The Journal of Practical Medicine >
Effect of different administration doses of dexmedetomidine on the circulatory system and stress response in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting with noncorporeal circulation
Received date: 2024-01-29
Online published: 2024-06-13
Objective To observe the effects of different administration doses of dexmedetomidine on the circulatory system and stress response in patients undergoing extracorporeal coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCABG). Methods Ninety-six patients who underwent OPCABG in our hospital from October 2021 to October 2023 were selected and divided into two groups using simple randomization method. Group A was administered dexmedetomidine at a dose of 0.5 μg/kg over 10 minutes before anesthesia induction, followed by a maintenance dose of 0.5 μg/(kg·h) infused until the end of the surgery, while group B was administered dexmedetomidine at a dose of 0.8 μg/kg for 10 min before anesthesia induction, followed by a maintenance dose of 0.8 μg/(kg·h) until the end of the operation. The two groups were compared in terms of cardiac index (CI), heart rate, mean arterial pressure (MAP), intrathoracic blood volume index (ITBI), bispectral index (BIS), and systemic peripheral vascular resistance index (SVRI) before anesthesia started (T0), at the immediate moment of intubation (T1), at the immediate moment of the start of the surgery (T2), at the time of sawing of the sternum (T3), and at the immediate moment of extubation (T4). Additionally, the two groups were compared in terms of cortisol (Cor), Angiotensin Ⅱ (Ang Ⅱ) levels, safety and postoperative awakening time. Results The two groups showed no differences in operation time, anaesthesia time, bleeding and urine volume (P > 0.05), but group B demonstrated less intraoperative use of cisatracurium compared to group A (P < 0.05). At T0, the two groups showed no difference in heart rate and MAP (P > 0.05), but higher heart rate and MAP at T1 and T3 than at T0. Group A was observed to have higher heart rate and MAP at T4 than at T0, while group B showed no significant differences in heart rate and MAP at T4 compared to them at T0 (P > 0.05). At T2 and T4, Group B showed significantly lower heart rate and MAP compared to group A (P < 0.05). At T0, the two group had no differences in terms of CI, CO, ITBI, and SVRI (P > 0.05). Both groups showed significantly lowered levels of CI, CO, ITBI, and SVRI at T1-T4 than at T0 (P < 0.05), but demonstrated no differences in the levels of CI, CO, ITBI, SVRI at T0-T4 (P > 0.05). At T0, both groups had no difference in BIS values (P > 0.05), but showed significantly decreased BIS values at T1-T4 compared with those at T0 (P < 0.05). At T2-T4, group A showed significantly lower BIS values compared with group A (P < 0.05). The two groups had no difference in postoperative awakening time compared with group A (8.12 ± 1.88 min vs. 8.05 ± 1.97 min, P > 0.05). Preoperatively, the two groups had no differences in Cor and Ang Ⅱ(P > 0.05). However, at 6 h postoperatively, both groups showed significantly elevated Cor and AngⅡ values compared to preoperatively (P < 0.05), and group B showed signifantly lower values of Cor and AngⅡ compared to group A (P < 0.05). The two groups had no difference in the adverse reactions (6.25% vs. 8.33%, P > 0.05). Conclusion Dexmedetomidine administered at the dose of 0.8 μg/(k·h) rather than at the dose of 0.5 μg/(k·h) for managing OPCABG results in more stable hemodynamics during surgery, yielding better sedative effect, milder postoperative stress response, and no increase in adverse reactions.
Jing XIE , Dong GUO , Shiqiang FENG , Yi ZHAO , Hong LI , Zhenhua. QU . Effect of different administration doses of dexmedetomidine on the circulatory system and stress response in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting with noncorporeal circulation[J]. The Journal of Practical Medicine, 2024 , 40(11) : 1574 -1579 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2024.11.018
| 1 | MARX N. Koronare Herzkrankheit[J].Dtsch Med Wochenschr,2021,146(16):1021. doi:10.1055/a-1220-8144 |
| 2 | KATTA N, LOETHEN T, LAVIE C J, et al. Obesity and Coronary Heart Disease: Epidemiology, Pathology, and Coronary Artery Imaging[J]. Curr Probl Cardiol, 2021,46(3):100655. doi:10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2020.100655 |
| 3 | ALPERT J S. New Coronary Heart Disease Risk Factors[J].Am J Med, 2023,136(4):331-332. doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2022.08.002 |
| 4 | OFOEGBU C, MANGANYI R M. Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting; is it Still Relevant?[J]. Curr Cardiol Rev, 2022,18(2):e438257783. doi:10.2174/1573403x17666211027141043 |
| 5 | MEGURO S, HAGA N, IMAI H, et al. Association Between Surgical Stress and Biochemical Recurrence After Robotic Radical Prostatectomy[J]. JSLS, 2021,25(1):e2020-e2078. doi:10.4293/jsls.2020.00078 |
| 6 | MEI B, LI J, ZUO Z. Dexmedetomidine attenuates sepsis-associated inflammation and encephalopathy via central α2A adrenoceptor[J]. Brain Behav Immun, 2021,91:296-314. doi:10.1016/j.bbi.2020.10.008 |
| 7 | TASBIHGOU S R, BARENDS C R M, ABSALOM A R. The role of dexmedetomidine in neurosurgery[J]. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol, 2021,35(2):221-229. doi:10.1016/j.bpa.2020.10.002 |
| 8 | POON W H, LING R R, YANG I X, et al. Dexmedetomidine for adult cardiac surgery: a systematic review, meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis[J]. Anaesthesia, 2023,78(3):371-380. doi:10.1111/anae.15947 |
| 9 | 张芮,王志涛,刘德君,等. 不同剂量右美托咪定对瑞马唑仑致患者意识消失ED95及应激反应的影响[J]. 实用医学杂志,2023,39(4):476-480. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2023.04.016 |
| 10 | 葛均波,徐永健. 内科学[M]. 8版. 北京:人民卫生出版社,2013:273. |
| 11 | BONACCHI M, HOWE R, MICALI L R, et al. Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Reduces Cardiac Death in Patients with Peripheral Arteriopathy[J]. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2021,69(7):614-620. doi:10.1055/s-0041-1724036 |
| 12 | FAN G, WANG X, CHEN C, et al. Surgeons′ Preference for Off-Pump or On-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Surgery[J]. Heart Surg Forum, 2021,24(3):E422-E426. doi:10.1532/hsf.3747 |
| 13 | BIANCO V, KILIC A, GELZINIS T, et al. Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: Closing the Communication Gap Across the Ether Screen[J]. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth, 2020,34(1):258-266. doi:10.1053/j.jvca.2019.05.005 |
| 14 | JADHAV J A, MANKHAIR S, CHAKOLE V. Comparative Evaluation of Dexmedetomidine and Magnesium Sulfate for Prevention of Postoperative Atrial Fibrillation in Patients of Coronary Artery Bypass Surgeries[J]. Cureus, 2023,15(6):e41075. |
| 15 | TASBIHGOU S R, BARENDS C R M, ABSALOM A R. The role of dexmedetomidine in neurosurgery[J]. Best Prac Res Clin Anaesthesiol, 2021,35(2):221-229. doi:10.1016/j.bpa.2020.10.002 |
| 16 | 杨逸成,陈贝儿,叶凯雁,等. 右美托咪定的心脏保护机制及其临床应用价值[J]. 中国医学科学院学报, 2022,44(1):130-135. |
| 17 | 秦卫民,郑龙彬,尹宁,等. 预注不同负荷剂量右美托咪定在腹腔镜胆囊切除术中的应用[J]. 临床麻醉学杂志, 2022,38(2):134-138. |
| 18 | LIAQUAT Z, XU X, ZILUNDU P L M, et al. The Current Role of Dexmedetomidine as Neuroprotective Agent: An Updated Review[J]. Brain Sci, 2021,11(7):846. doi:10.3390/brainsci11070846 |
| 19 | VUKICEVIC P, KLISIC A, NESKOVIC V, et al. Oxidative Stress in Patients before and after On-Pump and Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: Relationship with Syntax Score[J]. Oxid Med Cell Longev, 2021,2021:1-9. doi:10.1155/2021/3315951 |
| 20 | 周红刚,解成兰,薛雷,等. 不同剂量右美托咪定术后滴鼻对小儿扁桃体腺样体切除术患者血流动力学及咽痛的影响[J]. 解放军医学院学报, 2020,41(10):988-991,996. doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-5227.2020.10.008 |
| 21 | OKAMOTO A, KAMATA K, MIYATA T, et al. Bispectral index-guided propofol sedation during endoscopic ultrasonography[J]. Clin Endosc, 2022,55(4):558-563. doi:10.5946/ce.2022.001 |
| 22 | CHIMA A M, MAHMOUD M A, NARAYANASAMY S. What Is the Role of Dexmedetomidine in Modern Anesthesia and Critical Care?[J]. Adv Anesth, 2022,40(1):111-130. doi:10.1016/j.aan.2022.06.003 |
| 23 | XIAO S, WANG Q, GAO H, et al. Dexmedetomidine alleviates airway hyperresponsiveness and allergic airway inflammation through the TLR4/NF?κB signaling pathway in mice[J]. Mol Med Rep, 2022,25(3):74. doi:10.3892/mmr.2022.12590 |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |