Clinical Research

Clinical efficacy of maxillary protraction combined with customized titanium plate in the treatment of skeletal class malocclusion during growth period

  • Lei LI ,
  • Lu HAN ,
  • Geng. WU
Expand
  • Department of Stomatology,the Affiliated Lianyungang Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University,Lianyungang 222000,Jiangsu,China

Received date: 2025-04-18

  Online published: 2025-07-29

Abstract

Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy of maxillary protraction combined with customized titanium plates in the treatment of skeletal Class Ⅲ malocclusion during the growth and development stage. Methods A total of 96 patients diagnosed with skeletal Class Ⅲ malocclusion who received treatment at our hospital between May 2021 and May 2023 were included in this study. Participants were randomly divided into two groups using a ball-drawing method: those assigned odd numbers were placed in the control group (n = 48), while those assigned even numbers were allocated to the experimental group (n = 48). The control group underwent maxillary protraction therapy alone, whereas the experimental group received maxillary protraction combined with customized titanium plate intervention. The two groups were evaluated and compared based on clinical effectiveness, facial soft tissue parameters (LL-EP, NLA, G-SnPg), hard tissue parameters [SNA (sella-nasion-A point angle), SNB (sella-nasion-B point angle), ANB (A point-nasion-B point angle), MP-SN (mandibular plane-SN angle), MP-FH (mandibular plane-Frankfort horizontal angle), A-OLP (vertical distance from A point to occlusal line plane), Pg-OLP (vertical distance from pogonion to OLP), and Y-axis angle], hyoid bone position, dental indicators (H-X, H-Y, H-MP, H-FH), and the incidence of adverse events. Results Following the intervention, the experimental group demonstrated a significantly higher overall efficacy rate compared to the control group (P < 0.05). The LL-EP value was significantly lower in the experimental group (P < 0.05); conversely, SNA, ANB, MP-SN, MP-FH, A-OLP, and the Y-axis angle were all significantly increased (P < 0.05). Additionally, H-X and H-Y distances were notably shorter (P < 0.05), while U1-NA was greater and overbite depth was reduced in comparison to the control group (P < 0.05). No statistically significant difference was observed in the incidence of adverse reactions between the two groups (P > 0.05). Conclusion Maxillary protraction utilizing customized titanium plates can significantly improve clinical outcomes in patients with skeletal Class Ⅲ malocclusion, positively affecting both craniofacial hard and soft tissue structures, hyoid bone positioning, and dental parameters, while maintaining a favorable safety profile.

Cite this article

Lei LI , Lu HAN , Geng. WU . Clinical efficacy of maxillary protraction combined with customized titanium plate in the treatment of skeletal class malocclusion during growth period[J]. The Journal of Practical Medicine, 2025 , 41(14) : 2231 -2236 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2025.14.016

References

[1] YOSRA T, ABDOUL HAFIZOU R A, et al. Orthosurgical approach of a skeletal class Ⅲ malocclusion with mandibular laterognathia: A case report[J]. Ann Med Surg (Lond), 2023, 85(6):2965-2973. doi:10.1097/ms9.0000000000000591
[2] 李欣然,陈彬,李梦,等. PAR指数联合头影测量在骨性Ⅲ类错畸形疗效评价中的初步应用[J]. 上海口腔医学,2023,32(4):417-421.
[3] 尹志刚,郭强. 正畸-正颌联合治疗骨性Ⅲ类错( )畸形的临床疗效及对侧貌软硬组织变化的影响[J]. 中国美容医学,2024,33(5):57-61.
[4] 马艳宁,强茹月,金作林. 无托槽隐形矫治器联合前方牵引治疗替牙期骨性Ⅲ类错 的三维有限元研究[J]. 中华口腔医学杂志,2024,59(9):919-926.
[5] LI Y, LI H, LAI Q, et al. Finite element analysis of 3D-printed personalized titanium plates for mandibular angle fracture[J]. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin, 2023, 26(1):78-89. doi:10.1080/10255842.2022.2047952
[6] LI K, LI J, DU W, et al. Computer-Aided Design and Manufacturing Cutting and Drilling Guides with Prebent Titanium Plates Improve Surgical Accuracy of Skeletal Class Ⅲ Malocclusion[J]. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2020, 145(5):963e-974e. doi:10.1097/prs.0000000000006794
[7] 周静文,闫麒安,米丛波. 正颌手术治疗骨性Ⅲ类错( )畸形对颞下颌关节髁突影响的研究现状[J]. 中国美容医学,2024,33(5):185-187.
[8] 邓旭霞,刘雅飞,尹洪杰,等. 骨性Ⅲ类错颌患者正畸正颌联合治疗后上中切牙牙根吸收情况及其影响因素分析[J]. 中南医学科学杂志,2023,51(5):756-759.
[9] 石慧,葛红珊,陈露祎,等. 骨支抗装置与上颌面具前牵引装置治疗青少年骨性Ⅲ类错( )畸形疗效比较的Meta分析[J]. 华西口腔医学杂志,2020,38(1):69-74.
[10] KIM M, LI J, KIM S, et al. Individualized 3D-Printed Bone-Anchored Maxillary Protraction Device for Growth Modification in Skeletal Class Ⅲ Malocclusion[J]. J Pers Med, 2021, 11(11):1087.
[11] 齐玉涵,姜若萍. 骨性Ⅲ类错 正畸正颌联合治疗前后唇部形态变化研究 [J]. 中华口腔正畸学杂志,2023,30(3):148-153.
[12] KIM S H, KIM A H, CHOI Y J, et al. Personalized 3D-printed Titanium Cutting Guide and Prefabricated Osteosynthesis Plate for Mandibular Step Osteotomy to Treat Severe Mandibular Prognathism[J]. J Craniofac Surg, 2022, 33(7):2247-2251. doi:10.1097/scs.0000000000008735
[13] LI M, SHEN S, ZHAO Z, et al. The application of a fully digital approach in the treatment of skeletal class Ⅲ malocclusion: A preliminary study[J]. BMC Oral Health, 2023, 23(1):237. doi:10.1186/s12903-023-02918-y
[14] 黄纯,温馨,黄乐,等. 上颌前方牵引对恒牙早期骨性Ⅲ类错 上、下颌骨宽度影响的三维模拟分析[J]. 上海口腔医学,2022,31(5):550-555.
[15] NAN X, WANG C, LI L, et al. Application of three-dimensional printing individualized titanium mesh in alveolar bone defects with different Terheyden classifications: A retrospective case series study[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2023, 34(6):639-650. doi:10.1111/clr.14062
[16] YANG I H, CHOI J Y, BAEK S H. Characterization of phenotypes of skeletal Class Ⅲ malocclusion in Korean adult patients treated with orthognathic surgery using cluster analysis[J]. Angle Orthod, 2022, 92(4):537–546. doi:10.2319/081421-635.1
[17] LI Z, HUNG K F, AI Q Y H, et al. Radiographic Imaging for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Patients with Skeletal Class Ⅲ Malocclusion[J]. Diagnostics (Basel), 2024, 14(5):544. doi:10.3390/diagnostics14050544
[18] 冉碧红,赵军,龙晓玲. 上颌前牵引联合FRⅢ型矫治器保持对儿童生长发育期骨性Ⅲ类错( )畸形的疗效[J]. 实用临床医药杂志,2020,24(18):18-21.
[19] 徐书奎,张珊,谢新宇,等. 上颌前方牵引矫治骨性Ⅲ类错( )畸形远期疗效稳定性的研究进展[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志,2023,50(6):646-652.
[20] 刘朝明,郑越予,吴添福,等. 个性化导板技术在上颌骨缺损精确重建中的应用[J]. 口腔医学研究,2020,36(7):669-673.
[21] 姚丽霞,刘杰,李君,等. 微型钛板骨支抗联合Ⅲ类颌间牵引矫治Angle Ⅲ类骨性错( )畸形疗效观察[J]. 山东医药,2018,58(13):83-85.
[22] 王凡,常荍,梁舒然,等. 个性化钛板与传统前方牵引治疗生长发育期骨性Ⅲ类错 的疗效对比 [J]. 中华口腔医学杂志,2024,59(9):904-910.
[23] LIU S, LI J, XU C, et al. Effect of computer-assisted design and manufacturing cutting and drilling guides accompanied with pre-bent titanium plates on the correction of skeletal class II malocclusion: A randomized controlled trial[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2021, 50(10):1320-1328. doi:10.1016/j.ijom.2021.01.023
[24] 张美玲,杨琳. 上颌前牵引联合FRⅢ矫治器在骨性Ⅲ类错( )畸形患儿中的应用分析[J]. 中国美容医学,2024,33(8):63-67.
Outlines

/