实用医学杂志 ›› 2021, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (12): 1619-1625.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006⁃5725.2021.12.021

• 中医药现代化 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于“多感官刺激”理论的中医综合康复方案对老年缺血性脑卒中后失眠患者睡眠功能的影响

王丹,钟建国    

  1. 成都医学院第二附属医院·核工业四一六医院康复医学科(成都 610000)

  • 出版日期:2021-06-25 发布日期:2021-06-25
  • 通讯作者: 钟建国 E⁃mail:2073745571@qq.com
  • 基金资助:

    四川省卫生与计划委员会科研课题(编号:18PJ518


Effect of TCM Comprehensive rehabilitation program based on“multi sensory stimulation”theory on sleep function of elderly patients with insomnia after ischemic stroke 

WANG Dan,ZHONG Jianguo.    

  1. Depart-ment of Rehabilitation Medicine,Nuclear Industry 416 Hospital,Chengdu 610000,China 

  • Online:2021-06-25 Published:2021-06-25
  • Contact: ZHONG Jianguo E⁃mail:2073745571@qq.com

摘要:

目的 观察基于“多感官刺激”理论的综合方案对老年缺血性脑卒中后失眠(PSI)患者睡眠 功能影响。方法 从本院选取 PSI 患者 72 例,随机分为观察组和对照组。观察组采用基于“多感官刺激” 理论的综合方案,即把多种干预手段创造性的压缩在一个地点、1 h 内的“眠屋”中进行;对照组采用常规 西药治疗,两组均干预 4 周。两组在干预前、干预 4 周、干预后 3 个月观察匹兹堡睡眠质量指数(PSQI)、阿森斯失眠量表(AIS)、焦虑自评表(SAS)、血清肿瘤坏死因子α(TNF⁃α)、白介素 6(IL⁃6)、五羟色胺(5⁃HT)、 睡眠图监测睡眠效率、睡眠总时间、夜间觉醒次数;并在干预后3个月判定疗效。结果 在PSQI 评分方面, 干预 4 周后两组均低于干预前,组间比较两组差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05);干预后 3 个月,观察组低于对 照组,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。在 AIS 评分方面,干预 4 周后两组均低于干预前,组间比较对照组低 于观察组(P < 0.05);干预后 3 个月观察组高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。在 SAS 评分方面, 干预 4 周后两组均低于干预前,组间比较观察组低于对照组(P < 0.05);干预后 3 个月观察组低于对照组, 差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。在 TNF⁃α IL⁃6 方面,干预 4 周与干预后 3 个月,两组两指标均低于干预 前,组间比较观察组两时间节点均低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P < 0. 05)。在 5⁃HT 方面,干预 4 周后 两组均高于干预前,而干预后 3 个月,观察组高于干预前(P < 0.05),而对照组与干预前差异无统计学意义 P > 0.05),组间比较观察组高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。在睡眠图睡眠效率方面,干预 4 周与干预后 3 个月,两组两时间节点均高于干预前,组间比较观察组均高于对照组,差异有统计学意义 P < 0.05)。在睡眠总时间方面,干预 4 周后两组均高于干预前,组间比较对照组高于观察组,差异有统计 学意义(P < 0.05);干预后 3 个月仅观察组高于干预前,对照组差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05),组间比较观 察组高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。在夜间觉醒次数方面,干预 4 周与干预后 3 个月,两组两 时间节点均低于干预前,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05);而组间比较,在干预 4 周两组无差异,干预后 3 月观察组低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。在疗效方面,在干预后 3 个月,观察组显效率为 83.33%,对照组显效率为 30.56%,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。结论 基于“多感官刺激”理论的中医综 合康复方案,不仅能有效干预睡眠障碍,缓解焦虑症状,疗效显著,还高效率的融合多种治疗,让治疗时间 得到充分利用,值得临床进一步研习和推广应用。 

关键词:

多感官刺激, 综合方案, 老年, 缺血性脑卒中后失眠, 睡眠功能

Abstract:

Objective To observe the effect of a comprehensive program based on the theory of multi⁃ sensory stimulation on the sleep function in elderly patients with post ⁃ischemic stroke insomnia(PSI). Methods A total of 72 PSI patients were selected from our hospital and randomly divided into observation group and control group. The observation group adopted a comprehensive plan based on the multi⁃sensory stimulation theory,that is a variety of interventions were creatively compressed in a sleeping house within one hour at one location;the con⁃ trol group was treated with conventional western medicine,and both groups were intervened for 4 weeks. Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index(PSQI),Athens Insomnia Scale(AIS),Anxiety Self⁃Rating Scale(SAS),serum tumor necrosis factor alpha(TNF⁃α),interleukin 6(IL⁃6),serotonin(5⁃HT),sleep chart were used to monitor sleep efficiency,total sleep time,number of night awakening before intervention,4 weeks after intervention,and 3 months after intervention;The sleep efficacy was determined 3 months after the intervention. Results In terms of PSQI score,the two groups after 4 weeks of intervention were lower than those before the intervention,and there was no significant difference between the two groups(P > 0.05);3 months after the intervention,the observation group was lower than the control group(P < 0.05). In terms of AIS scores,the two groups were lower than before the intervention for 4 weeks,and the control group was lower than the observation group(P < 0.05);the observation group was higher than the control group 3 months after the intervention,the difference was statistically significant Meaning(P < 0.05). In terms of SAS scores,the two groups were lower than before the intervention for 4 weeks and the observation group was lower than the control group(P < 0.05);the observation group was lower than the control group 3 months after the intervention,the difference was statistically significant Meaning(P < 0.05). In terms of TNF⁃α and IL⁃6,the two indicators of the two groups were lower than before the intervention for 4 weeks and 3 months after the intervention. The comparison between the two groups was lower than the control group at both time points,and the difference was statistically significant(P < 0.05). In terms of 5⁃HT,the two groups were higher than before the intervention 4 weeks after the intervention,while the observation group was higher than before the intervention 3 months after the intervention(P < 0.05),while the control group was not different from before the intervention(P > 0.05),the observation group was higher than the control group,the difference was statistically significant(P < 0.05). In terms of sleep efficiency in sleep patterns,the two time nodes of the two groups were higher than before the intervention for 4 weeks and 3 months after the intervention,and the observation group was higher than the control group in comparison between the groups,and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). In terms of total sleep time,after 4 weeks of intervention,both groups were higher than before inter⁃ vention,and the comparison between the two groups was higher than the observation group in the control group the difference was statistically significant(P < 0.05);only the observation group was higher in the 3 months after intervention Before the intervention,there was no statistical difference in the control group(P > 0.05),and the observation group was higher than the control group in comparison between the groups,and the difference was statistically significant(P < 0.05). In terms of the number of night awakening,the two time points of the two groups were lower than those before the intervention for 4 weeks and 3 months after the intervention,and the difference was statistically significant(P < 0.05);and the comparison between the groups was two weeks after the intervention. There was no difference between the two groups,the observation group was lower than the control group 3 months after intervention,and the difference was statistically significant(P < 0.05). In terms of curative effect,3 months after the intervention,the marked efficiency of the observation group was 83.33% and that of the control group was 30.56%,the difference was statistically significant(P < 0.05). Conclusion A comprehensive program based on the multi⁃sensory stimulation theory could not only effectively relieve sleep disorders and anxiety symptoms ,but also integrate multiple treatments with high efficiency to fully utilize the treatment time. It is worthy of further clinical study and promotion. 

Key words:

MSs, comprehensive plan, elderly, PSI, sleep function