实用医学杂志 ›› 2020, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (23): 3279-3282.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006⁃5725.2020.23.023

• 医学检查与临床诊断 • 上一篇    下一篇

彩色多普勒超声与MRI结合心肌损伤标志物对心肌梗死左心室室壁瘤诊断的对比研究

陈庆康, 陈蔚蔚, 邓素雅, 廖涛, 陈中恒   

  1. 1武警广东省总队医院医学影像科(广州510507);2 广州市工人疗养院(广州510520)
  • 出版日期:2020-12-10 发布日期:2020-12-23

Comparativestudyof color doppler ultrasound and MRI combined with myocardial injury markers in the diagnosis of left ventricular aneurysmin myocardial infarction

CHEN Qingkang,CHEN Weiwei,DENG Suya,LIAO Tao,CHEN Zhongheng.#br#   

  1. Department of Medical Imaging,Guangdong Armed Police Corps Hospital,Guangzhou 510507,China
  • Online:2020-12-10 Published:2020-12-23

摘要:

目的 对比彩色多普勒超声与MRI结合心肌损伤标志物对心肌梗死左心室室壁瘤(LVA)的诊断价值。方法 选取2019年1月至2020年1月期间30例我院疑为LVA 患者的彩色多普勒超声及MRI资料,结合心肌损伤标志物结果,以病理结果为对照,对比研究对LVA的诊断价值。结果 彩色多普勒超声、MRI 检查LVA 检出率及LVA 分布的准确率均为100%,差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05);彩色多普勒超声、MRI 矛盾运动区域检出率差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05);彩色多普勒超声、MRI 诊断真性LVA 准确率差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05);CK⁃MB、cTnI测值诊断真性LVA与假性LVA差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05);D⁃二聚体(D⁃D)测值在真性LVA高于假性LVA(P < 0.05)。结论 彩色多普勒超声与MRI在诊断LVA中均有诊断价值,彩色多普勒超声可作为诊断首选,MRI可作为补充检查手段;D⁃D有利于真性LVA和假性LVA的鉴别诊断。

关键词: 彩色多普勒超声, MRI, 心肌梗死, LVA, CK?MB, cTnI, D?D, 诊断

Abstract:

Objective To compare the diagnostic value of Color Doppler Ultrasound and MRI combinedwith myocardial injury markers in left ventricular aneurysm(LVA)in myocardial infarction. Methods The Colordoppler Ultrasound andMRI data of 30 suspected LVApatients from Jan 2019 to Jan 2020 were collected,the diag⁃nostic value of LVA was compared with pathological results according to the results of myocardial injury markers.Results The positive rate of LVA and LVA distribution by Color Doppler Ultrasound and MRI was100.00%,thedifference was not statistically significant(P > 0.05),the detection rate of Color Doppler Ultrasound and MRIcontradictory movement area was not significantly different(P > 0.05);there was no significant difference in theaccuracy of Color Doppler Ultrasound and MRI diagnosis of true LVA(P > 0.05),and there was no significantdifference between CK⁃MB and cTnIt in the diagnosis of true LVA and false LVA(P > 0.05);The value of D⁃dimer(D⁃D)in true LVA were higher than those in false LVA(P < 0.05). Conclusion Both Color Doppler Ultrasoun⁃dand MRI have diagnostic value in diagnosis of LVA,Color Doppler Ultrasoundcan be used as the first choice fordiagnosis,MRI can be used as a supplementary examination method;D⁃D is beneficial to the differential dignosisof true LVA and false LVA.

Key words: color doppler ultrasound, MRI, myocardial infarction, LVA, CK?MB, cTnI, D?D, diagnosis