
doi: 10.1007/s00192-021-04784-0 |
23 |
MEREU L, TATEO S, D'ALTERIO M N, et al. Laparoscopic lateral suspension with mesh for apical and anterior pelvic organ prolapse: A prospective double center study[J]. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 2020,244:16-20. doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2019.10.026
doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2019.10.026 |
24 |
MALANOWSKA E, STARCZEWSKI A, BIELEWICZ W, et al. Assessment of Overactive Bladder after Laparoscopic Lateral Suspension for Pelvic Organ Prolapse[J]. Biomed Res Int, 2019,2019:9051963. doi:10.1155/2019/9051963
doi: 10.1155/2019/9051963 |
25 | 刘书杰,张海燕,刘印美,等. 腹腔镜改良Dubuisson术治疗盆腔器官脱垂的临床疗效分析[J]. 腹腔镜外科杂志, 2023,28(12):929-933. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||