实用医学杂志 ›› 2020, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (20): 2797-2801.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006⁃5725.2020.20.010

• 临床研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同无创通气模式在早产儿呼吸窘迫综合征撤机后的应用比较

卢隽滢,卢红艳,常明,王秋霞   

  1. 江苏大学附属医院儿科(江苏镇江212001)
  • 出版日期:2020-10-20 发布日期:2020-10-25
  • 通讯作者: 卢红艳E⁃mail:lhy5154@163.com
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金(编号:81741052);江苏省妇幼重点人才(编号:FRC201735);

    镇江市重点社会发展项目(编号:SH2018050)

Comparison of three noninvasive ventilation modes in premature infants with respiratory distress syn⁃drome after extubation

LU Junying,LU Hongyan,CHANG Ming,WANG Qiuxia   

  1. Department of Pediatrics,Affiliated Hospital of Jiangsu University,Zhenjiang 212001,China
  • Online:2020-10-20 Published:2020-10-25
  • Contact: LU Hongyan E⁃mail:lhy5154@163.com

摘要:

目的 探讨呼吸窘迫综合征(respiratory distress syndrome,RDS)早产儿撤机后分别应用经鼻间歇正压通气(nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation,NIPPV)、双水平气道正压通气(bilevel positiveairway pressure,BiPAP)和经鼻持续气道正压通气(nasal continuous positive airway pressure,NCPAP)的临床疗效。方法 70 例RDS 早产儿依据拔管撤除呼吸机后呼吸支持方式分为NIPPV 组(20 例)、BiPAP 组(24 例)和NCPAP 组(26 例),分析三组患儿无创通气前后血气分析指标、1 周内拔管成功率及并发症等。结果 拔管前三组PaO2和PaCO2差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。NIPPV组与BiPAP组无创通气后6 h PaO2、12 h PaO2比较差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05),两组均高于NCPAP组,差异均有统计学意义(P < 0.05);NIPPV组6 h PaCO2 最低,NCPAP 组最高,三组间两两比较差异均有统计学意义(P < 0.05);NIPPV 组与BiPAP 组12 h PaCO2比较差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05),两组均低于NCPAP组,差异均有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。三组在7 d内再插管、气胸、脑室内出血和支气管肺发育不良方面差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05);NIPPV组无创通气期间患儿腹胀发生率较BiPAP 组和NCPAP 组低,差异具有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。

结论 作为早产儿RDS 撤机后的过渡方式,NIPPV 与BiPAP 均能更好改善肺通气功能;在NIPPV 使用中需要关注避免PaCO2过低;在BiPAP和NCPAP使用中需关注腹胀的发生。

关键词: 经鼻间歇正压通气, 双水平正压通气, 经鼻持续气道正压通气, 呼吸窘迫综合症, 早产儿, 撤机

Abstract:

Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy of nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation(NIPPV),bilevel positive airway pressure(BiPAP)and nasal continuous positive airway pressure(NCPAP)inpremature infants with respiratory distress syndrome(RDS)after extubation. Methods According to the respiratorysupport methods after extubation,70 premature infants with RDS were divided into NIPPV group(n = 20),BiPAPgroup(n = 24),and NCPAP(n = 26). The indexes of blood gas analysis,success rate of extubation within one weekand complications before and after noninvasive ventilation were analyzed. Results There was no significant differ⁃ence in PaO2 and PaCO2 among the three groups before extubation(P > 0.05). There was no statistically significantdifference between NIPPV group and BiPAP group in terms of 6 h PaO2 and 12 h PaO2 after non⁃invasive ventila⁃tion(P > 0.05),which were higher than those in NCPAP group(P < 0.05),indicating statistical significance. 6 hPaCO2 was the lowest in the NIPPV group,and the highest in the NCPAP group and pairwise comparison amongthe three groups was statistically significant(P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in 12 h PaCO2 betweenthe NIPPV group and the BiPAP group(P > 0.05),which was lower than that in the NCPAP group(P < 0.05). Theincidence of abdominal distension in the NIPPV group during noninvasive ventilation was significantly lower thanthat in the BiPAP group and the NCPAP group(P < 0.05). The incidences of internal extubation failure within 7 days,pneumothorax,intracerebral hemorrhage,or bronchopulmonary dysplasia were not statistically significant in thethree groups(P > 0.05). The incidence of abdominal distension in the NIPPV group was lower than that in theBiPAP group or the NCPAP group,and the difference was statistically significant(P < 0.05). Conclusion As atransitional mode after the extubation in premature infants with RDS,both NIPPV and BiPAP can improve thepulmonary ventilation function. Attention should be paid to avoid low PaCO2 in the use of NIPPV.The use of BiPAPor NCPAP requires attention to the occurrence of abdominal distension.

Key words: nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation, bilevel positive airway pressure, nasal continuous positive airway pressure, respiratory distress syndrome, premature infant, extubation