实用医学杂志 ›› 2021, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (14): 1852-1856.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006⁃5725.2021.14.016

• 药物与临床 • 上一篇    下一篇

右美托咪定与丙泊酚对机械通气患者膈肌功能及撤机的影响

伍松柏, 戴瑶, 何峻, 吕爱莲, 黄康, 方向, 吕建磊   

  1. 长沙市第一医院重症医学科(长沙 410005)

  • 出版日期:2021-07-25 发布日期:2021-07-25
  • 基金资助:

    湖南省卫生健康委员会科研计划课题横向项目(编号:B2019068)

Effects of exmedetomidine and propofol on diaphragm function and weaning from mechanical ventilation of patients 

WU Songbai,DAI Yao,HE Jun,LÜ Ailian,HUANG Kang,FANG Xiang,LÜ Jianlei.   

  1. The First Hospital of Changsha,Changsha 410005,China

  • Online:2021-07-25 Published:2021-07-25
  • Supported by:


摘要:

目的 比较右美托咪定与丙泊酚对机械通气患者膈肌功能及撤机的影响。方法 140 例机 械通气患者,随机分为右美托咪定组(72 例),丙泊酚组(68 例),在常规治疗及布托啡诺镇痛的基础上,分 别使用右美托咪定及丙泊酚镇静,使用超声进行膈肌功能评估,比较两组首次自主呼吸试验时呼气末 膈肌厚度、膈肌增厚率及膈肌位移,首次撤机成功率、机械通气时间的差异。结果 两组首次自主呼吸 试验时膈肌功能有显著差异,右美托咪定组呼气末膈肌厚度、膈肌增厚分数、膈肌位移均高于丙泊酚 组(< 0.05);右美托咪定组首次撤机成功率高于丙泊酚组,机械通气时间少于丙泊酚组(< 0.05)。 结论 与丙泊酚相比,机械通气患者使用右美托咪定膈肌功能影响更小、能够提高机械通气撤机成功率、 缩短机械通气时间

关键词:

右美托咪定, 丙泊酚, 机械通气, 膈肌功能, 撤机

Abstract:

Objective To compare the Effects of dexmedetomidine and propofol on diaphragm function and weaning from mechanical ventilation of patients. Methods One hundred and forty patients who received mechanical ventilation were randomly divided into dexmedetomidine group(n = 72)and propofol group(n = 68). On the basis of conventional treatment and used butorphanol for analgesia,dexmedetomidine and propofol were added to the treatment respectively.Evaluation of diaphragm function by ultrasonography ,The changed of the diaphragm function such as diaphragmatic thickness at the end of expiration ,diaphragm thickening fraction diaphragmatic displacement and the Success rate of first weaning and mechanical ventilation time were compared and analyzed. Results There was a significant difference in diaphragm function during first spontaneous breathing trial change between the two groups. The diaphragmatic thickness at the end of expiration,diaphragm thickening fraction and diaphragmatic displacement in dexmedetomidine group were significantly higher than those in propofol group(P < 0.05). The the success rate of first weaning in dexmedetomidine group were significantly higher than those in propofol group(P < 0.05). The mechanical ventilation time in dexmedetomidine group were significantly lower than that in propofol group(P < 0.05). Conclusion Compared with propofol,dexmedetomidine has less effect on diaphragm function in patients with mechanical ventilation,can improve the weaning success rate of mechanical ventilation and shorten the duration of mechanical ventilation.

Key words:

dexmedetomidine, propofol, mechanical ventilation, diaphragm, weaning