实用医学杂志 ›› 2021, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (11): 1450-1455.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006⁃5725.2021.11.016

• 临床研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

Multiloc髓内钉与Philos钢板治疗Neer二、三部分肱骨近端骨折的疗效比较

祝捷, 杨运发, 肖学军    

  1. 广州市第一人民医院骨科(广州 510180)

  • 出版日期:2021-06-10 发布日期:2021-06-10

R683.41 Multiloc intramedullary nailvsPhilos plate fixations in the treatment of Neer two⁃or three⁃part proximal hu⁃ merus fracture 

ZHU Jie,YANG Yunfa,XIAO Xuejun.   

  1. Department of Orthopedics,Guangzhou First People′s Hos⁃ pital,Guangzhou 510180,China 

  • Online:2021-06-10 Published:2021-06-10

摘要:

目的 比较 Mutiloc 髓内钉与 Philos 钢板治疗 Neer 二、三部分肱骨近端骨折的疗效差异。 方法 回顾性分析 2015 1 月至 2019 6 月我院收治的 93 Neer 二、三部分肱骨近端骨折的临床数据, 根据内固定方式分为 Mutiloc 髓内钉组(n = 30)和 Philos 钢板组(n = 56)。记录两组患者手术时间、术中出 血量和术后并发症,术后 12 周和末次随访时采用视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分、美国肩肘外科协会(ASES)评 分及 Constant 评分评估肩关节功能,对以上指标进行比较。结果 随访时间(59.2 ± 26.5)周。与 Philos 板组相比,Multiloc 髓内钉组手术时间更短(P = 0.013)、术中出血量更少(P<0.001);术后 12 周随访 VAS 评分更低(P<0.001),ASES评分、Constant评分更高(PASES = 0.011,Pconstant = 0.030),差异有统计学意义。末次随 访两组 VAS 评分、ASES 评分、Constant 评分、术后并发症发生率相比较,差异无统计学意义(P vas = 0.308 PASES = 0.105,Pconstant = 0.15,P 并发症 = 0.818)。结论 Mutiloc 髓内钉与 Philos 钢板治疗 Neer 二、三部分肱骨近 端骨折均能取得良好的短期疗效,前者在手术时间、术中出血量、术后早期康复方面更具优势。

关键词:

肱骨近端骨折, Multiloc 髓内钉, Philos 钢板, 骨折切开复位内固定

Abstract:

Objective To compare the therapeutic effects between Mutiloc intramedullary nail and Philos plate in the treatment of Neer two⁃ or three⁃part proximal humerus fractures(PHF). Methods Clinical data of 93 patients with Neer two⁃ or three⁃part PHF admittedin our hospital from January 2015 to June 2019 were analyzed retrospectively and were divided into Mutiloc intramedullary nail group(n = 30)and Philos plate group(n = 56 according to internal fixation procedures.The operation time,intraoperative estimate blood loss and postoperative complications were recorded,visual analogue scale(VAS)score,American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons(ASES score and Constant shoulder function score of the shoulder joint were used to evaluate the shoulder joint function at 12 weeks after operation and the last follow⁃up,and the above indexes were compared between two groups. Results The follow ⁃up time was(59.2 ± 26.5)weeks. Compared with the Philos plate group,the Multiloc intramedullary nail group had shorter operation time(P = 0.013)and less intraoperative blood loss(P<0.001). At the follow⁃up of 12 weeks after operation,the VAS score was lower(P<0.001),ASES score and Constant score were higher (PASES = 0.011,Pconstant = 0.030),and the difference was statistically significant. At the last follow⁃up,there was no significant difference in VAS score,ASES score,Constant score and the incidence of complications between the two groups(Pvas = 0.308,PASES = 0.105,Pconstant = 0.15,Pcomplications = 0.818). Conclusion Both Mutiloc intramedullary nail and Philos plate fixations couldachieve good short⁃term outcomesin the treatment ofNeer two⁃ or three⁃part PHF and the former has shorter operation time,less intraoperative blood lossand better postoperative rehabilitation.

Key words:

proximal humeral fracture, multiloc intramedullary nail, philos plate, open reduction and internal fixation of fracture