The Journal of Practical Medicine >
Effect of laparoscopic salpingectomy on ovarian reserve function and serum neuropeptide Y and cortisol in patients with ectopic pregnancy
Received date: 2023-08-29
Online published: 2024-04-08
Objective To explore the effect of laparoscopic salpingectomy on ovarian reserve function and serum neuropeptide Y (NPY) and cortisol (Cor) in patients with ectopic pregnancy. Methods 82 patients with ectopic pregnancy who had visited Chaohu Hospital Affiliated to Anhui Medical University from June 2018 to June 2021 were randomly divided into two groups, with 41 in each group. The control group underwent laparoscopic salpingostomy and suturing for embryo retrieval, while the study group underwent laparoscopic salpingectomy. Surgical duration, intraoperative blood loss, time to postsurgical mobilization, length of hospital stay, serum NPY and Cor levels, antral follicle count (AFC), indexes for peak flow velocity and resistance of ovarian artery were compared between the two groups. Follow-up was conducted for two years after surgery, and the success rate of pregnancy and the ectopic pregnancy rate were recorded. Results The surgical duration in the study group was shorter than that in the control group (P < 0.05). The differences in serum NPY and Cor values between the two groups immediately after surgery and at postoperative week one were not statistically significant (P > 0.05). At postoperative months1 and 6, the peak flow velocity of the affected ovary was lower in the study group than in the control group, whereas the resistance index was higher (P < 0.05). At postoperative month 6, both groups showed an increase in peak flow velocity and a decrease in resistance index (P < 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in AFC and the success rate of pregnancy between the two groups postoperatively (P > 0.05). The ectopic pregnancy rate in the study group was lower than that in the control group (P < 0.05). Conclusion As compared with laparoscopic salpingostomy, laparoscopic salpingectomy for ectopic pregnancy can also preserve postoperative ovarian antral follicle count (AFC), and it has greater advantage in reducing the risk of recurrent ectopic pregnancy after surgery.
Rong SHI , Xianfang ZHENG , Qun TAO , Junmo CHEN , Xiaohua GE . Effect of laparoscopic salpingectomy on ovarian reserve function and serum neuropeptide Y and cortisol in patients with ectopic pregnancy[J]. The Journal of Practical Medicine, 2024 , 40(6) : 801 -806 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2024.06.012
| 1 | HENDRIKS E, ROSENBERG R, PRINE L. Ectopic pregnancy: diagnosis and management[J]. Am Fam Physician,2020,101(10):599-606. |
| 2 | OZCAN M, WILSON J R, FRISHMAN G N. A Systematic review and meta-analysis of surgical treatment of ectopic pregnancy with salpingectomy versus salpingostomy[J]. J Minim Invasive Gynecol,2021,28(3):656-667. doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2020.10.014 |
| 3 | PIECHA D, PLUTA D, PAS P, et al. Interstitial ectopic pregnancy following ipsilateral salpingectomy[J]. Ginekol Pol,2020,91(8):478-479. doi:10.5603/gp.2020.0083 |
| 4 | MASTEN M, ALSTON M. Spontaneous bilateral ectopic pregnancy treated with combination of methotrexate, unilateral salpingectomy, and unilateral expulsion of pregnancy[J]. Cureus,2022,14(9):e29031. |
| 5 | LEVIN G, OHAYON A, WEISSBACH T, et al. Ectopic first pregnancy treated by methotrexate versus salpingectomy-maternal and perinatal outcomes in a subsequent pregnancy: a retrospective study[J]. Int J Gynaecol Obstet,2023,160(3):823-828. doi:10.1002/ijgo.14365 |
| 6 | BAGGIO S, GARZON S, RUSSO A, et al. Fertility and reproductive outcome after tubal ectopic pregnancy: comparison among methotrexate, surgery and expectant management[J]. Arch Gynecol Obstet,2021,303(1):259-268. doi:10.1007/s00404-020-05749-2 |
| 7 | 张璇,杜海霞,黄虹,等. 腹腔镜下输卵管妊娠物清除联合近端阻断术对卵巢储备及生育功能影响[J]. 中国计划生育学杂志,2020,28(5):652-655. |
| 8 | 张玲玲. 腹腔镜输卵管妊娠切开取胚术和输卵管切除术对再次妊娠的影响[J]. 中国计划生育学杂志,2019,27(6):735-737. |
| 9 | GAO M Y, ZHU H, ZHENG F Y. Interstitial pregnancy after ipsilateral salpingectomy: analysis of 46 cases and a literature review[J]. J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 2020,27(3):613-617. doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2019.04.029 |
| 10 | 王媛媛,刘文娟,黄莉,等. 输卵管因素不孕患者在体外受精-胚胎移植前行腹腔镜手术的获益程度[J]. 实用医学杂志,2023,39(4):442-446. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2023.04.009 |
| 11 | KNIGHT C A, BRIDWELL R E, LONG B, et al. Cornual pregnancy after ipsilateral salpingectomy[J]. Cureus,2021,13(8):e17244. |
| 12 | WANG T, LI Q. Extratubal secondary trophoblastic implants (ESTI) following laparoscopic bilateral salpingectomy for ectopic pregnancy: problems that have been neglected for a long time[J]. Gynecol Endocrinol,2022,38(7):608-611. doi:10.1080/09513590.2022.2078962 |
| 13 | ANH N D, HAI N X, HA N T, et al. Retroperitoneal ectopic pregnancy after in vitro fertilization: a case report of a patient with bilateral salpingectomy[J]. Radiol Case Rep, 2022,17(3):721-724. doi:10.1016/j.radcr.2021.12.011 |
| 14 | LIN C, HSIEH H. Early ectopic pregnancy refractory to methotrexate treatment: a case report[J]. Cureus,2021,13(11):e19686. |
| 15 | RESTAINO S, VIDIRI A, ANCHORA P L, et al. Recurrent ectopic pregnancy on tubal remnant treated by laparoscopic resection: loop and stitch[J]. Facts Views Vis Obgyn, 2021,13(2):183-186. doi:10.52054/fvvo.13.2.020 |
| 16 | ONWUGBENU N M. Ectopic pregnancy after hysterectomy: a case report of ectopic pregnancy 7 years after postpartum hysterectomy[J]. R I Med J (2013), 2020,103(8):50-52. |
| 17 | MCGRATTAN M, CHAN W V, MURJI A. A purse-string approach to laparoscopic cornuotomy for interstitial ectopic pregnancy[J]. J Obstet Gynaecol Can, 2022,44(1):75-76. doi:10.1016/j.jogc.2021.08.008 |
| 18 | NEZHAT C, YOUSSEF Y, TOLEDO A A. Hysteroscopy-assisted laparoscopic salpingectomy for interstitial pregnancy without cornual resection[J]. Fertil Steril, 2021,116(3):909-911. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.05.082 |
| 19 | BALAFOUTAS D, DIESSNER J, KIESEL M, et al. Laparoscopic management of a heterotopic pregnancy in the tubal stump[J]. J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 2021,28(4):752-753. doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2020.07.008 |
| 20 | SHEN Y T, YANG Y Y, ZHANG P G, et al. Tubal ectopic pregnancy: a retrospective cohort study on clinical characteristics, treatment options and reproductive outcomes within 5 years[J]. Arch Gynecol Obstet, 2022,306(6):2055-2062. doi:10.1007/s00404-022-06690-2 |
| 21 | WANG S, WANG D. Management of interstitial pregnancy using laparoscopic salpingectomy with complete removal of the interstitial portion[J]. Fertil Steril, 2023,119(5):889-891. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.02.041 |
| 22 | LAMBLIN G, CHENE G, MANSOOR A, et al. Ectopic pregnancy management by V-NOTES technique[J]. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod, 2021,50(5):102073. doi:10.1016/j.jogoh.2021.102073 |
| 23 | SHEHAB Q J, DOLLOWAY L, DAMRA A M, et al. Negative histology in surgically managed tubal ectopic pregnancy[J]. Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 2022,157(3):719-722. doi:10.1002/ijgo.13913 |
| 24 | PEREIRA N, WILLSON S, MCCARTER K, et al. Combined transvaginal and transabdominal oocyte retrieval in a patient with an ectopic ovary and unicornuate uterus[J]. Fertil Steril, 2021,115(5):1347-1349. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.12.006 |
| 25 | RODGERS R, CARTER J, REID G, et al. The effect of laparoscopic salpingectomy for ectopic pregnancy on ovarian reserve[J]. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol, 2020,60(2):278-283. doi:10.1111/ajo.13129 |
| 26 | KARAVANI G, GUTMAN-IDO E, HERZBERG S, et al. Recurrent tubal ectopic pregnancy management and the risk of a third ectopic pregnancy[J]. J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 2021,28(8):1497-1502. doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2020.12.005 |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |