The Journal of Practical Medicine >
The effect of invisible appliances on the changes in temporomandibular joint angles and gaps in the treatment of Class Ⅱ malocclusion
Received date: 2023-08-29
Online published: 2024-04-19
Objective To explore the effect of using invisible appliances to correct Class Ⅱ malocclusion on the temporomandibular joint. Methods Seventy patients with Class II malocclusion were selected and divided into an observation group (n = 35) and a control group (n = 35) using the envelope method. The observation group received invisible orthodontic treatment, while the control group received self-locking bracket orthodontic treatment. The changes in temporomandibular joint angles and gaps and so on between the two groups were observed. Results The changes before and after correction of the lower internal angle at the intersection of the long axis of the upper central incisor and the anterior skull base plane (U1-SN), angle between the long axis of the upper central incisor and the line connecting the nasal root point and the upper alveolar seating point (U1-NA) in the observation group were (11.05 ± 1.01) ° and (4.75 ± 0.76) °, respectively, which were significantly higher than those in the control group (P < 0.05). The changes in maxillary central incisors, maxillary lateral incisors, mandibular central incisors, and mandibular lateral incisors before and after treatment in the observation group were (0.51 ± 0.21) mm, (0.40 ± 0.15) mm, (0.40 ± 0.13) mm, and (0.20 ± 0.05) mm, respectively, which were significantly lower than those in the control group (P < 0.05). The changes in Plaque Index (PLI), Gingival Index (GI), and Exploration Depth (PD) before and after correction in the observation group were (0.44 ± 0.19) points, (0.41 ± 0.13) points, and (0.38 ± 0.10) mm, respectively, which were significantly lower than those in the control group (P < 0.05). Conclusion Invisible appliances have good application value in correcting Class Ⅱ malocclusion, which is beneficial for improving the temporomandibular joint of patients.
Lulu HU , Weizi WU , Zi YANG , Jianguang. XU . The effect of invisible appliances on the changes in temporomandibular joint angles and gaps in the treatment of Class Ⅱ malocclusion[J]. The Journal of Practical Medicine, 2024 , 40(8) : 1121 -1125 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2024.08.017
| 1 | CAMPBELL C, MILLETT D, KELLY N, et al. Frankel 2 appliance versus the Modified Twin Block appliance for Phase 1 treatment of Class Ⅱ division 1 malocclusion in children and adolescents: A randomized clinical trial[J]. Angle Orthod,2020,90(2):202-208. doi:10.2319/042419-290.1 |
| 2 | JANSON G, NIEDERBERGER A L G, JANSON G, et al. Stability of Class Ⅱ malocclusion treatment with Class Ⅱ elastics[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop,2023,163(5):609-617. doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2021.10.017 |
| 3 | PARVATHY R M, SHETTY S, KATHEESA P. Evaluation of changes seen in TMJ after mandibular advancement in treatment of Class Ⅱ malocclusions, with functional appliances, a CBCT study[J]. Biomedicine, 2021, 41(2):236-242. doi:10.51248/.v41i2.789 |
| 4 | ZHU H, HE D, YANG Z,et al. The effect of condylar regeneration after different disc repositioning surgeries in adolescents with skeletal Class Ⅱ malocclusion[J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2021,79(9):1851-1861. doi:10.1016/j.joms.2021.03.011 |
| 5 | SALLOUM E, MILLETT D T, MCINTYRE G T. The twin-block appliance for correction of class Ⅱ division 1 malocclusion[J]. Dental Update, 2021, 48(7):579-583. doi:10.12968/denu.2021.48.7.579 |
| 6 | KHAN M I, NEELA P K, UNNISA N, et al. Dentoskeletal effects of Twin Block appliance in patients with Class Ⅱ malocclusion[J]. Med Pharm Rep, 2022,95(2):191-196. |
| 7 | ALBERTINI E, ALBERTINI P, COLONNA A, et al. Invisible treatment with lingual appliance for the correction of an adult class Ⅱ subdivision with asymmetrical Wilson and Spee curves: A case report[J]. Int Orthod,2023,22(1):100825. doi:10.1016/j.ortho.2023.100825 |
| 8 | LEONARDO B D, CONTARDO L, RIATTI R. Herbst Appliance palatally anchored in the treatment of dental class Ⅱ malocclusion[J]. South Eur J Orthod Dent Res, 2021, 7(2):21-24. doi:10.5937/sejodr7-28694 |
| 9 | BASTIANI C, BELLINI-PEREIRA S A, ALIAGA-DEL CASTILLO A, et al. Twin-block and mandibular anterior repositioning appliances effects in Class II malocclusion correction[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2023,163(2):181-190. doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2021.09.021 |
| 10 | MATTHAIOS S, TSOLAKIS A I, HAIDICH A B, et al. Dental and Skeletal Effects of Herbst Appliance, Forsus Fatigue Resistance Device, and Class Ⅱ Elastics-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis[J]. J Clin Med,2022,11(23):6995. doi:10.3390/jcm11236995 |
| 11 | ALOUINI O, KN?SEL M, BLANCK-LUBARSCH M, et al. Controlling incisor torque with completely customized lingual appliances[J]. J Orofac Orthop,2020,81(5):328-339. doi:10.1007/s00056-020-00231-9 |
| 12 | 赵高峰.口腔正畸学[M]. 北京:高等教育出版社,2005. |
| 13 | BATRA A, SHETTY V. Effect of Twin-block Appliance on Pharyngeal Airway, Sleep Patterns, and Lung Volume in Children with Class Ⅱ Malocclusion[J]. J Contemp Dent Pract,2022,23(1):66-73. doi:10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3289 |
| 14 | PATTERSON B D, FOLEY P F, UENO H, et al. Class II malocclusion correction with Invisalign: Is it possible[J]? Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2021,159(1):e41-e48. doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2020.08.016 |
| 15 | GEORGE A M, FELICITA A S, MILLING TANIA S D, et al. Systematic review on the genetic factors associated with skeletal Class Ⅱ malocclusion[J]. Indian J Dent Res,2021,32(3):399-406. doi:10.4103/ijdr.ijdr_59_20 |
| 16 | KONG L, LIU X Q. Efficacy of invisible advancement correction for mandibular retraction in adolescents based on Pancherz analysis[J]. World J Clin Cases, 2023,11(6):1299-1309. doi:10.12998/wjcc.v11.i6.1299 |
| 17 | ALBERTINI E, ALBERTINI P, COLONNA A, et al. Non-surgical adult class Ⅱ high-angle treatment with an invisible appliance: A case report[J]. Int Orthod, 2022,20(1):e100605. doi:10.1016/j.ortho.2021.100605 |
| 18 | DE STEFANI A, BRUNO G, FREZZA A, et al. Association between teeth agenesis and Angle's classes in an Italian population[J]. Minerva Dent Oral Sci,2021,70(1):21-25. doi:10.23736/s2724-6329.20.04320-4 |
| 19 | 刘俊峰,赵转浓,张文忠,等. 安氏Ⅰ类骨面型Ⅰ类错牙合正畸后下颌磨牙轴倾度的变化 [J]. 实用医学杂志, 2023, 39(8): 969-974. |
| 20 | MUSA M, ZHANG Q, AWAD R, et al. Quantitative and qualitative condylar changes following stabilization splint therapy in patients with temporomandibular joint disorders[J]. Clin Oral Investig,2023,27(5):2299-2310. doi:10.1007/s00784-023-04963-x |
| 21 | ASTASOV-FRAUENHOFFER M, G?LDI L, ROHR N, et al. Antimicrobial and mechanical assessment of cellulose-based thermoformable material for invisible dental braces with natural essential oils protecting from biofilm formation[J]. Sci Rep,2023,13(1):13428. doi:10.1038/s41598-023-39320-1 |
| 22 | SUN Z, PAN Y, LIN T, et al. Comparison of cephalometric measurements of the Twin Block and A6 appliances in the treatment of Class Ⅱ malocclusion: a retrospective comparative cohort study[J]. Ann Transl Med,2022,10(16):876. doi:10.21037/atm-22-3762 |
| 23 | 朱永翠,朱凤节,翟蕾,等. 无托槽隐形矫治器及自锁托槽矫治器对牙周炎患者牙周及龈下菌群的影响[J]. 上海口腔医学,2022,31(2):184-188. |
| 24 | MYLLYM?KI E, HEIKINHEIMO K, SUOMINEN A, et al. Longitudinal trends in temporomandibular joint disorder symptoms, the impact of malocclusion and orthodontic treatment: A 20‐year prospective study[J]. J Oral Rehabil, 2023, 50(9):739-745. doi:10.1111/joor.13471 |
| 25 | PETER E. One Phase Treatment of Adolescent Class II Malocclusion Using Twin-Block Appliance and Preadjusted Edgewise Appliance-A Case Report[J]. J Indian Orthod Soc, 2022, 56(8):71-81. doi:10.1177/03015742221075238 |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |