实用医学杂志 ›› 2023, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (3): 326-331.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006⁃5725.2023.03.011

• 临床研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

胸腰椎压缩性骨折复位床联合经皮椎体成形术治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折的疗效 

郑伟杰 马航展 曾展鹏    

  1. 广州市番禺区中医院(广州 511400)

  • 出版日期:2023-02-10 发布日期:2023-02-10
  • 基金资助:

    基金项目:广东省中医药局科研项目(编号:20212186)

Clinical effect of thoracolumbar compression fracture reduction bed combined with percutaneous vertebro⁃ plasty in treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures

ZHENG Weijie,MA Hangzhan,ZENG Zhanpeng.   

  1. Department of Orthopedics,Panyu Hospital of Chinese Medicine,Guangzhou 511400,China

  • Online:2023-02-10 Published:2023-02-10

摘要:

目的 探讨胸腰椎压缩性骨折复位床联合经皮椎体成形术(percutaneous vertebroplasty PVP)治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折的临床疗效。方法 选取 2021 1 月至 2022 1 月我院收治的 75 例骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折患者纳入本研究,按入院顺序,采用随机数字表法分为胸腰椎压缩性骨 折复位床联合 PVP 组(复位床组)、单纯 PVP 组和经皮球囊扩张椎体后凸成形术组(PKP 组),比较 3 组患 者术前和术后局部Cobb 角、vas 评分、伤椎椎体前后缘高度、伤椎椎体前缘压缩率、Oswestry 功能障碍指数, 骨水泥渗漏、术后随访期间邻椎椎体新发骨折情况、手术当天骨水泥注入量、住院费用、住院时间、术 6 个月骨密度以及其他并发症情况。结果 复位床组和 PKP 组与单纯 PVP 组比较,术后 Cobb 角更 小,术后伤椎椎体前缘高度更高,术后伤椎椎体前缘压缩率更低,骨水泥注入量更多;复位床组和 PKP 组比较,住院费用更低;术后同一时间,3 VAS 评分、Oswestry 功能障碍指数、骨水泥渗漏、术后随访期 间邻椎椎体新发骨折、术后骨密度、住院时间差异均无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。结论 复位床联合 PVP 治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折,术后 Cobb 角更小,恢复伤椎椎体前缘的高度更高,降低住院费用,可在 基层医院推广。

关键词:

骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折, 复位床, 经皮椎体成形术, 经皮球囊扩张椎体后凸成 形术

Abstract:

Objective To evaluate the clinical effect of thoracolumbar compression fracture reduction bed combined with percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP)in the treatment of osteoporotic thoracolumbar compression fracture. Methods From January 2021 to January 2022,75 patients with osteoporotic thoracolumbar compression fracture in our hospital were randomly divided into reduction bed group,PVP group and percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP)group. Preoperative and postoperative local Cobb angle,VAS score,the height of anterior and posterior edge of the injured vertebral body,anterior edge compression rate of the injured vertebral body,the Oswestry Dysfunction Index,bone cement leakage,new fractures of adjacent vertebral body,amount of cement injected hospitalization cost,days of hospitalization,bone mineral density(BMD)and other complications were compared in the three groups. Results Compared with PVP Group,the reduction bed group and PKP group had smaller Cobb angle,higher anterior edge height,lower anterior edge compression rate and more cement injection at the same time after operation. There were no significant differences in VAS score,Oswestry Dysfunction Index,bone cement leakage,new fracture of adjacent vertebral body,bone mineral density and days of hospitalization among the three groups(P > 0.05). The cost of hospitalization was lower in the reduction bed group than that in the PKP Group. Conclusion Reduction bed combined with PVP for osteoporotic thoracolumbar compression fracture can improve postoperative Cobb Angle,restore the height of the anterior edge of the injured vertebral body,and reduce the hospitalization cost,and it is worth to be popularized in primary hospitals.

Key words:

osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures, reduction bed, percutaneous vertebroplasty, percutaneous kyphoplasty