Medical Examination and Clinical Diagnosis

Value of ultrasound radiomics in re⁃evaluating the benign or malignant of Bethesda Ⅲ nodules

  • Shangpeng HE ,
  • Weixian HUANG ,
  • Yanhui JIANG ,
  • Xiongqiang PENG ,
  • Lingcui MENG ,
  • Jianxing ZHANG
Expand
  • The Second Clinical Medical College,Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine,Guangzhou 510000,Guangdong,China

Received date: 2025-02-07

  Online published: 2025-07-02

Abstract

Objective To construct a combined model integrating ultrasonic features and radiomics derived from ultrasound images, and to evaluate its diagnostic performance in re - assessing the benign or malignant nature of Bethesda Ⅲ nodules. Methods A retrospective study was carried out on 442 patients with thyroid nodules classified as Bethesda Ⅲ after fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) between January 2019 and September 2024. All patients had undergone surgical pathology. The patients were randomly allocated into a training set and a testing set at a ratio of 7∶3. Relevant clinical characteristics were gathered, and regions of interest (ROI) were outlined on the most suspicious slice of the lesion prior to biopsy. Ultrasound radiomics features were extracted, key radiomics features were selected, and radiomics scores (Rad-score) were computed. The ultrasound model, radiomics model, and combined model were constructed. Subsequently, the diagnostic efficacy and clinical application value of each model were evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and decision curve analysis (DCA). Results Univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression analysis findings indicated that microcalcification, irregular margin, and Rad-score were independent risk factors for the malignant transformation of Bethesda Ⅲ nodules. In the testing set, the AUC values of the ultrasound model, radiomics model, and combined model were 0.76, 0.71, and 0.81, respectively. The calibration curve of the combined model revealed a good consistency between the predicted values and the actual outcomes. The DCA of the testing set demonstrated that the combined model exhibited high clinical utility. Conclusion The combined model, established based on ultrasonic features and ultrasound radiomics, provides a higher predictive value for evaluating the malignancy risk of Bethesda Ⅲ nodules.

Cite this article

Shangpeng HE , Weixian HUANG , Yanhui JIANG , Xiongqiang PENG , Lingcui MENG , Jianxing ZHANG . Value of ultrasound radiomics in re⁃evaluating the benign or malignant of Bethesda Ⅲ nodules[J]. The Journal of Practical Medicine, 2025 , 41(12) : 1892 -1898 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2025.12.018

References

1 ESCALANTE D A, ANDERSON K G. Workup and Management of Thyroid Nodules [J]. Surg Clin North Am, 2022, 102(2): 285-307. doi:10.1016/j.suc.2021.12.006
2 WONG R, FARRELL S G, GROSSMANN M. Thyroid nodules: Diagnosis and management [J]. Med J Aust, 2018, 209(2): 92-98. doi:10.5694/mja17.01204
3 HAUGEN B R, ALEXANDER E K, BIBLE K C, et al. 2015 American Thyroid Association Management Guidelines for Adult Patients with Thyroid Nodules and Differentiated Thyroid Cancer: The American Thyroid Association Guidelines Task Force on Thyroid Nodules and Differentiated Thyroid Cancer [J]. Thyroid, 2016, 26(1): 1-133.
4 CIBAS E S, ALI S Z. The 2017 Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology [J]. Thyroid, 2017, 27(11): 1341-1346. doi:10.1089/thy.2017.0500
5 ALLEN L, AFIF A AL, RIGBY M H, et al. The role of repeat fine needle aspiration in managing indeterminate thyroid nodules [J]. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2019, 48(1): 16. doi:10.1186/s40463-019-0338-7
6 暴珞宁, 王瑛, 陈东,等. 超声影像组学标签预测乳腺癌前哨淋巴结转移的价值 [J]. 实用医学杂志, 2021, 37(15): 2007-2011. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2021.15.020
7 CONTI A, DUGGENTO A, INDOVINA I, et al. Radiomics in breast cancer classification and prediction [J]. Semin Cancer Biol, 2021, 72: 238-250. doi:10.1016/j.semcancer.2020.04.002
8 李羚, 胡大涛, 夏春华,等. 基于CT影像组学诺模图预测头颈部恶性肿瘤淋巴结转移 [J]. 实用医学杂志, 2021, 37 (14): 1872-1877.
9 TESSLER F N, MIDDLETON W D, GRANT E G, et al. ACR Thyroid Imaging, Reporting and Data System (TI-RADS): White Paper of the ACR TI-RADS Committee [J]. J Am Coll Radiol, 2017, 14(5): 587-595. doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2017.01.046
10 CHEN J H, ZHANG Y Q, ZHU T T, et al. Applying machine-learning models to differentiate benign and malignant thyroid nodules classified as C-TIRADS 4 based on 2D-ultrasound combined with five contrast-enhanced ultrasound key frames [J]. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne), 2024, 15: 1299686. doi:10.3389/fendo.2024.1299686
11 ALYUSUF E Y, ALHMAYIN L, ALBASRI E, et al. Ultrasonographic predictors of thyroid cancer in Bethesda Ⅲ and Ⅳ thyroid nodules [J]. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne), 2024, 15: 1326134. doi:10.3389/fendo.2024.1326134
12 TALMOR G, BADASH I, ZHOU S, et al. Association of patient characteristics, ultrasound features, and molecular testing with malignancy risk in Bethesda Ⅲ-V thyroid nodules [J]. Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol, 2022, 7(4): 1243-1250. doi:10.1002/lio2.847
13 O'CONNOR E, MULLINS M, O'CONNOR D, et al. The relationship between ultrasound microcalcifications and psammoma bodies in thyroid tumours: A single-institution retrospective study [J]. Clin Radiol, 2022, 77(1): e48-e54. doi:10.1016/j.crad.2021.09.014
14 ALSHAHRANI A S, ALAMRI A S, BALKHOYOR A H, et al. The Prediction of Malignancy Risk in Thyroid Nodules Classified as Bethesda System Category Ⅲ (AUS/FLUS) and the Role of Ultrasound Finding for Prediction of Malignancy Risk [J]. Cureus, 2021, 13(9): e17924.
15 ALEXANDER E K, CIBAS E S. Diagnosis of thyroid nodules [J]. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol, 2022, 10(7): 533-539. doi:10.1016/s2213-8587(22)00101-2
16 KOBALY K, KIM C S, MANDEL S J. Contemporary Management of Thyroid Nodules [J]. Annu Rev Med, 2022, 73: 517-528. doi:10.1146/annurev-med-042220-015032
17 ZHOU J, YIN L, WEI X, et al. 2020 Chinese guidelines for ultrasound malignancy risk stratification of thyroid nodules: The C-TIRADS [J]. Endocrine, 2020, 70(2): 256-279.
18 吴秀艳, 蔡雪珍, 刘舜辉,等. 甲状腺结节超声恶性危险分层指南对甲状腺乳头状癌的诊断价值:C-TIRADS与ATA指南比较 [J]. 中国医学影像学杂志, 2024, 32 (1): 34-41
19 YANG X Y, HUANG L F, HAN Y J, et al. Histopathological Analysis of Thyroid Nodules with Taller-Than-Wide Shape in Adults [J]. Int J Gen Med, 2024, 17: 5123-5131. doi:10.2147/ijgm.s473731
20 YU B, LI Y, YU X, et al. Differentiate Thyroid Follicular Adenoma from Carcinoma with Combined Ultrasound Radiomics Features and Clinical Ultrasound Features [J]. J Digit Imaging, 2022, 35(5): 1362-1372. doi:10.1007/s10278-022-00639-2
21 ZHOU H, JIN Y, DAI L, et al. Differential Diagnosis of Benign and Malignant Thyroid Nodules Using Deep Learning Radiomics of Thyroid Ultrasound Images [J]. Eur J Radiol, 2020, 127: 108992. doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.108992
22 LUO P, FANG Z, ZHANG P, et al. Radiomics Score Combined with ACR TI-RADS in Discriminating Benign and Malignant Thyroid Nodules Based on Ultrasound Images:A Retrospective Study [J]. Diagnostics (Basel), 2021, 11(6):1011. doi:10.3390/diagnostics11061011
23 LIANG J, HUANG X, HU H, et al. Predicting Malignancy in Thyroid Nodules:Radiomics Score Versus 2017 American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging, Reporting and Data System [J]. Thyroid, 2018, 28(8): 1024-1033. doi:10.1089/thy.2017.0525
24 HUANG X, WU Z, ZHOU A, et al. Nomogram Combining Radiomics With the American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System Can Improve Predictive Performance for Malignant Thyroid Nodules [J]. Front Oncol, 2021, 11: 737847. doi:10.3389/fonc.2021.737847
Outlines

/