Oncology: Diagnosis, Treatment and Prevention

Correlation analysis of methylation levels of plasma CCNE1IRX2, and XPR1 genes with clinicopathological features and prognosis in patients with endometrial cancer

  • Huaifeng LIANG ,
  • Sijin LI ,
  • Daocheng LI
Expand
  • Department of Gynecology,Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine,Guangzhou 510000,Guangdong,China

Received date: 2026-03-23

  Online published: 2026-08-05

Abstract

Objective To investigate the association between the methylation levels of plasma cyclin E1 (CCNE1), iroquois homeobox protein 2 (IRX2), and xenotropic and polytropic retrovirus receptor 1 (XPR1) genes, and the clinicopathological features and prognosis in patients with endometrial cancer (EC). Methods A total of 120 patients with EC who underwent surgical treatment at the hospital between June 2018 and December 2022 (study group) were selected and divided into the survival group (88 cases) and the death group (32 cases) based on the patients' prognosis. Another 100 healthy volunteers of matching age were recruited as the control group. The methylation levels of plasma CCNE1IRX2, and XPR1 genes were detected using methylation-specific real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction. The relationship between the methylation levels of plasma CCNE1IRX2, and XPR1 and the prognosis of EC patients was analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method. The Cox risk regression model was employed to analyze the prognostic factors of EC patients. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were utilized to evaluate the predictive value of plasma CCNE1IRX2, and XPR1 methylation for poor prognosis in patients with endometrial cancer. Results Compared with the control group, the methylation levels of plasma CCNE1 and XPR1 in the study group were lower, whereas the methylation level of IRX2 was higher (P < 0.05). In patients with FIGO stage Ⅲ + Ⅳ, poorly differentiated histological grade, myometrial infiltration depth ≥ 1/2 myometrium, and lymph node metastasis, the methylation levels of CCNE1 and XPR1 were low, while the methylation level of IRX2 was high (P < 0.05). A total of 120 EC patients were followed up for 5 - 36 months, with a median follow-up time of 21 months. Among them, 32 patients died, and the 3-year overall survival rate was 73.33% (88/120). The 3-year overall survival rate of patients with low expression of plasma CCNE1 and XPR1 methylations was lower than that of the high-expression groups (χ2 = 4.729, 6.136; P = 0.030, 0.013), and the 3-year overall survival rate of patients with high expression of plasma IRX2 methylation was lower than that of the low-expression groups (χ2 = 6.569; P = 0.010). Compared with the survival group, the methylation levels of CCNE1 and XPR1 in the death group were lower, and the methylation level of IRX2 was higher (P < 0.05). Hypermethylation of IRX2 was a risk factor for poor prognosis in patients with EC, while hypermethylation of CCNE1 and hypermethylation of XPR1 were protective factors (P < 0.05). The AUC values for plasma CCNE1IRX2, and XPR1 methylation as individual predictors of poor prognosis in EC patients were 0.827, 0.820, and 0.816, respectively; The AUC for the combined prediction was 0.941, indicating superior predictive performance (Z = 3.427, 2.610, 3.068; P = 0.001, 0.009, 0.002). Conclusions Reduced levels of CCNE1 and XPR1 methylation, along with elevated levels of IRX2 methylation, in the plasma of endometrial cancer patients are closely associated with clinical and pathological characteristics as well as poor prognosis. The combination of these three markers holds high predictive value for poor prognosis in endometrial cancer patients.

Cite this article

Huaifeng LIANG , Sijin LI , Daocheng LI . Correlation analysis of methylation levels of plasma CCNE1IRX2, and XPR1 genes with clinicopathological features and prognosis in patients with endometrial cancer[J]. The Journal of Practical Medicine, 2026 , 42(14) : 2550 -2557 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2026.14.008

References

[1] HABESHIAN T S, PARK S Y, CONTI D, et al. Inflammatory and insulinemic dietary and lifestyle patterns and incidence of endometrial cancer: The multiethnic cohort[J]. Am J Clin Nutr, 2025, 121(6):1236-1245. doi: 10.1016/j.ajcnut. 2025.04. 020 .
[2] CONCIN N, MATIAS-GUIU X, CIBULA D, et al. ESGO-ESTRO-ESP guidelines for the management of patients with endometrial carcinoma: Update 2025[J]. Lancet Oncol, 2025, 26(8):423-435. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(25)00167-6 .
[3] 刘露, 丁慧静, 张坤. 子宫内膜癌早期筛查和诊断技术的研究进展[J]. 中国性科学, 2026, 35(3):35-38. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-1993.2026.03.008 .
[4] NISHIKUBO H, KAWABATA K, SANO T, et al. CCNE1 gene amplification might be associated with lymph node metastasis of gastric cancer[J]. Genes (Basel), 2025, 16(6):617. doi: 10.3390/genes16060617 .
[5] ZHENG X, CHEN L, LIU W, et al. CCNE1 is a predictive and immunotherapeutic indicator in various cancers including UCEC: A pan-cancer analysis[J]. Hereditas, 2023, 160(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s41065-023-00273-0 .
[6] MA Z G, YUAN Y P, FAN D, et al. IRX2 regulates angiotensin II-induced cardiac fibrosis by transcriptionally activating EGR1 in male mice[J]. Nat Commun, 2023, 14(1):4967. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-40639-6 .
[7] XU Q, ZHOU W, ZHOU Y, et al. IRX2 regulates endometrial carcinoma oncogenesis by transcriptional repressing RUVBL1[J]. Exp Cell Res, 2024, 434(1):113866. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr. 2023.113866 .
[8] HAN X, YANG L, NUERMANGULI R, et al. In-depth evaluation of XPR1 as a new prognostic indicator for endometrial cancer[J]. BMC Cancer, 2025, 25(1):1411. doi: 10.1186/s12885-025-14818-1 .
[9] COLOMBO N, CREUTZBERG C, AMANT F, et al. ESMO-ESGO-ESTRO Consensus Conference on Endometrial Cancer: Diagnosis, treatment and follow-up[J]. Ann Oncol, 2016, 27(1):16-41. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000609 .
[10] 翟一阳, 马韵翼, 翟俊英, 等. 子宫内膜癌组织肿瘤坏死因子α诱导蛋白8家族成员2、细胞增殖核抗原表达水平及与临床病理参数和预后的关系[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2025, 41(3):379-384. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2025.03.011 .
[11] GAO S, WANG J, LI Z, et al. Global Trends in incidence and mortality rates of endometrial cancer among individuals aged 55 years and above from 1990 to 2021: An Analysis of the Global Burden of Disease[J]. Int J Womens Health, 2025, 17(1):651-662. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S499435 .
[12] GODDARD E, PACE D, TWELLS L, et al. Laparoscopic bariatric surgery with hysterectomy for endometrial cancer to improve long-term outcomes: A review article[J]. Int J Gynecol Cancer, 2025, 35(2):100033. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgc.2024.100033 .
[13] 中国医师协会微无创医学专业委员会妇科肿瘤学组, 中国医院协会妇产医院分会妇科肿瘤专业学组, 中国优生科学协会肿瘤生殖学分会, 等. 子宫内膜未分化/去分化癌诊治的中国专家共识(2022年版)[J]. 癌症进展, 2023, 21(1):1-9, 14. doi: 10.11877/j.issn.1672-1535.2023.21.01.01 .
[14] XU T, DING H, CHEN J, et al. Research progress of DNA Methylation in Endometrial cancer[J]. Biomolecules, 2022, 12(7):938. doi: 10.3390/biom12070938 .
[15] TAKAMATSU S, HILLMAN R T, YOSHIHARA K, et al. Molecular classification of ovarian high-grade serous/endometrioid carcinomas through multi-omics analysis: JGOG3025-TR2 study[J]. Br J Cancer, 2024, 131(8): 1340-1349. doi: 10.1038/s41416-024-02837-x .
[16] ULLAH M A, FARZANA M, ISLAM M S, et al. Identification of the prognostic and therapeutic values of cyclin E1 (CCNE1) gene expression in Lung Adenocarcinoma and Lung Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A database mining approach[J]. Heliyon, 2022, 8(9):10367. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10367 .
[17] LABEAU T, LOGER J S, JEAN-LAURENT M, et al. Molecular profiling of endometrial cancer in martinique reveals frequent CCNE1 amplification in poor prognosis tumors[J]. Sci Rep, 2025, 15(1):40830. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-24580-w .
[18] MARLIN R, LOGER J S, JOACHIM C, et al. Copy number signatures and CCNE1 amplification reveal the involvement of replication stress in high-grade endometrial tumors oncogenesis[J]. Cell Oncol (Dordr), 2024, 47(4):1441-1457. doi: 10.1007/s13402-024-00942-w .
[19] CATELA C, ASSIMACOPOULOS S, CHEN Y, et al. The Iroquois (Iro/Irx) homeobox genes are conserved Hox targets involved in motor neuron development[J]. iScience, 2025, 28(4):112210. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2025.112210 .
[20] ZHANG J, ZHOU Y, LI X, et al. Expression profile and prognostic values of irx family members in lung adenocarcinoma[J]. Curr Med Chem, 2025, 32(35): 7906-7924. doi: 10.2174/0109298673320965240829065919 .
[21] HUANG J, YUAN L, HUANG W, et al. LATPS, a novel prognostic signature based on tumor microenvironment of lung adenocarcinoma to better predict survival and immunotherapy response[J]. Front Immunol, 2022, 13(1):1064874. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.1064874 .
[22] ZHANG X Y, LIU Y, RONG Q, et al. RUVBL1 accelerates tongue squamous cell carcinoma by mediating CRaf/MEK/ERK pathway[J]. iScience, 2024, 27(4):109434. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.109434 .
[23] SU Y, MEI L, WU Y, et al. Xenotropic and polytropic retrovirus receptor 1 (XPR1) promotes progression of papillary thyroid carcinoma via the BRAF-ERK1/2-P53 signaling pathway[J]. J Endocrinol Invest, 2025, 48(3):633-652. doi: 10.1007/s40618-024-02481-5 .
[24] SUN C, GUAN H, LI J, et al. RBM15-mediated m6A modification of XPR1 promotes the malignant progression of lung adenocarcinoma[J]. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol, 2025, 398(7):9279-9290. doi: 10.1007/s00210-025- 03849-x .
[25] WANG L. Bioinformatics analyses proposed xenotropic and polytropic retrovirus receptor 1 as a potential diagnostic and prognostic biomarker and immunotherapeutic target in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma[J]. Auris Nasus Larynx, 2023, 50(1):134-150. doi: 10.1016/j.anl.2022.05.018 .
[26] AKASU-NAGAYOSHI Y, HAYASHI T, KAWABATA A, et al. PHOSPHATE exporter XPR1/SLC53A1 is required for the tumorigenicity of epithelial ovarian cancer[J]. Cancer Sci, 2022, 113(6):2034-2043. doi: 10.1111/cas.15358 .
Outlines

/