The Journal of Practical Medicine >
Consistency verification of reverse screening strategy for syphilis in maternal and child populations and assocliation between S/CO value and false positive rate of CLIA
Received date: 2025-07-02
Online published: 2025-11-05
Objective To compare the diagnostic performance of two syphilis reverse testing protocols recommended by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (USCDC) and the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) within maternal and child populations, and to explore the factors contributing to false-positive results in chemiluminescent immunoassays (CLIA). Methods A retrospective analysis was performed on serological test results from 109,003 patients collected between 2021 and 2023. All participants were initially screened for specific syphilis antibodies using CLIA, and those with positive results underwent confirmatory testing with both the toluidine red unheated serum test (TRUST) and the Treponema pallidum particle agglutination assay (TPPA). The kappa statistic was employed to assess the diagnostic agreement between the USCDC and ECDC protocols, while also analyzing the distribution patterns of CLIA false-positive results across varying S/CO value ranges and demographic groups. Results Both protocols achieved a syphilis positivity rate of 0.34%. The hospital's high-prevalence syphilis screening program identified no cases with CLIA-positive or TRUST-positive but TPPA-negative results, suggesting high specificity in this population. The two protocols demonstrated perfect agreement with a Kappa value of 1.0, indicating no significant difference in diagnostic performance between maternal and child populations. CLIA exhibited a true positive rate of 71.04%, which was positively correlated with S/CO values: 21.88% when 1.0 < S/CO ≤ 3.0 and 100% when S/CO > 10. The highest false positive rate for CLIA (38.75%) was observed among young adults, while the largest proportion of false positives-reaching 40.00%—was associated with pregnancy and abortion status. Conclusions The two reverse detection methods for syphilis exhibit comparable diagnostic efficacy in women and children from populations with low syphilis prevalence. CLIA demonstrates high sensitivity; however, when the S/CO ratio is less than 10, particularly in adult women of childbearing age, clinicians should remain vigilant for potential false-positive results to prevent misdiagnosis and unnecessary medical interventions.
Key words: syphilis; reverse detection process; S/CO value; false-positive
Weiming LU , Jiewen LI , Chunming GU , Junfei GUO , Kefeng LAI , Xianhua ZHENG , Mingyong. LUO . Consistency verification of reverse screening strategy for syphilis in maternal and child populations and assocliation between S/CO value and false positive rate of CLIA[J]. The Journal of Practical Medicine, 2025 , 41(20) : 3249 -3255 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2025.20.015
| [1] | 陈泽伟, 梁诗晴, 岳晓丽, 等. 2010-2023年中国梅毒流行趋势及时空分布特征[J]. 中华皮肤科杂志, 2024, 57(11): 1045-1050. |
| [2] | World Health Organization. Global incidence and prevalence of selected curable sexually transmitted infections: 2008[J]. Reprod Health Matters, 2012, 20(40): 207-208. doi:10.1016/s0968-8080(12)40660-7 |
| [3] | LYNN W A, LIGHTMAN S. Syphilis and HIV: A dangerous combination[J]. Lancet Infect Dis, 2004, 4(7): 456-466. doi:10.1016/s1473-3099(04)01061-8 |
| [4] | TSANG R S W, ALLAN L, et al. Serological diagnosis of syphilis: Comparison of the Trep-Chek IgG enzyme immunoassay with other screening and confirmatory tests[J]. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol, 2007, 51(1): 118-124. doi:10.1111/j.1574-695x.2007.00289.x |
| [5] | PAPP J R, PARK I U, FAKILE Y, et al. CDC Laboratory Recommendations for Syphilis Testing, United States[J]. MMWR Recomm Rep, 2024, 73(1): 31-32. doi:10.15585/mmwr.rr7301a1 |
| [6] | JANIER M, UNEMO M, DUPIN N, et al. 2020 European guideline on the management of syphilis[J]. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol, 2020, 35(3): 574-588. doi:10.1111/jdv.16946 |
| [7] | 利超强, 陈发颖, 陈清. 2011-2020年肇庆市梅毒流行病学特征变化[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2022, 38(13): 1685-1689. |
| [8] | 林艳英. 不同梅毒检测方法(ELISA、TPPA、TRUST)效果比较[J]. 西藏医药, 2024, 45(5): 32-33. |
| [9] | PENG J, LU Y, YU H, et al. Analysis of 2 Reverse Syphilis Testing Algorithms in Diagnosis of Syphilis: A Large-Cohort Prospective Study[J]. Clin Infect Dis, 2018, 67(6): 947-953. doi:10.1093/cid/ciy198 |
| [10] | ISMAIL A, YOUNES N, AYOUB H, et al. Evaluating chemiluminescent immunoassays for syphilis detection: A comparative analysis[J]. J Infect Public Health, 2025, 18(6): 102731. doi:10.1016/j.jiph.2025.102731 |
| [11] | 郝栩婷, 陈陆, 董媛, 等. 梅毒血清学检测流程评价[J]. 标记免疫分析与临床, 2017, 24(10): 1183-1186. |
| [12] | CHEN X, YANG R, LIANG Y, et al.Comparison and evaluation of Abbott chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay and ChIVD light-initiated chemiluminescent assay in the detection of Treponema pallidum antibody[J]. J Clin Lab Anal, 2020, 34(7): e23275. doi:10.1002/jcla.23275 |
| [13] | 丁莉, 陆奎英, 周颖, 等. 孕产妇梅毒假阳性调查分析[J]. 中国卫生产业, 2016, 13(30): 178-180. |
| [14] | 郑淑华, 黄瑞玉, 卢春敏, 等. 化学发光法和TPPA试验检测妇幼人群梅毒螺旋体抗体假阳性对比分析[J]. 中国皮肤性病学杂志, 2021, 35(3): 349-352. |
| [15] | ADHIKARI E H, FRAME I J, HILL E, et al. Abbott ARCHITECT Syphilis TP Chemiluminescent Immunoassay Accurately Diagnoses Past or Current Syphilis in Pregnancy[J]. Am J Perinatol, 2020, 37(1): 112-118. doi:10.1055/s-0039-3400994 |
| [16] | LIU G L, ZHOU X Y, DONG R J, et al. False-positive TPPA and TRUST syphilis test results in a patient with antiphospholipid syndrome and monoclonal immunoglobulinaemia[J]. Sex Transm Infect, 2022, 98(4): 313. |
| [17] | SHI H, LUO W, LI W, et al. Serologic false-positive reactions for syphilis in children of allergic purpura[J]. Clin Chem Lab Med, 2015, 53(9): 223-225. doi:10.1515/cclm-2014-0489 |
| [18] | MARQUES C, MARIZ C, MARQUES T, et al. Risk factors associated with syphilis among patients at a sexual health center in Brazil: A retrospective study[J]. Braz J Infect Dis, 2025, 29(5): 104558. doi:10.1016/j.bjid.2025.104558 |
| [19] | 鲁东平, 张荣, 王芬, 等. 梅毒血清固定患者NLRP3炎症小体及细胞因子表达的研究[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2021, 37(8): 1041-1045. |
| [20] | YURI I, KOH O, HIRONORI S, et al. Prevalence and clinical characteristics of patients with biologically false-positive reactions with serological syphilis testing in contemporary practice: 10-year experience at a tertiary academic hospital[J]. Sex Transm Infect, 2021, 97(6): 397-401. doi:10.1136/sextrans-2020-054628 |
| [21] | WILLIAMS J, BAZAN J, TURNER A, et al. Reverse Sequence Syphilis Screening and Discordant Results in Pregnancy[J]. J Pediatr, 2020, 219: 263-266. doi:10.1016/j.jpeds.2019.11.035 |
| [22] | TRIVELLATO M, CUNHA M, TRIVELLATO G, et al. Analysis of DNA extraction methods for detection of Treponema pallidum: A comparison of three methods[J]. J Microbiol Methods, 2021, 192: 106383. doi:10.1016/j.mimet.2021.106383 |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |