实用医学杂志 ›› 2021, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (10): 1337-1341.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006⁃5725.2021.10.021

• 医学检查与临床诊断 • 上一篇    下一篇

心肌T1、T2 mapping技术和细胞外容积分数对 急性心肌梗死的诊断价值

赵细辉,刘新峰, 马海彦,刘远成, 王荣品   

  1.  1 贵州省人民医院放射科(贵阳 550002);2 贵州省智能医学影像分析与精准诊断重点实验室(贵阳 550002)
  • 出版日期:2021-05-25 发布日期:2021-05-25
  • 通讯作者: 王荣品 E⁃mail:wangrongpin@126.com
  • 基金资助:
    贵州省科技厅⁃省医联合基金(编号:黔科合 LH 字[2015]7115 号);贵州省科技厅项目(编号:黔科合基础[2016]1096 号);
    贵州省人民医院青年基金(编号:GZSYQN[2017]15 号)

T1,T2 mapping and extracellular volume diagnostic value in patients with acute myocardial infarction 

ZHAO Xihui,LIU Xinfeng,MA Haiyan,LIU Yuancheng,WANG Rongpin.    

  1. Department of Radiology,Guizhou Provincial People′s Hospital,Guiyang 550002,China;*Laboratory of Medical Imaging Analysis and Precision Diag⁃ nose,Guiyang 550002,China 


  • Online:2021-05-25 Published:2021-05-25
  • Contact: WANG Rongpin E⁃mail:wangrongpin@126.com

摘要:

目的 探讨心肌 T1、T2 mapping 技术和细胞外容积分数(extracellularvolume fraction,ECV)在 急性心肌梗死中的诊断价值。方法 采用西门子 1.5T Aera 磁共振扫描仪对 24 例急性心梗的患者行心肌 T1、T2 mapping 序列和延迟灌注检查,将扫描图像输入到 syng MR D13 后处理工作站,在 T1、T2 mapping 图 手动画取延迟强化节段兴趣区并计算强化前后T1 、T2值及血池增强前后T1值,以远隔未强化区域为对照 组,同样方法计算该域强化前后T1、T2值及血池T1值,计算两组的ECV,采用t检验和ROC 曲线进行分析。 结果 急性心肌梗死区域初始T1值(1 320.0 ± 28.4)ms 大于远隔未强化区域初始T1值(1 196.8 ± 27.0)ms (< 0.001),急性心肌梗死区域 T1 值下降较远隔未强化区域更明显,两者 ECV 分别为(38.7 ± 2.1)%、 (24.8 ± 2.5)%(< 0.001);急性心肌梗死区域 T2 值为(93.3 ± 6.6)ms 大于远隔未强化区域 T2 值(80.7 ± 6.7)ms(< 0.001);各参数值 ROC 曲线下面积(AUC)分别为 0.812、0.840、0.875、0.819 ,均具备较好的 灵敏度、特异度和准确度。从 ROC 曲线图中可看出 ECV 值对于心肌梗死的诊断效能较其他指标高。 结论 心肌T1、T2 mapping 技术和ECV 在识别及定量急性心肌梗死具有较高价值。

关键词:

纵向弛豫时间, 横向弛豫成像, 磁共振, 细胞外容积分数, 急性心肌梗死

Abstract:

Objective To explore T1,T2 mapping and extracellular volume diagnostic value in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Methods 24 patients with acute myocardial infarction were performed T1,T2 mapping sequence and delayed perfusion examination by a Siemens 1.5 T Aera MRI scanner. The images were input to the syng MR D13 post⁃processing workstation,manually drawn the area of interest in the delayed⁃enhanced segment ,and then the T1 values before and after,T2 Values and reinforcement of area of interest and the blood pool were calculated. With Separate the unreinforced section did not strengthen the area for the control group,the same method was used to calculate the T1 values,T2 values and blood pool T1 values. The extracellular fractions were calculated for both groups. T ⁃test and the ROC curve were used to compare the differences between the two groups(P < 0.05). Results The initial T1 value(1 320.0 ± 28.4)ms in the delayed enhancement was larger than that in the Separate the unreinforced areas(1 196.8 ± 27.0 )ms(P < 0.05). The value of T1 in the delayed enhancement region was declining more obvious than that in the enhancement region. The extracellular volume fraction were(38.7 ± 2.1)% and(24.8 ± 2.5)% respectively(P < 0.05). The area under the ROC curve of each parameter was 0.812,0.840,0.875,0.819,and it has good sensitivity,specificity and accuracy. From the ROC curve,it can be seen that the diagnostic efficiency of ECV for myocardial infarction is higher than that of other parameters. Conclusion T1,T2 mapping and ECV have a high value in identifying and quantifying acute myocar⁃ dial infarction. 

Key words:

T1 mapping, T2 mapping, magnetic resonance, extracellular volume, acute myocar?ditis infarction ,