Feature Reports:Cardiovascular diseases

Preoperative left ventricular end-systolic dimension predicts postoperative ejection fraction recovery trajectory and clinical outcomes in mitral regurgitation

  • Min YANG ,
  • Hongbo QIAN ,
  • Dafa ZHANG ,
  • Yingjing GUI
Expand
  • Department of Cardiovascular Surgery,the First Affiliated Hospital of Southern Anhui Medical University,Wuhu 241000,Anhui,China

Received date: 2026-03-23

  Online published: 2026-07-14

Abstract

Objective To investigate whether the extent of preoperative left ventricular (LV) remodeling, indexed by LV end-systolic dimension (LVESD), influences the recovery trajectory of LV ejection fraction (LVEF) and long-term prognosis following mitral valve surgery in patients with moderate-to-severe mitral regurgitation (MR). Methods A total of 157 patients undergoing mitral valve surgery for moderate-to-severe MR between January 2020 and December 2024 were prospectively enrolled. Participants were stratified into quartiles (Q1 - Q4) based on preoperative LVESD. The primary outcome was the longitudinal trajectory of LVEF assessed at pre-discharge, 3 months, and 6 months postoperatively, analyzed using linear mixed-effects models. The secondary outcome was a composite endpoint of heart failure rehospitalization or all-cause mortality, evaluated by Cox proportional hazards regression. Results CCompared with the Q1 group, patients in the Q4 group exhibited significantly lower preoperative LVEF and higher NT-proBNP levels (P 0.05). LVEF improved significantly over time across the cohort (time effect, P 0.001); however, the Q4 group demonstrated consistently lower LVEF than Q1 at all postoperative timepoints (group effect, P 0.001), with a modest attenuation of between-group differences over time (time × group interaction, P = 0.008). After multivariable adjustment, LVEF in the Q4 group remained 13.10, 12.28, and 12.03 percentage points lower than in Q1 at pre-discharge, 3 months, and 6 months, respectively (all P 0.001). The cumulative incidence of the composite endpoint was significantly higher in Q4 (30.0%) versus Q1 (5.1%, log-rank P = 0.016). Multivariable Cox analysis identified Q4 membership as an independent predictor of adverse outcomes (adjusted HR = 2.39, 95% CI: 1.11 ? 5.13, P = 0.026), with a significant dose?response relationship across LVESD quartiles (P for trend = 0.018). Sensitivity analyses using LVESD ≥ 40 mm as a binary cutoff or modeling LVESD as a continuous variable yielded consistent results. Conclusions Preoperative LVESD, as a marker of LV remodeling severity, independently predicts both the trajectory of early- to mid-term LVEF recovery and adverse clinical outcomes after mitral valve surgery for MR. Although patients with advanced remodeling (higher LVESD) exhibit postoperative LVEF improvement, their absolute recovery remains suboptimal, and they face substantially elevated risks of heart failure rehospitalization or mortality. These findings support earlier surgical intervention before irreversible LV dilation occurs.

Cite this article

Min YANG , Hongbo QIAN , Dafa ZHANG , Yingjing GUI . Preoperative left ventricular end-systolic dimension predicts postoperative ejection fraction recovery trajectory and clinical outcomes in mitral regurgitation[J]. The Journal of Practical Medicine, 2026 , 42(13) : 2291 -2299 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2026.13.004

References

[1] FIGLIOLI G, STICCHI A, CHRISTODOULOU M N, et al. Global Prevalence of Mitral Regurgitation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Population-Based Studies[J]. J Clin Med, 2025, 14(8):2749. doi: 10.3390/jcm14082749 .
[2] PRAZ F, VAHANIAN A, MESTRES C A, et al. 2025 ESC/EACTS Guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease[J]. Eur Heart J, 2025, 46(44):4635-4736. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaf194 .
[3] CRAVEN T P, CHEW P G, DOBSON L E, et al. Cardiac reverse remodeling in primary mitral regurgitation: mitral valve replacement vs. mitral valve repair[J]. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson, 2023, 25(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s12968-023-00946-9 .
[4] 李妍,金子燃,孙皓天,等. 自动心肌运动定量技术评价2型糖尿病合并肾功能不全患者左心室收缩功能[J]. 实用医学杂志,2025,41(3):414-421. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2025. 03.017 .
[5] PETOLAT E, THERON A, RESSEGUIER N, et al. Prognostic value of forward flow indices in primary mitral regurgitation due to mitral valve prolapse[J]. Front Cardiovasc Med, 2023, 10:1076708. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1076708 .
[6] TRIBOUILLOY C, RUSINARU D, GRIGIONI F, et al. Indexing left ventricular end-systolic dimension to body size: Association with mortality in patients with degenerative mitral regurgitation[J]. Eur J Heart Fail, 2024, 26(12):2563-2569. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.3393 .
[7] YILMAZ F K, CAKAL B, YILMAZ F, et al. Relationship between fragmented QRS complex and early left ventricular dysfunction after mitral valve repair[J]. J Electrocardiol, 2024, 84:65-69. doi: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2024.02.011 .
[8] NATALINO L A, MARSAM R K, DINARTI L K, et al. The Role of Global Longitudinal Strain in Predicting Left Ventricular Reverse Remodeling After Mitral Valve Replacement Surgery in Patients With Primary Mitral Regurgitation[J]. Echocardiography, 2024, 41(11):e15950. doi: 10.1111/echo.15950 .
[9] PYPE L L, BERTRAND P B, DEBONNAIRE P, et al. Mitral Valve Surgery for Mitral Regurgitation Results in Reduced Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction in Barlow's Disease as Compared with Fibro-Elastic Deficiency[J]. J Cardiovasc Dev Dis, 2024, 11(3):71. doi: 10.3390/jcdd11030071 .
[10] MARCHETTI D, DI GIOVANNI F, NOVEMBRE M L, et al. Contemporary Echocardiographic Evaluation of Mitral Regurgitation and Guidance for Percutaneous Mitral Valve Repair[J]. J Clin Med, 2023, 12(22):7121. doi: 10.3390/jcm12227121 .
[11] 马春梅,吴志康,陈可,等. 肺动脉与主动脉直径比对急性失代偿性心力衰竭患者预后的影响[J]. 实用医学杂志,2025,41(7):960-967. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2025.07.005 .
[12] MUNERETTO C, D'ALONZO M, BAUDO M, et al. Outcomes of patients with mitral annular disjunction undergoing mitral valve repair[J]. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 2025, 67(2):ezaf029. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezaf029 .
[13] LABABIDI H, EL-TALLAWI K C, KITKUNGVAN D, et al. The prognostic importance of left ventricular diastolic function in primary mitral regurgitation and its relation to structural changes by CMR[J]. Sci Rep, 2025, 15(1):35079. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-18965-0 .
[14] SPAMPINATO R A, MARIN-CUARTAS M, VAN KAMPEN A, et al. Left ventricular fibrosis and CMR tissue characterization of papillary muscles in mitral valve prolapse patients[J]. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging, 2024, 40(2):213-224. doi: 10.1007/s10554-023-02985-w .
[15] PAMIDIGHANTAM P, CHEN C, SHRESTHA N, et al. Long-term outcomes of semirigid ring and band annuloplasty in functional mitral regurgitation patients without advanced left ventricular dilation[J]. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2025, S0022-5223(25)00543-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2025.06.023 .
[16] ZILBERSZAC R, GLEISS A, MASSETTI M, et al. Left atrial size predicts outcome in severe but asymptomatic mitral regurgitation[J]. Sci Rep, 2023, 13(1):3892. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-31163-0 .
[17] ALTES A, GAROT J, HABIB G, et al. Quantification of primary mitral regurgitation by cardiovascular magnetic resonance: An echocardiographic and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging study[J]. Front Cardiovasc Med, 2023, 10:1107724. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1107724 .
[18] ZHENG J, HUANG S W, AHMED M I, et al. Imminent risk of LVEF decline in asymptomatic patients with primary mitral regurgitation[J]. Front Cardiovasc Med, 2024, 11:1410859. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1410859 .
[19] GARG P, PAVON A G, PENICKA M, et al. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in mitral valve disease[J]. Eur Heart J, 2025, 46(7):606-619. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehae801 .
[20] PAGNESI M, RICCARDI M, MAISANO F, et al. Epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis and management of atrial functional mitral regurgitation: An expert opinion paper[J]. ESC Heart Fail, 2025, 12(6):3788-3805. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.15405 .
[21] ALHAKAK A, BUTT J H, HAVERS-BORGERSEN E, et al. Mitral valve replacement or repair and long-term risk of infective endocarditis: A Danish nationwide study[J]. Eur Heart J, 2025, 46(36):3569-3579. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaf342 .
[22] FAZA N N, DELGADO V, BERREBI A, et al. Multimodality imaging in mitral regurgitation: Current applications and future directions[J]. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging, 2024, 25(12):1549-1563. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jeae195 .
[23] AURIGEMMA G P, GRAYBURN P A, ZOGHBI W A. Quantitation of Primary Mitral Regurgitation: A Fresh Take on an Old Challenge[J]. J Am Soc Echocardiogr, 2025, 38(8):682-684. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2025.04.009 .
[24] MCDONAGH T A, METRA M, ADAMO M, et al. 2023 Focused Update of the 2021 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure[J]. Eur Heart J, 2023, 44(37):3627-3639. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehad195 .
[25] VOORS A A, GARDNER R S, GHIORGHIADE M, et al. Novel Recommendations for the Treatment of Patients With Heart Failure: 2023 Focused Update of the 2021 ESC Heart Failure Guidelines[J]. J Card Fail, 2023, 29(12):1619-1621. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2023.08.017 .
Outlines

/