Feature Reports:Diabetes Mellitus

Comparative effect of autologous platelet-rich gel with different preparation methods on treating diabetic foot ulcers and its time-dependent bacteriostatic activity in vitro

  • Shi LIU ,
  • Bin WEN ,
  • Wei LI ,
  • Enfang ZHU ,
  • Xuefei XU ,
  • Mingsheng CHEN ,
  • Li GUI
Expand
  • 1.School of Clinical Medicine,Dali University,Dali 671003,Yunnan,China
    2.Department of Endocrinology,the Third People's Hospital of Yunnan Province,Kunming 650011,Yunnan,China

Received date: 2026-01-17

  Online published: 2026-05-27

Abstract

Objective To investigate the efficacy of autologous platelet-rich gel (APG) prepared by different methods on diabetic foot wound healing and antibacterial activity in vitro. Methods In the wound healing trial, 80 patients with diabetic foot ulcers admitted to The Third People's Hospital of Yunnan Province from 2024 to 2025 were randomly divided into four groups (n=20 each): Single centrifugation APG group, double centrifugation APG group, machine-harvested APG group, and debridement gel control group. fasting blood glucose (FBG), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), interleukin-6 (IL-6), procalcitonin (PCT), C-reactive protein (CRP), antithrombin Ⅲ(AT-III), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), homocysteine (Hcy), and ulcer area reduction rate were compared before and after treatment. In the in vitro antibacterial test, 20 diabetic patients were additionally enrolled. Three types of APG were used as experimental groups, with platelet-poor plasma (PPP) group and saline solution as controls. Antibacterial effects against Staphylococcus aureusEscherichia coli, extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa were observed. Results After treatment, significant differences were found in laboratory parameters among the four groups (P < 0.05). Pairwise comparisons showed that AT-Ⅲ was higher in the three experimental groups than in the control group, while the other seven indicators were lower (P < 0.05). After the first and third dressings, significant differences were observed in ulcer area, ulcer area reduction rate, and final efficacy among the four groups (P < 0.05); the control group was inferior to the experimental groups. The ulcer area reduction rate was significantly lower in the control group than in the three experimental groups at each time point (P < 0.001), with no significant difference among experimental groups (P > 0.05). The ulcer area reduction rate increased significantly over time (P < 0.001), with different temporal patterns between groups; the control group had lower healing rates than experimental groups at all time points. Treatment group, baseline ulcer area, and the aforementioned laboratory parameters were significantly different among groups (P < 0.05). For more severe Wagner grade 3 ulcers, APG treatment provided definite clinical improvement superior to conventional therapy. Multivariate logistic regression showed that all three experimental groups were strong predictors of marked efficacy (P < 0.05), whereas baseline ulcer area, fasting blood glucose, and other indicators had no significant effect (all P > 0.05). All three experimental groups exhibited significant antibacterial activity against Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus at 4 ? 12 hours, with similar levels among groups. None of the five groups showed antibacterial activity against extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli or Pseudomonas aeruginosa; the PPP group and control group had no effect on any strain. Antibacterial activity decreased over time and was almost absent at 24 hours. Conclusions APG prepared by the three methods effectively reduces blood glucose, improves clinical parameters, and promotes wound healing in diabetic foot patients. Autologous platelet-rich gel displays a specific antibacterial spectrum, and its antibacterial effect against different bacterial genera is time-dependent.

Cite this article

Shi LIU , Bin WEN , Wei LI , Enfang ZHU , Xuefei XU , Mingsheng CHEN , Li GUI . Comparative effect of autologous platelet-rich gel with different preparation methods on treating diabetic foot ulcers and its time-dependent bacteriostatic activity in vitro[J]. The Journal of Practical Medicine, 2026 , 42(10) : 1692 -1702 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2026.10.002

References

[1] SUMPIO B J, MEZGHANI I, WANG E, et al. Experimental treatments in clinical trials for diabetic foot ulcers: Wound healers in the pipeline[J]. Expert Opin Investig Drugs, 2023, 32(2): 95-99. doi:10.1080/13543784.2023.2178418 .
[2] ZHANG P, LU J, JING Y, et al. Global epidemiology of diabetic foot ulceration: A systematic review and meta-analysis[J/OL]. Ann Med, 2017, 49(2):106-116.doi:10.1080/07853890.2016.1231932 .
[3] SORBER R, ABULARRAGE C J. Diabetic foot ulcers: Epidemiology and the role of multidisciplinary care teams[J]. Semin Vasc Surg, 2021, 34(1): 47-53.doi:10.1053/j.semvascsurg.2021.02.006 .
[4] 邓品, 孙志波, 吴琼, 等. 糖尿病足溃疡的现代医学研究现状[J]. 中国中医基础医学杂志, 2025, 31(10): 1867-1872. doi:10.19945/j.cnki.issn.1006-3250.2025.10.036 .
[5] BARDILL J R, LAUGHTER M R, STAGER M, et al. Topical gel-based biomaterials for the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers[J]. Acta Biomaterialia, 2022, 138: 73-91. doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2021.10.045 .
[6] SHEEAN A J, ANZ A W, BRADLEY J P. Platelet-rich plasma: Fundamentals and clinical applications[J]. Arthroscopy, 2021, 37(9): 2732-2734.doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2021.07.003 .
[7] ABOELSAAD E, MOUSTAFA S, AMINE A, et al. Platelet-rich plasma as a potential antimicrobial agent against multidrug-resistant bacteria in diabetic foot infections[J/OL]. Scientific Reports, 2025, 15(1): 15145. doi:10.1038/s41598-025-97418-0 .
[8] AGHALOO T L, MOY P K, FREYMILLER E G. Investigation of platelet-rich plasma in rabbit cranial defects: A pilot study[J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2002, 60(10): 1176-1181.doi:10.1053/joms.2002.34994 .
[9] 张娅丽, 周晖, 刘攀影. 自体富血小板凝胶辅助负压引流治疗糖尿病足溃疡的疗效及对血管新生的影响[J]. 临床医学, 2025, 45(4): 15-18. doi:10.19528/j.issn.1003-3548.2025.04.005 .
[10] ?ETINKAYA R A, YENILMEZ E, PETRONE P, et al. Platelet-rich plasma as an additional therapeutic option for infected wounds with multi-drug resistant bacteria: In vitro antibacterial activity study[J]. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg, 2019, 45(3): 555-565. doi:10.1007/s00068-018-0957-0 .
[11] 肖洁, 李翠莹, 张利, 等. 富血小板血浆体外抑菌作用研究[J]. 四川医学, 2015, 36(4): 470-473. doi:10.16252/j.cnki.issn1004-0501-2015.04.010 .
[12] 蔡鸿娇, 张斌阳, 陈融斌, 等. 槲皮素和没食子酸对七种水产病原菌抑菌效果测定[J]. 中国饲料, 2025(17): 117-121, 165. doi:10.15906/j.cnki.cn11-2975/s.2024050059-07 .
[13] 李卓男. 自体富血小板血浆与传统方法治疗糖尿病足溃疡疗效的Meta分析[D]. 长春: 吉林大学, 2019.
[14] ZANZOV E, ANASTASOVA V, IVANOVA K, et al. Platelet-rich plasma for wound healing in diabetic patients[J]. Medicina, 2025, 61(9): 1535.doi:10.3390/medicina61091535 .
[15] 相佳宁,钟华,任嘉毅,等.门诊应用负压微引流联合超声清创治疗糖尿病足溃疡的疗效[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2026, 42(5): 102-108. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2026.05.013 .
[16] BURNOUF T, CHOU M L, WU Y W, et al. Antimicrobial activity of platelet (PLT)-poor plasma, PLT-rich plasma, PLT gel, and solvent/detergent-treated PLT lysate biomaterials against wound bacteria[J]. Transfusion, 2013, 53(1): 138-146. doi:10.1111/j.1537-2995.2012.03668.x .
[17] PLATINI H, ADAMMAYANTI K, MAULANA S, et al. The potential of autologous platelet-rich plasma gel for diabetic foot ulcer care among older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Ther Clin Risk Manag, 2024, 20: 21-37.doi:10.2147/TCRM.S433033 .
[18] SHENG X, HU L, LI T, et al. Clinical efficacy and mechanism of the combination of autologous platelet-rich gel and recombinant human acidic fibroblast growth factor in the management of refractory diabetic foot[J]. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne), 2024, 15: 1374507. doi:10.3389/fendo.2024.1374507 .
[19] LI T, MA Y, WANG M, et al. Platelet-rich plasma plays an antibacterial, anti-inflammatory and cell proliferation-promoting role in an in vitro model for diabetic infected wounds[J]. Infect Drug Resist, 2019, 12: 297-309. doi:10.2147/IDR.S186651 .
[20] RAMAKANT P, VERMA A K, MISRA R, et al. Changing microbiological profile of pathogenic bacteria in diabetic foot infections: Time for a rethink on which empirical therapy to choose[J]. Diabetologia, 2011, 54(1): 58-64. doi:10.1007/s00125-010-1893-7 .
[21] 罗富强, 余电柏, 谢康麒, 等. 糖尿病足溃疡创面修复相关机制的研究进展[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2023, 39(2): 158-163.doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2023.02.006 .
[22] EVERTS P A, LANA J F, ALEXANDER R W, et al. Profound properties of protein-rich, platelet-rich plasma matrices as novel, multi-purpose biological platforms in tissue repair, regeneration, and wound healing[J]. Int J Mol Sci, 2024, 25(14): 7914. doi:10.3390/ijms25147914 .
[23] DU F, MA J, GONG H, et al. Microbial infection and antibiotic susceptibility of diabetic foot ulcer in China: Literature review[J]. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne), 2022, 13: 881659.doi:10.3389/fendo.2022.881659 .
[24] SMITH O J, WICAKSANA A, DAVIDSON D, et al. An evaluation of the bacteriostatic effect of platelet-rich plasma[J]. Int Wound J, 2021, 18(4): 448-456.doi:10.1111/iwj.13545 .
[25] CIE?LIK-BIELECKA A, BOLD T, ZIó?KOWSKI G, et al. Antibacterial activity of leukocyte- and platelet-rich plasma: An in vitro study[J]. Biomed Res Int, 2018, 2018: 1-8.doi:10.1155/2018/9471723 .
[26] BIELECKI T M, GAZDZIK T S, ARENDT J, et al. Antibacterial effect of autologous platelet gel enriched with growth factors and other active substances: AN IN VITRO STUDY[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 2007, 89(3): 417-420.doi:10.1302/0301-620X.89B3.18491 .
[27] 赵连前, 张宇, 回蔷, 等. 富血小板凝胶对金黄色葡萄球菌的体外抗菌性研究[J]. 中国美容整形外科杂志, 2016, 27(6): 371-374. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1673-7040.2016.06.016 .
Outlines

/