The Journal of Practical Medicine >
Comparison of the early postoperative visual quality of oval versus round valve in FS⁃LASIK
Received date: 2024-06-13
Online published: 2024-09-13
Objective To investigate the difference in visual quality between oval and round corneal flaps in femtosecond excimer laser in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK). Methods In a prospective randomized controlled clinical study, patients who voluntarily underwent FS-LASIK surgery in Wuhan University Affiliated Aier Ophthalmology Hospital from June 2022 to February 2023 were randomly divided into oval valve group and round valve group, with 36 patients (72 eyes) in each group. During FS-LASIK, oval and round corneal flaps were made, and excimer laser surgery was performed in parallel. Observe intraoperative and postoperative complications. The unaided visual acuity (UCVA) and spherical equivalent (SE) at 1 day, 1 week, 1 month and 3 months after surgery were compared between the two groups at 3 months after surgery, and the modulation transfer function (MTF), Strel ratio (SR) and total higher-order aberration at 3 months after surgery were compared between the two groups. Results All patients had successfully completed the surgery without serious complications. There was no significant difference between the oval valve group and the round valve group in UCVA at 1 day, 1 week after surgery, 1 month after surgery, 3 months after surgery. There was no significant difference between the two groups on the postoperative SE at 1 day, 1 week after surgery, 1 month after surgery, and 3 months after surgery. There was no significant difference in MTF, SR and total higher-order aberration between the two groups at 3 months after surgery. Conclusion Ideal visual acuity can be achieved with either oval or round corneal flap during FS-LASIK, and there is no significant difference in visual quality between the two in the early postoperativeperiod.
Xiongzi LIANG , Qingsong ZHANG , Wanju YANG , Si LENG , Haixia WU , Minghui. ZHANG . Comparison of the early postoperative visual quality of oval versus round valve in FS⁃LASIK[J]. The Journal of Practical Medicine, 2024 , 40(17) : 2430 -2434 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2024.17.013
| 1 | ANG M, GATINELL D, REINSTEIN D Z, et al. Refractive surgery beyond 2020[J]. Eye(Lond),2021,35(2):362-382. doi:10.1038/s41433-020-1096-5 |
| 2 | 唐忞,马代金. 角膜地形图引导的FS-LASIK与常规FS-LASIK术后视觉质量比较[J]. 中华眼视光学与视觉科学杂志,2020,22(6):427-433. doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn115909-20190718-00202 |
| 3 | 张醇,黎明,应方微,等. FS?SBK 术、SMILE 术、LASIK术对近视及近视散光患者角膜生物力学、中央角膜内皮细胞的影响[J]. 实用医学杂志,2021,37(14):2837-2841. |
| 4 | TSAI T, ALWEES M, ROST A, et al. Changes of subjective symptoms and tear film biomarkers following femto-LASIK[J]. Int J Mol Sci, 2022,23(14): 7512. doi:10.3390/ijms23147512 |
| 5 | KAMIYA K, SHIMIZU K, IGARASHI A, et al. Visual and refractive outcomes of femtosecond lenticule extraction and smallincision lenticule extraction for myopia[J]. Am J Ophthalmol,2014,157(1):128-134. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2013.08.011 |
| 6 | 王勤美. 屈光手术学[M]. 北京:人民卫生出版社,2018:114-115. |
| 7 | ZHANG Y, SUN X X, CHEN Y G. Comparison of corneal optical quality after SMILE, wavefront-optimized LASIK and topography guided LASIK for myopia and myopic astigmatism[J]. Front Med ( Lausanne),2022,9: 870330. doi:10.3389/fmed.2022.870330 |
| 8 | 王兴存,朱立强,张广峰,等. 基于单中心FS-LASIK术中前房气泡的临床观察[J]. 中华眼视光学与视觉科学杂志,2020,22(6):434-440. doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn115909-20190505-00131 |
| 9 | 于秋菊,张永红,陈月,等. FS200飞秒与ZiemerLDV飞秒制瓣并发症对比分析[J]. 中国实用眼科杂志,2016,34(12):1282-1285. doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1006-4443.2016.12.011 |
| 10 | YIN Y, LU Y, XIANG A, et al. Comparison of optical quality after SMILE and FS-LASIK for high myopia by QQAS and iTrace analyze:a one-year retrospective study[J/OL]. BMC Ophthalmol, 2021, 21(1):292. doi:10.1186/s12886-021-02048-5 |
| 11 | DONATE D, THAERON R. SMILE with low energy levels: Assessment of early visual and optical quality recovery[J]. J Refract Surg, 2019,35(5): 285-293. doi:10.3928/1081597x-20190416-01 |
| 12 | 丁凯军,杨亚波. 飞秒辅助不同角膜蒂位置的准分子激光角膜磨镶术治疗近视疗效比较[J]. 中国实用眼科杂志,2016,34(9):926-930. |
| 13 | TOMAS J, MURUETA G, HANNEKEN L. Corneal regeneration after photorefractive keratectomy:a riview[J]. J Optpm,2015,8(3):149-169. doi:10.1016/j.optom.2014.09.001 |
| 14 | 刘佳慧,郭秀瑾,高萌蔓. 角膜屈光手术前后高阶像差的变化[J]. 国际眼科纵览,2023,47(3):269-275. doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-5803.2023.03.013 |
| 15 | SHETTY R, FRANCIS M, SHROFF R, et al. Corneal biomechanical changes and tissue remodeling after SMLIE and LASIK[J]. Invest Ophthamol Vis Sci, 2017, 58(13):5703-5712. |
| 16 | 冯雨,赵庆新,贾新萍. 有效切削光学区的差异对经上皮准分子激光屈光性角膜切削术后高阶像差的影响[J]. 实用医学杂志,2021,37(17):2247-2251. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2021.17.016 |
| 17 | VALENTINA B S, RAMONA B, SPERANTA S, et al. The influence of optical aberrations in refractive surgery[J]. Rom J Ophthalmol,2015,59(4):217-222. |
| 18 | SHAH R. History and results;Indications and contraindications of SMILE compared with LASIK[J]. Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila), 2019,8(5):371-376. doi:10.1097/01.apo.0000580132.98159.fa |
| 19 | HE X, HE Q, YUAN M, et al. Evaluation of morphological festures:Femtosecond-lasik flap vs. Smile cap, and the effects on coeneal higher-order aberrations[J]. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol, 2022, 260(12):3933-4003. doi:10.1007/s00417-022-05841-0 |
| 20 | WEN D, MCALINDEN C, FLITCROFT I, et al. Postoperative efficacy,predictability,safely,and visual quality of laser corneal refractive surgery:a network meta-analysis[J]. Am J Ophthalmol, 2017, 178:65-78. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2017.03.013 |
| 21 | 郑燕,周跃华,张晶. FS-LSAIK、WF-LASIK与SMLIE术后视觉质量比较的研究[J]. 中华眼科杂志,2020,56(2):118-125. |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |