实用医学杂志 ›› 2022, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (19): 2429-2439.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006⁃5725.2022.19.010

• 临床研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

显微镜辅助下侧前方腰椎融合术与改良经椎间孔入路腰椎融合术治疗退变性腰椎管狭窄症的疗效 

许宇霞 史强 李远红 何友智 罗为民    

  1. 南华大学附属长沙中心医院脊柱外科(长沙 410004

  • 出版日期:2022-10-10 发布日期:2022-10-10
  • 通讯作者: 罗为民 E⁃mail:40297886@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    湖南省自然科学基金(编号:2022JJ40518);长沙市自然科学基金(编号:kq2014023)

OLIF versus Mis⁃TLIF assisted by microscope for degenerative lumbar stenosis

XU Yuxia,SHI Qiang,LI Yuanhong,HE Youzhi,LUO Weimin.   

  1. Department of Spine SurgeryChangsha Central HospitalUniversity of South ChinaChangsha 410004China 

  • Online:2022-10-10 Published:2022-10-10
  • Contact: LUO Weimin E⁃mail:40297886@qq.com

摘要:

目的 探讨通道辅助显微镜下侧前方腰椎融合术(oblique lumbar interbody fusionOLIF)与改良经椎间孔入路腰椎间融合术(minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusionMis⁃TLIF)治疗退 行性腰椎管狭窄症的临床治疗效果。方法 选择 2017 3 月至 2019 3 月南华大学附属长沙中心医院 收治的 120 例退变性腰椎管狭窄症患者,按照手术方式不同分为 OLIF 组和 Mis⁃TLIF 组各 60 例,比较 2 组 手术时间、术中出血量、住院时间。记录两组术前、术后 1 周和术后 36 个月疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS)、 Oswestry 功能障碍指数(ODI),比较两组患者疼痛评分、功能恢复、临床疗效和并发症情况。采用改良 MacNab 标准比较两组的临床疗效。结果Mis⁃TLIF 组比较,OLIF 组的术中出血量、住院时间和术后并 发症均明显更短或更少,组间差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。与治疗前比较,两组治疗后VAS评分与ODI评 分明显改善(P < 0.05),且治疗 6 个月后两组间 ODI 评分比较差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。两组患者末 次随访改良 MacNab 标准优良率相比差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。结论 相对 Mis⁃TLIF 而言,OLIF 手术 具有安全可行、出血少、恢复快的优势,能有效治疗退变性腰椎管狭窄症。

关键词:

退变性腰椎管狭窄症, 侧前方入路腰椎间融合, 椎间孔入路腰椎间融合, 显微镜

Abstract:

Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and oblique lumbar interbody fusion by microscope assisted for degenerative lumbar stenosis. Method A total of 120 patients with degenerative lumbar stenosis were selected from March 2017 to March 2019 and were assigned to minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion group Mis ⁃ TLIF groupand oblique lumbar interbody fusion groupOLIF group. Parameters including operative durationhemorrhage volume and perioperative complications were collected. The therapeutic effects were assessed by visual analogue scaleOswestry disability index during follow⁃up periodpostoperative 1 week3 months and 6 months. The surgical effect was evaluated by the modified MacNab criteria. Results Compared with Mis⁃TLIF groupthe intraoperative blood losspostoperative hospital stayand postoperative complications of OLIF group were significantly shorter or lessP < 0.05. The VAS score and ODI score of the two groups were all significantly improved after treatmentP < 0.05and there was significant difference in ODI score between two groupsP < 0.05. According to the modified MacNab criteriano significant difference was found between two groups at follow ⁃ upP > 0.05. Conclusion Compared with Mis⁃TLIFOLIF by microscope assisted was safe and feasiblewhich not only had less hemorrhage volumebut also shortened the postoperative hospital stay. OLIF by microscope assisted could get satisfying effect in the treatment of degenerative lumbar stenosis. 

Key words: degenerative lumbar stenosis,  , oblique lumbar interbody fusion,  , minimally invasive trans? foraminal lumbar interbody fusion,  , microscope