Clinical Research

Transurethral resection of prostate for treating benign prostatic hyperplasia: A comparative study of efficacy and safety of three procedures

  • Ben WU ,
  • Rui ZHOU ,
  • Tong BAO ,
  • Qunfeng WANG ,
  • Chong SHU ,
  • Xiaoxiang WU
Expand
  • Department of Urology,Anqing Hospital,Anhui Medical University,Anqing 246003,Anhui,China

Received date: 2024-04-11

  Online published: 2024-11-25

Abstract

Objective To explore and compare the efficacy and safety of different transurethral enucleation procedures for treating benign prostatic hyperplasia. Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 215 patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia admitted to our hospital from January 2021 to May 2023. According to the surgical procedures, they were divided into plasma resection group (n = 81), treated with transurethral plasma resection of the prostate, laser resection group (n = 92), treated with transurethral laser resection of the prostate, and green laser enucleation group (n = 42), treated with transurethral green laser enucleation of the prostate. The three groups were compared in terms of perioperative indicators (surgical time, intraoperative bleeding volume, bladder flushing time, indwelling catheter time, postoperative hemoglobin concentration, and hospital stay), urodynamic indicators (RUV, IPSS score, Qmax, and QOL score), and postoperative complications. Results The green laser enucleation group and laser resection group demonstrated a significantly higher total effective rate compared to the plasma electrosurgery group (P < 0.05). The three groups showed no statistically significant difference in hospital stay (P > 0.05), but the green laser enucleation group showed a significantly shorter surgical time compared to the other two group (P < 0.05). The green laser enucleation group and laser resection group had superiority in intraoperative bleeding, bladder flushing time, and indwelling catheter time compared to the plasma resection group, and a significantly higher postoperative hemoglobin concentration compared to the plasma resection group (P < 0.05). Repeated measurement analysis of variance showed that the three groups all exhibited significantly decreases in RUV, IPSS score, and QOL score (P < 0.05), and a significantly increase in Qmax at 1 month and 3 months after surgery (P < 0.05). The laser resection group and green laser enucleation group presented with significant decreases in RUV, IPSS score, and QOL score (P < 0.05), and a significantly decrease in Qmax compared to the plasma resection group at 1 month and 3 months after surgery (P < 0.05). However, the laser resection group and the green laser enucleation group had no statistically significant difference in RUV, IPSS score, Qmax, and QOL score at 1 month and 3 months after surgery (P > 0.05). The green laser enucleation group had the lowest total incidence of postoperative complications, following by the laser resection group and plasma resection group in order (7.14% vs. 21.74% vs. 35.80%, P < 0.05). Conclusion The three surgical procedures all have good therapeutic effects on benign prostatic hyperplasia. Transurethral laser prostatectomy and green laser enucleation have superiority to those of transurethral plasma resection of the prostate in efficacy and safety, and they can promote early recovery of patients. Transurethral green laser enucleation is the best in safety.

Cite this article

Ben WU , Rui ZHOU , Tong BAO , Qunfeng WANG , Chong SHU , Xiaoxiang WU . Transurethral resection of prostate for treating benign prostatic hyperplasia: A comparative study of efficacy and safety of three procedures[J]. The Journal of Practical Medicine, 2024 , 40(22) : 3202 -3207 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2024.22.014

References

1 甘为民,丁宁. 经尿道良性前列腺增生腔镜手术的经验与思考[J]. 现代泌尿外科杂志,2023,28(1):15-1741
2 许立哲,夏煜琦,程帆. 前列腺尿道悬吊术治疗前列腺增生的进展[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版),2022,16(5):385-388.
3 莫林键, 杨光林, 程继文,等. 整合耻骨上膀胱穿刺固定腺体法的经尿道前列腺等离子剜除术疗效分析[J]. 中华泌尿外科杂志, 2022, 43(3):193-197.
4 董毅,杨濛,王正,等. 经尿道等离子杆状电极解剖性前列腺剜除术的手术经验与临床疗效[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版),2022,16(5):413-418.
5 杨光林,莫林键,杨丹凌,等. 经尿道前列腺等离子剜除术和电切术对前列腺增生患者性功能影响比较的Meta分析[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版),2022,16(3):256-261.
6 李跃, 周捷, 晏建林,等. 改良经尿道前列腺等离子剜除术治疗良性前列腺增生的疗效及对性功能的影响[J]. 中国性科学, 2021, 30(10):20-24.
7 陈亮, 张仁涛, 丁银满,等. 经尿道前列腺等离子剜除术治疗小体积前列腺增生的效果分析[J]. 中国性科学, 2021,30(9):37-40.
8 梁胜杰, 陈长青, 李思敏,等. 经尿道前列腺等离子剜除术治疗小体积前列腺增生伴前列腺结石的疗效[J]. 现代泌尿外科杂志, 2022, 27(4):315-318.
9 蒋焜, 李浩勇, 宁金卓. 经尿道前列腺等离子剜除术治疗中小体积良性前列腺增生的疗效分析[J]. 中国医师杂志, 2022, 24(6):871-874,880.
10 朱显钟, 李金雨, 于忠英,等. 经尿道等离子前列腺剜除术与经尿道前列腺电切术治疗良性前列腺增生症的临床疗效对比研究[J]. 现代生物医学进展, 2022, 22(12):2280-2283,2288.
11 黄健. 中国泌尿外科和男科疾病诊断治疗指南[M]. 北京:科学出版社, 2019.
12 黄伟娜, 吴芃, 张耀光, 等. 国际尿失禁咨询委员会男性下尿路症状量表的汉化及验证研究[J]. 中华泌尿外科杂志, 2019, 40(4):299-303.
13 于淼,张晶,陈玉迪,等.中文版瘙痒患者生活质量问卷信效度及敏感性验证[J].中华皮肤科杂志, 2020,53(9):698-703
14 李泽安, 谢俊佳, 陈君秀,等. 微环境与良性前列腺增生发病机制的研究进展[J]. 中华泌尿外科杂志, 2022, 43(9):717-720.
15 杨雪圆, 刘喆雯, 涂雅玲,等. 针刺疗法治疗良性前列腺增生效果的Meta分析[J]. 中国全科医学, 2022, 25(26):3316-3323.
16 邓楹君, 高庆和, 刘胜京,等. 基于网络药理学的夏荔芪胶囊治疗良性前列腺增生的作用机制研究[J]. 中草药, 2021, 52(6):1681-1686.
17 LERNER L B, MCVARY K T, BARRY M J, et al. Errata: Management of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Attributed to Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: AUA GUIDELINE PART I, Initial Work-up and Medical Management[J]. J Urol, 2021, 206(5):1339. doi:10.1097/ju.0000000000002231
18 AYODELE O, CABRAL H J, MCMANUS D, et al. Re: The Risk of Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) in Men with Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Treated with 5-Alpha Reductase Inhibitors (5ARIs)[J]. J Urol, 2022, 207(13):207.
19 SONG B, SONG S H, JEONG S J. The learning curve for transurethral enucleation with bipolar energy for benign prostate hyperplasia: A single-surgeon experience of 494 patients[J].Asian J Androl, 2023, 26(3):288-294. doi:10.4103/aja202359
20 GEUM-LAN H, KYUNG-HYUN K, SUNG-PIL C,et al. Korean red ginseng alleviates benign prostatic hyperplasia by dysregulating androgen receptor signaling and inhibiting DRP1-mediated mitochondrial fission[J].Chinese J Nat Med, 2024, 22(8):1-10. doi:10.1016/s1875-5364(24)60619-9
21 ZHANG J. Histological inflammation and activation of M2 type macrophages may cause prostate fibrosis[J].Asian J Surg, 2024, 47(5):2515-2516. doi:10.1016/j.asjsur.2024.01.078
22 LI X. Genetically-proxied gut microbiota and the risk of benign prostate hyperplasia: A two-sample Mendelian randomization study[J]. Asian J Surg, 2024, 47(5):2363-2365. doi:10.1016/j.asjsur.2024.01.069
23 KAPLOWITZ P B. Premature Pubarche: A Pragmatic Approach[J].Endocrinol Meta Clin North Am, 2024, 53(2):203-209. doi:10.1016/j.ecl.2024.02.001
24 MIERNIK A, GRATZKE C. Current Treatment for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia[J]. Dtsch Arztebl Int, 2020,117(49):843-854.
25 顾宇伟,范波,丁琪,等. 保留部分尿道黏膜改良钬激光前列腺剜除术临床应用研究[J]. 实用医学杂志,2022,38(19):2457-2461,2466.
26 ABT D, MüLLHAUPT G, HECHELHAMMER L, et al. Prostatic Artery Embolisation Versus Transurethral Resection of the Prostate for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: 2-yr Outcomes of a Randomised, Open-label, Single-centre Trial[J]. Eur Urol, 2021, 80(1):34-42. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2021.02.008
27 闻竹,张超,李清华,等. 经尿道钬激光前列腺剜除术中保留部分尿道黏膜对尿控及性功能的影响分析[J]. 实用医学杂志,2023,39(10):1237-1241.
28 DEYIRMENDJIAN C, ELTERMAN D, CHUGHTAI B, et al. Surgical treatment options for benign prostatic obstruction: beyond prostate volume[J]. Curr Opin Urol, 2022,32(1):102-108. doi:10.1097/mou.0000000000000937
29 GóMEZ-SANCHA F. The constant search for the greater good: evolving from TURP to anatomic enucleation of the prostate is a safe bet[J]. World J Urol, 2021, 39: 2401-2406. doi:10.1007/s00345-021-03637-1
Outlines

/