Oncology: Diagnosis, Treatment and Prevention

The relationship between high-resolution CT features of pulmonary ground-glass nodules and pathological subtypes of lung adenocarcinoma

  • Hongmei YUAN ,
  • Dongyuan LIU ,
  • Yajun XU ,
  • Xiuping ZHAO ,
  • Wenjie MA
Expand
  • 1.CT Department,Huanghe Sanmenxia Hospital,Sanmenxia 472000,Henan,China
    2.Thoracic Surgery,Huanghe Sanmenxia Hospital,Sanmenxia 472000,Henan,China

Received date: 2026-01-28

  Online published: 2026-06-30

Abstract

Objective To explore the relationship between high-resolution CT signs of pulmonary ground glass nodules (GGN) and the pathological typing of lung adenocarcinoma. Methods A total of 104 patients with GGN confirmed by pathology from October 2021 to October 2025 were included in the study. Based on the World Health Organization (WHO) pathological classification criteria for lung adenocarcinoma, the patients were classified into the invasive adenocarcinoma (IAC) group, the minimally invasive adenocarcinoma (MIA) group, the adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) group, and the atypical adenomatous hyperplasia (AAH) group. The baseline data, clinical indicators, high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) sign features, and HRCT quantitative parameters of patients with different pathological types were compared. The HRCT sign features and quantitative parameters of IAC subtypes (wall-attached type, acinar type, and papillary type) were compared. Binary logistic regression analysis was employed to explore the influencing factors of IAC. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was utilized to analyze the diagnostic value of HRCT features for IAC. Results The proportions of lobulation sign, spiculation sign, clear and rough interfaces, vacuole sign, bronchial truncation sign, pleural indentation sign, and vessel convergence sign were significantly higher in the IAC group than those in the MIA, AIS, and AAH groups (P < 0.05). The maximum nodule diameter, CT value, volume, and mass in the IAC group were significantly higher than those in the MIA, AIS, and AAH groups (P < 0.05), whereas the relative CT value was significantly lower than that in the other three groups (P < 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in HRC qualitative features among the three IAC subtypes (P > 0.05). The CT value, volume, and mass in the wall-attached type group were significantly lower than those in the acinar type and papillary type groups (P < 0.05), while the relative CT value was significantly higher (P < 0.05). Moreover, the CT value in the acinar type group was significantly lower than that in the papillary type group (P < 0.05). The maximum nodule diameter, CT value, and volume were all influencing factors of IAC occurrence (P < 0.05). The AUC values for predicting confirmed IAC using the lobulation sign, maximum nodule diameter, CT value, and volume were 0.668, 0.929, 0.827, and 0.909 respectively. Combined prediction yielded an AUC of 0.992, with a sensitivity of 97.01% and a specificity of 75.68%, indicating higher predictive value. Conclusions The high-resolution CT signs of pulmonary GGN are associated with the pathological typing of lung adenocarcinoma. In patients with IAC, the maximum nodule diameter, CT value, and volume are relatively large, and the lobulation sign is prominent. There are significant differences in CT signs between patients with IAC and those without IAC. Moreover, CT quantitative parameters and signs can also offer references for the clinical identification of IAC pathological subtypes.

Cite this article

Hongmei YUAN , Dongyuan LIU , Yajun XU , Xiuping ZHAO , Wenjie MA . The relationship between high-resolution CT features of pulmonary ground-glass nodules and pathological subtypes of lung adenocarcinoma[J]. The Journal of Practical Medicine, 2026 , 42(12) : 2119 -2127 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2026.12.005

References

[1] 李祥天,温小晖,王若琳,等. 机械拉伸载荷调控肺癌细胞行为的分子机制[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志,2025,43(4):444-449.doi:10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2025.4.13 .
[2] KANZAKI R, REID S, BOLIVAR P,et al. FHL2 expression by cancer-associated fibroblasts promotes metastasis and angiogenesis in lung adenocarcinoma[J]. Int J Cancer,2025,156(2):431-446.doi: 10.1002/ijc.35174 .
[3] YIN X, LU Y, CUI Y,et al. CT-based radiomics-deep learning model predicts occult lymph node metastasis in early-stage lung adenocarcinoma patients: A multicenter study[J]. Chin J Cancer Res,2025,37(1):12-27.doi: 10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2025. 01.02 .
[4] LIU J, LI Y, LONG Y,et al. Predicting High-risk Lung Adenocarcinoma in Solid and Part-solid Nodules on Low-dose CT: A Multicenter Study[J]. Acad Radiol,2025,32(5): 2966-2976.doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2024.11.059 .
[5] ZOU P L, MA C H, LI X,et al. Early Lung Adenocarcinoma Manifesting as Irregular Subsolid Nodules: Clinical and CT Characteristics[J]. Acad Radiol,2025,32(4): 2320- 2329.doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2024.12.010 .
[6] 石琴,张依凡,杨易,等. 18F-FDG PET/CT预测浸润性肺腺癌WHO(2021)组织学分级[J]. 中国医学影像学杂志,2025,33(2):171-176.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-5185. 2025.02.012 .
[7] WU L H, CHEN L, WANG Q Y,et al. Correlation between HRCT signs and levels of CA125, SCCA, and NSE for different pathological types of lung cancer[J]. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci,2023,27(9):4162-4168.doi: 10.26355/eurrev_202305_32325 .
[8] ZHANG G, SHANG L, LI S,et al. Non-enhanced CT deep learning model for differentiating lung adenocarcinoma from tuberculoma: A multicenter diagnostic study[J]. Eur Radiol,2025,35(12):8116-8125.doi: 10.1007/s00330-025-11721-y .
[9] AZUMA Y, SAKAMOTO S, HOMMA S,et al. Impact of accurate diagnosis of interstitial lung diseases on postoperative outcomes in lung cancer[J]. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg,2023,71(2):129-137.doi: 10.1007/s11748-022-01868-6 .
[10] 中国医疗保健国际交流促进会肿瘤内科学分会,中国医师协会肿瘤医师分会. Ⅳ期原发性肺癌中国治疗指南(2024版)[J].中华肿瘤杂志,2024,46(7):595-636. doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn112152-20240311-00104 .
[11] SASAKI T, KUNO H, HIYAMA T,et al. 2021 WHO Classification of Lung Cancer: Molecular Biology Research and Radiologic-Pathologic Correlation[J]. Radiographics, 2024,44(3):1-36.doi: 10.1148/rg.230136 .
[12] 王春,王晓娣,张海涛,等. 人工智能量化参数联合256层螺旋CT扫描对肺磨玻璃结节浸润程度的预测[J]. 实用医学杂志,2025,41(19):3106-3111. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2025. 19.022 .
[13] CHEN L, SU Y, HUANG Y,et al. Predicting lymphovascular invasion in stage IA lung adenocarcinoma: A CT-based classification and regression tree model[J]. Eur Radiol,2025,35(10):6357-6368.doi: 10.1007/s00330-025-11593-2 .
[14] 古明宇, 郑翔匀, 马吉尔, 等. 干细胞治疗在肺移植领域中的应用现状[J]. 器官移植, 2026, 17(2): 311-318. doi: 10.12464/ j.issn.1674-7445.2025233 .
[15] XU P, YAO F, XU Y,et al. Habitat Radiomics and Deep Learning Features Based on CT for Predicting Lymphovascular Invasion in T1-stage Lung Adenocarcinoma: A Multicenter Study[J]. Acad Radiol,2025,32(8):4860-4870.doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2025. 04.005 .
[16] HUANG L, XU L, WANG X,et al. Prediction of EGFR Mutations in Lung Adenocarcinoma via CT Images: A Comparative Study of Intratumoral and Peritumoral Radiomics, Deep Learning, and Fusion Models[J]. Acad Radiol, 2025,32(8):4880-4892.doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2025.04.029 .
[17] 汪琼,王之悦,雍千叶,等. 肺结节圆度在HRCT多平面重建图像上对纯磨玻璃结节的浸润性预测优于常规横断位[J]. 中国CT和MRI杂志,2025,23(9): 44-46, 93.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1 672-5131.2025.09.013 .
[18] 武国华,伏平友,邢璐,宋方. 51例单发炎性肺磨玻璃结节患者HRCT特异征象分析[J]. 医学影像学杂志,2025,35(9):65-67.doi: 10.20258/j.cnki.1006-9011.2025. 09.015 .
[19] 张利霞,刘海霞,陈玮,等. 纯磨玻璃结节的HRCT征象对非附壁型浸润性肺腺癌的诊断价值[J]. 河北医学,2023,29(1):112-115.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6233. 2023. 01.021 .
[20] 刘江勇,黄文才,薛阳,等. 基于HRCT浸润性肺腺癌异质性分析及其与肿瘤倍增时间的相关性[J]. 放射学实践,2023,38(8):990-995.doi: 10.13609/j.cnki.1000-0313. 2023.08.006 .
[21] CHEN X, QI H, ZOU Y,et al. Predicting the spread through air spaces in lung adenocarcinoma from preoperative 18 F-FDG PET/CT radiomics[J]. Nucl Med Commun,2025,46(6):570-578.doi: 10.1097/MNM.0000000000001975 .
[22] SATO J, YANAGAWA M, NISHIGAKI D,et al. Radiologists Versus AI-Based Software: Predicting Lymph Node Metastasis and Prognosis in Lung Adenocarcinoma From CT Under Various Image Display Conditions[J]. Clin Lung Cancer,2025,26(1): 58-71.doi: 10.1016/j.cllc.2024.10.015 .
[23] DING X, ZHOU W, ZHONG G,et al. One-year mortality risk prediction model for patients with interstitial lung disease and lung cancer[J]. Transl Lung Cancer Res,2025, 14(5):1786-1803.doi: 10.21037/tlcr-2025-235 .
[24] KUDO Y, SAITO A, HORIUCHI T,et al. Preoperative evaluation of visceral pleural invasion in peripheral lung cancer utilizing deep learning technology[J]. Surg Today, 2025,55(1):18-28.doi: 10.1007/s00595-024-02869-z .
[25] CHEN S, WANG X, LIN X,et al. CT-based radiomics predictive model for spread through air space of IA stage lung adenocarcinoma[J]. Acta Radiol,2025,66(5): 477- 486.doi: 10.1177/02841851241305737 .
[26] MORI S, HASEGAWA M, SAKAI F,et al. Incidence of and predictive factors for lung cancer in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A retrospective long-term follow-up study[J]. Mod Rheumatol,2025,35(2):240-248.doi: 10.1093/mr/roae084 .
[27] 邓琦,徐志锋,周涛,等. 基于人工智能CT定量分析对长径≤10 mm肺磨玻璃结节浸润程度的预测价值[J].实用放射学杂志,2023,39(7):1088-1092.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-1671. 2023.07.010 .
Outlines

/