The Journal of Practical Medicine ›› 2025, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (18): 2906-2912.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2025.18.018
• Drugs and Clinic Practice • Previous Articles
Jingguo LI,Yan LIU,Chao WANG,Chenghui LI()
Received:
2025-06-30
Online:
2025-09-20
Published:
2025-09-25
Contact:
Chenghui LI
E-mail:lchui001@163.com
CLC Number:
Jingguo LI,Yan LIU,Chao WANG,Chenghui LI. Impact of sintilimab combined with TP chemotherapy regimen on immune function and prognostic survival in patients with advanced esophageal cancer[J]. The Journal of Practical Medicine, 2025, 41(18): 2906-2912.
Tab.1
Comparison of basic information between the two groups of patients"
组别 | 例数 | 性别 (男/女)/例 | 年龄/岁 | 体质量指数/(kg/m2) | 病变长度/cm | 病理分期/例 | 病变部位/例 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ⅲb期 | Ⅳ期 | 胸上段 | 胸中段 | 胸下段 | ||||||
对照组 | 41 | 23/18 | 60.78 ± 7.23 | 22.28 ± 3.40 | 6.47 ± 1.15 | 18 | 23 | 12 | 19 | 10 |
观察组 | 41 | 19/22 | 61.12 ± 7.45 | 22.52 ± 3.65 | 6.35 ± 1.07 | 20 | 21 | 14 | 18 | 9 |
t/χ2 值 | 0.781 | 0.210 | 0.308 | 0.489 | 0.196 | 0.234 | ||||
P值 | 0.377 | 0.834 | 0.759 | 0.626 | 0.658 | 0.890 |
Tab.3
Comparison of immune function between the two groups before and after treatment"
组别 | 例数 | CD3+ | CD4+ | CD8+ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
治疗前 | 治疗后 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | ||
对照组 | 41 | 55.79 ± 6.40 | 44.73 ± 5.12? | 40.93 ± 5.42 | 33.15 ± 4.21? | 30.19 ± 4.06 | 35.99 ± 4.42* |
观察组 | 41 | 56.12 ± 6.63 | 50.48 ± 5.61? | 41.21 ± 5.76 | 37.96 ± 4.69? | 30.44 ± 4.11 | 33.13 ± 4.10? |
t值 | 0.229 | 4.848 | 0.227 | 4.887 | 0.227 | 3.038 | |
P值 | 0.819 | < 0.05 | 0.821 | < 0.05 | 0.783 | < 0.05 |
Tab.4
Comparison of inflammation levels between the two groups before and after treatment"
组别 | 例数 | IL-6/(ng/L) | TNF-α/(g/L) | IL-8/(ng/mL) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
治疗前 | 治疗后 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | ||
对照组 | 41 | 178.12 ± 23.62 | 132.84 ± 16.46? | 15.01 ± 2.46 | 10.01 ± 1.34? | 4.59 ± 0.68 | 3.13 ± 0.52? |
观察组 | 41 | 176.91 ± 21.35 | 96.75 ± 10.39? | 14.76 ± 2.29 | 6.98 ± 1.02? | 4.65 ± 0.71 | 2.03 ± 0.40? |
t值 | 0.243 | 11.872 | 0.476 | 11.521 | 0.391 | 10.736 | |
P值 | 0.808 | < 0.05 | 0.635 | < 0.05 | 0.697 | < 0.05 |
Tab.5
Comparison of tumor marker levels between the two groups before and after treatment"
组别 | 例数 | CEA/ (ng/mL) | CA199 /(U/mL) | SCC/(μg/L) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
治疗前 | 治疗后 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | ||
对照组 | 41 | 11.64 ± 2.32 | 7.16 ± 1.23? | 52.74 ± 6.63 | 42.92 ± 5.67? | 9.25 ± 1.36 | 4.48 ± 0.59? |
观察组 | 41 | 12.16 ± 2.48 | 5.11 ± 1.18? | 52.32 ± 6.42 | 35.09 ± 5.20? | 9.18 ± 1.31 | 3.51 ± 0.40? |
t值 | 0.980 | 7.701 | 0.291 | 6.517 | 0.237 | 8.713 | |
P值 | 0.330 | < 0.05 | 0.771 | < 0.05 | 0.813 | < 0.05 |
Tab.6
Comparison of swallowing function and quality of life before and after treatment between groups"
组别 | 例数 | SSA评分 | QLICP-ES评分 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
治疗前 | 治疗后 | 治疗前 | 治疗后 | ||
对照组 | 41 | 38.32 ± 5.29 | 29.94 ± 4.14? | 148.89 ± 23.49 | 65.29 ± 8.90? |
观察组 | 41 | 38.75 ± 5.42 | 25.13 ± 3.57? | 150.14 ± 25.75 | 50.36 ± 6.48? |
t值 | 0.364 | 5.634 | 0.230 | 8.684 | |
P值 | 0.717 | < 0.05 | 0.819 | < 0.05 |
[1] | 王豪,陆筱祎,王文杰. 老年局部晚期食管癌同步放化疗序贯信迪利单抗免疫治疗的疗效[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2025, 41(3): 365-370. |
[2] |
ASEFA T, TESFAYE W, BITEW G, et al. Lived experiences of dysphagia-related quality of life among esophageal cancer patients: A qualitative study[J]. Health Qual Life Outcomes, 2025, 23(1):2. doi:10.1186/s12955-024-02319-x
doi: 10.1186/s12955-024-02319-x |
[3] | 游传宇,皈燕. 不可切除局部晚期食管鳞癌维持治疗的研究进展[J]. 中国肿瘤临床,2025,52(5):253-258. |
[4] | ZHENG W, FU L. Effect of thalidomide combined with TP chemotherapy on serum VEGF and NRP-1 levels advanced esophageal cancer patients[J]. Am J Transl Res, 2021, 13(9):10809-10815. |
[5] | 刘爱芹,闫冰,任鹏,等. 小牛脾提取物对食管鳞癌术后辅助化疗患者的影响[J]. 中国免疫学杂志,2025,41(5):1122-1128. |
[6] | 齐文昕,张伟龙,景红梅. 肿瘤免疫疗法中细胞来源对治疗效果的影响[J]. 中华血液学杂志,2024,45(7):699-704. |
[7] |
WANG C, JIN L, CHENG X,et al. Real-World Efficacy and Safety of Sintilimab-Based Regimens against Advanced Esophageal Cancer: A Single-Center Retrospective Observational Study[J]. Biomed Res Int, 2022, 2022:7331687. doi:10.1155/2022/7331687
doi: 10.1155/2022/7331687 |
[8] | 葛均波,徐永健,王辰.内科学[M].9版.北京: 人民卫生出版社,2018:350-352. |
[9] | 陈俊春,孙丽凯. 标准吞咽功能评估量表在高龄病人饮食护理中的应用[J]. 护理研究,2015,29(10):1220-1222. |
[10] | 戚艳波,李高峰,孟琼,等. 食管癌生命质量测定量表QLICP-ES的条目筛选[J]. 国际肿瘤学杂志,2010,37(7):554-556. |
[11] |
JIANG L, ZHU J, CHEN X,et al. Safety and efficacy of paclitaxel plus carboplatin versus paclitaxel plus cisplatin in neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for patients with locally advanced esophageal carcinoma: A retrospective study[J]. Radiat Oncol, 2022, 17(1):218. doi:10.1186/s13014-022-02190-4
doi: 10.1186/s13014-022-02190-4 |
[12] |
MAEDA O, FURUNE S, KANDA M,et al. Docetaxel, cisplatin, and fluorouracil with pegfilgrastim on day 3 as neoadjuvant chemotherapy for esophageal cancer[J]. Cancer Med, 2024, 13(2):e6974. doi:10.1002/cam4.6974
doi: 10.1002/cam4.6974 |
[13] |
YOOM H J, KIM G C, OH S,et al. WNK3 inhibition elicits antitumor immunity by suppressing PD-L1 expression on tumor cells and activating T-cell function[J]. Exp Mol Med, 2022, 54(11):1913-1926. doi:10.1038/s12276-022-00876-z
doi: 10.1038/s12276-022-00876-z |
[14] |
KOTANIDES H, LI Y, MALABUNGA M,et al. Bispecific Targeting of PD-1 and PD-L1 Enhances T-cell Activation and Antitumor Immunity[J]. Cancer Immunol Res, 2020, 8(10):1300-1310. doi:10.1158/2326-6066.cir-20-0304
doi: 10.1158/2326-6066.cir-20-0304 |
[15] |
WANG Q, XIE B, LIU S,et al. What Happens to the Immune Microenvironment After PD-1 Inhibitor Therapy?[J]. Front Immunol, 2021, 12:773168. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2021.773168
doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.773168 |
[16] |
WU Y Y, SHAO H. Research progress of sintilimab in the treatment of cancer (Review)[J]. Oncol Lett, 2025, 29(5):240. doi:10.3892/ol.2025.14986
doi: 10.3892/ol.2025.14986 |
[17] | 焦福智,陈雅蕊,姬薇,等. PD-1抑制剂联合化疗一线新辅助治疗局部进展期胃腺癌的近期疗效及安全性评估[J]. 中国药物警戒,2023,20(3):301-305. |
[18] |
SEBASTIAN J, RATHINASAMY K. Microtubules and Cell Division: Potential Pharmacological Targets in Cancer Therapy[J]. Curr Drug Targets, 2023, 24(11):889-918. doi:10.2174/1389450124666230731094837
doi: 10.2174/1389450124666230731094837 |
[19] |
BOZDAGANYAN M, FEDOROV V, KHOLINA E,et al. Exploring tubulin-paclitaxel binding modes through extensive molecular dynamics simulations[J]. Sci Rep, 2025, 15(1):8378. doi:10.1038/s41598-025-92805-z
doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-92805-z |
[20] |
WANG X, ZHOU Y, WANG D,et al. Cisplatin-induced ototoxicity: From signaling network to therapeutic targets[J]. Biomed Pharmacother, 2023, 157:114045. doi:10.1016/j.biopha.2022.114045
doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2022.114045 |
[21] |
PARK S Y, CHUNG Y S, PARK S Y,et al. Role of AMPK in Regulation of Oxaliplatin-Resistant Human Colorectal Cancer[J]. Biomedicines, 2022, 10(11):2690. doi:10.3390/biomedicines10112690
doi: 10.3390/biomedicines10112690 |
[22] |
SHEN G Y, ZHANG Y, HUANG R Z, et al. FOXP4-AS1 promotes CD8+ T cell exhaustion and esophageal cancer immune escape through USP10-stabilized PD-L1[J]. Immunol Res, 2024, 72(4):766-775. doi:10.1007/s12026-024-09482-9
doi: 10.1007/s12026-024-09482-9 |
[23] |
XIONG J, CHENG S, GAO X, et al. Anti-metabolic agent pegaspargase plus PD-1 antibody sintilimab for first-line treatment in advanced natural killer T cell lymphoma[J]. Signal Transduct Target Ther, 2024, 9(1):62. doi:10.1038/s41392-024-01782-8
doi: 10.1038/s41392-024-01782-8 |
[24] |
GRANDITS M, PALHARES L C G F, OSBORN G,et al. Fc-mediated immune stimulating, pro-inflammatory and antitumor effects of anti-HER2 IgE against HER2-expressing and trastuzumab-resistant tumors[J]. J Immunother Cancer, 2025, 13(3):e010945. doi:10.1136/jitc-2024-010945
doi: 10.1136/jitc-2024-010945 |
[25] |
YE Z M, XU Z, WANG H L,et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy as the first-line treatment for advanced esophageal cancer[J]. Cancer Med, 2023, 12(5):6182-6189. doi:10.1002/cam4.5350
doi: 10.1002/cam4.5350 |
[26] |
LV H, HUANG C, LI J, et al. The survival outcomes of neoadjuvant sintilimab combined with chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma[J]. Front Immunol, 2023, 13:1100750. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2022.1100750
doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.1100750 |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||