Drugs and Clinic Practice

Effects of sevoflurane or propofol anesthesia maintenance on renal function and postoperative cognition in patients undergoing liver transplantation

  • Jinhui XU ,
  • Mailong YUAN ,
  • Tao ZHOU ,
  • Mingsheng ZHANG ,
  • Yaqi. LI
Expand
  • Department of Anesthesiology,Jiangxi Provincial People's Hospital (The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang Medical College),Nanchang 330006,Jiangxi,China

Received date: 2024-10-10

  Online published: 2024-12-23

Abstract

Objective To compare the application of sevoflurane or propofol anesthesia maintenance in liver transplantation patients and explore its effects on renal function and postoperative cognition and possible mechanisms. Methods A total of 60 patients aged 18 ~ 60 years old and ASA grade Ⅱ-Ⅲ who were scheduled to undergo orthotopic liver transplantation in our hospital were selected. They were randomly divided into two groups (n = 30) according to the different maintenance schemes: group P (propofol group) and group S (sevoflurane group). Anesthesia maintenance: group P received continuous target-controlled infusion of propofol combined with remifentanil hydrochloride injection during surgery; group S received sevoflurane inhalation combined with infusion of remifentanil hydrochloride injection during surgery. The mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR) and central venous pressure (CVP) of the two groups of patients were recorded at seven time points, including before anesthesia induction (T0), immediately after skin incision (T1), 30 minutes in the anhepatic phase (T2), 3 hours in the neohepatic phase (T3), 12 hours after surgery (T4), 24 hours after surgery (T5) and 72 hours after surgery (T6). 3 mL of central venous blood was drawn from each group. The serum neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL), serum cystatin C (Cys C), kidney injury molecule 1 (KIM-1), syndecan 1 (SDC-1), heparin sulfate (HS), hyaluronic acid (HA) and serum concentrations of inflammatory markers (TNF-α, IL-6) were detected by ELISA at the above time points. The cognitive function was evaluated by the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) at T0, T5 and T6, and the occurrence of cognitive dysfunction (MMSE < 23 points) was counted. Results There were no significant differences in MAP, HR, and CVP between the two groups at each time point (P > 0.05). At T4, the serum levels of NGAL and Cys in the two groups were significantly higher than those in the other groups. C and KIM-1 increased, and the P group was significantly higher than the S group, the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05), and there was no significant difference between the two groups at other times (P > 0.05); SDC-1, HS, and HA increased significantly in both groups at T3 and T4, and the P group was significantly higher than the S group at T4, the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05), and there was no significant difference between the two groups at other times (P > 0.05); TNF-α and IL-6 increased significantly in both groups at T3 and T4, decreased at T5 and T6, but still higher than T0, and the P group was significantly higher than the S group at T4 and T5, the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05); MMSE scores decreased at T5 and T6, and the P score was significantly lower than the S group at T5, the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05), and there was no significant difference at T6 (P > 0.05); there was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative cognitive dysfunction between the two groups (P > 0.05). Conclusion Compared with propofol, sevoflurane anesthesia maintenance has less effect on the degree of short-term renal injury and cognitive function changes in patients undergoing liver transplantation, which may be related to its more obvious effect of inhibiting inflammatory response and reducing glycocalyx degradation.

Cite this article

Jinhui XU , Mailong YUAN , Tao ZHOU , Mingsheng ZHANG , Yaqi. LI . Effects of sevoflurane or propofol anesthesia maintenance on renal function and postoperative cognition in patients undergoing liver transplantation[J]. The Journal of Practical Medicine, 2024 , 40(24) : 3509 -3514 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2024.24.012

References

1 NORéN ?, OLTEAN M, FRIMAN S, et al.Liver Graft Proteomics Reveals Potential Incipient Mechanisms behind Early Renal Dysfunction after Liver Transplantation[J]. Int J Mol Sci,2022,23(19):11929. doi:10.3390/ijms231911929
2 HE Z, LIU Y, LI Z, et al. Gut microbiota regulates circadian oscillation in hepatic ischemia-reperfusion injury-induced cognitive impairment by interfering with hippocampal lipid metabolism in mice[J]. Hepatol Int, 2023,17(6): 1645-1658. doi:10.1007/s12072-023-10509-w
3 TOMSI? K, NEMEC SVETE A. A mini-review of the effects of inhalational and intravenous anesthetics on oxidative stress in dogs[J].Front Vet Sci, 2022,9: 987536. doi:10.3389/fvets.2022.987536
4 SOUSA DA SILVA R X, WEBER A, DUTKOWSKI P, et al. Machine perfusion in liver transplantation[J].Hepatology, 2022, 76(5): 1531-1549. doi:10.1002/hep.32546
5 CHO H, JUNG J Y, YOON H K, et al. Serum neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin and lactate level during surgery predict acute kidney injury and early allograft dysfunction after liver transplantation[J]. Sci Rep, 2023,13(1): 8643. doi:10.1038/s41598-023-34372-9
6 ZHOU Y, HUANG J, SI Z, et al. Pathogenic factors of cognitive dysfunction after liver transplantation: An observational study[J].Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2023,35(6): 668-673. doi:10.1097/meg.0000000000002551
7 RAJA K, PANACKEL C. Post Liver Transplant Renal Dysfunction-Evaluation, Management and Immunosuppressive Practice[J]. J Clin Exp Hepatol, 2024,14(2):101306. doi:10.1016/j.jceh.2023.101306
8 康福新,王小智,刘润,等. 中性粒细胞明胶酶相关脂质运载蛋白变化值对成人ICU患者发生急性肾损伤的诊断价值[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2019,35(5):760-763.
9 BENOIT L, DIEU A, FOGUENNE M, et al. Experimental and Clinical Aspects of Sevoflurane Preconditioning and Postconditioning to Alleviate Hepatic Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury: A Scoping Review[J]. Int J Mol Sci, 2023,24(3):2340. doi:10.3390/ijms24032340
10 DIEU A, BENOIT L, DUPONT C, et al. Sevoflurane preconditioning in living liver donation is associated with better initial graft function after pediatric transplantation: A retrospective study[J]. Perioper Med (Lond), 2024,13(1): 11. doi:10.1186/s13741-024-00367-x
11 TAYLOR B, SCOTT T E, SHAW J,et al. Renal safety of critical care sedation with sevoflurane: A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. J Anesth, 2023,37(5):794-805. doi:10.1007/s00540-023-03227-y
12 XU X, DENG R, ZOU L,et al. Sevoflurane participates in the protection of rat renal ischemia-reperfusion injury by down-regulating the expression of TRPM7[J]. Immun Inflamm Dis, 2023,11(1):e753. doi:10.1002/iid3.753
13 GIMBLET C J, ERNST J W, BOS K D,et al. Effect of acute heparin administration on glycocalyx thickness and endothelial function in healthy younger adults[J]. J Appl Physiol (1985), 2024,136(2): 330-336. doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00767.2023
14 FOOTE C A, SOARES R N, RAMIREZ-PEREZ F I, et al. Endothelial Glycocalyx[J]. Compr Physiol, 2022,12(4): 3781-3811.
15 ABBASI M, JIN M, RASHIDI Y, et al. Glycocalyx cleavage boosts erythrocytes aggregation[J]. Sci Rep, 2024,14(1): 24340. doi:10.1038/s41598-024-75012-0
16 HáNA L, KO?í J, POHNáN R, et al. The significance of glycocalyx in surgery[J]. Rozhl Chir, 2023,102(12): 453-458. doi:10.33699/10.33699/pis.2023.102.12.453-458
17 BASHANDY G M. Implications of recent accumulating knowledge about endothelial glycocalyx on anesthetic management[J].J Anesth, 2015,29(2):269-278. doi:10.1007/s00540-014-1887-6
18 SONG J W, GOLIGORSKY M S. Perioperative implication of the endothelial glycocalyx[J]. Korean J Anesthesiol, 2018, 71(2): 92-102. doi:10.4097/kjae.2018.71.2.92
19 LIN L, NIU M, GAO W, et al. Predictive role of glycocalyx components and MMP-9 in cardiopulmonary bypass patients for ICU stay[J]. Heliyon, 2024,10(1):e23299. doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e23299
20 WANG J, WU Y. Mass intraoperative endothelial glycocalyx shedding affects postoperative systemic inflammation response[J]. BMC Anesthesiol, 2024, 24(1):76. doi:10.1186/s12871-024-02459-z
21 ASMUJE N F, MAT S, MYINT P K, et al. Blood Pressure Variability and Cognitive Function: A Scoping Review[J]. Curr Hypertens Rep, 2022,24(10): 375-383. doi:10.1007/s11906-022-01200-w
22 薛茹月, 李悦娴,孙德峰. 星状神经节阻滞改善术后认知功能障碍研究进展[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2024, 40(11): 1500-1504.
23 LI A H, BU S, WANG L, et al. Impact of propofol and sevoflurane anesthesia on cognition and emotion in gastric cancer patients undergoing radical resection[J]. World J Gastrointest Oncol, 2024, 16(1): 79-89. doi:10.4251/wjgo.v16.i1.79
Outlines

/