实用医学杂志 ›› 2021, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (14): 1846-1851.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006⁃5725.2021.14.015

• 临床研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

内镜下球囊扩张术和括约肌小切开术治疗非扩张性肝外胆管结石的临床分析

高黎黎1, 张霞芬2, 张昊2    

  1. 上海市浦东医院(复旦大学附属浦东医院)1 医学科研与创新中心,2 普外科(上海 201399)

  • 出版日期:2021-07-25 发布日期:2021-07-25
  • 通讯作者: 张昊 E⁃mail:zztianxing@126.com
  • 基金资助:

    上海市浦东新区卫生和计划生育委员会科技发展专项基金资助青年科技项目(编号:PW2016B⁃15);复旦大学附属 浦东医院院级课题项目资助(编号:2015YJ⁃09)

Clinical effect of endoscopic papillary balloon dilation combined withendoscopic sphincterotomy for treatment of non⁃dilated extrahepatic bile duct stones

Gao Lili*,ZHANG Xiafen,ZHANG Hao.   

  1. *Center for Medical Research and Innovation,Shanghai Pudong Hospital,Fudan University Pudong Medical Center,Shanghai 201399,China 

  • Online:2021-07-25 Published:2021-07-25
  • Contact: ZHANG Hao E⁃mail:zztianxing@126.com

摘要:

目的 评估内镜下球囊扩张术(EPBD)和括约肌切开术(EST)治疗非扩张性肝外胆管结 石的疗效和安全性。方法 回顾性收集非扩张性和扩张性肝外胆管结石患者行内镜逆行胰胆管造影 ERCP)的临床资料,比较扩张组和非扩张组患者的疗效及并发症的差异;根据术式将非扩张组患者分为:EPBD 组、小切开组和联合治疗组(小切开术+EPBD),比较不同术式下患者的疗效和并发症的差异。 结果 与扩张组患者相比,非扩张组患者术后 1 周内急性胰腺炎(PEP)和高淀粉酶血症(HP)的发生率较 高(P < 0.05),但均为轻、中度 PEP,未出现重度患者;应用 EPBD、小切开术和联合方式治疗非扩张性肝外 胆管结石均能达到取净结石的目的(P > 0.05),并发症中仅PEP和HP的发生差异有统计学意义(P <0.05);两两比较结果显示,小切开组和联合治疗组 PEP HP 发生率较 EPBD 组低(P < 0.05)。结论 小切开术及联合治疗的效果较好且 PEP HP 发生率低;结合减少操作及成本效益原则,小切开术对非扩张性肝外胆管结石有较高的临床应用价值。

关键词:

非扩张性肝外胆管结石, 十二指肠镜下乳头括约肌切开术, 十二指肠镜下乳头气囊 扩张术, 内镜逆行胰胆管造影, 术后胰腺炎

Abstract:

Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of endoscopic papillary balloon dilation (EPBD)combined with endoscopic sphincterotomy(EST)for the treatment ofnon ⁃ dilated extrahepatic bile duct stones(Non⁃DEBDS). Methods The clinical data of patients with dilated extrahepatic bile duct stones(DEBDS and NDEBDS treated with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography(ERCP)were collected and analyzedto compare the efficacy and safety of ERCP between the two groups. According to the therapies they received,the patients with non⁃dilated extrahepatic bile duct stones were divided into EPBD group(n = 75),minor EST group (n = 75),and minor EST combined with EPBD(EST⁃EPBD)group(n = 87),and the efficacy and safety of the three groups were evaluated. Results The DEBDS group was less likely to develop with hyperamylasemia(HP)and post⁃ERCP pancreatitis(PEP)than the Non⁃DEBDS group within one week after surgery(P < 0.05),some cases developed with mild or moderate pancreatitis,but none with severe conditions. All the treatment methods were effective for clearing the stones completely in the non⁃DEBDS patients(P > 0.05). The pairwise comparison results showed that the incidences of HP and PEP in the EPBD group were both higher than in other groups,respectively (P < 0.05). Conclusion The endoscopic papillary balloon dilation combined with endoscopic sphincterotomy achieves a better effect in treatment of non⁃dilated extrahepatic bile duct stones,with lower incidences of PEP and HP. It is of higher value clinically in terms of reduced operation and surgical costs.

Key words:

non?dilated extrahepatic bile duct stones, endoscopic sphincterotomy, endoscopic papil? lary balloon dilatation, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, post?ERCP pancreatitis