The Journal of Practical Medicine >
Effects of lingual Tie⁃plasty combined with Twin⁃block orthodontic appliance for the treatment of patients with mandibular retraction during growth spurt
Received date: 2024-12-31
Online published: 2025-05-20
Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy of lingual frenectomy combined with Twin-block orthodontic appliances in patients with mandibular retraction during the growth spurt. Methods Forty-two patients with osseous ClassⅡ malocclusion, characterized by mandibular retraction and short lingual frenulum, who were admitted to our hospital between August 2023 and August 2024, were randomly divided into a control group and an observation group, each consisting of 21 patients. The control group was treated with Twin-block orthodontic appliances alone, while the observation group received treatment combining lingual frenuloplasty with Twin-block orthodontic appliances. Pre- and post-treatment comparisons were made between the two groups regarding treatment duration, Simplified Hazelbaker Assessment Tool for Lingual Frenulum Function (HATLFF) scores, and lingual frenulum length measurements. Oral cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) was performed in both groups before and after treatment, and three-dimensional reconstruction and cephalometric analyses were utilized to evaluate indicators related to the tongue and hyoid bone, upper airway, maxilla and mandible, and temporomandibular joint. Results The corrective time in the control group (10.14 ± 1.06 months) was significantly longer than that in the observation group (8.00 ± 1.41 months) (P < 0.05). Before treatment, there were no statistically significant differences between the control and observation groups in terms of simplified HATLFF scores, tongue tie lengths, or indicators related to the tongue and hyoid bone, upper airway, maxillomandibular complex, and temporomandibular joints (P > 0.05). After treatment, the simplified HATLFF scores and tongue tie lengths in the observation group were significantly higher than pre-treatment values (P < 0.05). Additionally, IP-CP, IP-RP, ANB, U1-SN, U1-NA angle, and U1-NA distance were significantly reduced in both the control and observation groups compared to pre-treatment levels (P < 0.05). Conversely, T-S, H-NP, H-CVP, H-Or, H-PP, H-MP, H-FH, H-PNS, total upper airway volume, palatopharyngeal volume, lingual pharyngeal volume, CL-CR, ML-MR, SNB, GoGn-SN, Go-Gn, Co-Gn, Co-Go, Ar-Go, L1-NB angle, L1-NB distance, L1-MP angle, L1-MP distance, SL, SE, Z, UI-PP, L6-MP, articular fossa width, condylar apical sagittal area, condylar height, and condylar apical coronal area were significantly increased post-treatment compared to pre-treatment levels (P < 0.05). Notably, after treatment, the ANB difference in the observation group was significantly lower than that in the control group (P < 0.05), while the differences in simplified HATLFF scores, tongue tie length, T-S, H-Or, H-PP, H-FH, total upper airway volume, palatopharyngeal volume, lingual pharyngeal volume, CL-CR, ML-MR, Go-Gn, Ar-Go, L1-NB angle, L1-NB distance, SL, SE, and L6-MP were significantly greater in the observation group compared to the control group (P < 0.05). Conclusion Lingual tie-plasty combined with the Twin-block appliance demonstrates superior efficacy compared to the single Twin-block appliance in terms of treatment duration and clinical outcomes for patients exhibiting mandibular retraction during the growth spurt..
Hongji CHEN , Juan SONG , Mohong DENG . Effects of lingual Tie⁃plasty combined with Twin⁃block orthodontic appliance for the treatment of patients with mandibular retraction during growth spurt[J]. The Journal of Practical Medicine, 2025 , 41(9) : 1352 -1360 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2025.09.012
| 1 | HUO B, CHE X, LI X. Timing of early correction of mandibular hypoplasia in skeletal class Ⅱ malocclusion: A review[J]. J Clin Pediatr Dent, 2023, 47(6):11-20. |
| 2 | FADEL R, NICOT R, SCHLUND M, et al. Simultaneous mandibular anterior segmental osteotomy and genioplasty: A novel technique[J]. J Craniofac Surg, 2023, 34(3):1064-1066. doi:10.1097/scs.0000000000009049 |
| 3 | KONG L, LIU X Q. Efficacy of invisible advancement correction for mandibular retraction in adolescents based on Pancherz analysis[J]. World J Clin Cases, 2023, 11(6):1299-1309. doi:10.12998/wjcc.v11.i6.1299 |
| 4 | 樊文君, 杜娟, 王颖, 等. Twin-block矫治器与无托槽隐形矫治器对下颌后缩患者舌骨位置及上气道矢状径的影响比较[J]. 中国美容医学, 2023, 32(5):167-170. |
| 5 | 杨彤彤, 王之瑜, 刘莉萍. AngleⅡ类1分类下颌后缩患者舌体腭部形态及位置相关性研究[J]. 中国药物与临床, 2019, 19(20):3516-3518. doi:10.11655/zgywylc2019.20.020 |
| 6 | 王世雄, 闫卉. 成人矢状骨面型与舌系带长度间相关性的初步分析[J]. 继续医学教育, 2020, 34(12):90-91. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-6763.2020.12.046 |
| 7 | JOHNSON J S, SATYAPRASAD S, SHARATH CHANDRA H, et al. A comparative evaluation of the dentoskeletal treatment effects using Twin Block appliance and myobrace system on class Ⅱ division Ⅰ malocclusion[J]. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent, 2021, 14():S10-S17. doi:10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2013 |
| 8 | KHAN M I, NEELA P K, Unnisa N, et al. Dentoskeletal effects of Twin Block appliance in patients with Class Ⅱ malocclusion[J]. Med Pharm Rep, 2022, 95(2):191-196. |
| 9 | CAMPBELL C, MILLETT D, KELLY N, et al. Frankel 2 appliance versus the Modified Twin Block appliance for Phase 1 treatment of Class II division 1 malocclusion in children and adolescents: A randomized clinical trial[J]. Angle Orthod, 2020, 90(2):202-208. doi:10.2319/042419-290.1 |
| 10 | 胡静, 沈国芳, 刘彦普, 等. 牙颌面畸形诊断与治疗指南[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2011, 9(5):415-419. |
| 11 | 王超然, 李洪发, 李志勤, 等. Forsus矫治器矫治下颌后缩患者牙颌及颞下颌关节变化的CBCT分析[J]. 天津医科大学学报, 2016, 22(3):5. |
| 12 | AMIR L H, JAMES J P, DONATH S M. Reliability of the hazelbaker assessment tool for lingual frenulum function[J]. Int Breastfeed J, 2006, 1(1):3. doi:10.1186/1746-4358-1-3 |
| 13 | 刘立访. Nd:YAG激光联合Er:YAG激光行舌系带过短矫正术218例的临床分析[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2020, 36(21):2966-2970. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2020.21.016 |
| 14 | SEPET E, YILDIZ C, ERDEM A P, et al. Relationship between mandibular incisor irregularity and type of occlusion in ankyloglossia[J]. Oral Health Prev Dent, 2015, 13(1):59-63. |
| 15 | 傅民魁. 口腔正畸专科教程[M]. 北京:人民卫生出版社, 2007. |
| 16 | 张明欣, 马艳宁, 金作林. 隐形功能矫治在青少年骨性Ⅱ类下颌后缩患者治疗中的研究进展[J]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志电子版, 2024, 18(1):61-64. doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-1366.2024.01.010 |
| 17 | MOSS M L. The functional matrix hypothesis revisited. 1. The role of mechanotransduction[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 1997, 112(1):8-11. doi:10.1016/s0889-5406(97)70267-1 |
| 18 | ZHAO W, CHEN Y, KYUNG H M, et al. Effectiveness of tongue crib combination treating severe skeletal angle class Ⅲmalocclusion in mixed dentition[J]. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent, 2020, 13(6):668-676. doi:10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1855 |
| 19 | ASSAF D D C, KNORST J K, BUSANELLO-STELLA A R, et al. Association between malocclusion, tongue position and speech distortion in mixed-dentition schoolchildren: An epidemiological study[J]. J Appl Oral Sci, 2021, 29:e20201005. doi:10.1590/1678-7757-2020-1005 |
| 20 | WALLS A, PIERCE M, WANG H, et al. Parental perception of speech and tongue mobility in three-year olds after neonatal frenotomy[J]. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol, 2014, 78(1):128-131. doi:10.1016/j.ijporl.2013.11.006 |
| 21 | HAUG A C, MARKESTAD T, TJORA E, et al. Tongue-tie in neonates[J]. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen, 2021,141. doi:10.4045/tidsskr.21.0515 |
| 22 | CUESTAS G, DEMARCHI V, MARTíNEZ CORVALáN M P, et al. Surgical treatment of short lingual frenulum in children[J]. Arch Argent Pediatr, 2014, 112(6):567-570. |
| 23 | DUAN J, LI X., ZHANG F, et al. Palatal morphology after treatment of children with obstructive sleep apnoea using the modified Twin-Block appliance[J]. Int Dent J, 2024, S0020-6539(24)00094-7. doi:10.1016/j.identj.2024.03.007 |
| 24 | CHOI Y, KIM Y I, KIM S S, et al. Immediate effects of mandibular posterior displacement on the pharyngeal airway space: A preliminary study[J]. Korean J Orthod, 2020, 50(2):129-135. doi:10.4041/kjod.2020.50.2.129 |
| 25 | RAPAPORT B H J, BROWN J S. Systematic review of lingual nerve retraction during surgical mandibular third molar extractions[J]. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2020, 58(7):748-752. doi:10.1016/j.bjoms.2020.02.022 |
| 26 | GUILLEMINAULT C, HUSENI S, LO L. A frequent phenotype for paediatric sleep apnoea: short lingual frenulum[J]. ERJ Open Res, 2016, 2(3):00043-2016. doi:10.1183/23120541.00043-2016 |
| 27 | CORREA E J, O'CONNOR-REINA C, RODRíGUEZ-ALCALá L, et al. Does frenotomy modify upper airway collapse in OSA adult patients?Case report and systematic review[J]. J Clin Med, 2022, 12(1):201. doi:10.3390/jcm12010201 |
| 28 | TAHMASBI S, SEIFI M, SOLEYMANI A A, et al. Comparative study of changes in the airway dimensions following the treatment of Class Ⅱ malocclusion patients with the twin-block and Seifi appliances[J]. Dent Med Probl, 2023, 60(2):247-254. doi:10.17219/dmp/142292 |
| 29 | 王威, 莫仕诚, 王林. Twin-block矫治下颌后缩患者前、后的气道变化[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2018, 27(6):607-611. doi:10.19439/j.sjos.2018.06.009 |
| 30 | SINGARVEL CHILDAMBARANATHAN A, MADAN V, BALASUBRAMANIUM M. Tongue training technique for guiding the mandible in establishing horizontal jaw relation in edentulous patients[J]. Gerodontology, 2023, 40(4):526-528. doi:10.1111/ger.12682 |
| 31 | ZHANG Y, ZHENG J, WU Q, et al. Three-dimensional spatial analysis of temporomandibular joint in adolescent Class Ⅱ division 1 malocclusion patients: Comparison of Twin-Block and clear functional aligner[J]. Head Face Med, 2024, 20(1):4. doi:10.1186/s13005-023-00404-y |
| 32 | 刘洋, 冯泽伟, 葛晓磊, 等. Forsus矫治器治疗安氏Ⅱ类下颌后缩患者颞下颌关节变化的CBCT分析[J]. 现代口腔医学杂志, 2023, 37(3):150-154. |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |