The Journal of Practical Medicine >

2024 , Vol. 40 >Issue 6: 807 - 813

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2024.06.013

Clinical Research

Comparative study of percutaneous endoscopic treatment of L5/S1 disc herniation by two approaches

  • Zhiwei SHI ,
  • Jianming WU ,
  • Yahui NIU ,
  • Chen GONG
Expand
  • Department of Spine Surgery，the Affiliated Bozhou Hospital of Anhui Medical University，Bozhou 236800，China

Received date: 2023-08-29

  Online published: 2024-04-08

Fold

Abstract

Objective To compare the efficacy of percutaneous transforaminal approach and translaminar approach in the treatment of L5/S1 disc herniation （LDH） under endoscopic discectomy. Methods Adopted a retrospective case-control study， and selected 62 cases of patients with L5/S1 LDH who were treated with percutaneous endoscopic surgery in the spine surgery department of our hospital from June 2020 to December 2022， and the transforaminal approach was used. （TELD） in 32 cases （TELD group）， and interlaminar approach （IELD） in 30 cases （IELD group）. The observation indicators included intraoperative fluoroscopy times， operation time， hospitalization days， hospitalization expenses， leg pain VAS score， ODI score， modified MacNab curative effect evaluation and complications. Results All 62 patients successfully completed the operation and follow-up， and no serious complications occurred. There were statistically significant differences in operation time， fluoroscopy times， and hospitalization expenses between the two groups （P < 0.001）， but there was no significant difference in hospitalization days between the two groups （P > 0.05）. The lower extremity VAS scores at the last follow-up and the last follow-up were significantly improved compared with those before operation （P < 0.001）， and the ODI scores of the two groups were significantly improved at 2 days， 1 month and at the last follow-up （P < 0.001）. At the same time point， there was no statistical difference （P > 0.05）； there was no significant difference in the excellent and good rate of surgery between the two groups （P > 0.05）. 11 patients with high iliac crest in the TELD group successfully completed the surgery. Conclusions Both the endoscopic surgery through the intervertebral foramen and the interlaminar approach can achieve satisfactory results in the treatment of L5/S1 LDH. However， local anesthesia through the intervertebral foramen approach reduces hospitalization costs， and patients with high iliac crest can successfully complete the surgery by selecting a suitable puncture path. The translaminar approach has fewer fluoroscopy times and shorter surgical time， but there is a higher risk of dura mater and nerve damage， which requires careful operation for beginners.

Key words： endoscopy; intervertebral foramen approach; intervertebral approach; lumbar disc herniation

Cite this article

Zhiwei SHI , Jianming WU , Yahui NIU , Chen GONG . Comparative study of percutaneous endoscopic treatment of L5/S1 disc herniation by two approaches[J]. The Journal of Practical Medicine, 2024 , 40(6) : 807 -813 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2024.06.013

References

1 CHENG Y， ZHANG Q， LI Y，et al. Percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar discectomy for L5-S1 calcified lumbar disc herniation： A retrospective study［J］. Front Surg， 2022，9：998231. doi:10.3389/fsurg.2022.998231
2 辛大森，程才，孙洪江，等. 脊柱内镜可视环锯技术治疗高龄退变性腰椎侧凸椎间孔狭窄的近期疗效［J］. 实用骨科杂志，2023，29（2）：97-101.
3 SHEN S C， CHEN H C， TSOU H K，et al. Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for L5-S1 disc herniation based on image analysis and clinical findings： A retrospective review of 345 cases［J］. Medicine （Baltimore）， 2023，102（5）：e32832. doi:10.1097/md.0000000000032832
4 王威威，连鸿凯. 经皮椎间孔镜技术对巨大型腰椎间盘突出症患者功能恢复、创伤程度的前瞻性研究［J］. 实用医学杂志，2021，37（5）： 648-653. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2021.05.018
5 LI W S， YAN Q， CONG L. Comparison of Endoscopic Discectomy Versus Non-Endoscopic Discectomy for Symptomatic Lumbar Disc Herniation： A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis［J］.Global Spine J， 2022，12（5）： 1012-1026. doi:10.1177/21925682211020696
6 FUKUHARA D，OUO K， KENJI T， et al. A Narrative Review of Full-Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy Using Interlaminar Approach［J］. World Neurosurg， 2022，168：324-332. doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2022.08.080
7 JU C I， LEE S M. Complications and Management of Endoscopic Spinal Surgery［J］. Neurospine， 2023，20（1）：56-77. doi:10.14245/ns.2346226.113
8 李军杰，唐兰兰，杨镇源，等. 天玑机器人改良导航系统在脊柱内镜髓核摘除术中的应用［J］. 实用医学杂志， 2023，39（12）： 1564-1570. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2023.12.018
9 JITPAKDEE K， LIU Y， HEO D H，et，al. Minimally invasive endoscopy in spine surgery： where are we now？［J］. Eur Spine J，2023，32（8）： 2755-2768. doi:10.1007/s00586-023-07622-7
10 GAO A， YANG H， ZHU L，et al. Comparison of Interlaminar and Transforaminal Approaches for Treatment of L5/S1 Disc Herniation by Percutaneous Endoscopic Discectomy［J］. Orthop Surg，2021， 13（1）：63-70. doi:10.1111/os.12831
11 YANG J S， LIU K X， KADIMCHERLA P，et al. Can the novel lumboIliac triangle technique based on biplane oblique fluoroscopy facilitate transforaminal percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for patients with L5-S1 disc herniation combined with high Iliac crest？ Case-Control Study of 100 Patients［J］. Pain Physician， 2020，23（3）： 305-313.
12 崔冠宇，舒雄，刘亚军，等. 经皮椎间孔镜下椎间盘切除治疗伴有高髂嵴的L5/S1椎间盘突出症［J］. 中国组织工程研究，2021，25（27）：4333-4338. doi:10.12307/2021.192
13 魏景超，李文毅，高尚聚，等. TF-PELD与IL-PELD治疗高髂嵴L5-S1椎间盘突出症的Meta分析［J］. 颈腰痛杂志， 2021，42（1）：1-7. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-7234.2021.01.001
14 JITPAKDEE K， LIU Y， KOTHEERANURAK V，et al. Transforaminal Versus Interlaminar Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy for Lumbar Disc Herniation： A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis［J］. Global Spine J， 2023，13（2）： 575-587. doi:10.1177/21925682221120530
15 LI X， PAN B， CHENG L， et al. Development and Validation of a Prognostic Model for the Risk of Recurrent Lumbar Disc Herniation After Percutaneous Endoscopic Transforaminal Discectomy［J］. Pain Physician， 2023，26（1）： 81-90.
16 LEWANDROWSKI K U， HELLINGER S， DE CARVALHO PST， et al. Dural tears during lumbar spinal endoscopy： Surgeon skill， training， incidence， risk factors，and management［J］. Int J Spine Surg， 2021，15（2）： 280-294. doi:10.14444/8038
17 CHEN J， JING X， LI C， et al. Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy for L5S1 Lumbar Disc Herniation Using a Transforaminal Approach Versus an Interlaminar Approach： A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis［J］. World Neurosurg， 2018，116：412-420.e2. doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2018.05.075
18 宋坤锋，马海军，周红刚，等. 全内镜下椎板开窗减压（Endo-LOVE）治疗青壮年钙化型L5/S1椎间盘突出症［J］.中国微创外科志， 2022， 22（1）： 14-18.
19 ZHAO Q， XIAO L， WU Z，et al. Comparison of the efficacy of fully endoscopic spine surgery using transforaminal and interlaminar approaches in the treatment of prolapsed lumbar 4/5 disc herniation［J］. J Orthop Surg Res， 2022，17（1）：391. doi:10.1186/s13018-022-03282-3
20 CHENG Y P， CHENG X K， WU H. A comparative study of percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar discectomy and transforaminal discectomy for L5-S1 calcified lumbar disc herniation［J］. BMC Musculoskelet Disord， 2022，23（1）：244. doi:10.1186/s12891-022-05186-z
21 HUANG H， HU H， LIN X，et al. Percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar discectomy via inner border of inferior pedicle approach for downmigrated disc herniation： a retrospective study［J］. J Orthop Surg Res，2022，17（1）：359. doi:10.1186/s13018-022-03245-8
22 CHEN Z， WANG X， CUI X，et al. Transforaminal Versus Interlaminar Approach of Full-Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy Under Local Anesthesia for L5/S1 Disc Herniation： A Randomized Controlled Trial［J］. Pain Physician， 2022，25（8）：E1191-E1198.
23 WANG D， XIE W， CAO W， et al. A Cost-utility Analysis of Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy for L5-S1 Lumbar Disc Herniation： Transforaminal versus Interlaminar［J］. Spine （Phila Pa 1976）， 2019，44（8）：563-570. doi:10.1097/brs.0000000000002901
24 HUANG S， WANG Z， XU L， et al. Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy via the medial foraminal and interlaminar approaches： A comparative study with 2-year follow-up［J］. Front Surg， 2022，9： 990751. doi:10.3389/fsurg.2022.990751
Options
Outlines

/

〈 〉