Feature Reports:Musculoskeletal Diseases

Comparison of local debridement versus En bloc osteotomy for chronic osteomyelitis of the tibia

  • Changzheng YAN ,
  • Dongxu TANG ,
  • Hao SONG ,
  • Yanfei LUO ,
  • Kai CHEN ,
  • Liu YANG ,
  • Jiang DENG ,
  • Shiqiang. RUAN
Expand
  • Department of Orthopedic Trauma,Third Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University,Zunyi 563000,Guizhou,China

Received date: 2025-08-04

  Online published: 2025-12-18

Abstract

Objective To compare of the efficacy of two distinct debridement techniques in membrane induction therapy for chronic tibial osteomyelitis. Methods A retrospective study was conducted on 52 patients with Cierny-Mader type IV A/B chronic tibial osteomyelitis who were treated at the Third Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University between July 2016 and December 2023. Five patients were diagnosed and treated before 2020, while 47 were managed from 2020 onward. Patients were divided into two groups: a local debridement group (n = 28) and an en bloc osteotomy group (n = 24). Perioperative outcomes—including operative time, incision length, intraoperative blood loss, and length of hospital stay—were assessed, along with clinical efficacy at 6 months, 12 months, and final follow-up. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) knee score, the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot score, joint range of motion (knee flexion-extension and ankle plantarflexion-dorsiflexion), recurrence rate, and the Paley classification for infectious bone defects. Results The local debridement group exhibited significantly less intraoperative blood loss (P < 0.05), shorter operative time (P < 0.05), and reduced hospital stay (P < 0.05), as well as higher AOFAS and HSS scores at both 6 and 12 months postoperatively (P < 0.05). In contrast, the osteotomy group demonstrated superior Paley classification outcomes at 6 months, 12 months, and final follow-up (P < 0.05), along with lower rates of infection recurrence. Longitudinal analysis indicated significant improvements in AOFAS scores, HSS scores, and joint mobility over time in both groups (P < 0.05). However, no statistically significant differences were observed between groups in terms of functional scores or joint mobility parameters at final follow-up (P > 0.05). Conclusion En bloc osteotomy combined with the induced membrane technique (Masquelet technique) enables more comprehensive debridement, minimizes the necessity for repeated surgical interventions, reduces postoperative complications, lowers the risk of recurrence, and promotes enhanced bone healing.

Cite this article

Changzheng YAN , Dongxu TANG , Hao SONG , Yanfei LUO , Kai CHEN , Liu YANG , Jiang DENG , Shiqiang. RUAN . Comparison of local debridement versus En bloc osteotomy for chronic osteomyelitis of the tibia[J]. The Journal of Practical Medicine, 2025 , 41(23) : 3645 -3651 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2025.23.003

References

[1] WALTER N, BAERTL S, ALT V, et al. What is the burden of osteomyelitis in Germany? An analysis of inpatient data from 2008 through 2018[J]. BMC Infect Dis, 2021, 21(1): 550. doi:10.1186/s12879-021-06274-6
[2] ZHAO Z, ZHANG Y, LI J, et al. A remotely controlled nanotherapeutic with immunomodulatory property for MRSA-induced bone infection[J]. Biomaterials, 2025, 321: 123298. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2025.123298
[3] CHEN Y, LIU Z, LIN Z, et al. The effect of Staphylococcus aureus on innate and adaptive immunity and potential immunotherapy for S. aureus-induced osteomyelitis[J]. Front Immunol, 2023, 14: 1219895. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2023.1219895
[4] TONG K, ZHONG Z, PENG Y. Masquelet technique versus Ilizarov bone transport for reconstruction of lower extremity bone defects following posttraumatic osteomyelitis[J]. Injury, 2017, 48(7): 1616-1622. doi:10.1016/j.injury.2017.03.042
[5] WANG Y, LI J, ZHANG X, et al. Clinical outcome of chronic haematogenous osteomyelitis of the femur or tibia in adults using selective segmental osteotomy and induced membrane technique[J]. BMC Surg, 2025, 25(1): 137. doi:10.1186/s12893-025-02865-1
[6] SAMBRI A, CEVOLANI L, PASSARINO V, et al. Mid-Term Results of Single-Stage Surgery for Patients with Chronic Osteomyelitis Using Antibiotic-Loaded Resorbable PerOssal? Beads [J]. Microorganisms, 2023, 11(7): 1623. doi:10.3390/microorganisms11071623
[7] METSEMAKERS W J, MORGENSTERN M, MCNALLY M A, et al. Fracture-related infection: A consensus on definition from an international expert group[J]. Injury, 2018, 49(3): 505-510. doi:10.1016/j.injury.2017.08.040
[8] DE MEO D, MARTINI P, TORTO F LO, et al. Antibiotic-Loaded Hydrogel for the Treatment of Lower-Limb Fracture-Related Infections: A Single Center's Multidisciplinary Experience[J]. Gels, 2024, 10(10): 628. doi:10.3390/gels10100628
[9] HUANG X, LI Q, CHEN J, et al. Clinical features of chronic tibial osteomyelitis: A single-center retrospective study of 282 cases in Xinjiang, China[J]. BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 2024, 25(1): 823. doi:10.1186/s12891-024-07928-7
[10] 沈锋, 万杰, 魏国文, 等. 胫骨近端与远端骨搬移治疗骨髓炎骨缺损的比较[J]. 中国矫形外科杂志, 2021, 29(5): 470-472.
[11] HUANG S, WEN J, ZHANG Y, et al. Choosing the right animal model for osteomyelitis research: Considerations and challenges[J]. J Orthop Translat, 2023, 43: 47-65. doi:10.1016/j.jot.2023.10.001
[12] PICCATO A, CROSIO A, ANTONINI A, et al. Single-stage versus two-stage bone flap reconstruction in chronic osteomyelitis: Multicenter outcomes comparison[J]. Microsurgery, 2024, 44(1): e31139. doi:10.1002/micr.31139
[13] LANGIT M B, TAY K S, AL-OMAR H K, et al. Surgical debridement in long bone chronic osteomyelitis: Is wide tumour-like resection necessary?[J]. Bone Jt Open, 2023, 4(8): 643-651. doi:10.1302/2633-1462.48.bjo-2023-0017.r1
[14] CHO J W, KENT W T, KIM J K, et al. Outcome of multi-staged induced membrane technique based on post-debridement cultures for the management of critical-sized bone defect following fracture-related infection[J]. Sci Rep, 2022, 12(1): 22637. doi:10.1038/s41598-022-26746-2
[15] 张虎, 杨晓勇, 陈星宇, 等. 膜诱导技术治疗Cierny-MaderⅣ型股骨慢性骨髓炎[J]. 中国矫形外科杂志, 2022, 30(21): 2003-2006.
[16] SHEN J, WEI Z, WU H, et al. The induced membrane technique for the management of infected segmental bone defects[J]. Bone Joint J, 2024, 106-B(6): 613-622. doi:10.1302/0301-620x.106b6.bjj-2023-1443.r1
[17] 吴宏日, 贾硕, 傅景曙, 等. En bloc切除结合膜诱导技术分期治疗长骨Cierny-Mader Ⅳ型创伤后骨感染[J]. 中华创伤杂志, 2017, 33(2): 123-128.
[18] 彭钱宝, 何伟信, 李源, 等. Masquelet技术结合En bloc切除治疗Cierny-MaderⅣB型骨髓炎的疗效分析[J]. 湖南师范大学学报(医学版), 2023, 20(4): 36-42.
[19] RODRIGUEZ-BARON E B, GAWAD H, ATTUM B, et al. Delayed Unions or Nonunions of the Distal Femur: A Comprehensive Overview[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2024, 106(21): 2028-2040. doi:10.2106/jbjs.23.00985
[20] 孙劲, 付纳新, 刘沛, 等. 吻合血管腓骨皮瓣移植与万古霉素硫酸钙填塞治疗慢性胫骨骨髓炎并骨缺损[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2017, 33(3): 421-424.
[21] XUE B, PAN Y, WANG B, et al. Simultaneous reconstruction of tibial osteomyelitis-complicated soft tissue defects using free flap transplantation in conjunction with the masquelet technique: A retrospective study[J]. BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 2024, 25(1): 891. doi:10.1186/s12891-024-08026-4
[22] 姜楠, 余斌. 骨折内固定术后感染的诊治最新进展[J]. 中华创伤骨科杂志, 2020, 22(12): 1098-1104.
[23] SHEN J, WEI Z, WANG S, et al. Treatment of infected bone defects with the induced membrane technique[J]. Bone Joint Res, 2023, 12(9): 546-558. doi:10.1302/2046-3758.129.bjr-2022-0439.r2
[24] TIAN L, TAN Z, YANG Y, et al. In situ sprayed hydrogels containing resiquimod-loaded liposomes reduce chronic osteomyelitis recurrence by intracellular bacteria clearance[J]. Acta Biomater, 2023, 169: 209-227. doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2023.07.039
[25] FéVRIER A, BOURSOT C, TANNUGI K C. Osteomyelitis and Gentamicin-PMMA Chains[J]. Clin Nucl Med, 2022, 47(11): e708-e709. doi:10.1097/rlu.0000000000004360
[26] 王子田, 杨彪, 李欣, 等. 万古霉素骨水泥治疗胫骨慢性骨髓炎[J]. 中国矫形外科杂志, 2019, 27(11): 1052-1053.
[27] LU W, ZHAO R, FAN X, et al. Time-varying characteristics of the induced membrane and its effects on bone defect repair[J]. Injury, 2023, 54(2): 318-328. doi:10.1016/j.injury.2022.12.026
Outlines

/